You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 27, 2023

Laos to Require Registration of Import-Export Activities

On May 25, 2023, Laos published Decision on the Registration of Importers and Exporters of Goods No. 0752, which requires importers and exporters to register their activities and the related goods with the Ministry of Industry and Commerce (MOIC). The MOIC’s goal is to create a database to monitor imports and exports and collect data on the flow of goods in and out of Laos. The decision also aims to regulate the import and export of goods to and from Laos by foreign traders who do not have a local presence.

Once the decision takes effect on July 6, 2023, import and export of goods will be possible only upon registration by the importers or exporters with the MOIC. This registration requirement is in addition to the current mandate that importers and exporters operating in Laos obtain a Business Operating License from the MOIC.

Activities Subject to the Decision

Under the decision, the obligation to register applies to individuals and entities that import or export goods for which the revenues and payments are controlled by the government as well as “goods that have a quick impact on the lives of the population.” Although it is not yet clear which products the MOIC has in mind, further clarifications are expected.

Under the current regulatory framework in Laos, some goods need an import-export permit prior to crossing the Lao border, in accordance with a 2022 regulation listing goods subject to the permitting requirement. It is possible that the goods regulated by the new decision could be the same as those defined in the 2022 list (see here for a Lao-language list)—such as drugs, medical products, land vehicles, petrol, and hazardous chemicals—but further confirmation and clarification will be necessary to determine this.

Importers and Exporters Subject to the Decision

The decision applies to both local and foreign operators, and it does not replace or amend the 2019 regulation requiring certification of foreign traders with no registered business establishment in Laos. Therefore, such foreign traders will need to show proof of this certification before registering with the MOIC pursuant to the decision.

The decision stipulates that all importers and exporters registering with the MOIC must also submit copies of their Enterprise Registration Certificate and Business Operating License along with their application form. It is likely that more documents will be requested for certain specialized goods (e.g., relevant license for medical products, etc.).

Registration Validity

Under the decision, the registration certificate is valid for one year and can be renewed for the same period. This is in line with the authority’s intention of collecting up-to-date data on annual imports and exports and controlling imported and exported goods.

The list of goods permitted for import and export will be specified on the registration certificate based on the business operator’s application. The business operator will only be allowed to import or export these goods.

Penalties and Enforcement

Breaches of the decision deemed minor or first-time violations are punishable by warnings or education (usually a warning along with relevant training to ensure compliance with the law). Further disciplinary actions may include civil claims (if damages are caused) and criminal charges depending on the nature of the infringement. The decision, however, does not provide more information, such as a sliding scale for fines.

Implementation and Outlook

The decision will allow the Department of Import-Export (DEMEX) in the MOIC to centralize information and maintain a comprehensive database of all local and foreign operators conducting import-export activities, along with the exact types of products being imported or exported. If the information in the registration certificate does not match the declaration of goods to be imported or exported, the trader may not be authorized to import or export the unspecified or incorrectly specified goods. In this regard, the DEMEX acts as the central point in managing the information in order to simplify verification carried out by separate administrations as necessary (e.g., Customs Department, Ministry of Health, etc.).

Another objective of the decision is to control the liquidity of foreign currency coming into and going out of Laos. Under the amended Law on Management of Foreign Currency, locally established businesses must have a bank account for the purpose of handling all business transactions. The purpose is to have greater oversight of foreign currency coming into the country by ensuring that all transactions are processed through the national banking system. Laos’ foreign currency holdings are notably low, with approximately only two months’ worth of imports, according to the World Bank and the Lao PDR Economic Monitor of May 2023.

In addition, the decision may be the next step toward thwarting parallel imports through improved implementation of existing measures. Although legal provisions exist to impede parallel imports for most types of goods, interpretation by the authorities has been tolerant of most imported goods due to the lower prices that this practice can offer consumers. Nonetheless, some goods are better protected and regulated than others, such as drugs that require a registration license.

For more information on this import-export decision, or on any aspect of trade involving Laos, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected] or +856 21 262 355.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 19, 2025
On January 3, 2025, the Bank of the Lao PDR (BOL) issued Decision No. 11/BOL on the Use of Foreign Currency in Lao PDR, taking effect on the same date. This decision sets out the rules for using foreign currency in Laos and ensures the Lao kip (LAK) remains the primary currency while allowing flexibility for international transactions. Key points in the decision are outlined below. Permissible Activities for Foreign Currency The decision provides that authorized entities can use foreign currency as a secondary currency to LAK in the setting of cost and pricing structures, announcing and advertising prices, and making or receiving payments for goods and services that are imported or have manufacturing inputs imported from other countries. Otherwise, LAK is the only permitted currency. The decision also stipulates that foreign exchange must be conducted only via authorized commercial banks or foreign exchange markets. The exchange rate for setting costs, pricing structures, announcing and advertising prices, and making and receiving payments for goods and services in foreign currency must match the exchange rate announced by commercial banks from time to time. Businesses Allowed to Use Foreign Currency The decision allows certain businesses and organizations to use foreign currency. These entities are divided into two groups: those that need approval before using foreign currency, and those that can use it immediately. Enterprises that can use foreign currency with BOL approval include: Businesses that export goods or services and entities that lease or obtain concessions from the government, generating revenue in foreign currency through commercial banks. Enterprises that provide international freight and passenger transportation services. Enterprises that provide services related to cross-border logistics and warehousing. Enterprises located at international borders and airports, such as duty-free shops and restaurants. Enterprises that have obligations to make payments in foreign currency to other
January 29, 2025
The fourth round of negotiations of the EU-Thailand Free Trade Agreement (FTA) wrapped up in Bangkok in November 2024. Now that the latest summary report is out, it is worth highlighting some of the intellectual property (IP)-related changes we might see once the chapter is complete. Copyright If Thailand were to agree to follow the EU proposal, we would see the term of protection for copyright extended. Currently under Thai law, protection is the life of the author plus fifty years. This is twenty years less than the EU proposal. It seems that copyright is one area the two sides have yet to agree on, and it is no wonder as agreeing to follow Thai law would deprive authors from the EU of an additional twenty years of protection post-death. On the other hand, Thailand agreeing to the EU proposal would likely result in legislative change in the country to align domestic law with the FTA. We may also see more robust and streamlined collective management organizations (CMOs) in Thailand. The current proposal calls for each party to promote cooperation between their CMOs, which would extend to transparency over their running, including revenue and representation agreements. Thailand does currently have CMOs within the territory, and the Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) has a voluntary CMO code. However, it is unclear whether existing practice will be sufficient for EU rightsholders. CMOs have been an area that is difficult to regulate as there has been a balancing act between tightening the examination of reporting and not wanting to limit the freedom of rightsholders and how they commercialize their IP. Trademarks There is a fair amount of overlap between the Trademark Act in Thailand and the EU proposals. However, it is unclear to what degree the existing laws would satisfy the requests
January 7, 2025
Myanmar’s Ministry of Commerce (MOC) announced a significant policy change allowing foreign companies incorporated in Myanmar under the Myanmar Companies Law 2017 to export eight categories of locally produced commodities, with effect from December 17, 2024. Notification 93/2024 allows eligible foreign companies—companies with more than 35% of their shares held by foreign entities or individuals—to export, manufacture, or trade the following additional commodities: Value-added meats, fish, and fishery products Value-added agricultural products Pulp and various papers Seeds Refined metals Semifinished or finished horticultural products, including fruits and vegetables Wood-based furniture Products supporting environmental conservation The notification, which was issued under the Export and Import Law 2012, does not set a minimum capital requirement for foreign companies taking advantage of these opportunities. Any type of foreign company can apply to export the eight commodities listed above. Companies permitted or endorsed by the Myanmar Investment Commission (MIC) that wish to engage in these opportunities must also adhere to the rules and regulations set by the MIC. To facilitate the export process, the notification specifies that foreign companies must obtain an export recommendation from the relevant government departments and an export license from the MOC’s Department of Trade for each of these commodities. For more information on this announcement, the relevant licensing authorities for different commodities, or any other aspect of import and export matters in Myanmar, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected].
December 18, 2024
The EU-Thailand Free Trade Agreement is drawing a lot of interest as the fourth round recently concluded in Bangkok. Despite negotiations starting in 2013, there was a ten-year pause before we saw the first round of negotiations end in September 2023. The initial plan was for four rounds of negotiations, with the free trade agreement (FTA) finalized in 2025. However, following the fourth round it is clear that the negotiations are still ongoing. Now, the question is: how much closer are the EU and Thailand to concluding their FTA? The EU initially submitted 13 chapter proposals for the FTA, followed by a further 12, and these became the springboard for the negotiations. Given the complexity of agreeing on an accord of this size, there will probably be additional proposals submitted in 2025. These chapters have seen sector-specific negotiation groups formed, and although it has been difficult to truly gauge the status, steady progress has been made in each. Arguably one of the biggest points of discussion pertains to the customs process for imports and exports. Both sides aim to align their practices in relation to rules of origin and custom rates, with preferential tariff treatments offered to goods originating from Thailand and the EU, as well as talks of eliminating or reducing relevant taxes. The desire for a faster customs clearance can be seen in EU proposals for clearance of goods on arrival. Although there has been progress in agreeing to a more simplified customs process, more work needs to be done before we hear news of the agreed-upon fees and charges, or confirmation of what goods would be allowed temporary admission. When we consider customs clearance, it is important to also examine what this FTA could mean for rightsholders. One piece of good news is that it appears