You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 7, 2026

Thailand Seeks Input on Competition Guidelines for Digital Platforms, Modern Trade, and On-Demand Delivery

Subscribe to Updates

On July 31, 2026, the Trade Competition Commission of Thailand (TCCT) launched a one-month public consultation period on proposed regulatory guidelines for competition in three business segments: (1) digital platforms; (2) modern trade and credit terms; and (3) ride-hailing and on-demand delivery, including food delivery and mart/quick commerce. At the same time, the TCCT released a market report on ride hailing and on-demand delivery that is likely to influence the guidelines and their interpretation and enforcement.

The consultation runs until August 31, 2026. Stakeholders have a limited window to submit practical, evidence-based input that may shape the next phase of Thailand’s regulatory framework for competition.

Scope of the Consultation

The public consultation targets updating existing guidance in three business sectors that have experienced transformative growth and structural change:

  • Digital platforms: The TCCT has actively monitored this sector in recent years and has coordinated with other regulators, primarily the Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) and the Ministry of Commerce. In March 2026 the TCCT’s Guidelines on Multi-Sided Platforms and E-Commerce Businesses took effect, and in July the TCCT established a digital platform subcommittee to regulate and prevent unfair trade practices in digital platform businesses. This activity followed a TCCT market report on e-marketplace businesses in September 2025.
  • Modern trade and credit terms: This sector was the focus of the TCCT’s 2019 Guidelines on Unfair Trade Practices between Wholesale and Retail Operators and Manufacturers or Suppliers (widely known as the “Modern Trade Guidelines”) , as well as its 2021 Guidelines on Unfair Trade Practices regarding the Credit Terms under which Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Sell Products or Services to a Purchaser (also known as the “Credit Term Guidelines”), which were amended the following year.
  • Ride-hailing and on-demand delivery (including food delivery and quick commerce): The TCCT published the Guidelines on Unfair Trade Practices between Digital Platform Operators for Food Delivery and Restaurants (or the “Food Delivery Guidelines”)in December 2020, but no specific guidelines currently exist for ride-hailing and mart/quick commerce.

The TCCT’s decision to revise existing guidelines follows field research across multiple provinces and in-depth market structure analysis. The findings of that research suggest that current guidelines may not fully capture fast-changing trading practices, platform ecosystems, and sector-specific market dynamics. The consultation is therefore an opportunity for operators to explain how their markets work in practice, identify where regulatory assumptions may not reflect commercial realities, and help the TCCT design rules that are targeted, workable, and proportionate.

TCCT’s Market Report on Ride-Hailing and On-Demand Delivery

Alongside the call for public consultation, the TCCT has released a detailed market report for the ride-hailing and on-demand delivery sectors, conducted by its Market Structure and Business Systems Division.

In the ride-hailing sector, a single platform held approximately 70 percent market share in 2024, but by 2026 the market had evolved into a behavioral duopoly between two leading platforms holding around 45–50 percent and 45 percent, respectively, with smaller players holding minimal shares. The rapid ascent of the challenger platform resulted from aggressive pricing strategies, including waiving commission fees for drivers during its market-entry phase. A newer entrant that launched in early 2024 introduced a zero-commission model charging drivers a flat THB 20 platform fee per trip.

The food delivery market has experienced more dramatic concentration. The market, valued at approximately THB 100 billion over 2022–2025, underwent a major structural shift in May 2025 when a pioneering operator with more than 19 percent market share announced its permanent withdrawal from Thailand due to sustained losses. At the same time, a domestic financial group completed the sale of its loss-making food delivery platform to a consortium of local investors. These exits left two leading food delivery platforms controlling a combined 80–90 percent of transaction volume in 2026, with a third operator holding approximately 10 percent as a supporting player within a broader regional e-commerce group.

The report identifies systemic entry barriers that reinforce market concentration. These include:

  • Indirect network effects that create a “chicken-and-egg problem” whereby new platforms cannot attract drivers or delivery riders without passengers or customers, and vice versa, forcing entrants to subsidize both sides simultaneously at enormous cost.
  • Multihoming barriers that impose hidden costs on drivers wishing to work across multiple platforms—including uniforms, insulated delivery bags, high-performance smartphones, fast internet packages, and advance deposits—compounded by loyalty programs designed to incentivize single-platform commitment.
  • Data and ecosystem advantages that enable incumbents to leverage their market power and achieve economies of scope, including superior algorithmic pricing, demand forecasting, and integrated financial services such as digital wallets and buy-now-pay-later schemes that create switching costs and lock in users.

The report also documents several categories of potentially anticompetitive conduct. Pricing behaviors include:

  • Surge pricing through opaque algorithms that may discriminate unfairly against consumers in urgent need.
  • Predatory pricing or pricing below cost to eliminate smaller competitors, followed by raising prices and commission rates once market dominance is achieved (recoupment).
  • Unfair commission fees imposed on small merchants with high platform dependency, coupled with unilateral changes to rider compensation without advance notice.

Nonprice conduct includes:

  • Price parity clauses that prohibit restaurants from offering lower prices on their own websites or competing platforms.
  • Self-preferencing through algorithm manipulation to promote in-house food preparation or captive logistics services.
  • Exclusivity arrangements that coerce merchants or riders to avoid competitors in exchange for preferential commission rates or marketing tools.

Next Steps for Business Operators

The public consultation marks a significant shift toward more responsive competition law enforcement in Thailand’s digital platform economy. The TCCT is expected to play a more active role through heightened ex-ante oversight and sector-specific guidance, and it has signaled its intention to align enforcement more closely with international competition policy trends—including the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), foreign competition authority enforcement experience, and Thailand’s broader policy direction toward OECD accession. The outcome of this consultation, in conjunction with the TCCT’s market studies, will likely shape how Thailand’s competition rules are interpreted and applied across these sectors.

Participation in the consultation is thus important not only to comment on existing and future guidelines but also to influence the market study assumptions that may underpin future law reform and enforcement priorities. This is a valuable opportunity to help the TCCT understand the nature of participants’ businesses, the commercial justification for existing practices, and the differences between Thai market conditions and foreign market dynamics and regulatory models.

Business operators should act promptly to:

  1. Identify which aspects of the consultation and market study may affect their business model, commercial terms, data practices, pricing policies, commission structures, merchant or supplier arrangements, and platform governance.
  2. Prepare factual evidence and practical examples showing how the relevant markets operate in Thailand.
  3. Submit clear, well-supported comments before the consultation closes on August 31, 2026.

To encourage this process, Tilleke & Gibbins is helping operators assess the consultation’s impact and develop practical advocacy positions. We can also lead industry-wide discussions and engagements with the TCCT and other regulators so that the consultation reflects insightful market practices and a balanced regulatory approach.

Related Professionals

Practices

Antitrust and Competition

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 2, 2021
Thailand’s long-awaited new Trade Competition Act B.E. 2560 (2017) (TCA) came into effect on October 5, 2017, and the legislation’s extensive reforms of both substantive and procedural rules from the preceding version of the law have been both effective and revolutionizing. Significantly, the TCA lays out an efficient structure for the Trade Competition Commission (TCC) and grants independence to its administrative office, the Office of Trade Competition Commission (OTCC). Consequently, enforcement of this law—which had been almost absent in the past 20 years—is picking up pace. This article will examine the ongoing developments under this law in recent years, and will highlight its current application by discussing some of the TCC’s latest guidelines. TCC: A Developer-Regulator Since its establishment in 2018, the TCC has proven that its role and responsibilities are beyond those of a conventional regulator and law enforcer. The OTCC, with the support of its ad hoc subcommittees, have been actively monitoring the conduct of business operators and the level of competition in various markets and sectors, and the commission is well recognized for its publicizing of the TCA and establishment of new regulations under the law. Through various channels and platforms, a series of regulations, reports on market conditions, press releases, rulings, and precautionary statements have been published, and the TCC’s spokesperson often appears in the media to educate the public. To streamline the exchange of information and collaboration, the TCC and the OTCC have entered into an MOU with six sectoral regulators, including the Securities and Exchange Commission of Thailand, the Office of Insurance Commission, and others. The TCC has also exercised its pre-emptive power to prevent suspicious trade practices and transactions. Prohibitive warnings have been issued against potential infringement, such as unfair trade practices by food delivery platform operators and a proposed merger by
Read More
February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension
Read More
February 1, 2021
Attorneys from Tilleke & Gibbins in Myanmar have contributed to the latest edition of Practical Law’s online Life Sciences Global Guide. The guide is a Q&A-style overview of the regulatory frameworks for the life sciences industry across multiple jurisdictions worldwide, and this year the Myanmar chapter includes two sections, one of which is “Pharmaceutical IP and Competition Law in Myanmar.” This section runs through the country’s legal and regulatory environment for patents and trademarks—particularly as they relate to pharmaceutical business in the jurisdiction. The section then turns to IP and competition law issues, with questions and answers focusing on how the country’s competition laws and regulations affect the pharmaceutical sector. Readers are also given information on how to properly comply with Myanmar law on competition, including when it comes to licensing of medicines and pharmaceutical technology. The full Pharmaceutical Intellectual Property and Competition Law in Myanmar guide can be accessed on the Practical Law website. Practical Law, produced by Thomson Reuters, is the world’s leading legal know-how resource for business lawyers, publishing a huge range of guides covering hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. Tilleke & Gibbins also supplied the “Medicinal Product Regulation and Product Liability in Myanmar,” which Practical Law published in its Life Sciences Global Guide  at the same time.
Read More
December 9, 2020
Thailand’s Trade Competition Commission (TCC) has issued new rules governing business relations between food delivery platform operators and the restaurants operating through those platforms. The guidelines identify various arrangements, that are sometimes imposed upon restaurants by digital platforms, as unfair and damaging to restaurant operators, and restrict them accordingly. This is the fourth time that the TCC has deemed it necessary to intervene in a specific industry by restricting certain unfair trade practices in accordance with the Trade Competition Act B.E. 2560 (2017) (TCA), and is indicative of the TCC’s greater drive to quell unfair practices using its powers under the TCA. It also shows their willingness to react quickly to new developments in the market—in this case, the substantial increase in restaurant operators selling their products through online platforms in recent months. The Guidelines on Unfair Trade Practices between Digital Platform Operators for Food Delivery and Restaurants were published in the Government Gazette on November 23, 2020, and take effect on December 23, 2020. Key Definitions Digital platforms mean online services which establish a trade linkage between restaurant businesses, food deliverers, and consumers—in other words, applications or websites that allow consumers to use restaurants via food deliverers. Digital platform operators for food delivery means the business operators that provide digital platform services, acting as an intermediary to accept the purchase order and deliver food between restaurant operators, food delivery service providers, and consumers; or between restaurant operators and consumers in accepting the purchase order for food. Put simply, they are the companies operating food delivery platforms. Unfair Conduct  The main principle set forth in the TCC’s food delivery guidelines is that business conduct between food delivery platform operators and restaurant operators must respect the freedom of each party; must be fair, noncompulsory, and nondiscriminatory; and must not obstruct another
Read More