You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 26, 2016

Vietnam’s New Penal Code: Employers Face Increased Criminal Liability for Unlawful Dismissals

Subscribe to Updates
Tilleke & Gibbins

Under Vietnam’s new Penal Code No. 100/2015/QH13 (“new code”) coming into force on July 1, 2016, the dismissal of an employee will become more challenging because managers of companies will be exposed to greater risks of criminal liability than under the existing Penal Code No. 15/1999/QH10 as amended by Law No. 37/2009/QH12 (“old code”). This criminal liability would be imposed in addition to any civil liability that might be imposed under Vietnamese labor laws.

Specifically, under Article 128 of the old code, a person can incur criminal liability for unlawfully forcing laborers to leave their employment which causes “serious consequences,” whereas under Article 162 of the new code, the elements of the offense have been reworded to: “(a) unlawful dismissal of an employee, or (b) the use of force or threats to cause an employee to resign if such acts result in hardship for that employee or his/her family, or causes a strike.” In addition, under both laws, the acts must be carried out for “self-seeking purposes or private benefit,” though there has been no elaboration as to how this element might be met.

No detailed guidance was ever issued on the meaning of “unlawfully force laborers to leave their employment” or “serious consequences” under Article 128 the old code. Both terms were probably detrimental to the application of the law because the language, at face value, is vague. To our best knowledge, no one has ever been prosecuted under Article 128. Unlawful dismissals (wrongful termination) in an employment setting have only ended with civil liability.

By comparison, the language of Article 162 of the new code appears to be more precise and utilitarian. For example, if “unlawful dismissal” element can be fulfilled by non-compliance with existing labor laws, as is likely to be the case, there is a large body of existing law that sets out the legal grounds for dismissal and the procedures that must be followed. Hence, there is enough legal guidance to be able to determine if an unlawful dismissal has taken place. As a practical matter under the new code, an investigation into criminal liability might be triggered by the determination of civil liability under an unlawful dismissal case.

In addition to potentially greater exposure to criminal liability, there are enhanced penalties if liability is found. The criminal liability under the old code includes warning, non-custodial reform for up to one year, or imprisonment for a period of three months to one year. Under the new code, the warning is no longer an option and is replaced by a monetary fine from VND 10 million to VND 100 million (approximately USD 450 to USD 4,500). The other potential penalties (non-custodial reform for up to one year or imprisonment for a period of three months to one year) remain unchanged.

Moreover, there are enhanced penalties for aggravating circumstances under the new code that did not exist under the old code. Under the new code, where two or more employees are unlawfully dismissed or forced to resign; or the employee is a female employee who the offender knows is pregnant, or who is raising a child under 12 months of age; or the unlawful dismissal or forced resignation results in the suicide of the dismissed or resigned employee, the offender will be subject to a monetary fine of VND 100 million to VND 200 million (approximately USD 4,500 to USD 9,000) or imprisonment for a period of one to three years. In addition, the offender may also be banned from holding certain positions for a period from one to five years.

Under Vietnamese labor laws, normally only the legal representative of an organization has the authority to dismiss its employees. Hence, legal representatives will be especially vulnerable to liability under this new law.

Related Professionals

Practices

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

May 10, 2021
Attorneys from Tilleke & Gibbins’ offices in Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam have contributed chapters on labor law in these jurisdictions to the Global Employment Law Guide, published by Lex Mundi. The guide provides answers to key employment-related legal questions in 57 jurisdictions around the world, with all entries provided by member firms in the global Lex Mundi legal network. Each chapter contains in-depth information on the jurisdiction’s legal framework governing employment relationships, including coverage of the following topics: Employment categories and contract types Employee rights and protections Employment termination Leave and social benefits Restrictive covenants COVID-19 vaccination mandates and post-pandemic workplace reopening Readers can browse the contributions, generate country-specific reports, and compare attorney-client privilege in multiple jurisdictions. For more information, please visit the Lex Mundi website.
Read More
March 2, 2021
Maintaining positive employee relations is a top concern for virtually all companies. Many companies in Thailand—especially those located in the country’s industrial estates—have labor unions, while others rely on other non-union pathways for attending to the concerns of employees. In all of these cases, the union or collective group of employees also chooses members of the “employee committee” that is charged with fostering good relations and open communications with the employer through regular meetings dedicated to discussion of workplace matters. Companies with a workforce of 50 or more employees need to understand the roles of the employee committee and the specific rights accorded to the committee members, which are different from the rights of the other employees. Besides the obvious benefits that this understanding has for relations with their employees, it is also important if an employer takes disciplinary action against employee committee members, as violation of a committee member’s rights could result in the employer facing criminal penalties. The legal basis for these employee committees is the Labor Relations Act B.E. 2518 (LRA), which stipulates that in any workplace with at least 50 employees, the employees or their labor union of the business establishment is entitled to establish an employee committee. Members are elected (or, in the case of a labor union, appointed) to three-year terms on the committee, with the total number of committee members depending on the size of the workforce, as shown in the table. Membership Requirements Among partially unionized workforces, labor unions are generally given precedence when it comes to control of the committee. If a labor union whose members account for more than 20% of the total employees in a workplace, the union gets to appoint the majority of the employee committee members (e.g., four out of a seven-person committee, five of a
Read More
February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension
Read More