You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 24, 2024

Vietnam’s Data Revolution: Law on Data

Subscribe to Updates

On November 30, 2024, the Data Law was officially promulgated after an accelerated preparation process that began in February 2024. The Data Law is set to take effect on July 1, 2025. Having extraterritorial effect, the Data Law will impact both local and foreign individuals and enterprises.

As noted in our previous legal update, the Data Law governs digital data, the National Data Center, the National General Database, digital data products and services, digital data management, and the rights, obligations, and responsibilities of agencies, organizations, and individuals related to digital data activities.

This legal update provides an overview of the Data Law, with a deep focus on the key provisions likely to impact businesses operating or offering services in Vietnam.

New Data Definition and Classification

The Data Law broadly defines “digital data” as data about objects, phenomena, and events, which can include one or a combination of audio, images, numbers, text, or symbols represented in digital format (hereinafter referred to as “data”). This definition is very broad and potentially covers any information recorded or represented in digital forms, including personal and nonpersonal data (such as business data, transactional data, trade secrets, etc.). Data is further categorized into different types that can be used by public bodies. However, the rights and obligations associated with each type of data are not clearly addressed. The data classification criteria include:

  • The nature of data sharing (shared data, private data, open data);
  • The importance of data (core data, important data, and other data);
  • Any other criteria to meet the requirements of data administration, processing, and protection, as determined by the data owner.

While the Data Law requires private organizations to categorize data based on its level of importance, it still grants these organizations the right to categorize data based on other criteria.

Cross-Border Data Transfers and Processing

Under the Data Law, agencies, organizations, and individuals can freely transfer and process offshore data in Vietnam, with the state protecting their lawful rights and interests.

For core and important data, the law regulates cases deemed as cross-border data transfers, including the transfer of data to foreign organizations and individuals, which was not mentioned in the Personal Data Protection Decree or the publicized version of the draft Personal Data Protection Law. Currently, the Data Law imposes no specific restrictions on cross-border data transfers, but these activities must comply with national defense, security, public interests, and international treaties. Further guidance is expected in a future government decree, which enterprises will also need to keep an eye on.

Under the Data Law, “important data” refers to data that may impact national defense, security, foreign affairs, macroeconomics, social stability, health, and public safety, while “core data” means important data that directly affects national defense, security, foreign affairs, macroeconomics, social stability, health, and public safety. More detailed lists of important data and core data will be issued by the prime minister.

National Comprehensive Database

The government will establish and manage a National Comprehensive Database, consolidating open, shared, and private data, as well as other data from various sources, including state and party agencies. This database will include data from administrative procedures and public services, though it is unclear whether it will include data submitted by private organizations during administrative filing processes. Once the National Comprehensive Database is created, it is possible that various authorities may have easy access to the data, which will strongly facilitate their supervision and enforcement activities.

Organizations and individuals can voluntarily contribute data, and in certain cases, may be requested to do so, as further explained below.

Access Rights of Competent Agencies

The Data Law sets out the conditions under which state agencies can access data from organizations and individuals. These access rights have been limited and are more restricted than the typical access rights that the government tends to reserve for itself. Under the Data Law, the request to access can be made under four special cases: (1) in response to a state of emergency; (2) upon a threat to national security, but not to the extent of declaring a state of emergency; (3) upon disasters; or (4) for the prevention of riots or terrorism. Consent from relevant data subjects is not required for data sharing in this case. If the data is encrypted, the state agencies also have the right to decrypt data for their access and usage.

The Data Law also prescribes certain responsibilities for state agencies when receiving data, which is a welcome development. Further regulations on the authorities access rights and the data provision obligations of private organizations and individuals are expected to be encompassed in the decree guiding this Data Law.

These new developments and limitations to access powers were among the requests the business community made following the first draft Data Law (circulated in March 2024), aiming to safeguard the attractiveness of the Vietnamese market and protect proprietary data.

New Data-Related Products and Services

Recognizing new data-related products and services, the Data Law opens the market to new opportunities for local players. However, the Data Law has yet to provide any definition of “data-related products and services” in general, and these products and services could be broadly interpreted to encompass any services related to data processing.

The Data Law clearly indicates that its provisions apply to data intermediary products and services, data analysis and aggregation, and data platforms. Accordingly, depending on the specific nature of the products or services, they may be subject to registration or licensing requirements as stipulated under the Data Law and its forthcoming guiding decree.

Applicability of the Data Law

To address the risk of contradiction or conflict in the patchwork of regulations related to data, the Data Law stipulates that where other laws issued before its effective date (July 1, 2025) contain regulations on key data-related activities (such as building, developing, protecting, managing, processing, and using data) that do not contradict the principles of the Data Law, the provisions of those laws shall still apply. The Data Law is silent on the consequences if the provisions of existing laws contradict the Data Law.

Furthermore, the Data Law requires new laws issued after its effective date to clarify how they comply with or deviate from the Data Law, ensuring a clear understanding of implementation requirements.

Looking Ahead

The Data Law explicitly recognizes that data is a resource that state policies will mobilize and develop into assets. This has the potential to pave the way for many data-related businesses in the future and offers promising opportunities for tech companies with a strong focus on data.

The Data Law recognizes the importance of data in the digital age and highlights Vietnam’s commitment to fostering a secure and innovative data environment. However, the scope and applicability of the Data Law, especially those overlapping with other existing laws or regulations, are still ambiguous, as discussed above. Thus, it remains to be seen how legislators will address these issues in the future.

Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 16, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has broadened the definition of institutional investors, expanded the types of qualifying investments, and updated financial qualification thresholds for various investor categories through a revised notification on the definitions of institutional investors, ultra-high net worth investors, and high net worth investors. The amended framework, which came into force on March 1, 2026, adds digital asset business operators, investment planners, and investment consultants to the roster of entities recognized as institutional investors, and broadens the definition of investment to account for digital tokens. Expanded Definition of Institutional Investors Under the SEC’s revised notification, the category of institutional investors now expressly includes digital asset business operators licensed under the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). This addition recognizes the growing role of digital asset platforms and service providers in Thailand’s investment ecosystem and aligns the regulatory treatment of digital markets with that of traditional markets. The definition of institutional investors now also encompasses investment planners and investment consultants approved by the SEC. Previously, only SEC-approved investment analysts held this status; the expansion covers a broader scope of professionals who possess comparable expertise and experience in evaluating investment opportunities. Broadened Investment Definition The revised framework now defines investment to mean direct or indirect investment in a wider range of assets beyond deposits. Specifically, the definition covers: Securities under the Securities and Exchange Act Derivatives under the Derivatives Act Investment tokens offered to the public Government-issued digital tokens (G-tokens) as specified in a separate SEC notification This expansion ensures that financial status assessments reflect the full spectrum of an investor’s holdings, including emerging digital assets. Updated Financial Qualification Thresholds The amended SEC notification also provides updated qualification thresholds for angel investors, ultra-high net worth investors, and high net worth investors. While the core criteria
Read More
March 13, 2026
Vietnam’s Law on Intellectual Property (IP Law) has undergone continuous amendment in recent years, with the latest amendment issued at the end of 2025. Among the amended and supplemented provisions, the regulation that has perhaps attracted the most attention is a provision relating to the use of protected IP objects by artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Specifically, Article 7 of the 2025 IP Law introduces a completely new Clause 5, which reads in full as follows: “Organizations and individuals are permitted to use texts and data relating to intellectual property objects that have been lawfully published, and which the public is allowed to access, for the purposes of scientific research, experimentation, and training of artificial intelligence systems, provided that such use will not unreasonably affect the legitimate rights and interests of the authors and intellectual property rights holders in accordance with this Law. With respect to texts and data that are objects protected by copyright and related rights, the use of the texts and data as set forth herein must also be in accordance with the regulations of the Government.” Analyzing this newly added provision in the context of how it was conceived, as well as the challenges that still lie ahead, can provide some interesting insights. From Aspirations to Flight in Science and Technology From the end of 2024 and throughout 2025—the 50th anniversary of the country’s reunification—Vietnam witnessed numerous sweeping changes in many areas, including legislative development. It could be said that no sessions of the National Assembly have ever adopted as many laws, resolutions, and major policies as this one. The aspirations of the highest-level leadership have been concretized into major law and policy projects, which were drafted, developed, and passed at record speed. All of this was aimed at building a foundation for Vietnam to achieve
Read More
March 12, 2026
Thailand’s AI legislative framework took another step forward when the Office of the Consumer Protection Board (OCPB) issued a notification establishing guidelines for AI-generated advertising that may cause material misunderstanding about products or services. The notification, which is already in effect, was issued under the Consumer Protection Act B.E. 2522 (1979) and its amendments, which prohibit advertising that is unfair to consumers or may cause harm to society, including false or exaggerated statements and statements that may cause material misunderstanding about products or services. The notification addresses emerging advertising practices, including the use of images edited using software or AI to attract consumer interest or build credibility. The OCPB noted that such advertising may result in consumers misunderstanding the essential characteristics, condition, or usage of products, which violates consumer rights and causes damage. Key Requirements on AI-Generated or Digitally Manipulated Advertising Content For advertisements using still images or videos created or edited with software programs or AI tools that may cause the depicted product or service to differ from the actual product sold or service provided—which may cause misunderstanding regarding the condition, quality, quantity, or other essential aspects of the products or services—advertisers and business operators must comply with the following requirements: Prior authorization. Obtain approval from relevant regulatory authorities where required by law. Accurate representation. Ensure that the advertised size, quantity, volume, number, or composition matches the actual product or service being sold, whether in still images or videos. Mandatory AI disclosure labels. Display clear disclosures when AI or software is used to create or edit images, such as: “Real image or simulation edited using AI” “Photo from actual location or simulation edited using AI” “Photo from actual product or edited simulation” “Image created by AI” “Video created by AI” Clarity of disclosure. Ensure disclosures are clearly visible,
Read More
March 10, 2026
Thailand’s Ministry of Finance and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have issued regulations broadening the criteria for determining who qualifies as a “major shareholder” of licensed securities and digital asset business operators. Under relevant SEC regulations, major shareholders of a regulated entity must obtain regulatory approval and undergo screening by the SEC. The revised framework introduces both shareholding-based and control-based tests to determine which shareholders require regulatory approval for a wider range of indirect ownership structures and de facto control. The Ministry of Finance notification took effect on February 21, 2026, while the SEC’s clarifying rules took effect on March 4, 2026. These changes aim to enhance transparency around beneficial ownership and strengthen regulatory oversight of entities operating in Thailand’s capital markets. Expanded Definition Under the revised framework, a “major shareholder” now includes persons who directly or indirectly hold more than 10% of the voting rights in a regulated company, as well as persons who exercise control over the regulated company or its shares. This system of two separate tests, based on both shareholding and control, differs from the prior regime, which focused primarily on shareholding thresholds and applied a more limited method for determining indirect shareholdings. The two tests (detailed below) operate independently of each other, and any person identified by either of the tests will be deemed a major shareholder. Shareholding-Based Test Broadens Indirect Ownership Attribution For the shareholding-based test, the SEC recognizes two existing methods for identifying indirect ownership, together with a new proportional attribution method. Any person captured under these methods, which are described below, will be regarded as a major shareholder of the regulated company and must obtain SEC approval as a major shareholder. First, the existing framework continues to apply to both first-tier and chain ownership structures. Approval is required for (1) first-tier
Read More