You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 29, 2018

Myanmar MoC Clarifies Registration Requirements for Retail and Wholesale Sector

Informed Counsel

In May 2018, Myanmar’s Ministry of Commerce (MoC) issued Directive 25/2018 (the Directive), allowing 100% foreign owned companies, as well as joint venture companies established between Myanmar citizens or companies and non-Myanmar citizens or companies, to conduct retail or wholesale businesses in Myanmar, subject to various minimum capital requirements and operational restrictions. Very broadly written, the Directive was quickly followed by a number of clarifications on both its scope and application to flesh out the legislative framework.    

The first such clarification was Newsletter 3/2018 (the Newsletter), issued by the Department of Trade of the MoC on July 26, 2018, which clarified the scope by listing categories of products that fall under the Directive:

  1. Consumer goods (including clothes, watches, and cosmetics)
  2. Foodstuff (including agricultural products except restricted products, marine products, animal products, ready-made foods, various types of beverage, and domestically manufactured liquors)
  3. Household goods (including ceramics, earthenware, and glassware)
  4. Kitchen products
  5. Medicine, medical devices and hospital equipment
  6. Animal feed and veterinary medicines
  7. Stationery
  8. Furniture
  9. Sport accessories
  10. Communication products (including cameras and phones)
  11. Electronics
  12. Construction materials and equipment
  13. Electrical goods
  14. Chemicals for industrial manufacturing;
  15. Seeds, inputs for agriculture, and materials for agricultural use;
  16. Machinery for agriculture;
  17. Various types of machinery and accessories;
  18. Bicycles;
  19. Motorcycles and accessories;
  20. Spare parts for motor vehicles and heavy machinery;
  21. Children’s toys;
  22. Decorative materials for households (including flowers and plants)
  23. Souvenirs and handmade products;
  24. Fine art, musical instruments, and accessories (excluding antiques).

Categories of Companies   

This was followed by clarification of the procedural requirements which form the MoC’s “standard operating procedure” for registering wholesale/retail businesses under the new regime. These identify four kinds of business that can operate under the Directive, and the approval which each category must secure:

Category A:  100% foreign-owned companies and joint venture companies that are incorporating in Myanmar for the first time and wish to register as a wholesaler or retailer.

Category B:  Established foreign or joint venture companies already operating in Myanmar that wish to register as a wholesaler or retailer, but do not currently have the right to sell goods wholesale or retail.

Category C:  Established foreign or joint venture companies currently permitted to conduct wholesale or retail business (including under an MIC endorsement or permit or through a previous notification* permitting foreigners to conduct wholesale or retail activities).

Category D: Domestic companies conducting wholesale or retail businesses covered by the Directive.

*Companies in Category C include companies under MoC Notification 36/2017, which opened five trading businesses to foreign companies. Therefore, existing Category C companies need to apply for approval from the local authority with jurisdiction over the geographic area of the business, and for approval from the MoC for wholesale or retail registration with the below minimum initial investment requirements within five years from the date of submitting the application.

Registration Documents   

To register as a retail/wholesale business, all companies in all categories must meet the final requirement of registration with the MoC using the following documents:

  • Certificate of company registration
  • Copy of the company’s Myanmar Investment Commission (MIC) endorsement (if the company is required to have  an MIC permit)
  • Recommendation letter from the relevant local authority
  • Lists of groups of goods to be sold retail or wholesale
  • Detailed business plan for the next five years prescribing the amount of initial capital investment, the location and number of outlets, and the area to be occupied in square meters
  • Evidence of the initial investment capital deposit (to be submitted within 30 days of applying)

Any existing company registered under the Directive that wishes to open a new branch or outlet must provide 90 days’ notice to the MoC.

In addition, the Directive expressly entitles Myanmar companies to operate retail or wholesale businesses with any amount of initial investment capital. However, if they are already in operation, and their initial investment capital was equivalent to USD 700,000 or more, they must register with the MoC within 150 days of the issuance of the Directive.

Minimum Initial Investment Capital for Purchasing Goods   

To qualify under the Directive, companies must meet certain minimum capital initial investment requirements, as detailed below.

For the purposes of the Directive, initial investment capital is for purchasing goods and does not include the costs of leasing land and company operations, and the requirements apply to each premises from which the wholesaler/retailer plans to do business. Any other capital requirements applicable to the company are separate from the initial capital required for purchasing under the Directive. For example, if an investor would like to invest in one wholesale business operation and one retail business operation, each with 100% foreign ownership, the minimum initial capital requirement for purchasing products will be USD 8,000,000. The initial capital required for other aspects of the business, such as land and day-to-day operations, will be subject to separate requirements under general company law.      

The standard operating procedure lessens the impact of this requirement a little by allowing companies in category A or B to make an initial capitalization of 50% of the total amount in the first year, 30% in the second year, and 20% in the third year of operation.    

As companies in Category C already have approval for importing and trading their products under the Directive, these businesses are already considered to be wholesale and retail services under the Directive. Therefore, they are required to get approval from the local authorities for each of their business locations and apply for a wholesale/retail license under the Directive. Companies in Category C need to pay the initial capital investment for purchasing products indicated in the above table within five years from the date of applying for the wholesale or retail business registration.

Operational Restrictions   

Companies established under the Directive must not operate door-to-door services or retail or wholesale premises, including minimarkets and convenience stores, with a floor area of less than 929 square meters under one roof, including small office space and storage. In addition, wholesaler must be deemed to have sufficient space to operate, and to be in an appropriate location if they engage in direct wholesale distribution.   

In order to open any new outlets, the retailer must inform the MoC at least 90 days in advance and obtain MoC approval.

Registration and Extension Fees   

A wholesale or retail registration certificate will be valid for five years from the date that the MOC approves it. The fee for registering or extending a registration is MMK 50,000 per registration, per location. Applications for extension should be submitted at least two months before the expiration date.

Penalties   

Failure to register a business under the Directive, or to deposit the required initial investment amount, will result in two warnings, after which the company’s export/import certificate will be suspended and its permission to import goods will be terminated.    

Failure to re-register an expired certificate will be subject to a fine of MMK 20,000 if rectified within two months of expiry, or MMK 30,000 within four months of expiry. After four months, the registration certificate will be suspended and any permission to import goods will be cancelled.    

The penalties for failure to comply with operational restrictions will be in accordance with applicable laws, bylaws, regulations, rules and directives issued by MoC and other authorities.  It is not yet clear what these will entail, but they are expected to result in a suspension or revocation of the registration certificate and import license.

Conclusion    

This major relaxation of business operational requirements in the Myanmar retail sector opens the door to large-scale foreign investment in this burgeoning economy and is of potentially enormous benefit to the country and to foreign investors. That said, the steady release of additional provisions governing that opportunity is a good example of the continued need to closely monitor ongoing legislative developments in Myanmar and to understand emerging issues as they arise.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 20, 2026
Vietnam’s Law on Bankruptcy and Rehabilitation No. 142/2025/QH15, passed by the National Assembly on December 11, 2025, does something many regional counterparts do not yet attempt: it instructs parties and arbitral tribunals on exactly what happens to an arbitration once a debtor becomes insolvent. Together with the Law on Commercial Arbitration No. 54/2010/QH12, the new law improves upon what used to be an uncertain area of practice, now providing an explicit, mandatory sequence of procedures. Suspension and Termination of Arbitration Proceedings Under article 40(2) of the law, once a Vietnamese court accepts a bankruptcy petition, any arbitration that concerns the debtor’s financial obligations must be temporarily suspended as soon as the tribunal receives the court’s notification. If the court subsequently issues a decision commencing bankruptcy proceedings, article 59(2) takes a further step: the suspended arbitration is terminated outright, and the underlying case file is transferred to the court handling the insolvency for resolution. The two provisions work as a sequence: first suspension, then termination and transfer, rather than as independent triggers. Meanwhile, article 60(4) reinforces this effect by vesting the bankruptcy court with exclusive jurisdiction over all claims against the debtor from the date the petition is accepted. Notably, this mechanism operates automatically, without the need for the insolvency court to issue a separate anti-arbitration order. The tribunal simply suspends or terminates the proceeding by operation of law once notified; however, Vietnamese law currently provides no procedure by which a party can apply to the insolvency court for permission to continue the arbitration despite the statutory effect. Practitioners with a Vietnamese counterparty in arbitration should treat notification of a bankruptcy filing as something to flag to the tribunal immediately since continuing to arbitrate a claim that has become subject to article 40(2) or 59(2) risks producing an award vulnerable
August 20, 2026
Thai law contains no provision that speaks directly to what happens to an arbitration when one of the parties becomes insolvent. The interaction between arbitration and insolvency is derived instead from the general operation of two separately drafted laws: the Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940) and the Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002). Because Thai courts have had few opportunities to interpret how these two statutes apply together, the practical answer to many questions, such as who represents an insolvent party in arbitration, whether an award will be enforced, and what happens to a foreign proceeding, depends on inference from general principles of insolvency, arbitration, and procedural law rather than on settled rules. Liquidation and Restructuring The Bankruptcy Act governs both liquidation, which winds up a debtor’s affairs, and restructuring (rehabilitation), which aims to preserve a business. The consequences for arbitration differ accordingly. In liquidation, the debtor’s assets vest in the official receiver, who alone can conduct or continue any arbitration affecting the estate; the debtor loses the authority to act on its own behalf. In restructuring, the plan preparer or administrator takes over that role, but there is more room for the debtor to remain involved, since the objective of rehabilitation is to keep the business operational. Restructuring carries an automatic stay that takes effect once the Bankruptcy Court accepts the restructuring petition. This stay can halt an arbitration regardless of where it is seated. In contrast, liquidation does not work through a stay; instead, the debtor’s loss of authority over its own assets and disputes is what constrains the arbitration. Neither proceeding provides a party a formal route to apply for permission to continue arbitrating—the Bankruptcy Act contains no such mechanism—though in restructuring cases the Bankruptcy Court may allow proceedings to continue where doing so will not prejudice
August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.
August 18, 2026
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) is seeking public comment on proposed amendments that would significantly expand know-your-customer (KYC) and customer due diligence (CDD) requirements for cash-related transactions at financial institutions (FIs) and specialized financial institutions (SFIs). Released on August 5, 2026, the proposed regulation would supersede BOT Notification No. 16/2569, which focused primarily on cash withdrawal transactions. The public comment period is open through September 3, 2026. The amendments reflect concerns that FIs and SFIs may be used to facilitate the movement, concealment, and conversion of criminal proceeds, potentially damaging institutional operations and public confidence in the financial system. Expanded Scope of Covered Transactions The most significant change is the broadening of the definition of “cash-related transactions.” Previously, the regulation covered only cash withdrawals and uncrossed check withdrawals. The amended regulation extends coverage to include: Cash deposits, check deposits, or receipt of funds from the public not in the form of deposit accounts; Thai baht (THB) banknote exchange (different denominations); Receipt of cash for issuing checks and drafts; and Purchase, sale, or exchange of foreign banknotes. Mandatory Identity Verification and Risk Management For all cash-related transactions, FIs and SFIs must require customers, or authorized or delegated persons, to present identification or verify their identity before every transaction, including one-time (walk-in) transactions. Specific identification requirements vary by transaction type, customer nationality, and channel (branch vs. electronic). FIs and SFIs must also establish comprehensive risk management processes and procedures for cash-related transactions. These requirements include identifying customers or authorized representatives in accordance with transaction-specific verification standards, analyzing customer behavior, implementing risk-management measures proportionate to the customer’s risk profile, and recording abnormal behavior in relevant systems. The BOT also encourages institutions to proactively guide customers toward transaction channels that offer greater traceability than cash. For corporate customers in high-risk business sectors—including foreign