You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 23, 2020

COVID-19: Laos Releases Requirements for Companies Seeking to Resume Normal Operations

Subscribe to Updates

On April 21, 2020, following the Prime Minister’s extension of the lockdown measures in Laos to May 3, the National Taskforce Committee for COVID-19 Prevention and Control (the Taskforce) issued guidance on what companies must do to be allowed to operate during the lockdown, entitled Instructions on the Conditions and Measures for Eligible Private Companies to Operate during the COVID-19 Outbreak. 

The instructions, which are effective from April 21, provide a set of requirements that private sector businesses, projects (e.g., concession activities), legal entities, and factories (collectively called Operators) must comply with to resume operations. Operators must be inspected by a specific unit mandated by the Taskforce before resuming any operations, and an agreement or memorandum between the Operators and the Taskforce unit must be signed to confirm that the Operators are compliant. Although not expressly indicated in the instruction, we understand that all companies may need authorization from the Taskforce to resume operations after the lockdown ends. Further information is expected on this in the coming weeks.

Conditions for Operation

  1. Operators must have a designated working area, and staff dormitories must be of a good standard. Those with a large workforce, or a high enough risk factor, must have an isolated quarantine area and an emergency transportation vehicle on standby. The original text does not clarify what is meant by “large workforce”, as it does not provide a threshold thereof, or “high risk,” but we understand that these recommendations must be implemented as practically possible, and that the authorities will not expect, for example, small enterprises to have a staff dormitory.
  2. The working environment must be spacious enough to guarantee social distancing of at least one meter.
  3. Dormitories must be sufficiently spacious and beds must be at least one meter apart.
  4. The canteen must be sufficiently spacious, and Operators must guarantee good hygiene, prohibit the common use of utensils, and ensure one-meter social distancing.
  5. If dormitories are not situated on site, employee transportation must provide sufficient space to enable one-meter social distancing.
  6. Sufficient 24-hour clean water, handwashing stations, alcohol gel, and masks must be available for all employees.
  7. 24-hour security must be provided, authorization to leave must be required the workplace, and outsiders must be prohibited.
  8. Cleaners must properly dispose of waste that may cause COVID-19 infections, such as by providing covered trashcans.
  9. Operators must facilitate inspections and visits from medical teams from the relevant authority. We understand that expenses linked to inspections must be borne by the Operators.

Measures that Operators Must Implement 

  1. Body temperature must be checked, and alcohol gel must be provided to all employees, prior to entering or leaving the working area, dormitory, and canteen, from morning to evening every day. Operators must also keep a written record the symptoms of each person. If any employee exhibits a fever (above 37.5 degrees), cough, or difficulties in breathing, they must be separated from the working area and put in isolated quarantine. Operators should immediately alert the authorities by using emergency numbers 165 and 166, and arrange to have the person examined by a doctor.
  2. Masks must be provided to all employees during working times, and other times when people must be in the same location as others. Handwashing stations must be situated at convenient locations for the employees.
  3. Social distancing of one meter must be guaranteed for employees. Activities where this social distancing requirement cannot be guaranteed are prohibited. The regulation provides a non-exhaustive list of examples, such as sports and celebrations. However, this requirement may be broadly interpreted—we understand that social drinking after work with colleagues is not permitted, for example.
  4. Specific prevention measures for suppliers from outside the company must be put in place, similar to those required for employees.
  5. Working areas, canteens, toilets, dormitories, warehouses, and storage rooms must be cleaned every day after working hours.
  6. Hiring new employees, consultants, and specialists, from abroad or from Laos, must be postponed until the outbreak is contained.

There are no details on when inspections will take place, and further guidance is expected in due course. Tilleke & Gibbins will continue to keep you informed as the situation develops.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 24, 2026
Myanmar’s Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA) has published the guidelines it uses to assess and approve company names for registration in the country. The guidelines, which were published on May 18, 2026, explain how DICA determines whether a proposed name is identical or too similar to an existing name, and they identify words and expressions that may be prohibited or restricted. Businesses planning to incorporate in Myanmar should expect DICA to scrutinize proposed names more closely than it has in the past. Prohibitions on Company Names The Myanmar Companies Law prohibits company names that are identical or similar to existing company names, and DICA’s internal assessment guidelines explain how this rule applies in practice. Under the guidelines, DICA may reject a proposed company name if the proposed name: Is identical or nearly identical to an existing company name; Differs from an existing company name only in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, or transliteration; Only adds words such as “Group,” “Holding,” “International,” “Myanmar,” or “Family” to an existing company name; Merely rearranges the words in an existing company name; Is pronounced similarly to an existing name; Uses the same brand name as an existing company, even if the company carries out different business activities; or Uses an existing brand name together with an abbreviation of that brand name or a shortened form of the name or business description. DICA may also consider whether a proposed name could give the impression that two companies are related, even if they operate in different business sectors. In addition, DICA may review a company name even after registration. If it later determines that the name does not comply with the Myanmar Companies Law or is otherwise unsuitable, DICA may direct the company to change its name under section 26 of the Myanmar Companies Law.
Read More
August 20, 2026
Vietnam’s Law on Bankruptcy and Rehabilitation No. 142/2025/QH15, passed by the National Assembly on December 11, 2025, does something many regional counterparts do not yet attempt: it instructs parties and arbitral tribunals on exactly what happens to an arbitration once a debtor becomes insolvent. Together with the Law on Commercial Arbitration No. 54/2010/QH12, the new law improves upon what used to be an uncertain area of practice, now providing an explicit, mandatory sequence of procedures. Suspension and Termination of Arbitration Proceedings Under article 40(2) of the law, once a Vietnamese court accepts a bankruptcy petition, any arbitration that concerns the debtor’s financial obligations must be temporarily suspended as soon as the tribunal receives the court’s notification. If the court subsequently issues a decision commencing bankruptcy proceedings, article 59(2) takes a further step: the suspended arbitration is terminated outright, and the underlying case file is transferred to the court handling the insolvency for resolution. The two provisions work as a sequence: first suspension, then termination and transfer, rather than as independent triggers. Meanwhile, article 60(4) reinforces this effect by vesting the bankruptcy court with exclusive jurisdiction over all claims against the debtor from the date the petition is accepted. Notably, this mechanism operates automatically, without the need for the insolvency court to issue a separate anti-arbitration order. The tribunal simply suspends or terminates the proceeding by operation of law once notified; however, Vietnamese law currently provides no procedure by which a party can apply to the insolvency court for permission to continue the arbitration despite the statutory effect. Practitioners with a Vietnamese counterparty in arbitration should treat notification of a bankruptcy filing as something to flag to the tribunal immediately since continuing to arbitrate a claim that has become subject to article 40(2) or 59(2) risks producing an award vulnerable
Read More
August 20, 2026
Thai law contains no provision that speaks directly to what happens to an arbitration when one of the parties becomes insolvent. The interaction between arbitration and insolvency is derived instead from the general operation of two separately drafted laws: the Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940) and the Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002). Because Thai courts have had few opportunities to interpret how these two statutes apply together, the practical answer to many questions, such as who represents an insolvent party in arbitration, whether an award will be enforced, and what happens to a foreign proceeding, depends on inference from general principles of insolvency, arbitration, and procedural law rather than on settled rules. Liquidation and Restructuring The Bankruptcy Act governs both liquidation, which winds up a debtor’s affairs, and restructuring (rehabilitation), which aims to preserve a business. The consequences for arbitration differ accordingly. In liquidation, the debtor’s assets vest in the official receiver, who alone can conduct or continue any arbitration affecting the estate; the debtor loses the authority to act on its own behalf. In restructuring, the plan preparer or administrator takes over that role, but there is more room for the debtor to remain involved, since the objective of rehabilitation is to keep the business operational. Restructuring carries an automatic stay that takes effect once the Bankruptcy Court accepts the restructuring petition. This stay can halt an arbitration regardless of where it is seated. In contrast, liquidation does not work through a stay; instead, the debtor’s loss of authority over its own assets and disputes is what constrains the arbitration. Neither proceeding provides a party a formal route to apply for permission to continue arbitrating—the Bankruptcy Act contains no such mechanism—though in restructuring cases the Bankruptcy Court may allow proceedings to continue where doing so will not prejudice
Read More
August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.
Read More