You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 14, 2021

New Draft Regulations on Medical Device Management in Vietnam

Subscribe to Updates

Since 2016, the government of Vietnam has issued a number of legal documents on medical device management, including Decree No. 36/2016/ND-CP dated May 15, 2016; Decree No. 169/ND-CP dated December 31, 2018; and Decree No. 03/2020/ND-CP dated January 1, 2020; all of which are concurrently valid. In an effort to unify and streamline regulations on the management of medical devices in Vietnam, the Ministry of Health (MOH) recently developed the draft of a new decree intended to replace the three decrees above. The draft is expected to be submitted to the government for further opinion and approval in the near future.

Below are some highlights of the new draft:

1. Clinical Trials of Medical Devices

The draft adds new regulations on clinical trials of medical devices. In particular, medical device trials will include three phases, in which phases 1 and 2 need to be finished before product registration while phase 3 will be conducted after the medical devices are approved for circulation following the specific requirement from the authorities. This regulation aims to continue evaluating the safety and efficacy of medical devices after they are widely used in the community in line with their usage conditions.

The draft also specifically stipulates cases (i) requiring full-stage clinical trials, (ii) being exempted from some stages of clinical trials, and (iii) being entirely exempted from clinical trials. The full exemption is intended to be applicable to class-A medical devices and medical devices that are already approved for circulation in at least one country in the world, and have sufficient safety and efficacy data.

Also, the draft sets out provisions on the requirements and obligations of relevant entities (the owners of the medical devices that need to be clinically evaluated and entities conducting the trials); dossiers for the trial; and procedures and processes to register and approve clinical trial protocols and trial results.

2. Medical Device Circulation

The draft adds two additional cases ((c) and (d) below) that qualify for the quick registration procedure. Accordingly, under the draft, the class-B/C/D medical devices that are subject to the quick registration procedure will include:

  • Products circulated in at least two of the following countries: Japan, Canada, Australia, the U.S., an EU member country, the U.K., or Switzerland.
  • Products circulated in Vietnam prior to December 31, 2020, and satisfying both of the following conditions:
    • The product was circulated for at least three years within a period of five years before the submission date.
    • There have been no warnings about the quality or safety of the product.
  • Products granted an import license and circulated in at least two countries in the world, one of which is Japan, Canada, Australia, the U.S., an EU member country, the U.K., or Switzerland.
  • Products meeting urgent needs for national defense, security, epidemic prevention and control, and overcoming of consequences of natural disasters and catastrophes, and having no substitutes available on the market.

Further, according to the draft, the MOH’s evaluation timeline will increase – up to 120 days instead of up to 60 days under current regulations. This is to ensure the feasibility of the evaluation.

3. Importation of Ingredients for Medical Device Production

Under the draft, import licenses are not required for medical device raw materials, except for materials containing narcotic substances and precursors.

4. Medical Device Advertisement

Under the draft, the content of medical device advertising must conform with either the dossiers for declaration of applicable standards for class-A medical devices, or the registration dossiers for class-B/C/D medical devices.

In addition, advertising contents will not require approval from the authorities. Instead, the holders of medical device registration numbers or their authorized entities will be responsible for publicly declaring the intended content and form of the advertising on the Medical Equipment Management Portal before conducting the advertising; the declaration for class-A/B medical devices would be applied from July 1, 2021 while the declaration for class-C/D medical devices would be applied from July 1, 2022.

5. Transitional Regulations

The draft sets out the transition mechanisms below:

  • Import licenses for class-B/C/D medical devices granted from 2018 to 2022 will be valid until December 31, 2022.
  • The procedures for obtaining import licenses during the transition period for class-B/C/D IVD medical devices, including reagents, calibrators, and control materials, are newly stipulated; this also means that the current procedures under Circular 47/2010/TT-BYT guiding the export and import of medicines and packaging in direct contact with medicines and Circular 30/2015/TT-BYT on import of medical equipment will be abolished.

 

Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 10, 2026
On June 17, 2026, Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 on Nutritional Information on Processed Food Labels. The new regulation, which revokes three previous nutrition labeling regulations, introduces several notable changes affecting food and beverage manufacturers, importers, and distributors. These changes range from updated nutrient reference values and serving-size requirements to the introduction of the Nutri-Level front-of-pack labeling system for certain beverage products. Businesses operating in Indonesia should carefully review these developments and assess their products’ compliance with the new requirements during the transition period. Implementation of the Nutri-Level Labeling System To implement the recently issued decree on Nutri-Level labeling, BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 stipulates the requirements to implement the Nutri-Level labeling system on the front-of-pack. Under the new framework, ready-to-drink beverages, powdered beverages, and liquid or solid concentrates are required to display Nutri-Level labeling on the front label of their packaging. The Nutri-Level labeling system classifies products into color-coded levels A through D based on their sugar, sodium, and total fat content. The applicable Nutri-Level is determined based on the lowest level measured in the assessment of sugar, sodium, and total fat content. For products classified as level C or D, the Nutri-Level label must be accompanied by information on the relevant sugar, sodium, and total fat content per 100 ml of the ready-to-consume product. Products classified as level A or B may either display only the Nutri-Level designation or display the Nutri-Level together with the relevant nutritional information per 100 ml. Minimum Vitamin and Mineral Content Required for Declaration BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 introduces a stricter threshold for the declaration of vitamins and minerals in the nutritional value information section (ING). Vitamins or minerals may only be declared if they are present at a
Read More
August 10, 2026
The drug registration process in Vietnam will be simplified, particularly for foreign applicants, following the recent issuance by Vietnam’s Ministry of Health (MOH) of a new circular that is expected to reduce administrative hurdles. Circular No. 32/2026/TT-BYT on the registration of drugs and medicinal ingredients (Circular 32) was issued on July 29, 2026, and will take effect on October 1, 2026, replacing Circular No. 12/2025/TT-BYT. Key provisions of the new circular are discussed below. Five-Year Data Exclusivity and Five-Month Public Disclosure Framework Circular 32 updates data protection guidelines by explicitly referencing Article 128 of the amended Intellectual Property Law, which sets out that new drugs supported by clinical trial data submitted for the first time will be granted a five-year data exclusivity period from the date of the initial marketing authorization (MA) approval. Subsequent applications that rely on the originator’s protected data will not be eligible for approval from the date of submission of the originator’s registration dossier until five years after the first MA is granted. Furthermore, in accordance with the new regulations, the regulatory authority must publicly disclose information on subsequent applications five months before the granting of MA, providing originator companies with an opportunity to exercise and enforce their intellectual property rights. Simplified Requirements for Foreign Legal Documents Circular 32 expands the circumstances under which legal documents issued by foreign authorities are exempt from consular legalization and authenticity verification requirements. Specifically, such documents may be exempt if the Drug Administration of Vietnam (DAV) is able to verify their authenticity directly through official electronic means, including written confirmation or email correspondence sent directly to the MOH by the competent foreign authority, or publicly accessible English-language databases maintained by recognized foreign regulatory authorities. In addition, the new circular permits the submission of electronic notarized copies of legal documents
Read More
July 24, 2026
As food innovation continues to accelerate, manufacturers are increasingly introducing ingredients derived from new sources, produced using novel technologies, or lacking a significant history of human consumption. While these innovations create new opportunities for the food industry, they also raise important questions regarding consumer safety. For this reason, many jurisdictions, including Thailand, the European Union, Australia and New Zealand, Canada, and Singapore, require a premarket safety assessment for novel food ingredients before they can be placed on the market. The objective of this assessment is to ensure that each ingredient is safe for its intended use and level of consumption, does not present toxicological, allergenic, microbiological, or nutritional concerns, and will not mislead consumers. Scientific authorities typically evaluate the ingredient’s identity, manufacturing process, composition, specifications, anticipated dietary exposure, toxicological information, nutritional impact, and history of use before determining whether it can be marketed. Against this background, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently took an important step toward improving regulatory transparency by publishing, for the first time, a consolidated public list of substances that have successfully completed the Thai FDA’s safety assessment process, including substances determined to be novel foods and those determined not to fall within the novel food category. The list identifies the approved substances, the corresponding manufacturers or importers, approval dates, and the approved conditions of use. Although the publication does not change the existing legal framework governing novel food approvals, it provides businesses with greater visibility into the Thai FDA’s regulatory precedents and the types of substances that have previously been accepted through the safety assessment process. The full announcement is available on the Thai FDA’s website. As the list is now publicly available, it also provides useful insight into the types of substances that have successfully completed the Thai FDA’s safety assessment process.
Read More
July 24, 2026
For businesses in Thailand’s regulated industries, the problem of “too many licenses” is one of the most familiar hurdles to getting a product to market. Take a simple example: importing the materials necessary to sell teriyaki chicken skewers. To legally do this, a business may need approvals from several different agencies—separate permits for the chicken (Department of Livestock Development), the dipping sauce (Thai FDA), the wooden skewers (Department of Forestry), and other ingredients, each under a different authority. This kind of overlap is often cited to argue for a “regulatory guillotine”—a systematic review to cut outdated or duplicative rules that slow investment and business activity. The Facilitation of Licensing and Public Service Consideration Act B.E. 2569 (2026) (Licensing Facilitation Act 2026) is Thailand’s most significant response yet to that concern. This article looks at the Facilitation Act 2026 through a life sciences and regulatory affairs lens—what it may mean for the manufacturers, importers, and distributors of food, drugs, medical devices, cosmetics, and similar products who routinely deal with several regulators to bring a single product to market. The Super License: One Approval Standing in for Many The reform with the clearest potential for regulated-product businesses is the law’s “super license” mechanism, referred to as a “main license” in the statute. Once a business obtains the main license for a regulated activity, it is automatically deemed to hold all related sublicenses issued by other agencies for that same activity, provided the activity has been designated as eligible in the Government Gazette. The Licensing Facilitation Act 2026 also creates a central application center, allowing applicants to submit a single application and pay all relevant fees at one point of contact, with the center routing the application to each agency through a shared information system. The potential benefits of this for businesses
Read More