You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 18, 2024

Thailand’s New Frontier: Casino Landscape Set for Change

Subscribe to Updates

Following the endorsement of the report on the study of opening entertainment complexes by Thailand’s House of Representatives and Cabinet in early 2024, the draft Entertainment Complex Bill, B.E. … (the “Entertainment Complex Bill”) finally became open for public hearing and is now under the consideration of the Ministry of Finance. The Entertainment Complex Bill aims to liberalize and facilitate the establishment of entertainment complexes that include casinos, allowing participation from domestic and foreign investors alike.

Key Takeaways

Under the Entertainment Complex Bill, an “entertainment complex” is a venue that operates at least four types of entertainment businesses alongside a casino. These may include five-star hotels, restaurants and bars, game centers, and department stores, among others.

Based on the information publicly available as of the date of this publication, the Entertainment Complex Bill and its prospective subordinate legislation should encompass the following key requirements.

  • Licensing requirements: Business operators seeking to operate an entertainment complex business must first obtain a license. To qualify, applicants must: (1) be a company incorporated in Thailand and (2) have a minimum paid-up capital of THB 10 billion. This license will operate as a “super license” covering not only casino activities but also other operations within the complex, such as hotels, restaurants, bars, and game centers, which, under normal circumstances, may require separate licenses or permits. The license will be valid for 30 years and may be renewed for an additional 10-year term upon expiration. The license fees may depend on the location of the entertainment complex.
  • Minimum investment requirements: Based on the preparatory works by the drafting committee, entertainment complex business licenses may be classified into four different categories based on the size of the investment: small, medium, large, and extra-large. At this stage, licenses for the extra-large category, requiring an investment of THB 100 billion, are anticipated to be available.
  • Location of the entertainment complex: It is suggested that entertainment complexes be situated in the following areas: (1) within a 100-kilometer radius of international airports, (2) in tourist provinces (e.g., Bangkok), and (3) in border provinces (e.g., economic corridors). However, this requirement has yet to be incorporated into the Entertainment Complex Bill and may be further detailed in its subordinate regulations.
  • Taxation: Entertainment complex business operators may be subject to corporate income tax at a progressive rate and a casino tax at the rate of 17% on the revenue gained minus the winnings awarded to players (gross gaming revenue, or “GGR”). Other excise taxes may apply depending on which types of entertainment business are operated alongside the casino.
  • Casino entry requirements: A casino entry levy may be imposed on players who are Thai residents to deter vulnerable groups of people from entering the casino.

As Thailand embarks on this transformative journey to redefine its entertainment sector, the introduction of the Entertainment Complex Bill promises to reshape the casino landscape and open new business opportunities for domestic and international investors.

For more details on the Entertainment Complex Bill or assistance navigating these prospective legal and regulatory changes, please contact Charupat Boon-Long at [email protected] or Sippakorn Bunraksa at [email protected].

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 24, 2026
Myanmar’s Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA) has published the guidelines it uses to assess and approve company names for registration in the country. The guidelines, which were published on May 18, 2026, explain how DICA determines whether a proposed name is identical or too similar to an existing name, and they identify words and expressions that may be prohibited or restricted. Businesses planning to incorporate in Myanmar should expect DICA to scrutinize proposed names more closely than it has in the past. Prohibitions on Company Names The Myanmar Companies Law prohibits company names that are identical or similar to existing company names, and DICA’s internal assessment guidelines explain how this rule applies in practice. Under the guidelines, DICA may reject a proposed company name if the proposed name: Is identical or nearly identical to an existing company name; Differs from an existing company name only in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, or transliteration; Only adds words such as “Group,” “Holding,” “International,” “Myanmar,” or “Family” to an existing company name; Merely rearranges the words in an existing company name; Is pronounced similarly to an existing name; Uses the same brand name as an existing company, even if the company carries out different business activities; or Uses an existing brand name together with an abbreviation of that brand name or a shortened form of the name or business description. DICA may also consider whether a proposed name could give the impression that two companies are related, even if they operate in different business sectors. In addition, DICA may review a company name even after registration. If it later determines that the name does not comply with the Myanmar Companies Law or is otherwise unsuitable, DICA may direct the company to change its name under section 26 of the Myanmar Companies Law.
Read More
August 20, 2026
Vietnam’s Law on Bankruptcy and Rehabilitation No. 142/2025/QH15, passed by the National Assembly on December 11, 2025, does something many regional counterparts do not yet attempt: it instructs parties and arbitral tribunals on exactly what happens to an arbitration once a debtor becomes insolvent. Together with the Law on Commercial Arbitration No. 54/2010/QH12, the new law improves upon what used to be an uncertain area of practice, now providing an explicit, mandatory sequence of procedures. Suspension and Termination of Arbitration Proceedings Under article 40(2) of the law, once a Vietnamese court accepts a bankruptcy petition, any arbitration that concerns the debtor’s financial obligations must be temporarily suspended as soon as the tribunal receives the court’s notification. If the court subsequently issues a decision commencing bankruptcy proceedings, article 59(2) takes a further step: the suspended arbitration is terminated outright, and the underlying case file is transferred to the court handling the insolvency for resolution. The two provisions work as a sequence: first suspension, then termination and transfer, rather than as independent triggers. Meanwhile, article 60(4) reinforces this effect by vesting the bankruptcy court with exclusive jurisdiction over all claims against the debtor from the date the petition is accepted. Notably, this mechanism operates automatically, without the need for the insolvency court to issue a separate anti-arbitration order. The tribunal simply suspends or terminates the proceeding by operation of law once notified; however, Vietnamese law currently provides no procedure by which a party can apply to the insolvency court for permission to continue the arbitration despite the statutory effect. Practitioners with a Vietnamese counterparty in arbitration should treat notification of a bankruptcy filing as something to flag to the tribunal immediately since continuing to arbitrate a claim that has become subject to article 40(2) or 59(2) risks producing an award vulnerable
Read More
August 20, 2026
Thai law contains no provision that speaks directly to what happens to an arbitration when one of the parties becomes insolvent. The interaction between arbitration and insolvency is derived instead from the general operation of two separately drafted laws: the Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940) and the Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002). Because Thai courts have had few opportunities to interpret how these two statutes apply together, the practical answer to many questions, such as who represents an insolvent party in arbitration, whether an award will be enforced, and what happens to a foreign proceeding, depends on inference from general principles of insolvency, arbitration, and procedural law rather than on settled rules. Liquidation and Restructuring The Bankruptcy Act governs both liquidation, which winds up a debtor’s affairs, and restructuring (rehabilitation), which aims to preserve a business. The consequences for arbitration differ accordingly. In liquidation, the debtor’s assets vest in the official receiver, who alone can conduct or continue any arbitration affecting the estate; the debtor loses the authority to act on its own behalf. In restructuring, the plan preparer or administrator takes over that role, but there is more room for the debtor to remain involved, since the objective of rehabilitation is to keep the business operational. Restructuring carries an automatic stay that takes effect once the Bankruptcy Court accepts the restructuring petition. This stay can halt an arbitration regardless of where it is seated. In contrast, liquidation does not work through a stay; instead, the debtor’s loss of authority over its own assets and disputes is what constrains the arbitration. Neither proceeding provides a party a formal route to apply for permission to continue arbitrating—the Bankruptcy Act contains no such mechanism—though in restructuring cases the Bankruptcy Court may allow proceedings to continue where doing so will not prejudice
Read More
August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.
Read More