You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 5, 2019

Moving Employees from a Rep. Office to a Foreign-Invested Enterprise in Vietnam

Informed Counsel

In recent years in Vietnam, new policies and changes in the law have led to many situations where foreign companies are no longer allowed to operate as representative offices (ROs), or find that it is no longer optimal to do so. As a result, many companies are converting or considering the conversion of their ROs into full subsidiaries or “foreign-invested enterprises” (FIEs). This has been an especially hot topic in the pharmaceutical sector after changes brought on in 2017 by new legislation.   

Establishing an FIE can open up new business opportunities and is recommended for companies with serious long-term commitments to Vietnam, but the shift from RO to FIE can pose its share of challenges, particularly in the area of labor and employment. A clear understanding of the conversion process will help ensure a smooth transition.

Representative Offices: A Good Place to Start   

ROs are very common as a first step when foreign companies enter the Vietnam market. The RO is a quick and relatively simple way to get started, and allows the company to explore the market and establish relationships with Vietnamese businesses (distributors, agents, etc.) without a massive outlay of investment capital.

The problem with the RO is that it is only allowed to conduct a limited scope of business activities under the law. Specifically, ROs are not permitted to “directly engage in profit-making activity in Vietnam.” Though such activity is not clearly defined in the law, it is understood to mean that the RO cannot provide goods or services to distributors or consumers, or collect money from them. The RO is meant to be merely a liaison office for its foreign parent company.   

Though ROs have been known to find creative ways of “doing business without doing business,” most companies with serious interest in the Vietnam market will eventually choose to establish FIEs in the form of limited liability companies or joint-stock companies. FIEs are allowed to conduct a much greater scope of business activities than ROs, including profit-making activities, though the licensing process is correspondingly longer and more complicated.

For some companies, the establishment of an FIE is more a necessity than a choice. For example, in the pharmaceutical sector, with the effectiveness of Decree 54/2017/ND-CP dated May 8, 2017, guiding the Law on Pharmacy (as amended) and its implementation documents, it became clear that ROs of foreign pharmaceutical companies could no longer directly employ medical representatives who conduct drug introduction activities to healthcare professionals without valid medical representative cards formally issued by the provincial department of health under the name of the RO. In turn, the provincial departments of health will no longer issue those cards to ROs, or renew the RO’s existing cards, which has effectively rendered the practice impossible. As a result, these companies have been “urged” to set up their own FIEs, not only to conduct actual pharmaceutical business in Vietnam in the long run, but also to receive the medical representatives and other staff from their ROs.

Moving Employees to the FIE   

In theory, once an FIE is successfully established, the RO’s employees can be moved to the FIE, and the foreign investor can officially close the RO, though the procedure is not always so simple. In the pharmaceutical sector, for example, the RO may need to be maintained in parallel with the FIE for a certain period of time to ensure the smooth operations of the FIE as well as the drug export-import activity.   

To move employees from the RO to the FIE, labor contracts between the RO and the employees must be terminated. To ensure a smooth migration, that should be structured as a mutual termination agreement, pursuant to which no involvement from the local labor authority or the trade union is required. A termination notice must be prepared, along with minutes of termination and liquidation of the labor contract.   

To let employees go who do not agree to the mutual termination, the RO will need to prepare a “labor usage plan” to describe the situation and clearly demonstrate that the termination of the labor relationship is necessary to comply with the law. The labor usage plan must be submitted to/discussed with the appropriate-level trade union for its consideration and approval. This procedure can be rather time-consuming as Vietnamese labor law is very protective of employees and the trade unions, especially the district trade union federations, will review the labor usage plan very carefully to ensure there are no contents viewed as unfair to the impacted employees. Thus, it is always better to attempt to reach agreement on mutual termination, even if it requires additional expense.   

The termination package provided to the RO’s departing employees will typically include:

  • salary accrued up until the termination date;
  • a prorated portion of any 13th month salary (commonly provided in labor contracts in Vietnam);
  • unused annual leave; and
  • statutory severance allowance, where applicable.

An additional payment may be negotiated by the parties to be offered as “goodwill,” and is typically determined by the seniority of the employee—for example, the employee may receive one-half month’s or one month’s salary for each year of employment.   

The RO must then ensure that all insurance and tax obligations are fulfilled. The former employees must be deregistered with the social insurance body, and all social insurance premiums and income personal income tax for the employees must be paid up to the contract termination date.   

On the FIE side, the newly established entity will sign new employment contracts with the migrated employees. In practice, the terms of these contracts should be at least as favorable as the terms in the previous contracts with the RO.   

The FIE can then register the migrated employees with the social insurance body and begin paying premiums for them, and also declare the employees with the tax authority, in order to assume their personal income tax obligations.

Planning Ahead   

Navigating Vietnamese labor law can be a challenge for foreign companies, as the country tends to be more protective of employees than many other jurisdictions, and requires strict adherence to formal protocol. Companies who make the decision to convert their ROs in Vietnam to FIEs would be wise to set out a step-by-step employee migration plan in advance, with the assistance of experienced advisors, to ease the transition and ensure business continuity.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 4, 2026
Foreign business restrictions on telecommunications, treasury center businesses, and intragroup support services were eased when Thailand published the Ministerial Regulation Prescribing Service Businesses Not Requiring Permission for Foreign Business Operations (No. 5) B.E. 2569 (2026) in the Government Gazette on August 28, 2026. The ministerial regulation expands the categories of service businesses that foreign investors may operate without a foreign business license (FBL) under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA). Of particular relevance to the telecommunications, fintech, and technology sectors, the ministerial regulation exempts: Type 1 telecommunications licensees, which do not have their own networks; Treasury center businesses operated in accordance with Thailand’s exchange control regulations; and Certain intragroup administrative, human resources, and information technology management services. Telecommunications Services Foreign-owned businesses providing telecommunications services under a type 1 telecommunications license may now operate without obtaining an FBL. This may streamline market entry for qualifying telecommunications and digital infrastructure businesses. The exemption applies only to the FBA licensing requirement. Operators must continue to comply with applicable requirements under the Telecommunications Business Act and the regulations of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission, and the change does not affect foreign ownership restrictions applicable to type 2 or type 3 telecommunications businesses. Treasury Center Businesses The ministerial regulation also exempts qualifying treasury center businesses from the FBL requirement. This may facilitate centralized treasury functions in Thailand, including liquidity management, foreign exchange management, and intragroup funding arrangements. Treasury center operations remain subject to applicable requirements of the Bank of Thailand and other competent authorities. Intragroup Administrative, HR, and IT Services Certain administrative, human resources, and information technology management services provided between affiliated entities are also exempt, provided the relevant entities satisfy prescribed ownership or management criteria. The exemption is available where the service provider and recipient are related through specified ownership
September 1, 2026
Thailand has taken another step toward liberalizing its foreign business framework, exempting additional service activities and derivatives brokerage or agency businesses from the licensing requirements of the Foreign Business Act (FBA). Since the FBA came into effect, Thailand has taken a measured approach to opening its economy to foreign investment. While the FBA regulates foreign participation in businesses that may affect domestic interests, the framework has also evolved to allow foreign participation in certain business activities where sector-specific laws and regulatory frameworks already provide sufficient oversight, making additional FBA restrictions unnecessary. This is particularly true where Thai businesses are sufficiently capable of competing in certain service sectors, or where liberalization is intended to facilitate the provision of services among companies within the same corporate group. Against this backdrop, two new ministerial regulations have been issued pursuant to the FBA. Service Businesses Under the FBA Under the FBA, certain categories of business are restricted for foreign operators. List 3 of the FBA sets out businesses that foreigners may operate only if they obtain a foreign business license (FBL) or a foreign business certificate (FBC), or unless a specific exemption applies. List 3 (21) covers “other service businesses,” which is a catch-all provision that captures a wide range of service businesses not specifically enumerated elsewhere in the FBA. In practice, this means that most service activities carried on by foreigners in Thailand require an FBL or FBC unless otherwise exempted. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the FBA provides a mechanism to address this breadth by empowering the Minister of Commerce to issue ministerial regulations excluding specific types of service businesses from List Three (21). Once a service business is so excluded, foreigners may operate it without obtaining an FBL or FBC. Prior to the new regulations, four ministerial regulations had been issued to
August 31, 2026
Thailand has introduced a new regulatory framework that may expose foreign nationals who violate the Foreign Business Act (FBA) to deportation. The Regulation of the Office of the Prime Minister on Deportation B.E. 2569 was published in the Government Gazette on August 27, 2026. The regulation establishes an administrative process for referring foreign nationals for deportation where this is deemed necessary in the interests of public order or public morality. It does not create new substantive deportation powers, but it expressly identifies unlawful business conduct under the FBA—including nominee arrangements—as grounds for referral. Grounds for Deportation Referral The regulation sets out five grounds that may give rise to a referral to the relevant authorities: Unlawful entry into, or unlawful stay in, Thailand in violation of immigration laws. Unlawful employment or engagement in work in violation of laws governing the employment of foreign nationals. Carrying on business in violation of the FBA, including through the use of nominee arrangements. Forging official documents or using forged official documents. Committing an offense punishable by imprisonment of five years or more. The framework takes a broad approach, extending not only to the perpetrators of these acts but also to those who facilitate, instigate, or otherwise support such acts. Deportation Risk Following a Criminal Judgment Where a foreign national has committed any of the above offenses and has fully served the sentence imposed pursuant to a final judgment, the interior minister has the power to order deportation. This power also applies where a court has issued a final judgment sentencing a foreign national to imprisonment but has suspended the execution of the sentence, or has imposed a fine. A deportation order may also specify a period during which the foreign national is prohibited from reentering Thailand. FBA Noncompliance: Broader Consequences Noncompliance with the FBA—including
August 24, 2026
Myanmar’s Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA) has published the guidelines it uses to assess and approve company names for registration in the country. The guidelines, which were published on May 18, 2026, explain how DICA determines whether a proposed name is identical or too similar to an existing name, and they identify words and expressions that may be prohibited or restricted. Businesses planning to incorporate in Myanmar should expect DICA to scrutinize proposed names more closely than it has in the past. Prohibitions on Company Names The Myanmar Companies Law prohibits company names that are identical or similar to existing company names, and DICA’s internal assessment guidelines explain how this rule applies in practice. Under the guidelines, DICA may reject a proposed company name if the proposed name: Is identical or nearly identical to an existing company name; Differs from an existing company name only in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, or transliteration; Only adds words such as “Group,” “Holding,” “International,” “Myanmar,” or “Family” to an existing company name; Merely rearranges the words in an existing company name; Is pronounced similarly to an existing name; Uses the same brand name as an existing company, even if the company carries out different business activities; or Uses an existing brand name together with an abbreviation of that brand name or a shortened form of the name or business description. DICA may also consider whether a proposed name could give the impression that two companies are related, even if they operate in different business sectors. In addition, DICA may review a company name even after registration. If it later determines that the name does not comply with the Myanmar Companies Law or is otherwise unsuitable, DICA may direct the company to change its name under section 26 of the Myanmar Companies Law.