You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 24, 2024

Vietnam’s Data Revolution: Law on Data

Subscribe to Updates

On November 30, 2024, the Data Law was officially promulgated after an accelerated preparation process that began in February 2024. The Data Law is set to take effect on July 1, 2025. Having extraterritorial effect, the Data Law will impact both local and foreign individuals and enterprises.

As noted in our previous legal update, the Data Law governs digital data, the National Data Center, the National General Database, digital data products and services, digital data management, and the rights, obligations, and responsibilities of agencies, organizations, and individuals related to digital data activities.

This legal update provides an overview of the Data Law, with a deep focus on the key provisions likely to impact businesses operating or offering services in Vietnam.

New Data Definition and Classification

The Data Law broadly defines “digital data” as data about objects, phenomena, and events, which can include one or a combination of audio, images, numbers, text, or symbols represented in digital format (hereinafter referred to as “data”). This definition is very broad and potentially covers any information recorded or represented in digital forms, including personal and nonpersonal data (such as business data, transactional data, trade secrets, etc.). Data is further categorized into different types that can be used by public bodies. However, the rights and obligations associated with each type of data are not clearly addressed. The data classification criteria include:

  • The nature of data sharing (shared data, private data, open data);
  • The importance of data (core data, important data, and other data);
  • Any other criteria to meet the requirements of data administration, processing, and protection, as determined by the data owner.

While the Data Law requires private organizations to categorize data based on its level of importance, it still grants these organizations the right to categorize data based on other criteria.

Cross-Border Data Transfers and Processing

Under the Data Law, agencies, organizations, and individuals can freely transfer and process offshore data in Vietnam, with the state protecting their lawful rights and interests.

For core and important data, the law regulates cases deemed as cross-border data transfers, including the transfer of data to foreign organizations and individuals, which was not mentioned in the Personal Data Protection Decree or the publicized version of the draft Personal Data Protection Law. Currently, the Data Law imposes no specific restrictions on cross-border data transfers, but these activities must comply with national defense, security, public interests, and international treaties. Further guidance is expected in a future government decree, which enterprises will also need to keep an eye on.

Under the Data Law, “important data” refers to data that may impact national defense, security, foreign affairs, macroeconomics, social stability, health, and public safety, while “core data” means important data that directly affects national defense, security, foreign affairs, macroeconomics, social stability, health, and public safety. More detailed lists of important data and core data will be issued by the prime minister.

National Comprehensive Database

The government will establish and manage a National Comprehensive Database, consolidating open, shared, and private data, as well as other data from various sources, including state and party agencies. This database will include data from administrative procedures and public services, though it is unclear whether it will include data submitted by private organizations during administrative filing processes. Once the National Comprehensive Database is created, it is possible that various authorities may have easy access to the data, which will strongly facilitate their supervision and enforcement activities.

Organizations and individuals can voluntarily contribute data, and in certain cases, may be requested to do so, as further explained below.

Access Rights of Competent Agencies

The Data Law sets out the conditions under which state agencies can access data from organizations and individuals. These access rights have been limited and are more restricted than the typical access rights that the government tends to reserve for itself. Under the Data Law, the request to access can be made under four special cases: (1) in response to a state of emergency; (2) upon a threat to national security, but not to the extent of declaring a state of emergency; (3) upon disasters; or (4) for the prevention of riots or terrorism. Consent from relevant data subjects is not required for data sharing in this case. If the data is encrypted, the state agencies also have the right to decrypt data for their access and usage.

The Data Law also prescribes certain responsibilities for state agencies when receiving data, which is a welcome development. Further regulations on the authorities access rights and the data provision obligations of private organizations and individuals are expected to be encompassed in the decree guiding this Data Law.

These new developments and limitations to access powers were among the requests the business community made following the first draft Data Law (circulated in March 2024), aiming to safeguard the attractiveness of the Vietnamese market and protect proprietary data.

New Data-Related Products and Services

Recognizing new data-related products and services, the Data Law opens the market to new opportunities for local players. However, the Data Law has yet to provide any definition of “data-related products and services” in general, and these products and services could be broadly interpreted to encompass any services related to data processing.

The Data Law clearly indicates that its provisions apply to data intermediary products and services, data analysis and aggregation, and data platforms. Accordingly, depending on the specific nature of the products or services, they may be subject to registration or licensing requirements as stipulated under the Data Law and its forthcoming guiding decree.

Applicability of the Data Law

To address the risk of contradiction or conflict in the patchwork of regulations related to data, the Data Law stipulates that where other laws issued before its effective date (July 1, 2025) contain regulations on key data-related activities (such as building, developing, protecting, managing, processing, and using data) that do not contradict the principles of the Data Law, the provisions of those laws shall still apply. The Data Law is silent on the consequences if the provisions of existing laws contradict the Data Law.

Furthermore, the Data Law requires new laws issued after its effective date to clarify how they comply with or deviate from the Data Law, ensuring a clear understanding of implementation requirements.

Looking Ahead

The Data Law explicitly recognizes that data is a resource that state policies will mobilize and develop into assets. This has the potential to pave the way for many data-related businesses in the future and offers promising opportunities for tech companies with a strong focus on data.

The Data Law recognizes the importance of data in the digital age and highlights Vietnam’s commitment to fostering a secure and innovative data environment. However, the scope and applicability of the Data Law, especially those overlapping with other existing laws or regulations, are still ambiguous, as discussed above. Thus, it remains to be seen how legislators will address these issues in the future.

Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 6, 2026
Thailand’s Legislation Consideration Committee of the Ministry of Interior has ruled that in-game loot boxes in online games do not constitute gambling under the Gambling Act B.E. 2478 (1935). This first-of-its-kind ruling provides useful guidance for online game operators and digital entertainment companies operating in Thailand. Background The ruling came in response to an inquiry concerning an online role-playing game operator that launched a campaign featuring a loot box mechanism. The mechanism allowed players to purchase a token in exchange for the opportunity to receive a virtual loot box containing randomized in-game items. The key features of this were as follows: The items received were digital, noncash items usable only within the game. The items could not be exchanged, redeemed, or converted into cash with the game operator. Items may differ in rarity but remain purely virtual. The central question was whether paying money to obtain randomized in-game items constituted a risk-based activity involving the chance to receive money or property of monetary value, which would constitute gambling under the Gambling Act. Committee Ruling The committee reached the following conclusions regarding the characteristics of the game’s loot-box mechanism: No cash or monetary equivalent: Players did not receive cash or property that could be exchanged for cash. The in-game items were merely usage rights within the online game ecosystem. No real-world monetary valuation: There was no determination of item value in real currency, and no mechanism for redeeming or converting items into money with the game operator. Any off-platform trading of in-game items between players is irrelevant to online game operators, as any value arising from such transactions is determined by the market rather than by the operators themselves. Service fee characterization: Payments made by players purchasing in-game loot boxes constituted fees for online game services. Accordingly, the committee concluded
Read More
March 5, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a criminal complaint against a licensed digital asset broker, its overseas trading platform, and its executives for allegedly operating an unlicensed digital asset exchange targeting Thai customers. The case marks an escalation in the SEC’s enforcement efforts against unlicensed offshore platforms that attempt to serve Thai users through local licensed entities. Criminal Complaint On February 20, 2026, the SEC filed a criminal complaint with the Economic Crime Suppression Division against a local licensed digital asset broker, its overseas global trading platform, and its executives. The SEC alleges that the parties violated the Digital Asset Business Emergency Decree B.E. 2561 (2018) by cooperatively operating a digital asset exchange business on a cross-border basis since 2023 without the required SEC license. According to the SEC, the local broker promoted the overseas platform’s services to the public through Thai-language posts on social media channels, with services available exclusively to customers residing in Thailand. Access to the global platform was provided through the local broker’s website and mobile application. Customers who registered for the local broker’s services were automatically granted access to the global platform without having to undergo a separate identity verification process. The SEC also found that the local broker provided back-office system support services to the global platform. The SEC considers these activities to constitute joint operation of an unlicensed digital asset exchange. The former executives of the local broker are being held liable as the responsible persons during the relevant period. The SEC emphasized that the complaint initiates the criminal process, and the decision to prosecute or convict the accused parties will ultimately be made by law enforcement authorities and the criminal courts. Platform Blocking The SEC has also coordinated with the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society to block public
Read More
February 27, 2026
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has officially implemented a new regulatory framework supervising systemically important retail payment systems (SIRPS), effective February 21, 2026, with PromptPay being the first payment system designated as a SIRPS. Under this new set of regulations, the BOT may designate payment systems under the Payment Systems Act B.E. 2560 (2017) as SIRPSs based on quantitative and qualitative assessments. Once a system is designated as a SIRPS, the operator becomes subject to expanded supervisory obligations beyond the general requirements of the Payment Systems Act. Enhanced Supervisory Requirements SIRPS operators must comply with a heightened supervisory regime across three key areas, outlined below. 1. Governance SIRPS operators must maintain robust and transparent governance structures, including: Balanced board composition, with at least one-third of the board comprising independent directors who represent stakeholders in the system (such as payment service providers, consumers, and experts). Independent directors may serve for no more than two consecutive terms. Subcommittees to assist the board in overseeing compliance, policy implementation, and operational strategy. Clear separation between executives responsible for risk and information security and those overseeing day-to-day business operations. Risk Management and System SecuritySIRPS operators must implement comprehensive risk management frameworks, including: Clear service agreements between the SIRPS operator and its direct participants (payment service providers who connect directly to the SIRPS), defining roles and responsibilities among stakeholders. These agreements must include obligations for direct SIRPS participants to supervise any indirect participants they onboard to ensure compliance with service agreements and business rules. A business continuity plan covering both IT and non-IT aspects, with annual review. The SIRPS must target service availability comparable to international payment infrastructures, including the ability to recover operations within two hours of a disruption and to maintain scalable operational capacity. Tools and controls to monitor and manage material or
Read More
February 26, 2026
Thailand is preparing to offer new tools for intellectual property enforcement as the Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) recently released for public consultation a draft notification requiring social media platforms to verify user identities and conduct know-your-customer (KYC) checks on advertisers. The draft Notification of the Electronic Transactions Commission on Measures to Prevent Technological Crimes for Social Media Service Providers, which is to be issued under the Emergency Decree on Measures for the Prevention and Suppression of Technological Crimes B.E. 2566 (2023), as amended in 2025, primarily aims to combat online fraud and technology-related crimes. However, its new obligations also provide IP owners with valuable tools to identify anonymous infringers. Key Regulatory Mandates The draft notification imposes several verification requirements on social media platforms operating in Thailand. These requirements also strengthen IP rights holders’ ability to identify anonymous infringers, as platforms must: Verify user identities through registered phone numbers and link all accounts to verifiable identities. Conduct KYC checks on advertisers, including individuals, companies, and any third-party payers. Perform heightened identity checks for high-risk or repeat offenders before publishing advertisements. Promptly remove content flagged by the Anti-Technology Crime Division and prescreen advertisements for prohibited or high-risk content. How IP Owners Can Use This Notification for Enforcement The phone number–based verification requirement enables IP owners to work more effectively with enforcement authorities in tracing individuals or entities responsible for infringing content. The comprehensive advertiser KYC obligations, including mandatory disclosure of third-party payment sources, create a clear audit trail even when bad actors attempt to obscure their identity through intermediaries or shell accounts. This traceability is essential for pursuing damages and dismantling organized counterfeit operations. The ETDA is now considering adjustments to the draft notification after receiving comments during the public consultation period, which ended on February 2, 2026. Following finalization
Read More