You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 14, 2021

New Draft Regulations on Medical Device Management in Vietnam

Subscribe to Updates

Since 2016, the government of Vietnam has issued a number of legal documents on medical device management, including Decree No. 36/2016/ND-CP dated May 15, 2016; Decree No. 169/ND-CP dated December 31, 2018; and Decree No. 03/2020/ND-CP dated January 1, 2020; all of which are concurrently valid. In an effort to unify and streamline regulations on the management of medical devices in Vietnam, the Ministry of Health (MOH) recently developed the draft of a new decree intended to replace the three decrees above. The draft is expected to be submitted to the government for further opinion and approval in the near future.

Below are some highlights of the new draft:

1. Clinical Trials of Medical Devices

The draft adds new regulations on clinical trials of medical devices. In particular, medical device trials will include three phases, in which phases 1 and 2 need to be finished before product registration while phase 3 will be conducted after the medical devices are approved for circulation following the specific requirement from the authorities. This regulation aims to continue evaluating the safety and efficacy of medical devices after they are widely used in the community in line with their usage conditions.

The draft also specifically stipulates cases (i) requiring full-stage clinical trials, (ii) being exempted from some stages of clinical trials, and (iii) being entirely exempted from clinical trials. The full exemption is intended to be applicable to class-A medical devices and medical devices that are already approved for circulation in at least one country in the world, and have sufficient safety and efficacy data.

Also, the draft sets out provisions on the requirements and obligations of relevant entities (the owners of the medical devices that need to be clinically evaluated and entities conducting the trials); dossiers for the trial; and procedures and processes to register and approve clinical trial protocols and trial results.

2. Medical Device Circulation

The draft adds two additional cases ((c) and (d) below) that qualify for the quick registration procedure. Accordingly, under the draft, the class-B/C/D medical devices that are subject to the quick registration procedure will include:

  • Products circulated in at least two of the following countries: Japan, Canada, Australia, the U.S., an EU member country, the U.K., or Switzerland.
  • Products circulated in Vietnam prior to December 31, 2020, and satisfying both of the following conditions:
    • The product was circulated for at least three years within a period of five years before the submission date.
    • There have been no warnings about the quality or safety of the product.
  • Products granted an import license and circulated in at least two countries in the world, one of which is Japan, Canada, Australia, the U.S., an EU member country, the U.K., or Switzerland.
  • Products meeting urgent needs for national defense, security, epidemic prevention and control, and overcoming of consequences of natural disasters and catastrophes, and having no substitutes available on the market.

Further, according to the draft, the MOH’s evaluation timeline will increase – up to 120 days instead of up to 60 days under current regulations. This is to ensure the feasibility of the evaluation.

3. Importation of Ingredients for Medical Device Production

Under the draft, import licenses are not required for medical device raw materials, except for materials containing narcotic substances and precursors.

4. Medical Device Advertisement

Under the draft, the content of medical device advertising must conform with either the dossiers for declaration of applicable standards for class-A medical devices, or the registration dossiers for class-B/C/D medical devices.

In addition, advertising contents will not require approval from the authorities. Instead, the holders of medical device registration numbers or their authorized entities will be responsible for publicly declaring the intended content and form of the advertising on the Medical Equipment Management Portal before conducting the advertising; the declaration for class-A/B medical devices would be applied from July 1, 2021 while the declaration for class-C/D medical devices would be applied from July 1, 2022.

5. Transitional Regulations

The draft sets out the transition mechanisms below:

  • Import licenses for class-B/C/D medical devices granted from 2018 to 2022 will be valid until December 31, 2022.
  • The procedures for obtaining import licenses during the transition period for class-B/C/D IVD medical devices, including reagents, calibrators, and control materials, are newly stipulated; this also means that the current procedures under Circular 47/2010/TT-BYT guiding the export and import of medicines and packaging in direct contact with medicines and Circular 30/2015/TT-BYT on import of medical equipment will be abolished.

 

Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 13, 2026
Indonesia’s Halal Product Assurance Agency (BPJPH) has issued new regulations establishing clearer procedures for imposing administrative sanctions on businesses that violate halal product assurance requirements. BPJPH Regulation No. 2 of 2026 on the Imposition of Administrative Sanctions for Violations of Halal Product Assurance Implementation, issued on June 5, 2026, strengthens Indonesia’s halal compliance framework, as mandated under Law No. 33 of 2014 on Halal Product Assurance and Government Regulation No. 42 of 2024 on the Implementation of Halal Product Assurance. BPJPH Regulation No. 2/2026 also supports the upcoming mandatory halal compliance deadline of October 17, 2026, which will apply to a broad range of products and services, including imported food and beverages, slaughtering products and services, natural and quasi-drugs, health supplements, cosmetics, chemical and genetically engineered products, clothing and accessories, household goods, prayer equipment, stationery, and class A medical devices. Scope BPJPH is authorized to impose administrative sanctions for violations of halal product assurance requirements committed by businesses, halal inspection agencies (LPH), halal auditors, halal product process companion institutions (lembaga pendamping PPH), and halal product process companions (pendamping PPH). The head of BPJPH has authority to determine, cancel, or amend the imposition of administrative sanctions, including upon receipt of objections. This authority covers revocation of Halal Certificates (including foreign halal certificate registration numbers), withdrawal of goods from circulation, freezing of LPH operations, freezing of halal product process companion institutions, revocation of PPH companion institution registration numbers, revocation of halal auditor registration numbers, and revocation of LPH accreditation status. Administrative Sanctions Businesses may be subject to any of the following administrative sanctions: Written warning; Administrative fine; Revocation of the halal certificate, including revocation of foreign halal certificate registration numbers; and Withdrawal of goods from circulation. The regulation sets out the types of violations that may trigger these sanctions, with each
Read More
July 1, 2026
Obtaining marketing authorization is a fundamental requirement for bringing pharmaceutical products to the Thai market. Companies must navigate the Thai Food and Drug Administration’s registration procedures while also complying with post-approval pharmacovigilance obligations, licensing requirements for manufacturing and importation, data protection rules, and other regulatory requirements. This guide provides an overview of Thailand’s regulatory framework for pharmaceutical marketing authorization, including available registration pathways, review timelines, application fees, postmarketing surveillance obligations, licensing requirements, exemptions, data exclusivity, freedom of information, and parallel import considerations. It is intended as a practical reference for pharmaceutical companies, regulatory affairs professionals, and others involved in bringing medicinal products to the Thai market. Download the guide below for a concise overview of the current requirements and procedures governing pharmaceutical marketing authorization in Thailand.
Read More
June 24, 2026
Patent enablement requirements are provided under Article 102 of Vietnam’s Law on Intellectual Property (IP Law). In particular, a patent specification must “fully and clearly disclose the nature of the invention to such an extent that, based on the specification, a person having ordinary skill in the relevant art can implement the invention.” In pharmaceutical and biotechnology patents, this requirement is more complicated and subject to more rigorous assessment. The Patent Examination Guidelines (Guidelines) of the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (IP Office) were amended in March 2026 to introduce Annexes III and IV for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, in which Annex III provides detailed guidelines on the assessment of specification requirements. These amendments were made under a project for strengthening capacity in industrial property examination between the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and the IP Office. Annex III provides detailed instructions on how examiners assess enablement in a pharmaceutical or biotechnology application, and offers examples of acceptable and unacceptable descriptions with regard to the enablement aspect. Enablement Requirements in Pharma and Biotech Patents Article 12.7 of Circular 10/2026/TT-BKHCN (Circular 10) adds to the requirements of Article 102 of the IP Law that the description must demonstrate the novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability of the technical solution. For pharmaceutical composition subject matters, Article 12.9 of Circular 10 sets out that the description must present the results of clinical trials and/or the pharmacological effects of the claimed pharmaceutical composition, and must include at least the following information: Substance/mixture used. Testing method (system) employed. Information on the test results. Correlation between the pharmacological effects obtained from the tests and the application of the pharmaceutical product in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. The Guidelines note that pharmacological study results should be presented in a quantified manner, and pharmacological
Read More
June 19, 2026
For the first time, Thailand’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published a consolidated list identifying all substances that have successfully passed its novel food safety evaluation process. The list is a step forward in regulatory transparency, but it also highlights a feature of the Thai regime that food companies often overlook: each approval is tied exclusively to the company that applied for it. A substance’s appearance on the list does not give other companies the green light to use it. This article examines the structure of Thailand’s novel food approval framework, the implications of applicant exclusivity, and the strategic choices it requires of food companies looking to bring novel ingredients to the Thai market. Thai FDA Food Safety Evaluation Framework Notification No. 376 of the Ministry of Public Health requires novel food substances to undergo a food safety assessment, with an exemption only for novel foods manufactured exclusively for export. The framework also encompasses “foods that do not qualify as novel foods” but which present characteristics warranting a safety evaluation, such as differing quality standards, increased serving sizes, or applications in specific food categories, where such changes affect consumption levels, nutritional value, or consumer safety. The recently published list of foods that passed the safety evaluation by the Thai FDA is structured by substance category and identifies the approved company (domestic manufacturer or importer), country of origin, substance name and trade name, approved purpose of use, and date of the Thai FDA’s approval notification certificate. A notable feature of Thailand’s novel food regime is that the approval result is tied exclusively to the company that submitted the application. Publication of the consolidated list does not constitute a general authorization to use the approved substances. The Thai FDA’s approval certificate specifies the approved conditions of use and the requirements
Read More