You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

October 2, 2024

Vietnam’s Draft Personal Data Protection Law: An In-Depth Look

Subscribe to Updates

The first draft of Vietnam’s new Personal Data Protection Law (“Draft PDPL”) was released for public consultation on September 24, 2024, and is open for comments until November 24, 2024. (See further details here.) It is expected that the draft will be presented to the National Assembly before the end of 2024 and will be submitted for adoption in May 2025, with a tentative entry into force on January 1, 2026. As the Draft PDPL incorporates most of the provisions of Decree No. 13/2023/ND-CP on Personal Data Protection (“PDPD”), which has been the primary legal instrument on personal data protection since it took effect on July 1, 2023, it is likely that it will supersede the PDPD when it takes effect. [Please contact our Vietnam data protection team to request a detailed comparison of the Draft PDPL to the PDPD.]

Noting that there might be further changes to the draft once the public consultation period closes, the Draft PDPL proposes new specific requirements for a number of services. Some highlights of the current version include the following:

  • Marketing services: Although marketing services are already regulated under the PDPD, the Draft PDPL now recognizes that the use of personal data for marketing must comply with anti-spam regulations. The current draft does not clarify whether organizations are exempted from the consent requirement for the purpose of the initial call or message under the anti-spam regime. Marketing service providers are not allowed to outsource the services to another organization to perform or support the implementation of marketing business, which may prevent the sharing of personal data.
  • Behavioral advertising: Behavioral advertising (targeted personalized advertising based on a user’s activity or personal data) requires the consent of the data subject in a modifiable manner that allows the data subject to refuse to share data in different contexts. As with marketing services, advertising service providers may only use personal data collected through their business activities to provide their advertising services.
  • Big data processing: Organizations are free to utilize personal data on platforms where the data subjects have disclosed such data without any restrictions (which seems to allow the processing of any publicly available data, for as long as the data subjects do not restrict the use), as long as the collected data is only used for business activities in accordance with the law. The Draft PDPL specifies that the information registered for social network accounts or OTT services will not be considered public data, and cannot be processed without consent.
  • AI: Organizations are entitled to use personal data for research and development of machine-learning algorithms, artificial intelligence, and other automated systems, provided that notice is given to the data subjects (including explanations on the influence of the algorithm, artificial intelligence, or automated system on the legitimate rights and interest of the data subjects), and the data subjects are offered the right to opt out.
  • Cloud computing: The Draft PDPL now imposes the obligations on clients of cloud service providers to request that some content be included in the cloud computing contracts, notably that cloud service providers will only process their clients’ data for the benefit of and on behalf of the clients (which is very close to the definition of a data processor); compensation for damages must be clearly addressed; security, technical and organizational measures must be enumerated; technical measures are in place to ensure that the right to access data is reasonably decentralized, etc. In addition, cloud service providers must comply with impact assessment dossier requirements and with regulations on personal data protection in general; appoint a data protection department; request subcontractors to comply with regulations on personal data protection; and apply technical and organizational measures adequate to the scale and level of processing.
  • Labor and recruitment: When monitoring employees using technological and/or technical measures, organizations must ensure the rights and interests of the data subjects, particularly that the employees are aware of and consent to the monitoring, which must not be contrary to the law. The Draft PDPL confirms that employees must consent to the processing of their personal data — taking a different approach from the European Union and disregarding the argument that employees’ consent might not be voluntary considering the power imbalance with the employer. For intra-group sharing in a global employee database system, the legal entities must prove that the collection and processing of personal data is lawful, and the employees are responsible for the legality of the information provided. Further, the Draft PDPL indicates that the consent of the employees to share with one entity of the group does not mean the consent is given to the other entities of the group, which will be considered independently.
  • Financial, banking and credit information services: The sale and purchase of credit information is prohibited between financial institutions, credit institutions, and credit information institutions, as is the sending or transmission of unencrypted financial and credit data related to data subjects. Express consent is required to use the credit information of a data subject in credit scoring. The result of credit information assessment can only be binary (pass or fail; yes or no; true or false; etc.) or using a scale based on the database collected directly from the customers of the financial institutions, credit institutions, banks, or credit information institutions. De-identification measures must be applied at a specific stage of the processing. Credit information services/products can only be provided to financial institutions, banks, and credit institutions and when prescribed by law.
  • Health and insurance: Consent is mandatory for the collection and processing of health and insurance information. Organizations operating in the health sector may not provide personal data to healthcare providers or insurance providers, unless requested in writing by the data subject. This could hint that the data subject’s consent alone would not be sufficient in this case, and that the sharing of health information can only be initiated at the request of the data subject. For the sharing of health information in the context of reinsurance, any transfer must be clearly stated in the contract with the data subject.
  • Social network and communication services through cyberspace: Notification to the data subject on personal data processing must clearly state the content of personal data collected when installing or using the services, and organizations must refrain from collecting personal data outside the scope agreed with the user. Service providers are not allowed to request a photo of the ID card as an account authentication factor. Users must be allowed to opt out of cookies and have a “do-not-track” option. The service provider can only track the usage of its platform/OTT services with consent. When providing advertising or marketing services, notification must include information on the sharing of personal data and on the security measures that are applied. Calls and text messages must remain private—any recording or monitoring without the data subject’s consent is expressly stated as an illegal activity.
  • General B2C businesses: Contracts must now contain a clause on personal data protection clearly stating the responsibilities, rights and obligations of the parties.

The Draft PDPL also recognizes new services of (i) personal data protection trust rating organizations, and (ii) personal data protection organizations and experts (notably DPO-as-a-service), making it evident that outsourcing data protection departments and data protection officers (DPOs) is accepted.

Personal data protection trust rating organizations

Personal data protection trust rating organizations assess the ability of an organization to fully comply with the personal data protection regulations. The assessment will evaluate risk factors and their impact on the ability to satisfy personal data protection obligations, and will notably cover market and business environment risks, technological risks, governance risks, personnel risks, and financial risks. Results of the assessment are given in four rating levels—“high trust,” “trust,” “pass” and “failing”—and are reported to a “trust rating council” (a term which has not been defined in the Draft PDPL).

Organizations must satisfy certain eligibility requirements to obtain a certificate to provide trust rating services, including notably:

  • Registered capital of VND 5 billion or more;
  • Having at least one year of experience in personal data protection;
  • Employing at least three qualified personal data protection trust analysts.

Under the Draft PDPL, having a trust rating is mandatory for all organizations processing sensitive personal data. Considering the broad definition of sensitive personal data, which includes personal data that must be processed in an employment relationship (e.g., for salary payment purposes), this requirement will be practically applied to all organizations.

Personal data protection experts and organizations

A personal data protection expert (“PDP Expert”) is defined as a person with technological and/or legal capabilities appointed by a given processing entity to act as personal data protection person (i.e., data protection officer). PDP Experts must obtain a competence certificate from a certification organization whose role is to ensure that the PDP Experts are sufficiently qualified to undertake their roles. The Ministry of Public Security (MPS) will rely on licensed certification organizations to issue competence certificates to qualified PDP Experts who, at minimum, hold a college degree in a relevant field and have completed a data protection certification course.

A personal data protection organization (“PDPO”) is an entity that can be designated by a given data processing entity (including data controllers, data controller-processors, third parties, data transferors, and data recipients—but notably not data processors) as its personal data protection department. The PDPO provides personal data protection services to meet the needs of its appointing entity. The MPS will be in charge of issuing the license to the PDPO, subject to the PDPO hiring at least one technological and/or legal PDP Expert; engaging in functions, tasks, business lines, or domains related to technology and/or law; and obtaining a “pass” trust rating or higher.

The Draft PDPL imposes new requirements on businesses engaged in data processing services, which is now defined as a conditional business line (including any data processor engaged to process data for a data controller), notably to have at least one technological and legal expert (or one technology expert and one legal expert), register business lines related to technology or legal services or consultancy about technology or law related to personal data protection, and obtain a “pass” trust rating level or above.

Outlook

In sum, the Draft PDPL recognizes new data protection services with what seems to be an ambition to build trust (with the certification mechanism for PDP Experts and PDPOs and the trust rating organizations) and provide for sector-specific regulations on personal data protection. As the level of awareness in Vietnam regarding personal data protection remains low, these new service lines and sector-specific regulations might further contribute to the MPS’ efforts on capacity-building.

Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 2, 2026
Thailand and China have a longstanding and significant trade relationship, which increasingly extends to e-commerce and digitally enabled supply chains. While these channels create new opportunities for businesses to reach consumers across borders, their growth also brings greater exposure to intellectual property (IP) infringement across jurisdictions and online platforms. Effective cooperation between the two countries’ enforcement authorities has therefore become increasingly important. To strengthen cooperation in this area, Thailand and China signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) on IP enforcement in Beijing on July 20, 2026, during the Thai prime minister’s official visit to China. Officially titled “Memorandum of Understanding Between the State Administration for Market Regulation of the People’s Republic of China and the Ministry of Commerce of the Kingdom of Thailand on Cooperation in the Field of Intellectual Property Enforcement,” the MOU forms part of a broader bilateral agenda covering industrial and supply chains, participation by micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs), cooperation associated with the ASEAN–China Free Trade Area 3.0, and progress on the registration of Thai geographical indications in China. The MOU establishes a bilateral framework for cooperation and coordination in five broad areas: Strengthening dialogue in IP enforcement; Enhancing information sharing; Facilitating the enforcement of IP rights in cases arising in the parties’ domestic markets and on online platforms, in accordance with their respective domestic laws; Promoting cooperation in IP enforcement training and human resource development; and Undertaking other cooperation activities agreed upon by both sides. The Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) will serve as the principal coordinating agency for Thailand, while the Bureau of Law Enforcement and Inspection in China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) will serve in that role for China. The framework is particularly relevant to the growth of e-commerce, as it covers infringement in the domestic markets and on
Read More
August 25, 2026
Vietnam has enacted a new decree establishing administrative penalties for violations in the fields of cybersecurity and personal data protection. Decree No. 330/2026/NĐ-CP (Decree 330), issued and effective from August 19, 2026, provides a detailed sanctions framework for noncompliance with the Law on Personal Data Protection (including its implementing regulations under Decree 356/2025/ND-CP) and the Law on Cybersecurity, together with their guiding decrees. The issuance of Decree 330 signals that the practical grace period previously perceived by many businesses may be drawing to a close, with active regulatory enforcement in these areas expected to commence in earnest. Scope and Key Provisions Decree 330 has extraterritorial effect and applies to both onshore and offshore companies. For offshore companies, it applies to those that (1) provide telecommunications, internet, online-content, information-technology, cybersecurity, or cross-border services and (2) are involved in or related to the processing of personal data of Vietnamese citizens and certain other people of Vietnamese origin. Decree 330’s key provisions cover the following areas: Administrative penalties for violations relating to the protection of national security and public order in cyberspace, including the dissemination of unlawful, false, or unverified information. Sanctions for cyberattacks, unauthorized access, introduction of harmful code or programs, and failure to cooperate with specialized cybersecurity forces. Sanctions for personal data protection violations, such as consent, cross-border data transfers, impact assessments, breach notification, and data-subject rights, among others—with maximum fines of up to 5% of an organization’s preceding-year revenue for cross-border transfer violations, or up to VND 3 billion for other data-protection breaches. Personal Data Protection Penalties The key sanctions for personal data protection violations are as follows: Consent violations: Fines of up to VND 70 million (approx. USD 2,642), plus potential additional sanctions and remedial measures including irreversible deletion of personal data collected without consent and confiscation of
Read More
August 25, 2026
Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) is studying potential new regulatory measures for digital platform services that could significantly expand the country’s digital platform governance framework. The ETDA has already conducted one public consultation session on the proposed measures and will hold additional sessions on August 25 and September 2, 2026, covering five types of platform services under the Royal Decree on Digital Platform Services B.E. 2565 (2022). The measures under study are preliminary and may be changed based on consultation outcomes. Foundational Measures Applicable to All Platform Types Seven baseline obligations would apply across all digital platform categories: Transparency reports. Platforms must prepare and publish statistical reports on platform governance activities, including the number of content items removed or restricted and appeal outcomes, in a comparable format. Notice and action mechanism. Platforms must establish minimum standards for channels to report potentially illegal content or goods, conduct case-by-case review, provide explanations when content is removed or restricted, and maintain an internal appeals channel. Rights over automated decision-making. Users significantly affected by automated decisions are granted rights to request an explanation, request human review, and contest the decision. Service level agreements (SLAs). Platforms must publish minimum standards for response times, processing timelines, progress notifications, and remedies for incidents on the platform. Labeling of AI-generated content. Content generated or modified by AI must carry visible labels and machine-readable metadata, with exceptions for creative works that disclose AI use in a nonmisleading manner. Prohibition of dark patterns. User interface designs that deceive, coerce, or distort user decision-making are prohibited, including hiding critical information, creating false urgency, or making service cancellation unreasonably difficult. Business user fairness. Platforms must meet minimum standards for the treatment of sellers, workers, and content creators, including advance notice of term changes, explanation of account suspensions or visibility reductions,
Read More
August 20, 2026
Thailand has established a new cross-ministerial committee to oversee data center operations nationwide. On August 5, 2026, the Thai cabinet approved the Prime Minister’s Office Regulation on the Data Center Business Policy Committee, which was published in the Government Gazette on August 13, 2026, and is now in effect. The regulation reflects the government’s policy to elevate Thailand’s digital economy and promote investment in digital infrastructure and AI. The key features of the new committee are outlined below. Definition of “Data Center” Under the regulation, “data center” is defined as a building, premises, or structure that uses electronic equipment to provide services related to the collection, storage, processing, hosting, or transmission of data by electronic means to third parties that are not affiliates, as further determined by the Data Center Business Policy Committee. Committee Composition The committee will be chaired by a deputy prime minister designated by the prime minister, and will have three vice-chairs comprising the ministers of digital economy and society, interior, and energy. The committee also includes 12 ex-officio members: the permanent secretaries of finance, agriculture, natural resources, energy, interior, digital economy, industry, and commerce; the secretaries-general of the Board of Investment (BOI), Energy Regulatory Commission, National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC), and National Water Resources Office; and the director of the Energy Policy and Planning Office. Up to three expert members may be appointed by the prime minister for two-year terms, renewable once. The secretary-general of the National Economic and Social Development Council (NESDC) serves as member and secretary, with up to two NESDC officials serving as assistant secretaries. Powers and Duties The committee is empowered to: Propose policies, standards, and operational frameworks for government agencies in approving, licensing, issuing investment promotion certificates, or providing services to data center operators in Thailand; Study, analyze, and
Read More