You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 12, 2020

Indonesia Issues Workplace Guidelines in Preparation for Reopening

Two government agencies in Indonesia have issued guidelines that employers and employees should follow to ensure their workplaces can reopen and operate safely.

The National Agency of Drug and Food Control has issued health and safety guidelines titled “Everything About COVID-19, Prevent COVID-19, Health for All,” with recommendations for social distancing, ventilation, cleaning, mask wearing, and other personal hygiene practices.

Other detailed guidelines are in the Decree of the Minister of Health No. HK.01.07/MENKES/328/2020 on Guidelines to Prevent and Mitigate Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Office and Industrial Workplaces in an Effort to Support Business Continuation on a Pandemic Situation, and in Circular No. HK.02.01/MENKES/335/2020 Re: Protocol for the Prevention of Transmission of the Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) in Workplaces in Services and Trade Sectors (Public Areas) in an Effort to Support Business Continuation.

These detailed guidelines include the following requirements:

  • All workers must wear face masks during their commutes and at work.
  • All visitors must wear face masks.
  • Employers must provide adequate hand washing facilities that are easily accessible.
  • Employers must ensure that workers understand how they can prevent COVID-19 transmission.
  • Workers and visitors who have any symptoms of COVID-19 may not enter the workplace.
  • Workers classified as persons under monitoring and who are suspected of possible infection will have to undergo quarantine and isolation. Wages are to be paid in full during this period, and worker rights such as social security must also continune uninterrupted.
  • There must be a separate area or room for the observation of symptomatic workers during screening.
  • Under certain conditions, workplaces with the proper resources may be able to facilitate quarantine or isolation sites in accordance with the guidelines found at http://www.covid19.go.id.
  • All work areas must be cleaned every four hours using appropriate cleaners and disinfectants (particularly door handles, stairs, elevator buttons, shared office equipment, areas, etc.).
  • Information must be posted to remind workers, vistitors, and customers to observe physical distancing, hand washing (or sanitizing), and mask wearing.
  • Workplace air quality should be optimized with consideration for air circulation, natural lighting, and cleaning air-conditioning filters.
  • Minimize customer contact by using borders and partitions, and by encouraging the use of non-cash, contactless payment methods.
  • One day before going to the workplace, all workers must carry out a COVID-19 self-assessment.
  • Body temperature screening must be set up at each entry point to the workplace.
  • Physical distancing must be observed at all times (e.g., workers should be one meter apart, the number of workers should be limited, and workers should not gather in public areas or in close queues).
  • Floor markings, posters, or banners should be used as visual aids.
  • For workplaces in high-rise buildings, positioning within elevators should be clearly marked on the floor, and stairwell traffic should be separated between ascending and descending—in separate stairwells if possible, or else by establishing dedicated lanes within the stairwell.
  • Customer and client occupancy numbers should be limited by controlling customer entry and implementing a properly spaced queuing system at the entrance, indicating traffic and positioning with floor markings, taking orders online or by telephone (and fulfilling through delivery or take-away when possible), and regulating service hours in accordance with local and regional laws and regulations
  • If possible, special transportation to and from the workplace should be provided to workers. A team to monitor workers’ health should be created to ensure that workers complete the COVID-19 self-assessment form before coming to work, monitor workers with suspected symptoms during work, and ensure that workers returning from an at-risk area self- quarantine at home for 14 days, monitoring for symptoms and checking body temperature twice a day.

Tilleke & Gibbins will continue to update our clients on Indonosia’s handling of the COVID-19 situation. For more details on these guidelines or any aspect of the country’s response to the crisis, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins’s Jakarta office at [email protected] or +6221 2971 8088.

 

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 20, 2026
Vietnam’s Law on Bankruptcy and Rehabilitation No. 142/2025/QH15, passed by the National Assembly on December 11, 2025, does something many regional counterparts do not yet attempt: it instructs parties and arbitral tribunals on exactly what happens to an arbitration once a debtor becomes insolvent. Together with the Law on Commercial Arbitration No. 54/2010/QH12, the new law improves upon what used to be an uncertain area of practice, now providing an explicit, mandatory sequence of procedures. Suspension and Termination of Arbitration Proceedings Under article 40(2) of the law, once a Vietnamese court accepts a bankruptcy petition, any arbitration that concerns the debtor’s financial obligations must be temporarily suspended as soon as the tribunal receives the court’s notification. If the court subsequently issues a decision commencing bankruptcy proceedings, article 59(2) takes a further step: the suspended arbitration is terminated outright, and the underlying case file is transferred to the court handling the insolvency for resolution. The two provisions work as a sequence: first suspension, then termination and transfer, rather than as independent triggers. Meanwhile, article 60(4) reinforces this effect by vesting the bankruptcy court with exclusive jurisdiction over all claims against the debtor from the date the petition is accepted. Notably, this mechanism operates automatically, without the need for the insolvency court to issue a separate anti-arbitration order. The tribunal simply suspends or terminates the proceeding by operation of law once notified; however, Vietnamese law currently provides no procedure by which a party can apply to the insolvency court for permission to continue the arbitration despite the statutory effect. Practitioners with a Vietnamese counterparty in arbitration should treat notification of a bankruptcy filing as something to flag to the tribunal immediately since continuing to arbitrate a claim that has become subject to article 40(2) or 59(2) risks producing an award vulnerable
August 20, 2026
Thai law contains no provision that speaks directly to what happens to an arbitration when one of the parties becomes insolvent. The interaction between arbitration and insolvency is derived instead from the general operation of two separately drafted laws: the Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940) and the Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002). Because Thai courts have had few opportunities to interpret how these two statutes apply together, the practical answer to many questions, such as who represents an insolvent party in arbitration, whether an award will be enforced, and what happens to a foreign proceeding, depends on inference from general principles of insolvency, arbitration, and procedural law rather than on settled rules. Liquidation and Restructuring The Bankruptcy Act governs both liquidation, which winds up a debtor’s affairs, and restructuring (rehabilitation), which aims to preserve a business. The consequences for arbitration differ accordingly. In liquidation, the debtor’s assets vest in the official receiver, who alone can conduct or continue any arbitration affecting the estate; the debtor loses the authority to act on its own behalf. In restructuring, the plan preparer or administrator takes over that role, but there is more room for the debtor to remain involved, since the objective of rehabilitation is to keep the business operational. Restructuring carries an automatic stay that takes effect once the Bankruptcy Court accepts the restructuring petition. This stay can halt an arbitration regardless of where it is seated. In contrast, liquidation does not work through a stay; instead, the debtor’s loss of authority over its own assets and disputes is what constrains the arbitration. Neither proceeding provides a party a formal route to apply for permission to continue arbitrating—the Bankruptcy Act contains no such mechanism—though in restructuring cases the Bankruptcy Court may allow proceedings to continue where doing so will not prejudice
August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.
August 18, 2026
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) is seeking public comment on proposed amendments that would significantly expand know-your-customer (KYC) and customer due diligence (CDD) requirements for cash-related transactions at financial institutions (FIs) and specialized financial institutions (SFIs). Released on August 5, 2026, the proposed regulation would supersede BOT Notification No. 16/2569, which focused primarily on cash withdrawal transactions. The public comment period is open through September 3, 2026. The amendments reflect concerns that FIs and SFIs may be used to facilitate the movement, concealment, and conversion of criminal proceeds, potentially damaging institutional operations and public confidence in the financial system. Expanded Scope of Covered Transactions The most significant change is the broadening of the definition of “cash-related transactions.” Previously, the regulation covered only cash withdrawals and uncrossed check withdrawals. The amended regulation extends coverage to include: Cash deposits, check deposits, or receipt of funds from the public not in the form of deposit accounts; Thai baht (THB) banknote exchange (different denominations); Receipt of cash for issuing checks and drafts; and Purchase, sale, or exchange of foreign banknotes. Mandatory Identity Verification and Risk Management For all cash-related transactions, FIs and SFIs must require customers, or authorized or delegated persons, to present identification or verify their identity before every transaction, including one-time (walk-in) transactions. Specific identification requirements vary by transaction type, customer nationality, and channel (branch vs. electronic). FIs and SFIs must also establish comprehensive risk management processes and procedures for cash-related transactions. These requirements include identifying customers or authorized representatives in accordance with transaction-specific verification standards, analyzing customer behavior, implementing risk-management measures proportionate to the customer’s risk profile, and recording abnormal behavior in relevant systems. The BOT also encourages institutions to proactively guide customers toward transaction channels that offer greater traceability than cash. For corporate customers in high-risk business sectors—including foreign