You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 8, 2016

Reorganization: Business Survival During a Crisis

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

Thailand is no stranger to tumultuous events, be it unrest in the Deep South, widespread flooding, economic slowdowns in trading partners, domestic protests, exchange rate instability, global economic crises, or flailing tourism.

Inevitably, businesses and often entire sectors are directly affected by these events. Businesses do not exist in isolation, so one or more companies facing cash-flow problems can begin a chain reaction of accounts receivable and accounts payable rippling outward. With short-term credit increasingly difficult to come by, companies become trapped in a vicious circle, losing the ability to invest in developing new sources of revenue and using any cash generated to repay old debts.

One possible way to address this problem is reorganization—a process that sounds the death knell for some, but to debtors, a potential solution. This process, authorized under Thailand’s Bankruptcy Act, provides a means for a company to protect itself from creditors while being allowed to operate.

Under the reorganization process, once the Bankruptcy Court accepts a company’s petition—the company being the debtor—all its outstanding debts are frozen. This “automatic stay” ensures the debtor will be protected under bankruptcy law from debt collection efforts by creditors.

During an automatic stay, the debtor may continue to operate, subject to certain restrictions—for example, it may not dispose of, distribute, transfer, pay debt, create debt, or act in any way that may encumber its assets except as necessary in the ordinary course of business or as permitted by the court.

Creditors also receive a measure of protection. Debtors are not allowed to treat any creditors preferentially by paying off specific debts to one creditor and leaving fewer assets for others. Creditors or government agencies can also submit a reorganization petition on behalf of a debtor in order to obtain this protection.

The following is a summary of the criteria a company seeking protection during reorganization must meet as well as the process involved.

Persons Entitled to Submit Reorganization Petitions

The following persons or parties are entitled to submit reorganization petitions:

  • A single creditor or group of creditors owed not less than THB 10 million; and
  • Government agencies such as the Bank of Thailand, the Insurance Department, and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Principles of Reorganization Petitions

The following criteria need to be met:

  • The debtor is insolvent and indebted to one or more creditors for an amount not less than THB 10 million regardless of whether such debt is already due;
  • There are sufficient grounds to believe the debtor’s business can be successfully reorganized; and
  • The petitioner is honest in submitting the petition.

Court Hearing

Once the Bankruptcy Court determines the petition meets the basic legal requirements, it will schedule a hearing and take evidence to determine whether to approve reorganization. If the court does not accept the petition, it will dismiss the case, and the company will not be granted protection from its creditors.

Appointing the Planner

Once the court approves a reorganization, it will appoint a planner to prepare and submit a business reorganization plan. After the planner is appointed, the official receiver will publish the court’s reorganization order in the Royal Gazette and in two widely circulated daily newspapers. All creditors must submit debt repayment applications to the official receiver, which will evaluate them and render an order as to voting rights in approving the reorganization plan.

Planner’s Duty and Rights

The planner has a duty to draft the reorganization plan and is empowered to refinance, restructure and reduce debts as it deems necessary. It must submit the plan to the official receiver.

Creditors’ Meeting

After receiving the reorganization plan, the official receiver will hold a creditors’ meeting to discuss and approve the plan by a special resolution. The official receiver will report the outcome to the court. If a resolution accepting the plan is passed and the court agrees and finds the resolution is not illegal, it will issue an order approving the plan.

Plan Approval

Once the court approves the plan, the rights and duties of the planner will immediately transfer to the plan administrator, who has the right to manage the debtor’s business under the plan.

Successful Plan Administration

If the plan is successful in rehabilitating the debtor, the court may order a cancellation of the business reorganization order, at which point the debtor, its directors, and shareholders will regain control over the business. A successful reorganization benefits all stakeholders.

Reorganization can be a lifeline for a business struggling due to factors beyond its control, providing it with protection and, most importantly, time to get back on its feet. But reorganization is not always the right solution, as it may have far-reaching effects beyond the immediate protection. Each business facing difficulties must carefully evaluate its options on an ad hoc basis.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 15, 2026
The Myanmar Investment Commission (MIC) has issued a notification that gives investors with projects in Myanmar clearer guidance for securing approval and for changing, expanding, or exiting an approved project. Issued on August 19, 2026, MIC Notification No. 5/2026 replaces MIC Notification No. 26/2021 and sets procedures for state or regional investment committees to review, approve, and supervise investment projects, including project amendments, investment increases, land-use rights applications, compliance inspections, and suspension or termination of approved businesses. Endorsement Application Timeline and Deemed Acceptance In Myanmar, prospective investors seeking approval under the Myanmar Investment Law generally do so through an MIC permit or an MIC endorsement, depending on the nature of the investment. While certain large-scale investment projects require an MIC permit, projects that are not required to obtain an MIC permit may instead apply for an MIC endorsement. Investors seeking MIC endorsement for their planned projects typically submit their applications to the relevant state or regional investment committee. These committees are established under the Myanmar Investment Law and are authorized to approve investments of less than USD 5 million, subject to the project’s nature and location. MIC Notification No. 5/2026 specifies that upon receiving an endorsement application, the relevant investment committee office will check it for completeness and determine whether it can be considered at the state or regional level or must be referred to the MIC; if it must be forwarded to the MIC, this will be done within 10 working days. If an application is within its purview, the committee may reject the endorsement application within 15 working days of receipt; otherwise, the application is deemed accepted. If approved, the endorsement certificate will be issued within 10 working days of the approval decision, subject to applicable procedures. Endorsement Certificate Amendment The notification clarifies which amendments a state
September 9, 2026
Certain securities, derivatives, and treasury activities in Thailand were opened to foreign investors when Thailand’s Ministry of Commerce published two new ministerial regulations in the Government Gazette on August 28, 2026. The regulations significantly broaden the service activities that foreign-owned businesses may conduct without a license or certificate under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542, as amended (FBA). Securities and Derivatives Business Exemptions Prior to the issuance of these ministerial regulations, the exemptions covered (1) securities brokerage and derivatives brokerage with their only underlying assets being agricultural commodities, financial instruments, and securities; and (2) dealers, advisers, and fund managers conducting derivatives business under Thailand’s derivatives laws. The ministerial regulations provide broader exemptions. In addition to derivatives under the laws on derivatives as before, the following two major categories are provided: Derivatives whose underlying assets or variables fall outside the scope of Thailand’s laws on derivatives. This addresses a gap in the previous framework, which did not comprehensively exempt derivatives tied to nonregulated underlying assets or variables, such as certain commodities. Foreign brokers, advisors, and fund managers can now facilitate a broader range of hedging and risk management instruments without triggering FBA licensing requirements. Derivatives traded outside a derivatives exchange, or over the counter (OTC), whose payments are calculated by reference to foreign exchange rates or interest rates. This removes an FBA licensing barrier for foreign providers of widely used OTC hedging products, broadening the solutions available to importers and exporters managing currency exposure and to borrowers seeking greater certainty over financing costs. The ministerial regulations also exempt brokers and agents handling transactions involving either of these two derivatives categories. For securities businesses, the ministerial regulations add exemptions for margin loans used to purchase securities and for securities repurchase transactions. These additions clarify whether such activities qualify as exempt brokerage
September 4, 2026
Foreign business restrictions on telecommunications, treasury center businesses, and intragroup support services were eased when Thailand published the Ministerial Regulation Prescribing Service Businesses Not Requiring Permission for Foreign Business Operations (No. 5) B.E. 2569 (2026) in the Government Gazette on August 28, 2026. The ministerial regulation expands the categories of service businesses that foreign investors may operate without a foreign business license (FBL) under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA). Of particular relevance to the telecommunications, fintech, and technology sectors, the ministerial regulation exempts: Type 1 telecommunications licensees, which do not have their own networks; Treasury center businesses operated in accordance with Thailand’s exchange control regulations; and Certain intragroup administrative, human resources, and information technology management services. Telecommunications Services Foreign-owned businesses providing telecommunications services under a type 1 telecommunications license may now operate without obtaining an FBL. This may streamline market entry for qualifying telecommunications and digital infrastructure businesses. The exemption applies only to the FBA licensing requirement. Operators must continue to comply with applicable requirements under the Telecommunications Business Act and the regulations of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission, and the change does not affect foreign ownership restrictions applicable to type 2 or type 3 telecommunications businesses. Treasury Center Businesses The ministerial regulation also exempts qualifying treasury center businesses from the FBL requirement. This may facilitate centralized treasury functions in Thailand, including liquidity management, foreign exchange management, and intragroup funding arrangements. Treasury center operations remain subject to applicable requirements of the Bank of Thailand and other competent authorities. Intragroup Administrative, HR, and IT Services Certain administrative, human resources, and information technology management services provided between affiliated entities are also exempt, provided the relevant entities satisfy prescribed ownership or management criteria. The exemption is available where the service provider and recipient are related through specified ownership
September 4, 2026
Thailand’s cabinet has approved two draft amendments aimed at improving labor-related judicial proceedings. The proposed amendments to the Act on the Establishment of Labor Courts and Labor Case Procedure B.E. 2522 (1979) and the Act on Procedures for Human Trafficking Cases B.E. 2559 (2016) are intended to make the process more efficient, appropriate, and fair. Key elements of these proposed amendments are outlined below. Expansion of Labor Court Jurisdiction Under the current framework, labor courts generally hear labor disputes, while criminal offenses under labor laws are handled separately. Matters involving both labor and criminal issues may therefore require the parties to pursue proceedings before different courts. To address this, the proposed amendments would expand the jurisdiction of labor courts to cover certain criminal offenses under labor laws. The government states that the change is intended to allow related issues to be heard by judges with expertise in labor law and to reduce the need for parallel proceedings. The proposed amendments also set out the following rules for cases involving multiple offenses. Where a single act gives rise to multiple offenses and at least one of those offenses falls within the jurisdiction of the labor court, the labor court may hear the related offenses as part of the same case. Where multiple connected acts give rise to different offenses, the labor court may hear the matters together or transfer part of the case to the appropriate court, taking into account convenience and the interests of justice. Criminal Offenses Covered The proposed amendments would extend labor court jurisdiction to criminal offenses under 11 labor-related laws, including laws concerning: Home workers protection Labor protection Labor protection in fisheries work Employment and job-seeker protection Management of foreign workers Social security Occupational safety, health, and working environment Compensation Maritime labor State enterprise labor relations