You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 23, 2020

COVID-19: Laos Releases Requirements for Companies Seeking to Resume Normal Operations

On April 21, 2020, following the Prime Minister’s extension of the lockdown measures in Laos to May 3, the National Taskforce Committee for COVID-19 Prevention and Control (the Taskforce) issued guidance on what companies must do to be allowed to operate during the lockdown, entitled Instructions on the Conditions and Measures for Eligible Private Companies to Operate during the COVID-19 Outbreak. 

The instructions, which are effective from April 21, provide a set of requirements that private sector businesses, projects (e.g., concession activities), legal entities, and factories (collectively called Operators) must comply with to resume operations. Operators must be inspected by a specific unit mandated by the Taskforce before resuming any operations, and an agreement or memorandum between the Operators and the Taskforce unit must be signed to confirm that the Operators are compliant. Although not expressly indicated in the instruction, we understand that all companies may need authorization from the Taskforce to resume operations after the lockdown ends. Further information is expected on this in the coming weeks.

Conditions for Operation

  1. Operators must have a designated working area, and staff dormitories must be of a good standard. Those with a large workforce, or a high enough risk factor, must have an isolated quarantine area and an emergency transportation vehicle on standby. The original text does not clarify what is meant by “large workforce”, as it does not provide a threshold thereof, or “high risk,” but we understand that these recommendations must be implemented as practically possible, and that the authorities will not expect, for example, small enterprises to have a staff dormitory.
  2. The working environment must be spacious enough to guarantee social distancing of at least one meter.
  3. Dormitories must be sufficiently spacious and beds must be at least one meter apart.
  4. The canteen must be sufficiently spacious, and Operators must guarantee good hygiene, prohibit the common use of utensils, and ensure one-meter social distancing.
  5. If dormitories are not situated on site, employee transportation must provide sufficient space to enable one-meter social distancing.
  6. Sufficient 24-hour clean water, handwashing stations, alcohol gel, and masks must be available for all employees.
  7. 24-hour security must be provided, authorization to leave must be required the workplace, and outsiders must be prohibited.
  8. Cleaners must properly dispose of waste that may cause COVID-19 infections, such as by providing covered trashcans.
  9. Operators must facilitate inspections and visits from medical teams from the relevant authority. We understand that expenses linked to inspections must be borne by the Operators.

Measures that Operators Must Implement 

  1. Body temperature must be checked, and alcohol gel must be provided to all employees, prior to entering or leaving the working area, dormitory, and canteen, from morning to evening every day. Operators must also keep a written record the symptoms of each person. If any employee exhibits a fever (above 37.5 degrees), cough, or difficulties in breathing, they must be separated from the working area and put in isolated quarantine. Operators should immediately alert the authorities by using emergency numbers 165 and 166, and arrange to have the person examined by a doctor.
  2. Masks must be provided to all employees during working times, and other times when people must be in the same location as others. Handwashing stations must be situated at convenient locations for the employees.
  3. Social distancing of one meter must be guaranteed for employees. Activities where this social distancing requirement cannot be guaranteed are prohibited. The regulation provides a non-exhaustive list of examples, such as sports and celebrations. However, this requirement may be broadly interpreted—we understand that social drinking after work with colleagues is not permitted, for example.
  4. Specific prevention measures for suppliers from outside the company must be put in place, similar to those required for employees.
  5. Working areas, canteens, toilets, dormitories, warehouses, and storage rooms must be cleaned every day after working hours.
  6. Hiring new employees, consultants, and specialists, from abroad or from Laos, must be postponed until the outbreak is contained.

There are no details on when inspections will take place, and further guidance is expected in due course. Tilleke & Gibbins will continue to keep you informed as the situation develops.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 22, 2026
A new decree in Vietnam brings significant implementation clarity to the country’s existing extended producer responsibility (EPR) legal framework. An EPR mechanism was first codified in Vietnam in the 2020 Law on Environmental Protection amid ongoing challenges surrounding the collection and treatment of product and packaging waste. The mechanism was progressively detailed through Decree No. 08/2022/ND‑CP and its successive amendments, but the regulatory framework remained insufficiently developed, notably in terms of support mechanisms for waste collection, recycling, and treatment. The newly launched regulations in Decree No. 110/2026/ND-CP (Decree 110), issued on April 1, 2026, and taking effect on May 25, 2026, stipulate fully and clearly the responsibility of manufacturers and importers to recycle products and packaging and to treat waste. Some key provisions of Decree 110 for manufacturers, importers, and related stakeholders are presented below. Subjects of EPR The Law on Environmental Protection assigns responsibility to manufacturers and importers for product and packaging recycling (under Article 54) or waste collection and treatment (under Article 55), depending on the type of products and packaging they produce or import. Decree 110 elaborates on these EPR provisions by specifying the responsible entities and listing out the types of products and packaging subject to recycling and waste treatment responsibilities. Decree 110 clarifies the responsible entities in special cases, such as when products under the same brand are made by multiple manufacturers, when there is a contract manufacturing or entrusted import relationship, and when the manufacturer or importer is part of a corporate group. Notably, exemptions may be applied in some scenarios, such as for manufacturers and importers of products and packaging exclusively for export, temporary import and re-export, or research and testing purposes, as well as for entities with annual revenue from related products not exceeding VND 30 billion. Recycling Responsibilities Decree 110
April 15, 2026
On March 31, 2026, Vietnam’s government issued Decree 102/2026/ND-CP (Decree 102), which amends Decree 75/2019/ND-CP on administrative sanctions for competition law violations (Decree 75). Effective from May 20, 2026, the new decree introduces a number of significant changes aimed at strengthening enforcement, revising penalty structures, and broadening the range of remedial measures, primarily for violations related to economic concentration. Revised Penalties for Economic Concentration Violations Decree 102 significantly revises the penalties for violations related to economic concentration. Failure to notify an economic concentration; implementing an economic concentration before clearance Under the new framework, Articles 14 and 15 of Decree 75 have been amended to impose a range of monetary fines, rather than relying solely on percentage‑based penalties as under the previous regime, for violations involving the failure to notify an economic concentration or the implementation of an economic concentration prior to clearance. The fines range from VND 500 million to VND 1 billion for each enterprise participating in a concentration with combined assets, revenues, or purchase value below VND 3,000 billion in the preceding fiscal year, capped at 5% of the violating enterprise’s total turnover in the relevant market. For concentrations meeting or exceeding the VND 3,000 billion threshold across those same metrics, the fines increase to VND 1 billion to VND 2 billion per enterprise, also subject to the 5% cap. These differentiated thresholds allow penalties to better reflect the size of the transaction and its potential competitive impact. Non-compliance with conditional approvals Enterprises that do not implement or only partially implement the conditions specified in a conditional economic concentration approval decision face fines ranging from 1% to 3% of total turnover in the relevant market during the fiscal year preceding the violation. Decree 102 also adds a new remedial measure requiring enterprises to fully implement all conditions
March 31, 2026
Against the backdrop of Vietnam’s rapid economic and technological transformation and its ambition to build a knowledge-driven economy, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Higher Education No. 125/2025/QH15 on December 10, 2025, The new law took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Higher Education No. 08/2012/QH13 of 2012 and its subsequent amendments after more than a decade of implementation. The new law reflects a significant policy shift toward enhancing the institutional autonomy of higher education institutions (“HEIs”)—universities and other university-level institutions. By granting broader autonomy, Vietnam aims to enable HEIs to operate more proactively, better respond to market needs, and improve the quality and efficiency of education and research activities. Comprehensive Institutional Autonomy in HEIs The new law marks a significant shift by granting HEIs comprehensive autonomy as a statutory right, within the bounds of the licensed scope of educational operation and the legal framework, rather than a conditional right as provided under the former law. Under the new law, HEIs are empowered to exercise autonomy over their academic expertise, training, scientific research, international cooperation, organizational structure, personnel, finance, and other higher education activities. The expansion of institutional autonomy is also accompanied by a correspondingly strengthened framework of institutional accountability. However, Vietnam maintains a certain degree of control and imposes restrictions on institutional autonomy in sensitive and strategically important areas. These controls and restrictions include limitations on training autonomy in the majors of teacher training, national defense, and security; and restrictions on financial and personnel management autonomy for HEIs under the administration of the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Public Security. New Model for Curriculum Development The new law removes the concept of “opening a training major” and focuses regulation on how training programs are developed and delivered. Under the previous regime,
March 31, 2026
Thailand’s Department of Business Development (DBD) has issued a regulation imposing additional requirements for amending a company’s directors and signatory power to designate a foreign national as an authorized signatory of the company. This measure, effective April 1, 2026, has been introduced in response to the widespread use of Thai nationals as nominees to conduct business on behalf of foreigners, a practice considered to have an adverse impact on the country’s economic stability and security. The new measures are particularly concerned with changes to the authorized signatory structure of companies that originally had only Thai directors authorized to sign for and bind the company. Under the new rules, any amendment that results in a foreign national becoming an authorized signatory—whether solely or jointly—for such a company will be subject to additional verification. Directors signing an application to register such an amendment to the company’s authorized signatory structure are now also required to provide a statement confirming that all shareholders of the company have made genuine contributions and no Thai national has assisted with, supported, or participated in business activities in a nominee capacity. Implications Companies intending to appoint foreign directors as authorized signatories should be aware of the increased regulatory requirements and assessments. Additional documentation and confirmations may be required as part of the registration process.