You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 26, 2016

New e-Payment Service Regulations for SFIs: A Boon for Customer Confidence?

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

In today’s digital economy, financial technology (FinTech) is a major economic driving force. FinTech has transformed the private sector, resulting in a drastic shift in the way customers use financial services. Financial institutions, in particular, have taken significant strides to implement innovative platforms to facilitate financial transactions and payment methods for goods and services. As electronic services become more sophisticated and prevalent, however, greater regulatory scrutiny needs to be paid to the industry in order to protect end-users and prevent damage to the country’s economy.

Background

Commercial banks are veterans in the e-Payment service market. They are governed by the Royal Decree Regulating Electronic Payment Services B.E. 2551 (2008); relevant Notifications of the Electronic Transaction Commission (ETC); and applicable Notifications of the Bank of Thailand (BOT), which also closely monitors their business activities.

Specialized Financial Institutions (SFIs), which were established by the government to provide financial services to various sectors that are not sufficiently served by commercial banks, are also engaged in the e-Payment service market. Thailand’s regulatory authorities determined that the laws and regulations surrounding SFIs and their engagement in e-Payment service businesses were insufficient, and further regulations were needed.

The Royal Decree on e-Payment Services

On March 30, 2016, the government promulgated the Royal Decree Governing the Control and Supervision of Electronic Payment Service Businesses of Specialized Financial Institutions B.E. 2559 (2016). It took effect on July 28.

As with commercial banks, the Royal Decree of 2016 designates the BOT to control and supervise the e-Payment service businesses of the following SFIs: Government Savings Bank, Bank for Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives, Government Housing Bank, Islamic Bank of Thailand, Export-Import Bank of Thailand, Small and Medium Enterprise Development Bank of Thailand, Thai Credit Guarantee Corporation, and Secondary Mortgage Corporation.

The Royal Decree aims to standardize supervisory provisions and measures enforced on both private and state service providers. This should help ensure financial and commercial stability, prevent damage caused to the public, and build trust and credibility in the e-Payment system among the public.

In terms of substantive provisions, the Royal Decree categorizes e-Payment service business into three lists, which resemble the categories for commercial banks in the Royal Decree Regulating Electronic Payment Services B.E. 2551 (2008), as follows:

  • List A: e-Money services used for purchasing specific goods or services as specified in advance from an entrepreneur, excluding e-Money services used only for customers’ convenience without the procurement of any profit from issuing the card, as prescribed by the BOT with the approval of the ETC. These services require notification before business operations commence.
  • List B: Credit card network services, electronic draft capture services, transaction switching services for payments in one system, and e-Money services used for purchasing specific goods or services as specified in advance at a place which uses the same system for distributing and providing these goods or services. These services require registration before business operations commence.
  • List C: Clearing services, settlement services, e-Payment services through any devices or networks, transaction switching services for payment through several systems, payment service provider services, and e-Money services used for purchasing specific goods or services as specified in advance in which the place where the services were used was not limited and the system for distributing or providing the services is not the same. These services require a license before business operations commence. The license lasts for ten years.

The Royal Decree also empowers the ETC to set methods and service conditions on: (1) custody and disclosure of customers’ personal information; (2) examining and maintaining system security for consistent reliability; (3) express prescribing of any service fees; (4) receiving and the process to ratify customers’ complaints or disputes; and (5) accounting and reporting, among others.

In addition, depending on the type of business, the BOT may prescribe additional rules on: (1) issuing evidence for payment; (2) keeping money which will be sent; (3) prescribing the finality of transferred money which may be unconditionally and promptly utilized by the beneficiary; and (4) arranging an independent auditor for security.

Any service providers in List A and List B that fail to comply with these rules will be subject to an administrative fine and/or an order of the ETC to take appropriate corrective action. Any service providers in List C that fail to comply with these rules can be subject to corrective measures, suspension, or license revocation.

Implementation

Even though the Royal Decree came into force on July 28, its transitional provisions allow SFIs which have operated an e-Payment service business prior to this date to continue their operation until November 24, 2016. The SFIs that want to continue their business need to notify, register, or apply for a license in accordance with this Royal Decree from August 26 to September 25, 2016.

If the Royal Decree is effectively enforced, and both the BOT and the ETC undertake their supervisory authority properly, information technology systems and electronic platforms will be much safer for customers who interact with these SFIs. Improved security and protection will lead to greater credibility with customers, and this will entice considerably more people to use e-Payment services.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Banking and Finance

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 23, 2026
On May 14, 2026, Thailand published a ministerial regulation in the Government Gazette to prescribe measures for prevention and suppression of technology crimes. The regulation creates a comprehensive procedural framework for returning money and digital assets to victims of technology crimes. It will take effect 90 days after publication (in mid-August 2026), giving affected entities a limited window to prepare. Mandatory Reporting Obligations for Financial Institutions When a deposit account, e-money account, or digital asset wallet is frozen in connection with a technology crime, the relevant financial institution or business operator must report transaction data to the Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) via AMLO’s designated electronic system. Required data elements include account numbers (sender and receiver), names, identification or passport numbers, legal entity registration numbers, phone numbers, remaining balance, damage amount, transaction reference numbers, and the bank case ID. Institutions that already share data through the information-sharing system under the emergency decree are deemed to have satisfied this reporting obligation, creating an incentive for platform participation. When the Royal Thai Police or the Department of Special Investigation seize or freeze assets related to technology crimes, they must provide AMLO with investigation reports, complaint evidence, money-trail data, and account statements. Notification and Claims Process Once the AMLO secretary-general approves verified reports of a technology crime, the account information of persons connected to the crime will be published in the Government Gazette, triggering a 90-day window for victims to file claims and for related persons to file objections. Officers will also publish details on AMLO’s electronic media and send registered mail to identified victims, which will be deemed received after 7 days domestically or 15 days internationally. Victims have 90 days from the date the crime is published in the Government Gazette to file claims through AMLO’s electronic system. Claims must include
Read More
June 9, 2026
On April 28, 2026, the Central Bank of Myanmar (CBM) issued Notification No. 18/2026 introducing the new Foreign Remittance Business Regulations. The new regulations apply to companies intending to operate foreign remittance businesses in Myanmar that are not licensed banks, non-bank financial institutions, or other financial institutions. The regulations supersede and replace the previous regulatory framework governing foreign remittance businesses under CBM Notification No. 21/2019. While the overall structure remains familiar, the new regulations introduce more detailed requirements for licensing, operations, reporting, and compliance, with a stronger focus on transparency and regulatory oversight. Broader Licensing Requirements Under the new regulations, applicants must submit detailed business plans describing the use of information technology and mobile platforms, along with clear plans for handling remittances from workers abroad and resolving customer complaints. Financial Thresholds and Reporting Requirements The baseline financial thresholds remain unchanged. Licensees must maintain a security deposit of MMK 100 million in an escrow account, along with a separate revolving fund dedicated solely to remittance operations. The new regulations introduce more structured reporting obligations. Licensees are now required to submit daily remittance transaction data by the next business day before noon, in addition to monthly and periodic reporting requirements. Foreign bank account statements must also be submitted regularly, and licensees must provide updates on business operations every six months. Strengthened AML and CFT Framework The new regulations place a greater emphasis on anti-money laundering (AML) and counter financing of terrorism (CFT), with tighter controls over management changes. Any changes in shareholding, share transfers, or the appointment of key management personnel such as the managing director require prior approval from the CBM. Licensing Fees and Validity The new regulations increase licensing costs, while maintaining the same validity period of three years. The new regulations provide more detailed grounds for suspension and
Read More
May 25, 2026
After several years of policy discussion and continued efforts led by the Ministry of Commerce (MOC) to relax the list of reserved businesses under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA), the reform process has now reached a significant milestone. On May 12, 2026, the Thai cabinet approved in principle two draft subordinate legislative instruments aimed at delisting certain reserved business activities under the FBA and reducing licensing requirements for foreign business operators. These developments signal a renewed and concrete effort by the government to modernize Thailand’s business regulatory framework in order to attract foreign investment and boost Thailand’s competitiveness in the global market. Nine Businesses Set for FBA Delisting Below is a list of the nine businesses that are being targeted for delisting from the FBA’s restrictions. A draft ministerial regulation would delist the first eight reserved businesses, while a royal decree has been drafted to delist the ninth business: Telecommunications services (Type 1 license only, covering operators without their own telecommunications infrastructure), under the supervision of the Office of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission. Treasury center services subject to the Foreign Exchange Control Act B.E. 2485 and under the supervision of the Bank of Thailand. Securities-collateralized lending, pursuant to the laws governing securities and exchange and derivatives regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Agency, dealer, advisory, or fund management services relating to derivatives where the underlying assets fall outside the scope of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) Intra-group shared services, including administrative, human resources, and IT functions Intra-group domestic debt guarantee services Leasing of partial space for installation of financial service machines and automatic vending machines for employee use Petroleum drilling services Trading of agricultural product derivatives through a futures exchange, with physical delivery or receipt of agricultural products at a futures exchange–designated
Read More
March 5, 2026
Amid increasing financial globalization, Vietnam’s establishment of an International Financial Center (IFC) represents a strategic initiative to attract high-quality foreign investment and enhance the country’s position in the global financial system. In support of this objective, a Specialized Court was introduced under Resolution No. 222/2025/QH15 as a dedicated dispute resolution mechanism within the IFC framework. The Specialized Court at the IFC was subsequently operationalized by Law on the Specialized Court No. 150/2025/QH15, effective from January 1, 2026. Organizational Structure of the Specialized Court The Specialized Court at the IFC is a court within the system of the People’s Courts, organized and operating in accordance with the Law on the Specialized Court, and vested with jurisdiction to adjudicate and resolve cases at the IFC. The Specialized Court is located in Ho Chi Minh City and comprises (i) a Court of First Instance; (ii) a Court of Appeal, and (iii) a supporting apparatus. Jurisdiction of the Specialized Court The jurisdiction of the Specialized Court at the IFC is strictly defined based on both (i) the subject matter of the cases and (ii) the membership status of the parties involved. Specifically, the Specialized Court has jurisdiction over (except for cases involving public interests or the interests of the state) the following: Disputes arising from investment and business activities. Requests for recognition and enforcement in Vietnam of judgments and decisions of foreign courts and foreign arbitral awards. Requests related to dispute resolution by arbitration. Other disputes directly related to investment and business activities (to be specified by the Supreme People’s Court). Additionally, at least one party in the case must be a member of the IFC. The IFC’s membership status is established through registration, recognition as a member, or the grant of a license for establishment and operation within the IFC. In the
Read More