You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 6, 2024

ASEAN: Big Changes on Vitamin and Mineral Limits for Health Supplements

Addressing technical barriers to trade is a key priority for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) as part of trade facilitation in achieving the single market and production base under the ASEAN Economic Community directive agreed in 2015. The region has been undertaking positive steps toward standard harmonization in ASEAN priority sectors, integrating and bringing about regulatory convergence by taking into account the diversities that exist in the ten ASEAN member states.

Health supplements in ASEAN are under the responsibility of the Traditional Medicine and Health Supplement Product Working Group (TMHS PWG). One of the TMHS PWG’s outputs is the ASEAN Agreement on a Regulatory Framework for Health Supplements, which includes various technical requirements for health supplements that participating member states must adopt by adjusting their domestic regulations.

The key ingredients of these health supplements are vitamins and minerals. While all ASEAN countries allow the use of vitamins and minerals in health supplements, the amounts allowed for use vary, depending on the nutritional requirements deemed appropriate by each country.

Partly in response to these efforts for regional harmonization, there have been important changes to vitamin and mineral limits in certain ASEAN countries that are worth monitoring. Some of these are outlined below.

Thailand

In January 2024, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (TFDA) updated the Thai Recommended Daily Intake (Thai RDI) guidelines for the Thai population. Subsequently, the TFDA adjusted the vitamin and mineral limits in order to comply with the updated Thai RDI and to follow the ASEAN Agreement on a Regulatory Framework for Health Supplements.

The TFDA’s adjustment of vitamin and mineral limits for use in food supplements came in Notification of the Ministry of Public Health (No. 448) B.E. 2566 (2023) Re: Food Supplements (No. 5), which was published in the Government Gazette on January 4, 2024. It increased the maximum limits for certain vitamins and minerals (see breakdown below) up to the limits that had previously only been allowed in drugs. The minimum limits of vitamins and minerals for use in food supplements should be more than 15% of Thai RDIs, as set out in the Notification of the Ministry of Public Health (No. 445) B.E. 2566 (2023) Re: Nutrition Labels. This notification took effect on July 2, 2024.

Before that date, if a party wished to use more than 60 mg of Vitamin C or more than 2 mcg of Vitamin B12 in a health supplement, they would have needed to register the product as a medicine (not a health supplement) in Thailand. Now, health supplements are allowed to use 1,000 mg of vitamin C and 600 mcg of vitamin B12—a level that previously would have required registration as a medicine.

Health supplements are classified as a type of food in Thailand—this differs from some other countries, which may include health supplements in the medicine group. The registration process for health supplements is straightforward and takes a short time (about one to two months) to receive approval. On the other hand, drug registration is more complex and time-consuming. Health supplement companies widely agree that the time needed to receive license approval is one of the main obstacles for a business getting their products to market.

This change allows products that in the past had to be registered as medicines to now be accepted as health supplements in Thailand. This regulatory change will help promote the health supplement business in Thailand and ASEAN.

Indonesia

In Indonesia, the maximum limits for vitamins and minerals for use in health supplements were first updated by the Indonesian FDA (known as BPOM) with the issuance of BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2020 concerning the Criteria and Procedure for Health Supplement Registration, which has since been revoked by BPOM Regulation No. 32 of 2022. There is currently a draft amendment to BPOM Regulation No. 32 of 2022 that has not yet been finalized. However, the draft amendment does not propose any changes to the current maximum limits for vitamins and minerals.

This shows how BPOM has been actively updating the regulatory framework on health supplements due to the large presence of health supplement products in Indonesia. Businesses in this sector therefore need to be sure of the latest requirements before registering their health supplement products in Indonesia.

Vietnam

In contrast to the changes seen in recent years in Indonesia and Thailand, Vietnam has not amended or drafted any amendments to domestic regulations related to the maximum levels of vitamins and minerals in health foods since 2014. The current maximum limits for vitamins and minerals in Vietnam are not matched to those in neighboring countries or to those in the ASEAN Agreement on a Regulatory Framework for Health Supplements. Nevertheless, Vietnam may consider revising the maximum limits at some point to comply with the ASEAN standards.

In Vietnam, health supplements are classified as food rather than medicine. Under Vietnam’s current regulations, the vitamin and mineral content in health supplements (calculated according to the manufacturer’s recommended daily dose) must not exceed the maximum intake threshold for vitamins and minerals prescribed in Circular 43/2014/TT-BYT.

If the maximum intake threshold is not specified, the related Codex regulations or those of relevant international organizations apply.

Breakdown

The following table summarizes the current maximum daily limits for vitamins and minerals in health supplements for adults in Thailand, Indonesia, and Vietnam. It also shows how the limits have changed compared to the previous regulations in each country.

Where the limits are marked as not available, manufacturers may either follow the limitations under the ASEAN Agreement on a Regulatory Framework for Health Supplements or assume vitamins and mineral limits in health supplements based on generally accepted scientific data and taking into consideration, as appropriate, the varying degrees of sensitivity of different consumer groups.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 24, 2026
As food innovation continues to accelerate, manufacturers are increasingly introducing ingredients derived from new sources, produced using novel technologies, or lacking a significant history of human consumption. While these innovations create new opportunities for the food industry, they also raise important questions regarding consumer safety. For this reason, many jurisdictions, including Thailand, the European Union, Australia and New Zealand, Canada, and Singapore, require a premarket safety assessment for novel food ingredients before they can be placed on the market. The objective of this assessment is to ensure that each ingredient is safe for its intended use and level of consumption, does not present toxicological, allergenic, microbiological, or nutritional concerns, and will not mislead consumers. Scientific authorities typically evaluate the ingredient’s identity, manufacturing process, composition, specifications, anticipated dietary exposure, toxicological information, nutritional impact, and history of use before determining whether it can be marketed. Against this background, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently took an important step toward improving regulatory transparency by publishing, for the first time, a consolidated public list of substances that have successfully completed the Thai FDA’s safety assessment process, including substances determined to be novel foods and those determined not to fall within the novel food category. The list identifies the approved substances, the corresponding manufacturers or importers, approval dates, and the approved conditions of use. Although the publication does not change the existing legal framework governing novel food approvals, it provides businesses with greater visibility into the Thai FDA’s regulatory precedents and the types of substances that have previously been accepted through the safety assessment process. The full announcement is available on the Thai FDA’s website. As the list is now publicly available, it also provides useful insight into the types of substances that have successfully completed the Thai FDA’s safety assessment process.
July 24, 2026
For businesses in Thailand’s regulated industries, the problem of “too many licenses” is one of the most familiar hurdles to getting a product to market. Take a simple example: importing the materials necessary to sell teriyaki chicken skewers. To legally do this, a business may need approvals from several different agencies—separate permits for the chicken (Department of Livestock Development), the dipping sauce (Thai FDA), the wooden skewers (Department of Forestry), and other ingredients, each under a different authority. This kind of overlap is often cited to argue for a “regulatory guillotine”—a systematic review to cut outdated or duplicative rules that slow investment and business activity. The Facilitation of Licensing and Public Service Consideration Act B.E. 2569 (2026) (Licensing Facilitation Act 2026) is Thailand’s most significant response yet to that concern. This article looks at the Facilitation Act 2026 through a life sciences and regulatory affairs lens—what it may mean for the manufacturers, importers, and distributors of food, drugs, medical devices, cosmetics, and similar products who routinely deal with several regulators to bring a single product to market. The Super License: One Approval Standing in for Many The reform with the clearest potential for regulated-product businesses is the law’s “super license” mechanism, referred to as a “main license” in the statute. Once a business obtains the main license for a regulated activity, it is automatically deemed to hold all related sublicenses issued by other agencies for that same activity, provided the activity has been designated as eligible in the Government Gazette. The Licensing Facilitation Act 2026 also creates a central application center, allowing applicants to submit a single application and pay all relevant fees at one point of contact, with the center routing the application to each agency through a shared information system. The potential benefits of this for businesses
July 13, 2026
Indonesia’s Halal Product Assurance Agency (BPJPH) has issued new regulations establishing clearer procedures for imposing administrative sanctions on businesses that violate halal product assurance requirements. BPJPH Regulation No. 2 of 2026 on the Imposition of Administrative Sanctions for Violations of Halal Product Assurance Implementation, issued on June 5, 2026, strengthens Indonesia’s halal compliance framework, as mandated under Law No. 33 of 2014 on Halal Product Assurance and Government Regulation No. 42 of 2024 on the Implementation of Halal Product Assurance. BPJPH Regulation No. 2/2026 also supports the upcoming mandatory halal compliance deadline of October 17, 2026, which will apply to a broad range of products and services, including imported food and beverages, slaughtering products and services, natural and quasi-drugs, health supplements, cosmetics, chemical and genetically engineered products, clothing and accessories, household goods, prayer equipment, stationery, and class A medical devices. Scope BPJPH is authorized to impose administrative sanctions for violations of halal product assurance requirements committed by businesses, halal inspection agencies (LPH), halal auditors, halal product process companion institutions (lembaga pendamping PPH), and halal product process companions (pendamping PPH). The head of BPJPH has authority to determine, cancel, or amend the imposition of administrative sanctions, including upon receipt of objections. This authority covers revocation of Halal Certificates (including foreign halal certificate registration numbers), withdrawal of goods from circulation, freezing of LPH operations, freezing of halal product process companion institutions, revocation of PPH companion institution registration numbers, revocation of halal auditor registration numbers, and revocation of LPH accreditation status. Administrative Sanctions Businesses may be subject to any of the following administrative sanctions: Written warning; Administrative fine; Revocation of the halal certificate, including revocation of foreign halal certificate registration numbers; and Withdrawal of goods from circulation. The regulation sets out the types of violations that may trigger these sanctions, with each
July 1, 2026
Obtaining marketing authorization is a fundamental requirement for bringing pharmaceutical products to the Thai market. Companies must navigate the Thai Food and Drug Administration’s registration procedures while also complying with post-approval pharmacovigilance obligations, licensing requirements for manufacturing and importation, data protection rules, and other regulatory requirements. This guide provides an overview of Thailand’s regulatory framework for pharmaceutical marketing authorization, including available registration pathways, review timelines, application fees, postmarketing surveillance obligations, licensing requirements, exemptions, data exclusivity, freedom of information, and parallel import considerations. It is intended as a practical reference for pharmaceutical companies, regulatory affairs professionals, and others involved in bringing medicinal products to the Thai market. Download the guide below for a concise overview of the current requirements and procedures governing pharmaceutical marketing authorization in Thailand.