You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

October 20, 2025

Thailand’s Role in Global Trade: Rules of Origin and Transshipment Tariffs

Subscribe to Updates

Global trade has become an everyday issue with immense effects on trade and the economy. Today’s global trade climate sees countries around the world engaged in trade negotiations aspiring to eliminate trade barriers. Customs tariffs and associated privileges are among the issues that most impact global trade flows and the import-export sector.

Thailand has negotiated customs tariff privileges as part of its 14 free trade agreements (FTAs) with 18 countries, including six bilateral and eight regional agreements. These FTAs set forth criteria for member states to comply with and adopt into national law. To achieve customs privileges, one of the most important criteria is rules of origin, which indicate the originating country of imported or exported goods and the accompanying duty rates or privileges for reduction or exemption.

Rules of Origin Under FTAs

The rules of origin mapped out in FTAs allow for duty exemptions or rate reductions based on the determination of goods’ country of origin. This largely includes two main categories:

  • Wholly obtained (WO) means the product was entirely produced in a single originating country and does not include any foreign (non-originating) content or manufacturing process.
  • Product specific rules (PSR) are detailed criteria that define how each product’s origin is determined. PSR criteria that are often found in FTAs include “change in tariff classification” (determining origin based on sufficient transformation of materials), “regional value content” (requiring a minimum percentage of value to be added locally), and specific manufacturing or processing operations (mandating particular production steps occur in the originating country). These criteria also extend to cover other subordinated methods of verification, such as accumulation rules and de minimis rules, to provide more flexibility for the establishment of origins and tariff privileges under such FTAs.

Compliance Challenges

Despite attempts to promote international trade and eliminate trade barriers through the establishment of FTAs, importers and exporters nevertheless face difficulties or disputes arising from FTAs, especially disputes concerning the origin of goods either at the time of importation/exportation or through the process of postclearance audit by customs officers. If imported goods are not originating goods as declared, the importer is subject to additional duty assessment. Declaration of non-originating goods as originating goods may constitute a criminal offense, such as false declaration to avoid duty payment.

Hence, it is of utmost importance that entrepreneurs understand and are aware of the criteria of rules of origin and associated procedural aspects, including requirements for certificates of origin, document retention periods, and dispute resolution mechanism pertaining to Customs disputes.

Thailand and US Reciprocal Tariffs

Tariff privileges have been a vital issue in the international trade arena and have continuously been pivotal points in trade negotiations. A prominent global issue that has been headlined worldwide this year is the “reciprocal tariff” regime executed by US President Donald Trump’s administration, which imposed significantly high and controversial tariff rates on nations trading with the US, which has been criticized as a trade barrier. For Thailand, the tariff was initially imposed at a rate of 36% and has since been reduced to 19% following a series of negotiations and tradeoffs between nations.

However, although the reciprocal tariff rate now appears settled, the US is still pursuing further agreements on “transshipment tariffs,” as this would likely prevent other countries, particularly China, from using supply chains in other countries to disguise products’ country of origin to benefit from lower tariffs or circumvent trade restrictions.

Thailand’s Transshipment Scrutiny

Pursuant to recent negotiations with the US, Thailand is being scrutinized regarding its transshipment practices, especially concerning the exportation of goods actually originating from China as “made in Thailand” with nominal or no local content added from Thai manufacturers. This practice occurs because the goods would encounter higher tariff rates if exported directly from China to the US.

To facilitate negotiations, Thailand has reportedly planned to set up a special task force to manage issues concerning certificates of origin, which are expected to be required under new trade rules being negotiated with the U.S.

While the agreed criteria for transshipment are still not well settled, it can be expected that transshipment practices will be more thoroughly tested and verified for goods being shipped to the US.

Conclusion

Based upon FTAs and the prospective rules on transshipment tariff classification, rules of origin and associated documentation such as certificates of origin are crucial considerations for entrepreneurs who wish to enjoy tariff privileges and prevent risks of higher tariff exposure. Thailand’s experience demonstrates how geopolitical trade tensions can quickly reshape compliance requirements for businesses operating in global supply chains. As transshipment rules continue to evolve, companies should regularly review their origin determinations and supply chain structures to ensure continued compliance and market access.

Related Professionals

Practices

Customs and International Trade

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 13, 2025
Licensing specialists at Tilleke & Gibbins in Bangkok have contributed the Thailand chapter to the newly issued Licensing 2025, a comprehensive guide from Lexology Panoramic to licensing in various jurisdictions around the world. The Thailand chapter covers the following topics: Laws and licensing arrangements: Unfair Contract Terms Act, Trade Competition Act, pre-contractual disclosure, registration of international licensing, implied obligations, Civil and Commercial Code, Trademark Act, Patent Act, Trade Secrets Act Intellectual property issues: Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, contesting the validity of licensor’s IP rights, invalidity and expiry of IP rights, security interests, proceedings against third parties, sublicensing, jointly owned IP, first to file, scope of patent protection, trade secrets, copyright Software licensing: Perpetual licensing, legal requirements, user restrictions Royalties and payments, currency conversion, and taxes: Relevant legislation, restrictions, taxation of foreign licensors Competition law issues: Restrictions on trade, legal restrictions, and IP-related court rulings Indemnification, disclaimers, and damages: Prevalence and enforceability of indemnity provisions and contractual waivers of damages Termination: Right to terminate, impact of termination Bankruptcy: Impact of licensee or licensor bankruptcy Dispute resolution: Governing law, arbitration, enforceability, injunctive relief, contractual waivers The Thailand chapter was authored by Alan Adcock, partner, and Kasama Sriwatanakul, counsel, both in the Thailand regulatory affairs team. The full Thailand chapter is available below as a PDF. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Vietnam chapter to Licensing 2025. Readers can gain 30 days of complementary access to the full Licensing 2025 guide and the rest of Lexology Panoramic’s varied offerings through this link.
Read More
March 6, 2025
On February 18, 2025, the Thai Senate approved an amendment to the Act on the Establishment of and Procedures for the Tax Court. This follows the July 2024 approval by the Thai cabinet and subsequent preparation of supporting secondary legislation. This important amendment to procedural law, once it takes effect, will extend the exclusive jurisdictional powers of the Tax Court to all criminal tax, customs, and excise tax claims in addition to the court’s existing jurisdiction over all such civil claims. The amendment, while now formally approved by the legislature, is awaiting the king’s signature and will take effect 180 days after its publication in the Government Gazette. Based upon its projected publication date, the amendment will likely take effect by the end of the third quarter of this year. This development is set to offer a more sophisticated Tax Court litigation process for highly specialized and often complex criminal tax and customs claims, something with which Thailand’s traditional criminal courts have struggled. It also ensures that all tax and customs matters are adjudicated before the same court, saving time, party costs, and judicial resources. This appears likely to result in more consistent adjudication of criminal tax and customs disputes, a benefit for the Thai government and party litigants alike. Any ongoing criminal tax and customs claims already commenced with the respective criminal courts on the date on which the amendment becomes effective will remain under the exclusive jurisdiction of those criminal courts. The Tax Court will have exclusive jurisdiction over all other claims. This important legislative change offers those managing or otherwise facing civil and/or criminal Thai tax or customs disputes the opportunity to more effectively plan and execute a uniform defense strategy before a single, qualified forum.
Read More
March 5, 2025
It is a common misconception that importers will never win classification assessments by the Thai Customs Department. However, this belief is far from the truth. Importers can indeed prevail in customs assessments, and one of the most effective tools at their disposal is the World Customs Organization’s (WCO) Explanatory Notes. The WCO’s Explanatory Notes are an indispensable resource for understanding the Harmonized System (HS) of tariff nomenclature. These notes provide detailed commentary on the scope of each heading, including lists of main products included and excluded, technical descriptions, and practical guidance for identifying goods. By leveraging these notes, importers can ensure accurate classification of their goods, which is crucial for fair customs assessments. Understanding the Explanatory Notes The Explanatory Notes serve as the official interpretation of the Harmonized System at the international level. They offer clarity on the classification of goods, which can significantly impact the duties and taxes imposed on imports. For instance, the notes provide insights into the properties, methods of production, and uses of various goods, helping importers to classify their products correctly and avoid misclassification disputes. Thailand’s Customs Tariff Decree holds that the classification interpretation must follow the General Rules for Interpretation together with the Explanatory Notes to the Harmonized System of the WCO. Most Thai Supreme Court decisions on classification also refer to the WCO’s Explanatory Notes and past rulings as the basis of their decisions. Successful Appeals There have been numerous instances of importers successfully appealing customs assessments by relying on the Explanatory Notes. For example, one importer of electronic components was initially assessed a higher duty due to misclassification. By presenting evidence from the Explanatory Notes that accurately described the components, the importer was able to demonstrate the correct classification and secure a favorable reassessment. Practical Steps for Importers To minimize the
Read More
February 19, 2025
On January 3, 2025, the Bank of the Lao PDR (BOL) issued Decision No. 11/BOL on the Use of Foreign Currency in Lao PDR, taking effect on the same date. This decision sets out the rules for using foreign currency in Laos and ensures the Lao kip (LAK) remains the primary currency while allowing flexibility for international transactions. Key points in the decision are outlined below. Permissible Activities for Foreign Currency The decision provides that authorized entities can use foreign currency as a secondary currency to LAK in the setting of cost and pricing structures, announcing and advertising prices, and making or receiving payments for goods and services that are imported or have manufacturing inputs imported from other countries. Otherwise, LAK is the only permitted currency. The decision also stipulates that foreign exchange must be conducted only via authorized commercial banks or foreign exchange markets. The exchange rate for setting costs, pricing structures, announcing and advertising prices, and making and receiving payments for goods and services in foreign currency must match the exchange rate announced by commercial banks from time to time. Businesses Allowed to Use Foreign Currency The decision allows certain businesses and organizations to use foreign currency. These entities are divided into two groups: those that need approval before using foreign currency, and those that can use it immediately. Enterprises that can use foreign currency with BOL approval include: Businesses that export goods or services and entities that lease or obtain concessions from the government, generating revenue in foreign currency through commercial banks. Enterprises that provide international freight and passenger transportation services. Enterprises that provide services related to cross-border logistics and warehousing. Enterprises located at international borders and airports, such as duty-free shops and restaurants. Enterprises that have obligations to make payments in foreign currency to other
Read More