You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 1, 2026

Thailand Opens Certain Services and Other Activities to Foreign Business

Subscribe to Updates

Thailand has taken another step toward liberalizing its foreign business framework, exempting additional service activities and derivatives brokerage or agency businesses from the licensing requirements of the Foreign Business Act (FBA).

Since the FBA came into effect, Thailand has taken a measured approach to opening its economy to foreign investment. While the FBA regulates foreign participation in businesses that may affect domestic interests, the framework has also evolved to allow foreign participation in certain business activities where sector-specific laws and regulatory frameworks already provide sufficient oversight, making additional FBA restrictions unnecessary. This is particularly true where Thai businesses are sufficiently capable of competing in certain service sectors, or where liberalization is intended to facilitate the provision of services among companies within the same corporate group.

Against this backdrop, two new ministerial regulations have been issued pursuant to the FBA.

Service Businesses Under the FBA

Under the FBA, certain categories of business are restricted for foreign operators. List 3 of the FBA sets out businesses that foreigners may operate only if they obtain a foreign business license (FBL) or a foreign business certificate (FBC), or unless a specific exemption applies.

List 3 (21) covers “other service businesses,” which is a catch-all provision that captures a wide range of service businesses not specifically enumerated elsewhere in the FBA. In practice, this means that most service activities carried on by foreigners in Thailand require an FBL or FBC unless otherwise exempted.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the FBA provides a mechanism to address this breadth by empowering the Minister of Commerce to issue ministerial regulations excluding specific types of service businesses from List Three (21). Once a service business is so excluded, foreigners may operate it without obtaining an FBL or FBC.

Prior to the new regulations, four ministerial regulations had been issued to exempt specific services from list 3 (21) of the FBA. The exempted services have generally fallen within three principal categories:

  • Services already governed by sector-specific laws, where market entry and business conduct are already regulated and supervised by the relevant sector regulator, making an additional FBA permission requirement duplicative.
  • Intragroup services provided between affiliated entities within the same corporate group, which are considered less likely to have a material impact on competition in the broader Thai market.
  • Services where the Thai market has reached sufficient readiness, with Thai businesses having developed adequate capabilities and competitive strength to operate alongside foreign participants.

Efforts to further remove additional service businesses from the restricted list had been under discussion for several years. Following an extended period of consideration and consultation, the Ministerial Regulation Prescribing Service Businesses Not Requiring Permission for Foreign Business Operations (No. 5), B.E. 2569 (2026) was published in the Government Gazette on August 28, 2026.

The regulation marks a significant step in Thailand’s opening of its service sectors to foreign investment, while maintaining the broader policy objective of ensuring that Thai businesses remain sufficiently prepared and protected as market access is expanded.

Exempted Service Businesses

The service businesses exempted by the ministerial regulation include:

  • Securities business under the Securities and Exchange Act. The exemption has been expanded to cover loans provided for securities purchases and securities repurchase agreement transactions regulated under the Securities and Exchange Act.
  • Services relating to derivatives where the underlying assets fall outside the scope of the Derivatives Act. The regulation introduces three additional services related to derivatives business, covering derivatives dealers, advisors, and fund managers in transactions involving underlying assets, or whose settlement is linked to foreign exchange rates or interest rates, subject to applicable requirements. Where Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) determines that these businesses need not be regulated, they fall outside the SEC’s regulatory scope and may be carried on without further regulatory requirements. On this basis, the Ministry of Commerce considers a separate FBA license unnecessary for foreign investors.
  • Telecommunications services. The exemption applies only to telecom operators that do not have their own telecommunications network (type 1 license holders) and are of a nature appropriate for liberalized service provision under the applicable telecommunications regulatory framework.
  • Treasury center business. This business is subject to regulation under the laws governing exchange control and is already supervised by the Bank of Thailand.
  • Intragroup shared management services (administration, human resources, IT). The exemption expands the scope of previously permitted advisory services to include administrative, human resources, and information technology management services provided among qualified group companies that satisfy the applicable ownership and management control criteria.
  • Intragroup domestic debt-guarantee services. This exemption applies exclusively to qualified affiliated group companies within the same corporate group, subject to the same ownership and management criteria as those applicable to intragroup shared management services, but with a higher applicable threshold.
  • Premises leasing for financial and vending equipment. This applies to services involving the leasing of space for ATMs, financial service kiosks, and vending machines for the benefit of employees.
  • Petroleum-drilling services under the law on petroleum. The exemption applies to petroleum drilling services provided by contractors directly engaged under contracts with concessionaires, production-sharing contractors, or service contractors under the law governing petroleum operations.

Brokerage or Agency Businesses

Issued on the same day (August 28, 2026), the Ministerial Regulation Prescribing Brokerage or Agency Businesses That Do Not Require Permission to Operate a Business of a Foreign Person B.E. 2569 (2026) exempts the following businesses from brokerage and agency restrictions under the FBA:

  • Derivatives agents under the law governing derivatives, where the agent conducts transactions in derivatives whose underlying goods or variables are not subject to the law governing derivatives.
  • Derivatives agents under the law governing derivatives, where the agent conducts transactions in derivatives that require cash settlement calculated by reference to an exchange rate or interest rate, and the derivatives transactions are conducted outside a derivatives exchange.

Guidance for Foreign Investors

These regulations signal the government’s continued commitment to modernizing the FBA’s foreign investment framework, aligning it more closely with Thailand’s economic development objectives and its international competitiveness agenda.

Businesses falling within any of the newly exempted categories should review their current FBA licensing arrangements, as an FBA license or foreign business certificate may no longer be required—reducing compliance costs and simplifying operations.

However, the liberalization discussed above involves exemption only from licensing requirements under the FBA. This exemption does not eliminate or replace any licenses, approvals, or registrations required under applicable sector-specific legislation.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 31, 2026
Thailand has introduced a new regulatory framework that may expose foreign nationals who violate the Foreign Business Act (FBA) to deportation. The Regulation of the Office of the Prime Minister on Deportation B.E. 2569 was published in the Government Gazette on August 27, 2026. The regulation establishes an administrative process for referring foreign nationals for deportation where this is deemed necessary in the interests of public order or public morality. It does not create new substantive deportation powers, but it expressly identifies unlawful business conduct under the FBA—including nominee arrangements—as grounds for referral. Grounds for Deportation Referral The regulation sets out five grounds that may give rise to a referral to the relevant authorities: Unlawful entry into, or unlawful stay in, Thailand in violation of immigration laws. Unlawful employment or engagement in work in violation of laws governing the employment of foreign nationals. Carrying on business in violation of the FBA, including through the use of nominee arrangements. Forging official documents or using forged official documents. Committing an offense punishable by imprisonment of five years or more. The framework takes a broad approach, extending not only to the perpetrators of these acts but also to those who facilitate, instigate, or otherwise support such acts. Deportation Risk Following a Criminal Judgment Where a foreign national has committed any of the above offenses and has fully served the sentence imposed pursuant to a final judgment, the interior minister has the power to order deportation. This power also applies where a court has issued a final judgment sentencing a foreign national to imprisonment but has suspended the execution of the sentence, or has imposed a fine. A deportation order may also specify a period during which the foreign national is prohibited from reentering Thailand. FBA Noncompliance: Broader Consequences Noncompliance with the FBA—including
Read More
August 24, 2026
Myanmar’s Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA) has published the guidelines it uses to assess and approve company names for registration in the country. The guidelines, which were published on May 18, 2026, explain how DICA determines whether a proposed name is identical or too similar to an existing name, and they identify words and expressions that may be prohibited or restricted. Businesses planning to incorporate in Myanmar should expect DICA to scrutinize proposed names more closely than it has in the past. Prohibitions on Company Names The Myanmar Companies Law prohibits company names that are identical or similar to existing company names, and DICA’s internal assessment guidelines explain how this rule applies in practice. Under the guidelines, DICA may reject a proposed company name if the proposed name: Is identical or nearly identical to an existing company name; Differs from an existing company name only in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, or transliteration; Only adds words such as “Group,” “Holding,” “International,” “Myanmar,” or “Family” to an existing company name; Merely rearranges the words in an existing company name; Is pronounced similarly to an existing name; Uses the same brand name as an existing company, even if the company carries out different business activities; or Uses an existing brand name together with an abbreviation of that brand name or a shortened form of the name or business description. DICA may also consider whether a proposed name could give the impression that two companies are related, even if they operate in different business sectors. In addition, DICA may review a company name even after registration. If it later determines that the name does not comply with the Myanmar Companies Law or is otherwise unsuitable, DICA may direct the company to change its name under section 26 of the Myanmar Companies Law.
Read More
August 20, 2026
Vietnam’s Law on Bankruptcy and Rehabilitation No. 142/2025/QH15, passed by the National Assembly on December 11, 2025, does something many regional counterparts do not yet attempt: it instructs parties and arbitral tribunals on exactly what happens to an arbitration once a debtor becomes insolvent. Together with the Law on Commercial Arbitration No. 54/2010/QH12, the new law improves upon what used to be an uncertain area of practice, now providing an explicit, mandatory sequence of procedures. Suspension and Termination of Arbitration Proceedings Under article 40(2) of the law, once a Vietnamese court accepts a bankruptcy petition, any arbitration that concerns the debtor’s financial obligations must be temporarily suspended as soon as the tribunal receives the court’s notification. If the court subsequently issues a decision commencing bankruptcy proceedings, article 59(2) takes a further step: the suspended arbitration is terminated outright, and the underlying case file is transferred to the court handling the insolvency for resolution. The two provisions work as a sequence: first suspension, then termination and transfer, rather than as independent triggers. Meanwhile, article 60(4) reinforces this effect by vesting the bankruptcy court with exclusive jurisdiction over all claims against the debtor from the date the petition is accepted. Notably, this mechanism operates automatically, without the need for the insolvency court to issue a separate anti-arbitration order. The tribunal simply suspends or terminates the proceeding by operation of law once notified; however, Vietnamese law currently provides no procedure by which a party can apply to the insolvency court for permission to continue the arbitration despite the statutory effect. Practitioners with a Vietnamese counterparty in arbitration should treat notification of a bankruptcy filing as something to flag to the tribunal immediately since continuing to arbitrate a claim that has become subject to article 40(2) or 59(2) risks producing an award vulnerable
Read More
August 20, 2026
Thai law contains no provision that speaks directly to what happens to an arbitration when one of the parties becomes insolvent. The interaction between arbitration and insolvency is derived instead from the general operation of two separately drafted laws: the Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940) and the Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002). Because Thai courts have had few opportunities to interpret how these two statutes apply together, the practical answer to many questions, such as who represents an insolvent party in arbitration, whether an award will be enforced, and what happens to a foreign proceeding, depends on inference from general principles of insolvency, arbitration, and procedural law rather than on settled rules. Liquidation and Restructuring The Bankruptcy Act governs both liquidation, which winds up a debtor’s affairs, and restructuring (rehabilitation), which aims to preserve a business. The consequences for arbitration differ accordingly. In liquidation, the debtor’s assets vest in the official receiver, who alone can conduct or continue any arbitration affecting the estate; the debtor loses the authority to act on its own behalf. In restructuring, the plan preparer or administrator takes over that role, but there is more room for the debtor to remain involved, since the objective of rehabilitation is to keep the business operational. Restructuring carries an automatic stay that takes effect once the Bankruptcy Court accepts the restructuring petition. This stay can halt an arbitration regardless of where it is seated. In contrast, liquidation does not work through a stay; instead, the debtor’s loss of authority over its own assets and disputes is what constrains the arbitration. Neither proceeding provides a party a formal route to apply for permission to continue arbitrating—the Bankruptcy Act contains no such mechanism—though in restructuring cases the Bankruptcy Court may allow proceedings to continue where doing so will not prejudice
Read More