You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 30, 2021

Thailand Decriminalizes Kratom in Amended Narcotics Act

Subscribe to Updates

Recently enacted Thai legislation has removed Mitragyna speciosa, commonly known as “kratom,” from the list of controlled narcotics under the Narcotics Act B.E. 2522 (1972), effectively decriminalizing the consumption, production, disposal, import, export, and possession of kratom, for any purpose and in any quantity or form, effective August 24, 2021. The Narcotics Act (No. 8) B.E. 2564 (2021) was published in the Government Gazette on May 26, 2021, and will come into effect 90 days later. This change comes some two years after Thailand allowed the use of cannabis and kratom for medical proposes with the Narcotics Act (No. 7) B.E. 2562 (2019).

Nevertheless, it appears that kratom will still be subject to some level of regulation. On June 1, 2021, the government announced that draft legislation regulating the sale and use of kratom plants was approved by the cabinet. The draft is expected to set licensing requirements for growing, selling, and importing or exporting kratom for industrial use, while also prohibiting the sale of kratom to minors and pregnant or nursing women, and clarifying issues such as labeling, advertising, and selling channels. It is also important to note that the use of kratom for production of food and beverages under the control of the Thai Food and Drug Administration remains prohibited unless the Ministry of Public Health Notification RE: Prohibited List of Plants for Use in Food is amended.

Kratom is a plant indigenous to Southeast Asia which some consider to have potential medicinal applications due to the presence of mitragynine—an alkaloid anecdotally said to boost energy, ease pain, and assist with opiate withdrawal. However, these claims have not been properly studied due to its relative international obscurity and illegality in many of the countries to which it is native. Kratom is an addictive substance and has a risk of dangerous contraindications when consumed with other substances, which has resulted in such prohibition.

In Thailand, restrictions were first implemented under the Kratom Plant Act B.E. 2486 (1943) and kratom was subsequently listed as a Category 5 narcotic in the Narcotics Act B.E. 2522 (1979), effectively prohibiting all consumption, cultivation, trade, and distribution.

The new legislation removes kratom from the Narcotics Act list of prohibited substances on the basis that its consumption is a part of traditional Thai cultural norms, and that it is not categorized as a narcotic in the UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs (an absence that is also reflected in the narcotics laws of several other countries, including federal laws in the United States).

The delisting of kratom as a narcotic will, in turn, trigger the rarely-used Section 2 of the Criminal Code, which expunges convictions and ends pending sentences or ongoing punishments stemming from an activity that is subsequently legalized.

The relaxation of restrictions on kratom (and on cannabis) is part of a larger strategic push for legal reform to make the law to reflect current societal conditions and expectations. The Act on Legislative Drafting and Evaluation of Law B.E. 2562 (2019) provides a clear indication of this by calling on government agencies to consider drafts to repeal or amend laws that are no longer necessary, are inconsistent with the current social context, or obstruct livelihoods or occupations, while also ensuring that criminal penalties do not impose too heavy a burden. Moreover, this act authorizes the General Assembly of Supreme Court Justices to exercise its discretion to decide against imposing criminal sanctions or consider lesser punishments than prescribed in the law when it believes that the provision is no longer needed, is inconsistent with the present social context, or hinders livelihoods or occupations. It is likely that this push for modernization will result in further legislative changes across a broad scope of legal measures in the future.

Tilleke & Gibbins will continue to monitor this development, and similar developments in future, and we keep you updated as the situation developments. For any queries about regulatory or contentious matters relating to kratom in Thailand, please contact the firm’s Bangkok office on [email protected].

Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Dispute Resolution and Litigation

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 1, 2021
Attorneys from Tilleke & Gibbins in Myanmar have contributed to the latest edition of Practical Law’s online Life Sciences Global Guide. The guide is a Q&A-style overview of the regulatory frameworks for the life sciences industry across multiple jurisdictions worldwide, and this year the Myanmar chapter includes two sections, one of which is “Pharmaceutical IP and Competition Law in Myanmar.” This section runs through the country’s legal and regulatory environment for patents and trademarks—particularly as they relate to pharmaceutical business in the jurisdiction. The section then turns to IP and competition law issues, with questions and answers focusing on how the country’s competition laws and regulations affect the pharmaceutical sector. Readers are also given information on how to properly comply with Myanmar law on competition, including when it comes to licensing of medicines and pharmaceutical technology. The full Pharmaceutical Intellectual Property and Competition Law in Myanmar guide can be accessed on the Practical Law website. Practical Law, produced by Thomson Reuters, is the world’s leading legal know-how resource for business lawyers, publishing a huge range of guides covering hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. Tilleke & Gibbins also supplied the “Medicinal Product Regulation and Product Liability in Myanmar,” which Practical Law published in its Life Sciences Global Guide  at the same time.
Read More
January 15, 2021
Following the recent delisting of almost all parts of the hemp plant from Thailand’s list of prohibited narcotics (see here for further details), the Ministry of Public Health has issued a notification allowing hemp to be used in cosmetics. Prior to this development, this use of hemp (whether from natural or synthetic sources) was not allowed, as it fell under the definition of narcotics under the Notification Re: Ingredients Not Allowed for Use in Cosmetics B.E. 2559 (2016). Under the Ministerial Notification Re: Use of Hemp in Cosmetics B.E. 2564 (2021), which was published in the Government Gazette on January 11, 2021, domestic manufacturers are now allowed to produce cosmetics containing hemp seed oil or hemp seed extract, provided the cosmetics do not have a THC level exceeding 0.2% by weight. To register such products with the Thai FDA, applicants must submit a certificate of analysis, safety data sheet, and label for the agency’s evaluation. The timeline for approval of the registration (notification) of a cosmetic containing hemp seed oil or hemp seed extract is three business days. The applicant (i.e., manufacturer or toll manufacturer) must declare the amount of hemp seed extract or hemp seed oil used in the cosmetic in their notification application. Cosmetics must not use a name for the product that evokes an association with hemp flowers or narcotics, and the name of the product must be within the scope of cosmetics. For example, names containing “inflorescence,” “flower,” “CBD,” “THC” or similar will not be allowed. It should also be noted that Thailand does not yet allow the importation of cosmetics containing hemp seeds or hemp seed extract, and this regulation only applies to domestically produced hemp products—a business currently restricted to individuals or companies with Thai nationality. For more details on this development, or
Read More
January 8, 2021
Across the globe, the demand for COVID-19 vaccinations has been understandably high, with many regulatory authorities (e.g., U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency in the U.K., European Medicine Agency, Swissmedic, etc.) issuing emergency use authorizations for COVID-19 vaccines. Similarly, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (Thai FDA) has published the Notification Re: Conditional Approval for Emergency Use of Medical Products, which allows drug importers to register COVID-19 vaccines under the conditional approval scheme.  While as of the date of this article, the Thai FDA has yet to authorize any COVID-19 vaccines, this should follow shortly as clinical trials are completed and government procurement negotiations progress. Under the notification, it appears that the channel of distribution of a COVID-19 vaccine under the conditional approval scheme would be strictly controlled by the Thai FDA. This channel includes the vaccine’s distribution to relevant government agencies (e.g., Department of Disease Control of Thailand and public hospitals specified by the Thai FDA). However, questions have been raised regarding which private hospitals would be included in the distribution list and how the Thai FDA would distribute the vaccine to private hospitals. This confusion over the role of private hospitals was seen recently when one private hospital advertised that it could secure the COVID-19 vaccine from one developer whose product had already been approved elsewhere, until the Thai FDA then stepped in and claimed that the advertisement violated the Drug Act. The Thai FDA notification also enumerates several essential criteria that must be fulfilled in seeking approval for a COVID-19 vaccine, including the following: The available scientific data must substantiate both the efficacy and safety of vaccine. Further, the risk-benefit analysis must indicate that the medicine’s benefits outweigh its risks. A risk management plan, including risk minimization measures, must be submitted.
Read More
January 8, 2021
At a meeting on December 21, 2020, the Thai Board of Investment (BOI) approved a series of stimulus packages aimed at encouraging local and foreign investment, as the government seeks to boost Thailand’s economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. The additional investment incentives, which will be promoted by the BOI in the upcoming year, include a number of sector- and project-specific stimulus measures.   Additional Tax Incentives for Large-Scale Projects Projects in target industries with investment of at least THB 1 billion (approx. USD 33 million) over a 12-month period, starting from the issuance of the BOI promotion certificate, will be entitled to an additional 50% corporate income tax (CIT) deduction for a period of five years, calculated on top of the standard 5–8 year CIT exemptions offered under the normal BOI tax-incentive scheme. To obtain this special tax incentive, eligible projects may apply to the BOI from January 4 to December 30, 2021.   Stimulus Package for Digital Economy and Software Industry Projects that support digital technology adoption, such as software integration, artificial intelligence, machine learning, or big data analytics, may benefit from 50% CIT exemptions on profits generated from their existing BOI projects for an additional three years. Applications for the exemption must be submitted by the end of 2022.   Application Deadline Extensions for Special Economic Zones and Five Southern Provinces Measures relating to special economic zones cover more than 300 investment promotion categories, with both tax and non-tax incentives, including an additional tax incentive for target industries such as textiles, agriculture, home furniture, jewelry, and others. These incentives are available to projects located in the border areas of Thailand (i.e., the 10 special economic zones in the provinces of Chiang Rai, Kanchanaburi, Mukdahan, Nakhon Phanom, Narathiwat, Nong Khai, Sa Kaeo, Songkhla, Tak, and Trat), with the
Read More