You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

//
//
Customs and International Trade

Customs and International Trade

Key Contacts

Cambodia

Laos

Myanmar

Thailand

Vietnam

OVERVIEW

Navigating complex trade challenges with clarity and cofidence.

Tilleke & Gibbins’ customs and international trade practice helps domestic and multinational companies navigate complex customs regulations, trade frameworks, and enforcement environments across the region. Drawing on deep regional experience, strong regulatory relationships, and technical expertise, we help clients manage risk, secure trade benefits, and resolve disputes efficiently.

We handle the full range of customs and international trade matters, including clearance, classification, valuation, FTA utilization, rules of origin, excise and tax issues, antidumping, and postclearance audits and appeals. As governments increase scrutiny of preferential schemes and adjust tariff regimes, we offer commercially focused strategies to ensure compliance with bilateral, regional, and WTO standards. Our team also represents local and multinational clients in customs investigations and civil and criminal disputes, working closely with authorities to ensure practical and effective engagement throughout the process.

With extensive experience across diverse industries, we craft tailored solutions that align seamlessly with each client’s operational realities and the complexities of their cross‑border supply chains.

Experience

  • Defended a leading global logistics company in three criminal actions brought by the Thai Customs Department involving potential fines exceeding USD 15 million and secured nonprosecution orders that were subsequently upheld.
  • Advised a global manufacturer on a complex customs dispute concerning the valuation and classification of tire imports under Thailand’s Ministry of Commerce regulations and worked closely with authorities to reach a successful resolution.
  • Represented a world-leading computer technology company in a complex rules-of-origin dispute under the China–Thailand FTA, involving products manufactured in China, shipped through Malaysia, and invoiced by a Singapore-based entity.
  • Represented a leading global producer of vitamins and nutritional supplements in filing more than 200 appeals with Thai Customs, involving rules of origin and tax exemptions under ASEAN trade agreements.
  • Secured favorable Board of Appeals rulings for a multinational defense and security company on the HS classification of identity documents under a government contract, including stays and bank guarantees for assessed duties.
  • Represented a Southeast Asian sugar refinery before the Trade Remedies Authority of Vietnam and prepared evidence demonstrating that no circumvention of trade‑remedy measures had occurred.
  • Advised a Malaysian flexible‑packaging film manufacturer in an antidumping investigation conducted by Vietnamese authorities, prepared submissions and represented the client throughout the proceedings.
  • Advised a multinational chemical manufacturer on antidumping and regional value-content issues under the China–Thailand FTA in connection with a proposed relocation of its production base.
  • Advised a Vietnamese furniture manufacturer on confidentiality obligations when providing information to a foreign government in an antidumping investigation concerning upholstered seating.
  • Assisted an overseas client with importing products from China into Thailand and secured preferential treatment under the ASEAN–China FTA, including preparing country-of-origin documentation for tax and regulatory compliance.
  • Advised a leading VR hardware manufacturer on product importation, labeling requirements, consumer-protection compliance, and regulatory procedures.
  • Advised a global freight forwarder on establishing manufacturing and assembly operations in a Thai free-trade zone, including importer-of-record and exporter-of-record considerations and multiregulatory risk analysis.
  • Advised a global health care company on importing used medical devices into Thailand for refurbishment and reexport, covering customs, excise, and Thai FDA requirements.
  • Assisted a multinational industrial company in self-reporting customs misdeclarations under Thai Customs’ one-stop-service pilot program and achieved significant reductions in surcharges.
  • Assisted a U.S.-based furniture manufacturer during a customs inspection of its factory in Quang Ngai, Vietnam, to verify compliance with export qualification requirements.
  • Advised a Singapore-based tobacco manufacturer on a regional counterfeit-goods investigation involving seizures in Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand linked to production in Vietnam.
  • Supported an American home and security products manufacturer in an investigation into Vietnamese transshipment and tax-avoidance schemes involving shell entities used to misrepresent the origin of goods.
  • Represented a subsidiary of a global multimodal transportation provider in a THB 24 million (approximately USD 735,000) dispute, and secured emergency relief from Thailand’s Intellectual Property and International Trade Court, enabling the client to remove cargo from its vessel.

PROFESSIONALS

RELATED INSIGHTS

May 22, 2026
Thailand recently concluded the latest round of high-level trade discussions with its US trade counterparts. In addition to addressing concerns over claimed human rights abuses, forced labor, and the current trade imbalance with the US, one critical area of focus was US allegations of transshipment in Thailand’s import-export sector. Transshipment is the practice of routing goods through a third country to circumvent duties or tariffs on goods exported to the receiving country. Specifically, the US alleges that many Thai exporters declare a Thai origin for goods to qualify for preferential duties or exemptions without meeting the legal standards for establishing Thai product origin—an act that it claims masks the goods’ true origin. This is a particular matter of concern for US authorities, since transshipment is perceived to be a means by which Thai origin is claimed for many Chinese goods exported abroad. This perception affects a wide range of otherwise legitimate Thai-origin goods. The Thai trade delegation, led by Deputy Prime Minister and Commerce Minister Suphajee Suthumpun, met with counterparts from the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) on May 3–6. A subsequent team of Thai trade representatives, led by the Thai Ministry of Commerce vice minister, met with the USTR on May 13–14. These discussions directly impact the trade enforcement environment in Thailand, potentially affecting numerous business operators involved in the manufacture, import, or export of goods and components. Thailand’s position is that it strictly adheres to and enforces the legal standards for determining qualifying origin and that allegations of transshipment are largely unjustified. Nonetheless, it has agreed to increase its focus on trade compliance and enforcement in Thailand in return for commitments on reciprocal trade benefits with the US, including consideration of tariff exemptions on certain critical Thai imports into the US. Notable Outcomes There
May 8, 2026
The global trade environment for Thai exporters in 2026 has shifted significantly. Recent enforcement developments in both the United States and the European Union show a clear shift in trade policy: regulators are no longer focused solely on tariff levels, but also on whether products genuinely originate where exporters claim they do. Adding to this complexity, the US Supreme Court’s February 2026 decision striking down the use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs has upended the legal basis for a major pillar of US tariff policy, creating significant legal and commercial uncertainty for exporters worldwide, including in Thailand. For Thai companies integrated into regional supply chains, this change carries material implications. Although the IEEPA-based US reciprocal tariffs have been struck down, intensified circumvention enforcement continues under separate legal authorities, and the administration has signaled its intent to reimpose tariffs under alternative statutory frameworks, while EU authorities are using anti-circumvention investigations where trade patterns shift. In both jurisdictions, the decisive issue is whether manufacturing in Thailand constitutes substantial transformation under applicable rules of origin. Such origin determinations increasingly drive duty exposure, audit risk and commercial disputes. In 2026, the ability to defend a product’s Thai origin is not merely a procedural step, it is central to preserving market access in the US and EU. Impact Of US Circumvention Enforcement and an Uncertain Tariff Landscape Following the 2025 Framework for an Agreement on Reciprocal Trade, Thailand saw a shift in its tariff relationship with the US. A substantial range of Thai-origin goods were subject to a 19% reciprocal tariff under the IEEPA. However, the Supreme Court’s ruling invalidating the use of IEEPA for tariffs has removed the legal basis for that rate. The Administration has indicated it intends to pursue replacement tariffs under other statutory authorities,
April 9, 2026
In March 2026, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) initiated two significant investigations under Section 301(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 that directly affect Thailand. The first investigation examines overproduction in manufacturing sectors caused by government support or policies that distort normal market conditions across 16 economies, including Thailand. The second investigation, launched the following day, targets 60 economies, also including Thailand, for alleged failures to impose and effectively enforce prohibitions on the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Taken together, these investigations represent a significant escalation in US trade enforcement and create substantial risk for Thai exporters, manufacturers, and businesses with supply chain connections to the United States. The investigations are moving on an accelerated timeline, with the USTR indicating that potential trade measures, including tariffs, could be imposed as early as July 2026. This article provides an overview of the investigations, highlights their specific implications for Thailand, and outlines practical considerations for affected businesses. Section 301 as a Trade Enforcement Tool Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 gives the USTR authority to investigate foreign acts, policies, or practices that are considered unreasonable or discriminatory and that burden or restrict US commerce. If the USTR concludes that such practices exist, the statute allows a wide range of remedial measures, including the imposition of tariffs, nontariff trade restrictions, and negotiated agreements with foreign governments. Unlike other trade authorities, Section 301 does not set limits on the level of tariffs or the duration of measures, giving the USTR considerable flexibility to address perceived trade imbalances or unfair practices. Historically, Section 301 investigations take up to a year to complete. In this instance, however, the USTR has indicated that the investigations will proceed on a much faster timetable, with an unofficial target of concluding by July 2026.
April 1, 2026
On March 30, 2026, Thailand’s Customs Department announced a strategy to raise import duties on a broad range of consumer goods—including plastic items and electronics accessories—to their maximum statutory ceilings, which often sit at 30% or 40%. Many of these goods currently benefit from promotional or incentive rates as low as 5%. For importers, e-commerce platforms, and logistics providers, this development demands immediate attention. While these increases generally require cabinet approval, they do not require full parliamentary amendment of the Customs Tariff Decree B.E. 2530, as the Customs director-general and the finance minister hold delegated authority to adjust rates within existing statutory bounds. Businesses should not assume that the legislative process will provide significant lead time before higher rates take effect. Death of the De Minimis: Abolishing the THB 1,500 Loophole This “ceiling-rate” policy, which is designed to equalize the landed cost of foreign goods with the domestic production costs of Thai manufacturers, builds on a sweeping set of customs reforms that have already begun to reshape Thailand’s trade environment. The foundation of this new regime was laid on January 1, 2026, when Thailand formally abolished the longstanding THB 1,500 duty exemption for small imported parcels under Customs Notification No. 219/2568. Every imported item is now subject to VAT and applicable import duties for its declared value, regardless of parcel size or transaction amount. By narrowing the scope of exemptions previously granted to low-value goods under the Customs Tariff Decree B.E. 2530, the government has made clear that the era of tax-free cross-border micro-imports is over. Three-Phased Strategy and Legal Modernization The March 30 announcement is the second phase of a three-part regulatory roadmap: Immediate enforcement: The removal of the THB 1,500 loophole and the imposition of VAT on all parcels, effective January 1, 2026. Tariff realignment: The current
AWARDS & RANKINGS
March 19, 2026
Tilleke & Gibbins has been recognized in 17 categories at the 2026 Thailand Law Firm Awards from Asia Business Law Journal (ABLJ), up from 10 categories in 2025. The awards highlight leading law firms in Thailand across a broad range of practice areas, as well as overall firm performance. This year, Tilleke & Gibbins was named a co-winner in the Best Overall Law Firm category as well as in the following practice-specific categories: Artificial Intelligence Aviation Blockchain & Digital Assets Competition & Antitrust Data Compliance & Cyber Security E-Commerce, Digital Trade & Platform Regulation ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) Fintech Healthcare & Life Sciences Insurance & Reinsurance IP Litigation IP Prosecution Labour & Employment Private Equity & Venture Capital Shipping & Maritime Technology, Media & Telecommunications The awards are determined through ABLJ’s independent research, which considers recent work, client feedback, and market standing. The annual Thailand Law Firm Awards recognize firms demonstrating strong performance and breadth of expertise across key practice areas. For more details and the full list of winners, please visit the ABLJ website.
March 9, 2026
Tilleke & Gibbins has been shortlisted in multiple firmwide and individual categories at the Legal 500 Southeast Asia Awards 2026, including Regional Firm of the Year, reflecting the firm’s work across Southeast Asia and the continued development of its regional practices. In the individual categories, Aye Thuzar Hlaing has been shortlisted for Myanmar Associate of the Year (Corporate and M&A), and Linh Duy Mai has been shortlisted for Vietnam Associate of the Year (Intellectual Property). Tilleke & Gibbins has also been shortlisted in the following firm categories: Regional Firm of the Year Thailand – Law Firm of the Year Thailand – Law Firm of the Year (Litigation) Myanmar – Law Firm of the Year Vietnam – Law Firm of the Year Vietnam – Law Firm of the Year (Labor and Employment) Laos – Law Firm of the Year The winners will be announced on April 30, 2026, at the Legal 500 Southeast Asia Awards ceremony in Singapore. To browse the full shortlist for the Legal 500 Southeast Asia Awards 2026, please see the Legal 500 website.
March 2, 2026
Tilleke & Gibbins has been shortlisted for two prestigious recognitions in the Chambers Asia-Pacific and Greater China Region Honours 2026. The firm received nominations for both Thailand Firm of the Year and Vietnam Firm of the Year. The Chambers Asia-Pacific and Greater China Region Honours recognize preeminent law firms demonstrating outstanding work, impressive strategic growth, and excellence in client service across the region. The Thailand nomination marks the firm’s sixth consecutive shortlisting and twelfth since 2010. For Vietnam, this is the third consecutive year the firm has been recognized. The winners will be announced at an awards ceremony in Hong Kong on May 28, 2026. To learn more about the Chambers Asia-Pacific and Greater China Region Honours 2026 and browse the full list of nominations, please visit the Chambers and Partners website.
January 15, 2026
Tilleke & Gibbins has demonstrated continued excellence across all six jurisdictions where the firm operates in the 2026 edition of the Legal 500 Asia-Pacific rankings. The recently released rankings showcase the firm’s outstanding performance with 29 practice area recognitions and 34 individual rankings—an increase from 30 individual recognitions in 2025.