You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 24, 2018

New Regulations on Foreign Investment in Goods Trading

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

Goods trading and activities directly related to goods trading are considered a “conditional” business for foreign investment in Vietnam, meaning the market is open to foreign investors provided they meet certain conditions. This area was governed for more than 10 years by Decree No. 23/2007/ND-CP (Decree 23), which was in line with the old 2005 Investment Law and gradually became out-of-date, especially when the new 2014 Investment Law took effect on July 1, 2015. Given this fact, on January 15, 2018, Decree No. 09/2018/ND-CP (Decree 9) was issued and took immediate effect, replacing Decree 23 as the primary legal basis for foreign investment in goods trading in Vietnam. Decree 9 provides many significant changes in line with the 2014 Investment Law for foreign investors and their wholly set-up foreign invested enterprises (FIEs). Some of the key changes are summarized below.

Single authority for licensing. Under Decree 9, the local Department of Industry and Trade (DOIT) has become the sole licensing authority for licensing matters in goods trading. The DOIT is also responsible for liaising with and seeking consultations from the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT) in any application dossiers required in- principle approvals from the MOIT. Though this is an internal working process between the DOIT and the MOIT, the relevant foreign investor or FIEs will be kept updated.

Some sub-license requirements removed. Under Decree 23, to engage in import, export and wholesale of goods, FIEs were required to have such activities with specific HS codes of the traded goods recorded in the Investment Registration Certificate, or separately in a sub-license called a Trading License (a.k.a. Business License). Furthermore, Decree 23 regulated that the in-principle approval from the MOIT was a must in case of granting wholesale rights to FIEs. Decree 9 relaxes these requirements. Accordingly, specific HS codes of traded goods are no longer recorded in the Investment Certificate and provided that the FIEs have rights to conduct import, export and wholesale of goods recorded in their Investment Registration Certificates as the enterprises’ business lines, they are entitled to legally do such activities without a Trading License, for any kinds of goods that are not in the list of products/goods prohibited from being imported and distributed in Vietnam. Decree 9 reserves the Trading License requirement for the import and wholesale of oil and lubricants only.

Retail sub-license easier to secure. Under Decree 9, there is a significant change in the procedure for an FIE to obtain a Trading License for retailing. The local DOIT no longer needs to seek consultation from the MOIT as an in-principle approval to grant the license, which will help shorten the timeline for obtaining the license. However, in-principle approval from the MOIT is still needed for retailing rice, sugar, video records, books, newspapers and magazines.

Retail outlet and the “economic needs test” requirement.  Similar to Decree 23, Decree 9 allows FIEs with a Trading License for retailing to set up a first retail outlet; however, to set up subsequent retail outlets, a vaguely defined “economic needs test” (ENT) may be required to prove the viability of the additional outlet. Under Decree 9, FIEs can be exempt from an ENT if the subsequent outlet satisfies the following conditions: (1) it has an area of less than 500 sqm; (2) it is located in a shopping mall; and (3) such retail outlet is not classified as a convenience store or mini supermarket. Decree 9 also provides much clearer criteria for the ENT. These improvements should allow FIEs to more easily set up their own retail outlets for distributing their products to end-users, and make the retail market in Vietnam more welcoming to foreign investment.

Clarification of “related activities.” Decree 23 and the 2005 Commercial Law were unclear as to which business activities were considered “activities directly related to goods trading,” which caused difficulties for both foreign investors/FIEs and licensing authorities in applying the conditions/procedures in practice. To solve this gap, Decree 9 clearly lists out the activities directly related to goods trading, including: (1) commercial assessment services; (2) logistics services; (3) goods leasing services (exclusive of finance leasing); (4) enhancement services (exclusive of advertising); (5) commercial intermediary services; (6) e-commerce services; and (7) goods tender organizing services. A Trading License is required for FIEs to conduct  these activities, except for certain logistics services included in Vietnam’s WTO Commitments in Services. The procedure for obtaining a Trading License in these cases requires an in-principle approval from the MOIT. 

Post-M&A requirements in goods trading. One of the important changes under the 2014 Investment Law is to provide a legal regime for mergers and acquisitions. Before Decree 9, there remained many gaps and inconsistencies in mergers and acquisitions in the goods trading field. In fact, when foreign investors acquired shares in a local trading enterprise to make it an FIE, Decree 23 did not have specific provisions as to what the FIEs had to do to continue trading legally. Decree 9 fills these gaps, providing a clear legal framework for trading FIEs formed via share acquisitions or capital purchases by foreign investors. In particular, Decree 9 introduces a specific procedure for such trading FIEs that have retail outlet(s) to maintain and continue running such retail outlets.

Outlook. The changes in Decree 9 show that Vietnam is still trying to shield local retailers from foreign investors with greater financial capacity and retail experience. However, by minimizing the administrative procedures and broadening opportunities for foreign investors/FIEs to engage in goods trading, Decree 9 also demonstrates the government’s intent to attract foreign investment. With an increase of competition in the Vietnam retail market, Vietnamese consumers may also benefit when more imported products can be sold at an affordable price. However, Decree 9 is still very new, and there are bound to be conflicts among the authorities in terms of understanding and application. It is hoped that the MOIT will issue additional guidance on Decree 9 soon.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 2, 2026
On July 24, 2026, a new 12.5% Section 301 tariff took effect on most imports from Thailand into the United States. The tariff was imposed by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, following a finding that Thailand had failed to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on imports of goods produced with forced labor. The new tariff replaced the temporary 10% Section 122 surcharge that had applied since February 24, 2026, following the US Supreme Court’s invalidation of the prior tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The 12.5% tariff is not the only potential source of additional US duties on Thai-origin goods. Thailand is also subject to a separate Section 301 investigation concerning structural excess manufacturing capacity, which could result in additional duties. Unlike the Section 122 surcharge, which was capped at 15% and limited to 150 days, Section 301 provides a more flexible framework for imposing and maintaining trade measures. Section 301 actions are generally subject to a four-year termination rule but may continue following a review if continuation is requested. The new tariff therefore represents a potentially longer-term change in the tariff treatment of Thai-origin goods entering the US market. This article explains the legal and policy developments that led to the new tariff, how the Section 301 tariff differs from the tariff regimes that preceded it, Thailand’s response and ongoing negotiations with the United States, and the practical implications for businesses that manufacture, export, import, or distribute goods between Thailand and the United States. From IEEPA to Section 122 to Section 301 IEEPA Era (April 2025–February 2026) Beginning in April 2025, the US administration imposed sweeping tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), invoking national emergencies relating to trade
Read More
September 28, 2026
Thailand has expanded the mandatory use of the Electronic Government Procurement (e-GP) system to cover submissions of procurement appeals to all government agencies subject to the Public Procurement and Supplies Administrative Act B.E. 2560 (2017) (Government Procurement Act). The expansion, which was set out in an official circular dated September 16, 2026, from the Public Procurement and Supplies Administrative Ruling Committee, takes effect on October 1, 2026. Notable Changes Under the expanded framework, bidders challenging an e-bidding or selective-method procurement result must file their appeal exclusively through e-GP within seven working days of the result being announced by the Comptroller General’s Department. While the system accepts filings around the clock during that window, submissions on the final day must be fully completed by 16:30 according to the e-GP system clock—merely starting a draft or uploading materials before the cutoff does not count as a confirmed submission. Government agencies that disagree with an appeal, in whole or in part, will also report their findings and supporting documents to the Appeals Committee through e-GP using the prescribed Appeal Opinion Report, also within seven working days of receipt. Withdrawals of appeals must likewise follow prescribed e-GP steps that vary depending on whether the matter is still under agency review, has been forwarded to the Appeals Committee, or has already been resolved. Excluded Categories Certain categories of procurement are not subject to the new guidelines on filing appeals electronically. These include: Procurement of supplies for confidential government use. Procurement conducted by government agencies operating overseas where the bidder is a foreign legal entity with no legal representative in Thailand, or where the bidder is a non-Thai national. Consulting service procurement under chapter 7 of the Government Procurement Act Design or construction supervision procurement under chapter 8 of the Government Procurement These exclusions apply
Read More
September 15, 2026
The Myanmar Investment Commission (MIC) has issued a notification that gives investors with projects in Myanmar clearer guidance for securing approval and for changing, expanding, or exiting an approved project. Issued on August 19, 2026, MIC Notification No. 5/2026 replaces MIC Notification No. 26/2021 and sets procedures for state or regional investment committees to review, approve, and supervise investment projects, including project amendments, investment increases, land-use rights applications, compliance inspections, and suspension or termination of approved businesses. Endorsement Application Timeline and Deemed Acceptance In Myanmar, prospective investors seeking approval under the Myanmar Investment Law generally do so through an MIC permit or an MIC endorsement, depending on the nature of the investment. While certain large-scale investment projects require an MIC permit, projects that are not required to obtain an MIC permit may instead apply for an MIC endorsement. Investors seeking MIC endorsement for their planned projects typically submit their applications to the relevant state or regional investment committee. These committees are established under the Myanmar Investment Law and are authorized to approve investments of less than USD 5 million, subject to the project’s nature and location. MIC Notification No. 5/2026 specifies that upon receiving an endorsement application, the relevant investment committee office will check it for completeness and determine whether it can be considered at the state or regional level or must be referred to the MIC; if it must be forwarded to the MIC, this will be done within 10 working days. If an application is within its purview, the committee may reject the endorsement application within 15 working days of receipt; otherwise, the application is deemed accepted. If approved, the endorsement certificate will be issued within 10 working days of the approval decision, subject to applicable procedures. Endorsement Certificate Amendment The notification clarifies which amendments a state
Read More
September 9, 2026
Certain securities, derivatives, and treasury activities in Thailand were opened to foreign investors when Thailand’s Ministry of Commerce published two new ministerial regulations in the Government Gazette on August 28, 2026. The regulations significantly broaden the service activities that foreign-owned businesses may conduct without a license or certificate under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542, as amended (FBA). Securities and Derivatives Business Exemptions Prior to the issuance of these ministerial regulations, the exemptions covered (1) securities brokerage and derivatives brokerage with their only underlying assets being agricultural commodities, financial instruments, and securities; and (2) dealers, advisers, and fund managers conducting derivatives business under Thailand’s derivatives laws. The ministerial regulations provide broader exemptions. In addition to derivatives under the laws on derivatives as before, the following two major categories are provided: Derivatives whose underlying assets or variables fall outside the scope of Thailand’s laws on derivatives. This addresses a gap in the previous framework, which did not comprehensively exempt derivatives tied to nonregulated underlying assets or variables, such as certain commodities. Foreign brokers, advisors, and fund managers can now facilitate a broader range of hedging and risk management instruments without triggering FBA licensing requirements. Derivatives traded outside a derivatives exchange, or over the counter (OTC), whose payments are calculated by reference to foreign exchange rates or interest rates. This removes an FBA licensing barrier for foreign providers of widely used OTC hedging products, broadening the solutions available to importers and exporters managing currency exposure and to borrowers seeking greater certainty over financing costs. The ministerial regulations also exempt brokers and agents handling transactions involving either of these two derivatives categories. For securities businesses, the ministerial regulations add exemptions for margin loans used to purchase securities and for securities repurchase transactions. These additions clarify whether such activities qualify as exempt brokerage
Read More