You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 14, 2021

New Draft Regulations on Medical Device Management in Vietnam

Subscribe to Updates

Since 2016, the government of Vietnam has issued a number of legal documents on medical device management, including Decree No. 36/2016/ND-CP dated May 15, 2016; Decree No. 169/ND-CP dated December 31, 2018; and Decree No. 03/2020/ND-CP dated January 1, 2020; all of which are concurrently valid. In an effort to unify and streamline regulations on the management of medical devices in Vietnam, the Ministry of Health (MOH) recently developed the draft of a new decree intended to replace the three decrees above. The draft is expected to be submitted to the government for further opinion and approval in the near future.

Below are some highlights of the new draft:

1. Clinical Trials of Medical Devices

The draft adds new regulations on clinical trials of medical devices. In particular, medical device trials will include three phases, in which phases 1 and 2 need to be finished before product registration while phase 3 will be conducted after the medical devices are approved for circulation following the specific requirement from the authorities. This regulation aims to continue evaluating the safety and efficacy of medical devices after they are widely used in the community in line with their usage conditions.

The draft also specifically stipulates cases (i) requiring full-stage clinical trials, (ii) being exempted from some stages of clinical trials, and (iii) being entirely exempted from clinical trials. The full exemption is intended to be applicable to class-A medical devices and medical devices that are already approved for circulation in at least one country in the world, and have sufficient safety and efficacy data.

Also, the draft sets out provisions on the requirements and obligations of relevant entities (the owners of the medical devices that need to be clinically evaluated and entities conducting the trials); dossiers for the trial; and procedures and processes to register and approve clinical trial protocols and trial results.

2. Medical Device Circulation

The draft adds two additional cases ((c) and (d) below) that qualify for the quick registration procedure. Accordingly, under the draft, the class-B/C/D medical devices that are subject to the quick registration procedure will include:

  • Products circulated in at least two of the following countries: Japan, Canada, Australia, the U.S., an EU member country, the U.K., or Switzerland.
  • Products circulated in Vietnam prior to December 31, 2020, and satisfying both of the following conditions:
    • The product was circulated for at least three years within a period of five years before the submission date.
    • There have been no warnings about the quality or safety of the product.
  • Products granted an import license and circulated in at least two countries in the world, one of which is Japan, Canada, Australia, the U.S., an EU member country, the U.K., or Switzerland.
  • Products meeting urgent needs for national defense, security, epidemic prevention and control, and overcoming of consequences of natural disasters and catastrophes, and having no substitutes available on the market.

Further, according to the draft, the MOH’s evaluation timeline will increase – up to 120 days instead of up to 60 days under current regulations. This is to ensure the feasibility of the evaluation.

3. Importation of Ingredients for Medical Device Production

Under the draft, import licenses are not required for medical device raw materials, except for materials containing narcotic substances and precursors.

4. Medical Device Advertisement

Under the draft, the content of medical device advertising must conform with either the dossiers for declaration of applicable standards for class-A medical devices, or the registration dossiers for class-B/C/D medical devices.

In addition, advertising contents will not require approval from the authorities. Instead, the holders of medical device registration numbers or their authorized entities will be responsible for publicly declaring the intended content and form of the advertising on the Medical Equipment Management Portal before conducting the advertising; the declaration for class-A/B medical devices would be applied from July 1, 2021 while the declaration for class-C/D medical devices would be applied from July 1, 2022.

5. Transitional Regulations

The draft sets out the transition mechanisms below:

  • Import licenses for class-B/C/D medical devices granted from 2018 to 2022 will be valid until December 31, 2022.
  • The procedures for obtaining import licenses during the transition period for class-B/C/D IVD medical devices, including reagents, calibrators, and control materials, are newly stipulated; this also means that the current procedures under Circular 47/2010/TT-BYT guiding the export and import of medicines and packaging in direct contact with medicines and Circular 30/2015/TT-BYT on import of medical equipment will be abolished.

 

Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 9, 2026
On August 5, 2026, the Consumer Case Division of Thailand’s Civil Court rendered a judgment in a case involving a beauty clinic that advertised acne scar treatments using claims that the clinic was operated by a specialist physician and that the treatment, allegedly involving stem cell technology, could permanently remove acne scars. The plaintiff brought a claim against both the physician-owner and the clinic company, alleging that the advertisements were false and induced her to purchase the treatment. The court found that the clinic was liable for the false representations and that the physician-owner, as both the authorized director of the company and the medical practitioner who provided treatment, was jointly responsible. Although the plaintiff could not fully prove all damages claimed, the court awarded compensation of THB 20,000, together with interest. While the judgment arose from a consumer protection dispute, it serves as a valuable reminder that medical facility advertisements in Thailand are regulated and may expose clinics and healthcare providers not only to regulatory enforcement but also to civil liability from patients who rely on misleading promotional claims. Regulatory Framework Governing Medical Facility Advertisements Medical facility advertising in Thailand is governed by the Medical Facility Act B.E. 2541 (1998), as amended by the Medical Facility Act (No. 4) B.E. 2559 (2016). The principal secondary legislation is the Department of Health Service Support (DoHSS) Notification Re: Rules, Procedures, Conditions, and Fees for an Advertisement or Publication Concerning a Medical Facility, which came into force on November 25, 2019. Under this notification, “advertising” includes any act, by any means, that causes members of the public to see, hear, or otherwise become aware of a message, sound, or image for the commercial benefit of a medical facility. This broad definition covers not only traditional media but also clinic websites, social
Read More
September 9, 2026
On June 30, 2026, Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 on Food Packaging, which expands the list of approved food-contact substances and recognizes a broader range of permissible functions for those substances. The new regulation, which revokes BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, reflects developments in packaging technology and materials science. Although the new regulation provides more advantages to business actors by adding more food contact substances to the approved list for use in food packaging, there are more stringent rules and restrictions for testing. One of the most significant changes is a comprehensive migration-testing framework that sets out requirements for packaging materials, testing conditions, food simulants, and specific migration limits. Overall and Specific Migration Under BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, migration requirements were primarily set out within the lists of approved food-contact substances and packaging materials. BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 instead expressly requires packaging materials that come into direct contact with food to meet both overall and specific migration limits. These are defined as follows: Overall migration: The total quantity of all substances that migrate from the packaging, regardless of whether the substances are hazardous or nonhazardous to health. Specific migration: The quantity of a particular identified substance known to be hazardous to health that migrates from the packaging. Stricter Limits on Heavy Metals The overall migration limit for plastic packaging remains unchanged under both regulations at 60 mg/kg or 10 mg/dm². However, the new regulation introduces significant changes to the regulation of heavy metals. Under the 2019 regulation, four heavy metals—lead, cadmium, chromium VI, and mercury—were subject to a single combined limit of 1 mg/kg. The 2026 regulation, however, requires each heavy metal to meet its own individual specific migration limit, adds arsenic as
Read More
September 7, 2026
Indonesia’s Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi) has reinstated a key provision limiting pharmaceutical patent protection, signaling a renewed commitment to balancing patent rights with public access to medicines. In its ruling to Case No. 255/PUU-XXIII/2025, the court partially granted a petition for judicial review of Law No. 65 of 2024, which had amended the country’s Patent Law, and ordered the restoration of a provision that had excluded certain pharmaceutical inventions from patentability. The decision took effect immediately upon its pronouncement at the court’s plenary session on August 28, 2026. Background The petition challenged the removal of article 4(f) from Law No. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents (Patent Law), as amended by Law No. 65 of 2024. Article 4(f) had excluded from patentability certain inventions relating to new uses of known substances. The petitioners argued that removing this provision would open the door to patent protection for second medical use inventions and facilitate patent evergreening—practices that can extend exclusivity periods, delay generic market entry, and reduce public access to affordable medicines. The petitioners included several patient advocacy and public-interest organizations: the Indonesian Dialysis Patients Community Association, the Indonesian Association of Drug Abuse Victims (PKNI), the Indonesian Pulmonary Hypertension Foundation (YHPI), the Rekat Peduli Indonesia Foundation, and the Indonesian Positive Women’s Association (IPPI), along with the Indonesia for Global Justice Association and four individual petitioners. The petitioners also challenged the constitutionality of the phrase “interested party” in article 70(1) of the Patent Law, arguing that it should be construed expressly to clarify who has standing to appeal a decision to grant a patent before the Board of Patent Appeal, and to allow a broader range of parties—such as patent holders, licensees, consumer organizations, prosecutors, aggrieved third parties, and others who may suffer direct or indirect harm from the grant of a patent—to
Read More
September 4, 2026
Blind boxes and collectibles have become increasingly popular, driven by the excitement of not knowing which character or design will be revealed until the package is opened. While most visible in the art toy market, the same concept is also used in the food industry. Confectionery, snacks, and other food products are sometimes sold with toys, character figures, cards, or other collectibles. A package might, for example, contain one of ten possible characters, with consumers knowing that an item is included but not which one they will receive. Some collections may also feature rare or “secret” items. For food businesses, however, adding a randomized toy or collectible involves more than a marketing decision. The food, the nonfood item, and the randomized mechanism may each raise different regulatory considerations in Thailand. Thai FDA Requirements for Nonfood Objects Packaged with Food The main food regulatory consideration is Ministry of Public Health Notification No. 310 B.E. 2551 (2008), which regulates food packaged together with things or objects that are not food. Under Notification No. 310, certain nonfood objects may be packaged together with food where they fall within specified exceptions, including objects that serve the following purposes: Maintaining the quality or standard of the food, such as a desiccant or oxygen absorber; Serving as a seasoning or as part of food preparation, such as chili powder sachets or seasoning sachets contained in instant noodle packages; or Functioning as an eating or food-preparation utensil, such as a spoon or fork included with instant noodles. Other nonfood objects that do not fall within these categories generally should not be placed inside the food container together with the food. Where a toy, collectible, or other nonfood object is intended to be sold together with a food product, businesses should therefore carefully consider the nature of
Read More