You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 1, 2020

Vietnam’s Updated Law on Investment and Law on Enterprises: Impact on Foreign Investors

Informed Counsel

On June 17, 2020, the National Assembly of Vietnam passed the Law on Investment 2020 (LOI) and Law on Enterprises 2020 (LOE). The new laws will take effect on January 1, 2021, replacing their predecessors from 2014. These are two of the main sources of corporate law in Vietnam, applicable to both domestic and foreign companies. Some key changes for foreign investors are listed below.

Law on Investment 2020

The 2020 LOI adds a few investment projects that are eligible for investment incentives, particularly creative startup projects, research and development institutions, manufacturing of medical devices, and projects providing auxiliary services to small and medium-sized enterprises. The incentives include corporate income tax exemption or reduction for a limited duration, exemption from import tax for equipment imported to form fixed assets, and accelerated depreciation and an increase in deductible expenses in the calculation of taxable income.

The updated LOI upholds the previous requirement of paying a deposit or providing a bank guarantee for investment projects involving land use, but provides some exceptions. Accordingly, investors are no longer subject to this deposit obligation if they win the land use rights via auction, are awarded a bid to implement a project using land, take over a project via project assignment for which the deposit or capital mobilization was already completed, or acquire project land via transfer of land use rights from another land user.

One of the most notable additions in the new law is the introduction of investment policies relating to national defense and security. Accordingly, any business investment activity will be suspended, stopped, or terminated if that activity causes or threatens harm to Vietnam’s national defense or security. In addition, a new pre-approval requirement will apply for M&A transactions involving local entities with the right to use land plots located on islands, border or coastal areas, or other areas affecting national defense and security.

These new provisions echo the direction of Vietnam’s Politburo in Resolution No. 50-NQ/TW of 2019 regarding the enhancement of investment quality toward 2030, which mandates the formulation of relevant provisions on “national defense and security requirements” during the process of considering issuance of an investment registration certificate or approval for a private equity purchase by foreign investors.

For the first time, Vietnam provides for the consequences of a sham transaction (i.e., nominee structure), with the updated LOI enabling the licensing authority to terminate part or all of a project if an investment is made through a sham transaction as defined by civil law, which also holds that a sham transaction may be held void ab initio.

The 2020 LOI also updates the list of conditional business lines by removing 22 business lines (including commercial arbitration, franchising, and logistics services), amending 14 business lines, and introducing 8 new business lines (including architectural services, data center services, electronic identification and authentication services, clean water business, fishing vessel registry, and training crew members of fishing ships).

A new provision has been added whereby foreign investors are subject to the same market access conditions applicable to domestic investors, unless the investment is in a business line whose market access is restricted or conditional for foreign investors. The list of business lines open to foreign investors, which will be announced by the government, includes conditions such as ownership restrictions, type and scope of investment, and financial capacity.

Law on Enterprises 2020   

Under the 2020 LOE, companies are no longer obliged to notify the relevant licensing authority of their seal samples. Additionally, electronic signatures can be used instead of seal samples.

The law also makes changes regarding the organizational structure of limited liability companies (LLCs). Under the new provisions, multiple-member LLCs (other than state-owned enterprises) are no longer required to have a Board of Inspection to be in charge of supervising and ensuring the compliance of functional bodies of the company. Similarly, a single-member limited liability company owned by an organization that is not a state-owned enterprise is not required to have an inspector.

Some changes will also affect shareholders of joint-stock companies, with the 2020 LOE’s introduction of “base ordinary shares,” which are ordinary shares used as the base asset for issuing non-voting depository receipts. This new category of shares is in addition to the ordinary and preferred shares in joint-stock companies that have been regulated since the 2014 version of the LOE. Non-voting depository receipts have equivalent economic rights and obligations to base ordinary shares, except for the voting rights. This is expected to offer more diversified securities products for investors.

Under the previous LOE, a shareholder or a group of shareholders in a joint-stock company holding at least 10% of the total ordinary shares (or a smaller percentage if stipulated in the company’s charter) had the right to request a general meeting of shareholders and to ask the Board of Inspection to investigate issues relating to the management and administration of the company. However, to protect minority shareholders, the updated LOE reduces this to 5%. The new law also abolishes the requirement on the duration of holding shares applicable to minority shareholders (or groups of shareholders) in exercising their rights, which was six consecutive months under the 2014 LOE.

Ease of Doing Business

While the changes in the LOI and LOE are relatively minor, they bring Vietnam’s corporate laws further in line with the country’s international commitments, reducing barriers to entry and facilitating business activities for foreign as well as domestic companies. The updated laws are a positive indication of Vietnam’s commitment to encouraging companies to do business in the country.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 30, 2025
Recent events at a Thai listed company, where a proposal to remove the director was not successful, amid claims that a competitor was attempting to gain control of the company, illustrate how disputes over corporate control can unfold differently at the board level and shareholder level. At the board level, removing directors of a listed company mid-term to gain corporate control is not an easy task under Thai law, as it requires a higher threshold than appointing a new director, which typically only requires a simple majority vote in a listed company. At the shareholder level, Thailand’s tender offer and competition regimes add complexity where different shareholder groups act in concert to remove opposing board representatives or otherwise influence control. In this article, we will explore why the attempted removal of a director may fail, and how the tender offer regime may apply. Key Issues at a Glance Shareholder groups may seek to convene meetings to propose changes to board composition or company authority. Such proposals can be delayed or complicated by regulatory requirements and the need for additional disclosures. Regulatory authorities and minority shareholders may raise concerns when major shareholders coordinate to influence board control, especially if such actions could trigger tender offer or merger control obligations. Companies often respond by seeking further information on shareholder relationships and potential conflicts before proceeding. Why the Director Removal Failed Under Section 76 of the Public Limited Companies Act B.E. 2535 (as amended), the early removal of a director requires two conditions to be satisfied at the same meeting of shareholders: Headcount test: At least 75% of shareholders attending and entitled to vote must vote in favor. If multiple shareholders appoint the same person as proxy, each proxy is counted as a separate head for the purpose of the headcount test,
October 24, 2025
On October 22, 2025, the Thai government posted a directive not to grant gambling licenses for gambling involving poker nationwide to crack down on illegal gambling activities. The directive was issued by Thailand’s Ministry of Interior to align with government policies to prevent the legalization of all types of gambling businesses, including poker as a sporting activity. This will result in the revocation of poker activities as sport and institute a strict ban on such activities nationwide. Businesses should note the new government’s strict approach toward gambling activities as the legal situation regarding gambling in the country continues to draw close attention.
October 1, 2025
In September 2025, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused a company listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), including its current and former directors, of concealing material information in connection with its filing registration and draft prospectus. This recent enforcement action demonstrates the serious consequences of making false statements or appearing to conceal material information in IPO filings and ongoing disclosures. In addition to being subject to criminal penalties, such actions can impact the eligibility of directors and executives to serve and may cause lasting reputational damage. Key Legal Risks The Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (as amended) imposes strict liability for making false statements or concealing material information in IPO registration statements and draft prospectuses. In such cases, investors can claim for damages, and there are also criminal penalties, including imprisonment for up to five years and substantial fines, may apply to the company, its directors, and responsible officers. However, misstatements or omissions in IPO filings do not, by themselves, disqualify directors or executives from holding office, whether arising from an SEC accusation or even a final court judgment. In contrast, for ongoing disclosures after listing, such as financial statements, annual reports, and meeting notices, false or misleading statements or concealment of material information can result in not only criminal liability but also immediate disqualification of directors and executives. If the SEC accuses a listed company or its directors or executives of such misstatements or omissions, those directors or executives are immediately disqualified from their positions, even before a final court judgment. Director and Executive Qualifications Directors and executives must meet the SEC’s specified standards of trustworthiness, as set out in the relevant rules. The SEC clearly defines characteristics that are considered to demonstrate a lack of trustworthiness. For ongoing disclosures, being involved in
September 30, 2025
Vietnam’s higher education system is at a pivotal stage of reform, with the government taking decisive steps to strengthen its policy and regulatory framework. In response to obstacles encountered during the implementation of the Law on Higher Education, issued in 2012 and amended in 2018, the third draft of the amended Law on Higher Education (Draft Law) is scheduled for submission to the National Assembly in October 2025. The Draft Law reflects the state’s commitment to aligning the education sector with international standards while addressing persistent structural challenges. The Draft Law emphasizes clarifying institutional mandates, enhancing accountability, and modernizing governance models to enable higher education institutions to operate with greater autonomy and efficiency. Against this backdrop, we outline below several notable provisions of the third draft and their potential implications for higher education institutions (HEIs) in Vietnam. Applicable Entities In addition to HEIs as defined and covered under existing legislation, the Draft Law extends its scope of applicable entities. The current Law on Higher Education does not regulate training institutions under state agencies, the armed forces, or political and social organizations, nor does it provide specific provisions for institutions offering only postgraduate education. To address this, the Draft Law introduces the term “institutions with higher education activities,” expanding its scope to include: (a) academies and research institutes established by the prime minister, mandated to provide doctoral-level training; (b) educational institutions affiliated with state agencies, political organizations, socio-political organizations, and the people’s armed forces, authorized to offer higher education programs in their specialized fields; and (c) institutions established pursuant to international treaties or by decision of the prime minister, with authorization to deliver certain levels of higher education. The inclusion of “institutions with higher education activities” represents a significant development both legally and institutionally. In an increasingly diversified higher education