You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 19, 2025

New Regulations on Foreign Currency in Laos

Subscribe to Updates

On January 3, 2025, the Bank of the Lao PDR (BOL) issued Decision No. 11/BOL on the Use of Foreign Currency in Lao PDR, taking effect on the same date. This decision sets out the rules for using foreign currency in Laos and ensures the Lao kip (LAK) remains the primary currency while allowing flexibility for international transactions.

Key points in the decision are outlined below.

Permissible Activities for Foreign Currency

The decision provides that authorized entities can use foreign currency as a secondary currency to LAK in the setting of cost and pricing structures, announcing and advertising prices, and making or receiving payments for goods and services that are imported or have manufacturing inputs imported from other countries. Otherwise, LAK is the only permitted currency.

The decision also stipulates that foreign exchange must be conducted only via authorized commercial banks or foreign exchange markets. The exchange rate for setting costs, pricing structures, announcing and advertising prices, and making and receiving payments for goods and services in foreign currency must match the exchange rate announced by commercial banks from time to time.

Businesses Allowed to Use Foreign Currency

The decision allows certain businesses and organizations to use foreign currency. These entities are divided into two groups: those that need approval before using foreign currency, and those that can use it immediately.

Enterprises that can use foreign currency with BOL approval include:

  • Businesses that export goods or services and entities that lease or obtain concessions from the government, generating revenue in foreign currency through commercial banks.
  • Enterprises that provide international freight and passenger transportation services.
  • Enterprises that provide services related to cross-border logistics and warehousing.
  • Enterprises located at international borders and airports, such as duty-free shops and restaurants.
  • Enterprises that have obligations to make payments in foreign currency to other countries and suppliers of goods and services to exporters that generate income in foreign currency from exporting.
  • Enterprises operating international insurance, such as travel insurance, overseas project insurance, transport insurance, and reinsurance.
  • Tour agencies.
  • Enterprises operating casino businesses that receive service fees within the scope of their business activities.
  • Other businesses that may be allowed to use foreign currency after obtaining approval from the BOL.

Entities in the government sector, enterprises providing accommodation services, embassies, consulates, and commercial banks and use foreign currency immediately under certain circumstances:

  • Government sector entities
    1. Making or receiving donations via commercial banks.
    2. Collecting state budget revenue at borders and international airports, including service and visa fees and obligatory state fees related to arrivals and departures in Laos.
  • Embassies and foreign consulates
    1. Receiving payments, setting values, and announcing visa and service fees related to travel to their countries.
    2. Making or receiving payments, setting values, and announcing or advertising fees, service charges, interest, and other fees related to their transactions through commercial banks.
  • Enterprises operating accommodation services
    1. Announcing and advertising service fees through online media using foreign languages.
    2. Accepting payments from other countries via electronic payment tools, with payments made to their bank accounts opened with commercial banks in the Lao PDR.

Requesting Approval to Use Foreign Currency

Entities that are required to obtain approval from the BOL prior to using foreign currency in Laos must submit a request letter stating the reasons, along with supporting documents. These documents include relevant certificates and licenses, a revenue-expense plan in LAK and foreign currency, and a foreign currency exchange plan for a period of one year.

A determination will be made within ten working days of receiving accurate and complete documents and will be valid for a period of one year from the issuance date.

Penalties

The decision prohibits entities from using foreign currency outside the approved scope, setting and announcing foreign exchange rates without obtaining approval from the BOL, making payments in foreign currency via unauthorized systems, rejecting or avoiding selling foreign currency to commercial banks based in Laos, and other behaviors that violate the law. Violators will be reeducated or fined, with fines doubling for repeat offenses. Persistent violations may lead to the revocation of the approval certificate for using foreign currency in Laos or rejection of certificate renewal, with an announcement to the public.

Related Professionals

Practices

Banking and Finance

Corporate/M&A

Customs and International Trade

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 27, 2026
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) is seeking public feedback on a proposed overhaul of the regulatory framework for licensed money changers authorized by the finance minister, under the Exchange Control Act, to buy and sell foreign banknotes separately from commercial banks and specialized financial institutions. The BOT published the draft principles on August 19, 2026, for public consultation, with comments accepted through September 18, 2026. If adopted in its current form, the new framework would substantially raise licensing standards, require existing licensees to undergo a review and upgrade process, temporarily freeze new applications in 2027, and reduce application intake rounds from 2028 onward, with significant implications for both existing operators and prospective new entrants. The overhaul initiative stems from the BOT’s recognition of a need to prevent the use of licensed money changers as channels for financial crime. The stated objectives are to build public confidence, ensure the safety of financial service users, and align the supervisory framework with the current risk profile of the business and evolving market conditions. Upgraded Licensing Standards The BOT intends to significantly revise the licensing framework, including requirements relating to registered capital, branch management, operational standards, and customer transaction limits. Detailed criteria have not yet been released and are expected to be subject to further consultation. All existing licensees will be required to upgrade to meet the new standards and submit evidence of compliance for BOT review on a case-by-case basis. Existing licensees that are unable to satisfy the upgraded requirements may face regulatory consequences, subject to the final framework and BOT review process. Freeze and Reopening The BOT will temporarily stop accepting new license applications throughout 2027 to focus resources on inspecting and upgrading existing money changers. Any party wishing to obtain a new money changer license must submit its application by
Read More
August 24, 2026
Myanmar’s Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA) has published the guidelines it uses to assess and approve company names for registration in the country. The guidelines, which were published on May 18, 2026, explain how DICA determines whether a proposed name is identical or too similar to an existing name, and they identify words and expressions that may be prohibited or restricted. Businesses planning to incorporate in Myanmar should expect DICA to scrutinize proposed names more closely than it has in the past. Prohibitions on Company Names The Myanmar Companies Law prohibits company names that are identical or similar to existing company names, and DICA’s internal assessment guidelines explain how this rule applies in practice. Under the guidelines, DICA may reject a proposed company name if the proposed name: Is identical or nearly identical to an existing company name; Differs from an existing company name only in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, or transliteration; Only adds words such as “Group,” “Holding,” “International,” “Myanmar,” or “Family” to an existing company name; Merely rearranges the words in an existing company name; Is pronounced similarly to an existing name; Uses the same brand name as an existing company, even if the company carries out different business activities; or Uses an existing brand name together with an abbreviation of that brand name or a shortened form of the name or business description. DICA may also consider whether a proposed name could give the impression that two companies are related, even if they operate in different business sectors. In addition, DICA may review a company name even after registration. If it later determines that the name does not comply with the Myanmar Companies Law or is otherwise unsuitable, DICA may direct the company to change its name under section 26 of the Myanmar Companies Law.
Read More
August 20, 2026
Vietnam’s Law on Bankruptcy and Rehabilitation No. 142/2025/QH15, passed by the National Assembly on December 11, 2025, does something many regional counterparts do not yet attempt: it instructs parties and arbitral tribunals on exactly what happens to an arbitration once a debtor becomes insolvent. Together with the Law on Commercial Arbitration No. 54/2010/QH12, the new law improves upon what used to be an uncertain area of practice, now providing an explicit, mandatory sequence of procedures. Suspension and Termination of Arbitration Proceedings Under article 40(2) of the law, once a Vietnamese court accepts a bankruptcy petition, any arbitration that concerns the debtor’s financial obligations must be temporarily suspended as soon as the tribunal receives the court’s notification. If the court subsequently issues a decision commencing bankruptcy proceedings, article 59(2) takes a further step: the suspended arbitration is terminated outright, and the underlying case file is transferred to the court handling the insolvency for resolution. The two provisions work as a sequence: first suspension, then termination and transfer, rather than as independent triggers. Meanwhile, article 60(4) reinforces this effect by vesting the bankruptcy court with exclusive jurisdiction over all claims against the debtor from the date the petition is accepted. Notably, this mechanism operates automatically, without the need for the insolvency court to issue a separate anti-arbitration order. The tribunal simply suspends or terminates the proceeding by operation of law once notified; however, Vietnamese law currently provides no procedure by which a party can apply to the insolvency court for permission to continue the arbitration despite the statutory effect. Practitioners with a Vietnamese counterparty in arbitration should treat notification of a bankruptcy filing as something to flag to the tribunal immediately since continuing to arbitrate a claim that has become subject to article 40(2) or 59(2) risks producing an award vulnerable
Read More
August 20, 2026
Thai law contains no provision that speaks directly to what happens to an arbitration when one of the parties becomes insolvent. The interaction between arbitration and insolvency is derived instead from the general operation of two separately drafted laws: the Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940) and the Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002). Because Thai courts have had few opportunities to interpret how these two statutes apply together, the practical answer to many questions, such as who represents an insolvent party in arbitration, whether an award will be enforced, and what happens to a foreign proceeding, depends on inference from general principles of insolvency, arbitration, and procedural law rather than on settled rules. Liquidation and Restructuring The Bankruptcy Act governs both liquidation, which winds up a debtor’s affairs, and restructuring (rehabilitation), which aims to preserve a business. The consequences for arbitration differ accordingly. In liquidation, the debtor’s assets vest in the official receiver, who alone can conduct or continue any arbitration affecting the estate; the debtor loses the authority to act on its own behalf. In restructuring, the plan preparer or administrator takes over that role, but there is more room for the debtor to remain involved, since the objective of rehabilitation is to keep the business operational. Restructuring carries an automatic stay that takes effect once the Bankruptcy Court accepts the restructuring petition. This stay can halt an arbitration regardless of where it is seated. In contrast, liquidation does not work through a stay; instead, the debtor’s loss of authority over its own assets and disputes is what constrains the arbitration. Neither proceeding provides a party a formal route to apply for permission to continue arbitrating—the Bankruptcy Act contains no such mechanism—though in restructuring cases the Bankruptcy Court may allow proceedings to continue where doing so will not prejudice
Read More