You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 26, 2016

New e-Payment Service Regulations for SFIs: A Boon for Customer Confidence?

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

In today’s digital economy, financial technology (FinTech) is a major economic driving force. FinTech has transformed the private sector, resulting in a drastic shift in the way customers use financial services. Financial institutions, in particular, have taken significant strides to implement innovative platforms to facilitate financial transactions and payment methods for goods and services. As electronic services become more sophisticated and prevalent, however, greater regulatory scrutiny needs to be paid to the industry in order to protect end-users and prevent damage to the country’s economy.

Background

Commercial banks are veterans in the e-Payment service market. They are governed by the Royal Decree Regulating Electronic Payment Services B.E. 2551 (2008); relevant Notifications of the Electronic Transaction Commission (ETC); and applicable Notifications of the Bank of Thailand (BOT), which also closely monitors their business activities.

Specialized Financial Institutions (SFIs), which were established by the government to provide financial services to various sectors that are not sufficiently served by commercial banks, are also engaged in the e-Payment service market. Thailand’s regulatory authorities determined that the laws and regulations surrounding SFIs and their engagement in e-Payment service businesses were insufficient, and further regulations were needed.

The Royal Decree on e-Payment Services

On March 30, 2016, the government promulgated the Royal Decree Governing the Control and Supervision of Electronic Payment Service Businesses of Specialized Financial Institutions B.E. 2559 (2016). It took effect on July 28.

As with commercial banks, the Royal Decree of 2016 designates the BOT to control and supervise the e-Payment service businesses of the following SFIs: Government Savings Bank, Bank for Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives, Government Housing Bank, Islamic Bank of Thailand, Export-Import Bank of Thailand, Small and Medium Enterprise Development Bank of Thailand, Thai Credit Guarantee Corporation, and Secondary Mortgage Corporation.

The Royal Decree aims to standardize supervisory provisions and measures enforced on both private and state service providers. This should help ensure financial and commercial stability, prevent damage caused to the public, and build trust and credibility in the e-Payment system among the public.

In terms of substantive provisions, the Royal Decree categorizes e-Payment service business into three lists, which resemble the categories for commercial banks in the Royal Decree Regulating Electronic Payment Services B.E. 2551 (2008), as follows:

  • List A: e-Money services used for purchasing specific goods or services as specified in advance from an entrepreneur, excluding e-Money services used only for customers’ convenience without the procurement of any profit from issuing the card, as prescribed by the BOT with the approval of the ETC. These services require notification before business operations commence.
  • List B: Credit card network services, electronic draft capture services, transaction switching services for payments in one system, and e-Money services used for purchasing specific goods or services as specified in advance at a place which uses the same system for distributing and providing these goods or services. These services require registration before business operations commence.
  • List C: Clearing services, settlement services, e-Payment services through any devices or networks, transaction switching services for payment through several systems, payment service provider services, and e-Money services used for purchasing specific goods or services as specified in advance in which the place where the services were used was not limited and the system for distributing or providing the services is not the same. These services require a license before business operations commence. The license lasts for ten years.

The Royal Decree also empowers the ETC to set methods and service conditions on: (1) custody and disclosure of customers’ personal information; (2) examining and maintaining system security for consistent reliability; (3) express prescribing of any service fees; (4) receiving and the process to ratify customers’ complaints or disputes; and (5) accounting and reporting, among others.

In addition, depending on the type of business, the BOT may prescribe additional rules on: (1) issuing evidence for payment; (2) keeping money which will be sent; (3) prescribing the finality of transferred money which may be unconditionally and promptly utilized by the beneficiary; and (4) arranging an independent auditor for security.

Any service providers in List A and List B that fail to comply with these rules will be subject to an administrative fine and/or an order of the ETC to take appropriate corrective action. Any service providers in List C that fail to comply with these rules can be subject to corrective measures, suspension, or license revocation.

Implementation

Even though the Royal Decree came into force on July 28, its transitional provisions allow SFIs which have operated an e-Payment service business prior to this date to continue their operation until November 24, 2016. The SFIs that want to continue their business need to notify, register, or apply for a license in accordance with this Royal Decree from August 26 to September 25, 2016.

If the Royal Decree is effectively enforced, and both the BOT and the ETC undertake their supervisory authority properly, information technology systems and electronic platforms will be much safer for customers who interact with these SFIs. Improved security and protection will lead to greater credibility with customers, and this will entice considerably more people to use e-Payment services.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Banking and Finance

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 7, 2024
On March 7, 2024, Laos moved to regulate the management of foreign-currency income from the exportation of goods and services. Effective March 29, 2024, Decision No. 333 (formally the Decision on Management of Income in Foreign Currency from Exportation of Goods and Services No. 333/BOL) from the Bank of Lao PDR (BOL) aims to incentivize the inflow of such foreign currency into Laos and its sale to licensed commercial banks. Decision No. 333 sets minimum required proportions for importing income in foreign currency derived from the exportation of goods and services, as well as the timeframe for doing so. It also stipulates the requirements for selling such foreign currency to commercial banks in Laos and the minimum proportions that must be sold. Importing Foreign-Currency Income Exporters must receive payments from abroad via bank transfer into a dedicated bank account designated for import-export business activities within the timeline specified in the sale-purchase agreement, but not exceeding 180 days from the date of export. Each sector must import income in foreign currency into the Lao PDR according to the minimum proportion of currency to be imported, and it must be done within the required timeframes, as specified in the table below. The ratios and timeframes are subject to change depending on the circumstances. If exporters cannot comply with the required ratio and timeline, exporters must provide relevant explanatory documents for the BOL’s consideration. Selling Foreign-Currency Income Exporters of goods and services must sell at least the minimum required proportion of their foreign-currency income (see table below) to a commercial bank in Laos. This foreign currency exchange must occur within three working days of receiving the foreign currency into the dedicated bank account in Laos. The selling rate will be determined by the prevailing rate of the commercial bank on the day
Read More
June 3, 2024
On May 24, 2024, the Central Bank of Myanmar (“CBM”) issued a public notice warning individuals against participating in the sale, purchase, exchange, or transfer of unregulated digital currencies, as well as unauthorized money transfers. The CBM has indicated its readiness to enforce regulations by closing bank accounts and pursuing legal action, which may result in imprisonment, fines, or both, in accordance with the Central Bank of Myanmar Law, the Anti-Money Laundering Law and the Financial Institutions Law. The CBM is the sole legal entity authorized to issue currency in Myanmar, as stipulated in the Central Bank of Myanmar Law. The CBM does not recognize digital currencies as official currency, nor has it granted permission to financial institutions within Myanmar to trade them. The existing legal framework, comprising the Foreign Exchange Management Law and the Financial Institutions Law, further cements the illegality of cryptocurrency transactions within the nation’s borders. Four years ago, in May 2020, the CBM issued Notification No. 9/2020, prohibiting all persons residing in Myanmar from engaging in the sale, purchase, or exchange of unregulated digital currencies. The list of prohibited currencies includes widely recognized cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin (BTC), Litecoin (LTD), Ethereum (ETH), and Perfect Money (PM), with a particular emphasis on transactions conducted through personal Facebook accounts and web pages. Before the issuance of the 2020 notification, the CBM had announced that anyone engaging in digital currency transactions did so at their own risk, but no enforcement measures were being taken at the time. However, after the 2020 notification was issued, the CBM has pursued legal action against persons involved in illegal currency conversion and unauthorized hundi money transfers using Tether (USDT). These enforcement measures have included shutting down bank accounts and initiating legal proceedings under the Anti-Money Laundering Law and the Financial Institutions Law.
Read More
May 30, 2024
A bank guarantee or bond is a powerful tool that provides contractual parties with security and assurance. Bank guarantees are commitments made by a bank (as a guarantor) on behalf of a customer (as an obligor) to a beneficiary to ensure that certain contractual obligations will be fulfilled. If the customer fails to comply with these obligations, the bank can compensate the beneficiary up to the amount specified in the bank guarantee. Bank guarantees are widely used in Thailand as a form of security and are common in construction agreements and government procurement contracts, among others. If the beneficiary (e.g., a project owner) concludes that the counterparty in the agreement (e.g., a contractor) has breached the underlying contract in some way, the beneficiary will demand payment from the bank pursuant to the guarantee. Collecting on a Guarantee and Preventing Payment In the context of construction and procurement agreements, there are two types of bank guarantees—conditional and unconditional. A conditional bank guarantee means that the project owner must satisfy certain agreed-upon conditions (e.g., provision of proof of the breach, proof of damages, or even consent from the contractor) to demand payment. An unconditional bank guarantee means that the bank must compensate the project owner for the demanded amount (up to the limit specified in the bank guarantee) without any conditions. When a project owner concludes that a contractor has breached the underlying contract (often for nonperformance or failure to comply with a representation or warranty), the project owner will demand payment from the bank holding the guarantee. Upon receiving such a demand, Thai banks will usually inform the contractor and ask if it has any objections. Even if the bank guarantee is unconditional, in practice, a bank may be reluctant to make payment if the contractor, as the bank’s customer,
Read More
May 9, 2024
As non-cash payments continue to surge in Vietnam, the requirement for strong security standards and a clear legislative framework for intermediary payment services (“IPS”) is becoming more and more critical. Recognizing this, the State Bank of Vietnam (“SBV”) has been working on a draft decree to supersede the outdated Decree No. 101/2012/ND-CP dated November 22, 2012, on non-cash payments (“Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree”), which will lay the groundwork for non-cash payments in general and the provision of IPS in particular. Building upon this, the SBV recently issued a draft circular to replace Circular No. 39/2014/TT-NHNN dated December 11, 2014, on IPS (“Circular 39”) (“Draft IPS Circular”), which will offer more detailed guidance on the provision of IPS in Vietnam on top of the Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree. The Draft IPS Circular will be applicable to (i) IPS providers; (ii) foreign organizations providing IPS in Vietnam; and (iii) organizations and individuals involved in the provision of IPS. Some key updates regarding the Draft IPS Circular are as follows: Scope of Application The Draft IPS Circular sets out further guidance for the provision of IPS as listed under the Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree, including: (i) electronic clearing services; (ii) electronic wallet (“e-wallet”) services; (iii) collection and payment support services; (iv) financial switching services; (v) international financial switching services; and (vi) electronic payment gateway services. Notably, the Draft IPS Circular has explicitly excluded from its scope of application the provision of accounts by goods/service providers to their customers solely for the purpose of payment within the systems of such providers (e.g., cards/coupons or service/transaction accounts of online game service providers, transportation service providers, or securities companies, etc.). Requirements on the Provision of IPS Electronic Clearing Services: The Draft IPS Circular introduces regulations to cover certain elements of electronic clearing services that have
Read More