You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

Khin Myo Myo Aye

Senior Associate

Biography

Khin Myo Myo Aye is a senior associate in Tilleke & Gibbins’ Yangon office. Her practice focuses on intellectual property matters in Myanmar, where she advises domestic and international clients on the acquisition, protection, commercialization, and enforcement of IP rights across a broad range of industries, including consumer goods, food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, technology, and manufacturing.

Khin assists clients on trademarks, industrial designs, copyrights, and emerging patent-related matters, including registration, prosecution, portfolio management, licensing, assignments, and strategic IP protection. She works with multinational corporations, regional businesses, and local enterprises to develop practical IP strategies aligned with their commercial objectives in Myanmar.

She is a certified IP representative recognized by Myanmar’s Intellectual Property Department (IPD) and is authorized to represent clients in trademark, industrial design, patent, and copyright filings, prosecutions, registrations, and related proceedings before the IPD.

Her experience includes managing local and international IP portfolios, conducting registrability assessments, advising on clearance and filing strategies, handling prosecution and regulatory compliance matters, and supporting IP protection and enforcement through infringement assessments, cease-and-desist actions, settlement negotiations, anti-counterfeiting measures, customs recordation, and border enforcement.

Before joining Tilleke & Gibbins, Khin practiced civil and criminal litigation and handled IP prosecution and enforcement matters at local and regional law firms in Myanmar. She holds an LLB from Dagon University and is an advocate admitted to the Supreme Court of the Union of Myanmar.

Experience

  • Represented a major telecommunications company in the execution of its intellectual portfolio management strategy, including the registration of marks in several Asian countries.
  • Acted on behalf of a brand owner in successful negotiations with an infringer, ultimately convincing the infringer to stop distributing and selling the counterfeit products, and recalling all distributed products from wholesale and retail outlets across Myanmar.
  • Represented an international food and beverage outlet in enforcing its marks in Myanmar after a local company imitated the client’s marks. Following cease-and-desist action, the local entity changed its name and ceased the infringing activities.
  • Assisted an international food manufacturer with enforcement actions against counterfeiters in Myanmar, including product-label review and liaison with the Myanmar Food and Drug Administration.
  • Advised a Singapore-based multinational banking and financial services corporation on enforcing its IP rights in Myanmar against a third party’s unauthorized use of a mark identical to the client’s well-known mark in lodging a complaint with the Directorate of Investment and Company Administration, which resulted in DICA issuing a notice requiring the third party to change its local entity name.
  • Managed local and international IP portfolios and coordinated multijurisdictional filing and protection strategies on trademark, industrial design, copyright, and patent-related matters.
  • Advised clients in IP enforcement matters, including infringement disputes, anticounterfeiting actions, cease-and-desist campaigns, customs recordation, and border enforcement strategies for IP rights protection.
ABOUT Khin

Location

Languages

    Burmese

    English

Education

    LLB, Dagon University

Insights

June 30, 2026
Customs recordation is an enforcement mechanism in Myanmar that enables intellectual property (IP) rights holders to seek prevention of the cross-border movement of infringing goods. The enactment of Myanmar’s IP laws in 2019 has enabled customs recordation for registered marks and copyrights under the Trademark Law 2019 and the Copyright Law 2019. By contrast, the Patent Law 2019 and the Industrial Design Law 2019 do not provide a practical framework for customs recordation, and accordingly such rights are not subject to the customs recordation regime. Under the Trademark Law 2019, rights holders may apply for customs recordation and may also ask the Customs Department to suspend the release of goods suspected of bearing counterfeit marks. Likewise, the Copyright Law 2019 allows for customs intervention in relation to pirated works. These provisions reflect Myanmar’s gradual alignment with international standards on border measures, although the implementation framework remains at a relatively early stage of development. Customs Recordation Pursuant to the Trademark Law 2019 and the Copyright Law 2019, the relevant authorities have issued customs rules concerning the protection of registered marks and copyrights. In practice, the process generally begins with the submission of an application to the Customs Department together with supporting documentation. This typically includes proof of registration in Myanmar; details of the rights holder, applicant, and any authorized representative; and a comprehensive description of the genuine goods. Product identification materials—such as photographs, packaging samples, and distinguishing features—are particularly important in helping customs officers identify suspected infringing goods. A recordation remains valid for two years from the date of approval. It may be renewed for additional two-year terms, provided that the renewal application is filed within the thirty days prior to expiry for marks and up to thirty days in advance of the expiry date for copyrights, in accordance with
June 16, 2026
Since the implementation of the Trademark Law 2019 on April 1, 2023, Myanmar has operated under a modern first-to-file trademark system that brings its registration framework closer to international practice. As the new regime continues to develop in practice, applicants are increasingly required to navigate formal examination requirements, substantive objections, and procedural deadlines with greater precision. This article provides a high-level review of the trademark examination process in Myanmar, focusing on the principal stages from initial review to approval, the types of objections commonly raised by the Intellectual Property Department (IPD), and the key considerations for responding effectively. A clear understanding of these issues is essential for applicants seeking to secure registration efficiently and to mitigate avoidable delays or refusals. Examination Process: Key Stages Trademark applications filed with the IPD undergo two stages of review. Formality Examination The IPD first verifies compliance with procedural requirements, including: Correct Nice Classification Clear mark representation Accurate applicant details Clearly defined goods or services Representative details, if the application is filed by a representative Other formality requirements cover translation and transliteration of any non-English or non-Myanmar elements in the mark, color claim details, applicable disclaimers, and payment of official fees. Deficiencies result in an office action requiring correction within 30 days, which may be extended upon request. Registrability Examination The IPD also assesses registrability. A mark may be refused if it: Lacks distinctiveness Is descriptive or generic Misleads the public or violates public order/morality Contains prohibited state symbols Only compliant applications proceed to publication. Responding to Office Actions Applicants must respond within 30 days of notification from the IPD. Depending on the nature of the objection, strategies may include submitting legal arguments for distinctiveness, providing evidence of acquired distinctiveness, filing appropriate disclaimers, clarifying descriptions such as color claims, or amending the listed goods
April 29, 2026
Across the region, local brands have become key drivers of economic growth, cultural identity, and innovation, and Myanmar is no exception. From traditional products and creative industries to modern startups and small and medium‑sized enterprises (SMEs), Myanmar’s local brands are increasingly shaping domestic markets. However, as local brands grow, they also face higher risks of imitation, misuse, and unfair competition. In this context, protecting brand identity, creativity, and innovation through proper intellectual property (IP) strategies is essential to ensure that Myanmar’s homegrown businesses can grow sustainably, compete confidently, and retain the value of what they create. The Key IP Laws for Local Brands In 2019, Myanmar enacted a comprehensive suite of four IP laws, aligning the nation’s IP enforcement framework with international standards. Trademark Law 2019: This law introduced the “first-to-file” system into the country, with trademark rights primarily obtained through registration with the Intellectual Property Department (IPD). Trademarks protect brand names, logos, and other signs that distinguish goods or services. Registration grants the exclusive rights to use the mark and to prevent others from using identical or confusingly similar marks. Each registration lasts for 10 years from the filing date and can be renewed for subsequent 10-year periods. Copyright Law 2019: Copyright, which arises automatically upon creation, protects literary, artistic, musical, and audiovisual works, including software, advertisements, artwork, and social media content. While registration with the IPD is not mandatory under this law, it can be helpful for establishing evidence and supporting any future enforcement. The terms of protection for economic rights associated with copyrights vary depending on the type of work involved. In contrast, the protection for moral rights lasts indefinitely—continuing even after the author’s death. Industrial Design Law 2019: Under this law, any industrial design that is new and independently created can be filed with the
April 20, 2026
Myanmar’s industrial design registration regime has been steadily gaining momentum since the country officially began accepting applications under the Industrial Design Law of 2019. The Industrial Design Division of Myanmar’s Intellectual Property Department (IPD) has actively advanced examination and registration procedures, and as of March 2026, approximately 300 industrial design applications have been published in the IPD’s publicly accessible database—a meaningful milestone in the development of Myanmar’s emerging intellectual property framework. This figure reflects only published applications; additional filings remain pending and will be published after the conclusion of ongoing examination. Filing Requirements in Practice Compliance with a defined set of mandatory requirements is the foundation for filing a valid design application. These mandatory particulars must be provided at the time of filing in order to establish a filing date. These include the applicant’s and creator’s identifying details, a notarized appointment of representative form, the Locarno Classification of the associated product, and a set of graphic representations of the design across multiple standard views. Applicants must also provide a written description of the design and, where applicable, information relating to any priority claim or request for deferred publication. Filing fees are payable at the time of submission. Beyond these core requirements, applicants typically need to provide supplementary documentation, either at the time of filing or in response to a formality examination. This may include evidence of the applicant’s legal entitlement to the design—particularly where the applicant and creator are different parties—as well as supporting corporate and authorization documents. Where priority rights are claimed, the relevant documents must generally be submitted within three months of the Myanmar filing date, with certified English translations required for any non-English priority applications. The supplementary requirements may vary depending on the nature of the application and the examiner’s requests during the formality examination process.

Awards & Rankings

April 3, 2026
Tilleke & Gibbins is pleased to announce that the firm has been shortlisted in two categories at the Financial Times (FT) Innovative Lawyers APAC 2026 awards: Innovative Lawyers in Cyber and Data Privacy – “Digital Identity & Cryptocurrency Compliance” Innovative Practitioner – Athistha (Nop) Chitranukroh The FT Innovative Lawyers APAC Awards recognize law firms and practitioners who are driving innovation in legal services and delivering innovative client solutions across the Asia-Pacific region. This recognition marks our third acknowledgment in the Innovative Lawyers category and, notably, our first-ever nomination in the Innovative Practitioner category at the FT Innovative Lawyers APAC awards. It reflects our team’s continued ability to support clients on groundbreaking, forward-looking projects across the region. The awards ceremony will take place on May 14, 2026, in Hong Kong. To learn more about the FT Innovative Lawyers APAC 2026 awards and to view the full list of shortlisted organizations, please visit the FT website.
March 9, 2026
Tilleke & Gibbins has been shortlisted in multiple firmwide and individual categories at the Legal 500 Southeast Asia Awards 2026, including Regional Firm of the Year, reflecting the firm’s work across Southeast Asia and the continued development of its regional practices. In the individual categories, Aye Thuzar Hlaing has been shortlisted for Myanmar Associate of the Year (Corporate and M&A), and Linh Duy Mai has been shortlisted for Vietnam Associate of the Year (Intellectual Property). Tilleke & Gibbins has also been shortlisted in the following firm categories: Regional Firm of the Year Thailand – Law Firm of the Year Thailand – Law Firm of the Year (Litigation) Myanmar – Law Firm of the Year Vietnam – Law Firm of the Year Vietnam – Law Firm of the Year (Labor and Employment) Laos – Law Firm of the Year The winners will be announced on April 30, 2026, at the Legal 500 Southeast Asia Awards ceremony in Singapore. To browse the full shortlist for the Legal 500 Southeast Asia Awards 2026, please see the Legal 500 website.
January 30, 2026
The newly released 2026 edition of the WTR 1000 rankings from World Trademark Review once again highlights the strength and consistency of Tilleke & Gibbins’ trademark practice across Southeast Asia. The rankings reaffirm the firm’s longstanding position as a leading regional trademark adviser, with World Trademark Review noting Tilleke’s market-leading presence in the region. In the 2026 rankings, Tilleke & Gibbins’ offices in Thailand and Vietnam retained their top-tier Gold Band rankings for the 16th consecutive year. The firm’s Cambodia practice was again placed in the Highly Recommended (top tier) category, marking its fourth consecutive year in the top tier, while the Myanmar office maintained its Recommended (single tier) ranking for the seventh consecutive year. In Indonesia, the firm continued to perform strongly, earning Silver Band rankings for Trademark Enforcement and Litigation for the seventh consecutive year and Trademark Prosecution and Strategy for the second consecutive year, along with a new ranking for Trademark Licensing and Transactions. World Trademark Review does not currently publish rankings for Laos. Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across the region also received strong individual recognition in the 2026 edition of the WTR 1000, with 26 lawyers ranked across 30 categories, including several first-time rankings and notable promotions reflecting the depth of the firm’s regional trademark team: The WTR 1000 is a trusted resource for companies and individuals seeking world-class legal assistance with trademark-related matters. The directory’s rankings are based on in-depth research to identify key firms and individuals leading the way in trademark-related legal practice. Depth of expertise, positioning in the market, level of activity, and peer and client feedback are all factored into the rankings. For more information about the rankings and to browse the full results, please visit the World Trademark Review website.

Other Professionals