You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 5, 2019

Update on Thailand’s “Delisting” of Marijuana and Hemp from the Scope of Category 5 Narcotics

On Friday August 30, 2019, a Notification of the Thai Ministry of Public Health (“MOPH Notification”) was published in the Government Gazette. The MOPH Notification went into effect on August 31, 2019, one day after its publication.

This MOPH Notification outlines another Thai Government initiative in connection with the free cannabis policy, this time carving out further aspects of marijuana and hemp use from the stringent regulations under the Narcotics Act.

Marijuana is described in the MOPH Notification as plants of the cannabis genus, including all parts of a marijuana plant and the substances or chemicals found in a marijuana plant. Hemp is defined as plants falling within Cannabis sativa L. Subsp. sativa, including all parts of a hemp plant.

In fact, marijuana and hemp are not entirely “delisted” from the classification of Category 5 Narcotics as identified in the Narcotics Act. While these plants are still listed as Narcotics, the MOPH Notification serves to prescribe “exceptions”, meaning aspects and particulars of marijuana and hemp related products that are not considered Narcotics.

The new exceptions are summarized below.

For both marijuana and hemp

(1) Marijuana or hemp stalks, stem cores, and fibers are excepted, if dried. The products made of such dry parts are excepted, as well.

(2) Cannabidiol (CBD) extracted from marijuana or hemp is excepted if having at least 99% purity and no more than 0.01 percent by weight of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).

(3) Extracts of marijuana or hemp having CBD as the main constituent and no more than 0.2% by weight of THC, which are considered “drugs” as per the Drug Act, or Herbal Products as identified in the Herbal Products Act.

For hemp only

(4) Hemp seeds or hemp seed oil, which are considered Food as identified in the Food Act.

(5) Hemp seed oil or hemp seed extracts, which are considered Cosmetics as identified in the Cosmetics Act.

In other words, hemp products according to the above descriptions may now be classified as Medicinal Drugs, Herbal Products, Food, or Cosmetics under their respective regulations. Marijuana may now be classified as Medicinal Drugs or Herbal Products only.

It should be noted that during the first five years under the MOPH Notification of August 30, 2019, the exceptions per (3) – (5) above apply only to domestic production by a licensee under the respective laws. This means the importation of products that would otherwise fall within those exceptions would still be regulated by the Narcotics Act—highlighting the Thai Government’s agenda in protecting Thai business operators.

According to the Thai Ministry of Public Health’s public conference held on September 2, 2019, the exception per (2) above for high-purity extracts (99% or higher of CBD; 0.01% or lower of THC) are intended to cover laboratory-grade standard extracts. For the (3) – (5) exceptions, the Thai FDA will later issue further rules under the Drug Act, the Herbal Products Act, the Cosmetics Act, or the Food Act to specifically accommodate the use of marijuana and hemp extracts in the respective products.

Moreover, amendments to the previous Industrial Hemp Regulation of 2016 are in the pipeline. The purpose of these amendments are to include non-public entities as parties having standing to apply for industrial hemp licenses.

Abridged Translation of the MOPH Notification

Remarks: The present MOPH Notification (2019) does not affect Items Nos. 2–4 on this list, which were prescribed by the previous MOPH Notification of 2018. Said unaffected items are:

No. 2:    Kratom (Mitragyna speciose);

No. 3:    Opium poppies (Papaver somniferum L. and Papaver bracteatum Lindl.); and

No. 4:    Psilocybin mushrooms.

Details about the above Nos. 2–4 are omitted from this update.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 1, 2024
The Indonesian food and drug authority, also known as “BPOM,” issued a draft regulation on September 9, 2024, proposing standard labeling disclosing the sugar, salt, and fat content of packaged food products sold in the country. The draft Regulation on Nutritional Value Information on Food Labels to implement Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024 on the Implementation of the Health Law seeks to mandate “Nutri-Level” front-of-pack nutrition labeling to indicate the amount of sugar, salt, and fat at four possible levels, with a modified stoplight-color system: Level “A” (lowest amount) has a dark green background Level “B” has a light green background Level “C” has a yellow background Level “D” (highest amount) has a red background These levels are shown in the following sample image: The requirements for sugar, salt, and fat content for each level are based on amounts per 100 milliliters of ready-to-eat processed food as follows: Further requirements relating to nutrients reflected in the Nutri-Level labeling include: Foods labeled as level A are not allowed to contain natural or artificial sweetening food additives, either through direct addition or carried over from other ingredients. Foods labeled as level B may only contain natural sweetening food additives. Foods labeled as level C or D may use natural and artificial sweetening food additives. “Sugar” includes all monosaccharides and disaccharides, excluding lactose. Processed plain liquid milk and plain milk powder are exempt from the requirement to declare total fat content on the Nutri-Level label. Labeling Implementation The implementation of Nutri-Level labeling must comply with the following requirements: The Nutri-Level label must list all four letters (as shown in the examples below) unless the package meets the criteria for display of a simplified format label. The Nutri-Level of the processed food must be indicated by enlarging the relevant letter, as shown
September 6, 2024
Addressing technical barriers to trade is a key priority for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) as part of trade facilitation in achieving the single market and production base under the ASEAN Economic Community directive agreed in 2015. The region has been undertaking positive steps toward standard harmonization in ASEAN priority sectors, integrating and bringing about regulatory convergence by taking into account the diversities that exist in the ten ASEAN member states. Health supplements in ASEAN are under the responsibility of the Traditional Medicine and Health Supplement Product Working Group (TMHS PWG). One of the TMHS PWG’s outputs is the ASEAN Agreement on a Regulatory Framework for Health Supplements, which includes various technical requirements for health supplements that participating member states must adopt by adjusting their domestic regulations. The key ingredients of these health supplements are vitamins and minerals. While all ASEAN countries allow the use of vitamins and minerals in health supplements, the amounts allowed for use vary, depending on the nutritional requirements deemed appropriate by each country. Partly in response to these efforts for regional harmonization, there have been important changes to vitamin and mineral limits in certain ASEAN countries that are worth monitoring. Some of these are outlined below. Thailand In January 2024, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (TFDA) updated the Thai Recommended Daily Intake (Thai RDI) guidelines for the Thai population. Subsequently, the TFDA adjusted the vitamin and mineral limits in order to comply with the updated Thai RDI and to follow the ASEAN Agreement on a Regulatory Framework for Health Supplements. The TFDA’s adjustment of vitamin and mineral limits for use in food supplements came in Notification of the Ministry of Public Health (No. 448) B.E. 2566 (2023) Re: Food Supplements (No. 5), which was published in the Government Gazette on January
August 8, 2024
On July 19, 2024, Thailand’s Ministry of Public Health Notification No. 450 B.E.2567 (2024) came into effect after being published in the Government Gazette the day before. The notification introduces significant updates to the labeling requirements for prepackaged foods. This new regulation consolidates and updates Thailand’s rules for food labeling by repealing and replacing several previous notifications. The notification’s key changes and their implications for food businesses are identified below. 1. Clarified “Best Before” Definition The notification aligns the definition of “best before” with Codex standards. It now refers to the date marking the end of the period during which the food maintains its best quality under stated storage conditions. After this date, food quality may change, and the product cannot be marketed. 2. Updated Labeling Exceptions Certain foods are exempt from labeling requirements, with the latest list including: Foods sold directly to consumers by manufacturers who can provide product information. Unprocessed foods. Some fresh foods not sold directly to consumers. Prepackaged foods produced and sold for immediate consumption in food service settings. However, any of these exempt foods that have received food serial numbers must still have labels that comply with the notification. 3. Expiration Date and Best-Before Date Display The notification provides clearer language for displaying the expiration date and best-before date. If specific wording is required by other notifications, it must be followed. English equivalents are now permitted alongside Thai text. 4. Warning Displays Multiple applicable warnings can now be consolidated and displayed together, provided the complete message is included as specified. 5. Claims about Substances or Ingredients New guidelines have been established for making claims about food additives and ingredients. Claims should be factual, not deceptive, and provably not false. 6. Label Placement and Design Labels must be permanently affixed, proportionate to the packaging, and
August 8, 2024
Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed the Thailand chapter to the 2024 edition of Pharmaceutical Advertising from the International Comparative Legal Guides (ICLG) series published by Global Legal Group. This detailed guide offers an in-depth examination of pharmaceutical advertising laws and regulations in multiple jurisdictions around the globe. Each chapter of the guide, structured in a Q&A format, is organized into comprehensive sections covering various aspects of pharmaceutical advertising, including: General rules and codes of practice governing pharmaceutical advertising Required arrangements for ensuring compliance with advertising regulations Procedures for obtaining advertising approvals from regulatory authorities Penalties for non-compliance with advertising rules Guidelines for providing information prior to product authorization Requirements for advertisements directed at healthcare professionals Restrictions on the content of pharmaceutical advertisements The complete Thailand chapter is available as a PDF below. The Thailand chapter—and the full Pharmaceutical Advertising guide—are also freely available on the ICLG website.