You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 26, 2024

Vietnam’s New Law on Credit Institutions Introduces Key Changes to Banking Operations

Subscribe to Updates

Vietnam’s new Law on Credit Institutions No. 32/2024/QH15, passed by the National Assembly on January 18, 2024 (“New LCI”), will take effect on July 1, 2024 (except for some clauses regarding the transfer of collateral, which will take delayed effect on January 1, 2025). The New LCI will replace the current Law on Credit Institutions issued in 2010 and amended in 2017, and aims to strengthen banking operations and enhance transparency in this sector.

Some key changes to banking operations introduced by the New LCI are set out below.

Lowering Credit Limits

Article 136 of the New LCI stipulates a gradual reduction of credit limits available to bank clients, to help credit institutions diversify their credit portfolios and minimize overdue risks. There are more stringent requirements for certain persons related to the bank (e.g., managers, auditors, and shareholders) and exemptions for special cases (e.g., approval by the prime minister, entrusted loans).

Specifically, the total balance of credit extended by commercial banks, cooperative banks, foreign bank branches, people’s credit funds, and microfinance institutions to a single client or to a client and related persons of that client will be reduced in stages from the current 15% of the credit institution’s equity capital (vốn tự có) for a single client and 25% for a client and related persons, to 10% for a single client and 15% for a client and related persons by 2029.

For non-bank credit institutions (i.e., general and specialized finance companies), the total balance of credit extended to a single client must not exceed 15% (down from 25%) of its equity capital, and the total balance of credit extended to a single client and related persons must not exceed 25% (down from 50%) of its equity capital.

It is worth noting that the above credit limits do not apply to (1) cases of entrusted loans for which the entrusted credit institution or foreign bank branch does not bear risk, (2) cases where the borrower is another credit institution or foreign bank branch, or (3) cases where the prime minister approves a higher credit limit.

Restricting Bancassurance Activities

Article 15.5 of the New LCI strictly prohibits credit institutions, foreign bank branches, and their managers, executives, and employees from combining the purchase of non-obligatory insurance products with the provision of banking products and services in any form.

This is a new regulation in the New LCI that emphasizes the commitment of the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) in addressing the past problem of clients being forced to purchase insurance in order to be granted loans, thereby building client trust in both the banking and insurance sectors.

Recognizing Security Agent Services

Article 114.2(dd) of the New LCI explicitly regulates a new service to be provided by commercial banks, which is the provision of third-party security agent services to lenders who are international financial institutions, domestic and foreign credit institutions, and foreign bank branches.

This addresses a past issue in which local commercial banks were not allowed to be independent security agents, but would have to be a lender in a syndicated loan to act as a security agent for the other lenders, which could expose the bank to more risk. Under the New LCI, the local bank is no longer required to be a co-lender in a syndicated loan to act as the security agent for foreign lenders.

Further details on how banks can provide such security agent services may be provided by the SBV in the future.

Disposal of Real Estate Collateral

To facilitate debt recovery, Article 200 of the New LCI grants credit institutions, foreign bank branches, debt management companies, and asset management companies the right to transfer all or part of real estate projects that are secured assets to recover debts in accordance with the provisions of the Law on Real Estate Business and other relevant laws, without applying the conditions normally applicable to the transferor.

This regulation is expected to pave the way for banks to have more options to dispose of large projects mired in legal problems, thereby helping both the bank and the real estate enterprises to generate cash flow and reduce debt—this is especially true for banks with high real estate lending rates.

However, this regulation will only apply from January 1, 2025.

Outlook

Given the stringent requirements, the New LCI is anticipated to have a profound impact on banking operations in Vietnam, and will require changes from credit institutions to ensure their compliance status.

In addition, as the New LCI will take effect soon, a decree guiding the New LCI in detail should be in the final stages of adoption. Therefore, stakeholders are encouraged to stay informed and updated on further legal developments.

Related Professionals

Practices

Banking and Finance

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 9, 2026
On April 28, 2026, the Central Bank of Myanmar (CBM) issued Notification No. 18/2026 introducing the new Foreign Remittance Business Regulations. The new regulations apply to companies intending to operate foreign remittance businesses in Myanmar that are not licensed banks, non-bank financial institutions, or other financial institutions. The regulations supersede and replace the previous regulatory framework governing foreign remittance businesses under CBM Notification No. 21/2019. While the overall structure remains familiar, the new regulations introduce more detailed requirements for licensing, operations, reporting, and compliance, with a stronger focus on transparency and regulatory oversight. Broader Licensing Requirements Under the new regulations, applicants must submit detailed business plans describing the use of information technology and mobile platforms, along with clear plans for handling remittances from workers abroad and resolving customer complaints. Financial Thresholds and Reporting Requirements The baseline financial thresholds remain unchanged. Licensees must maintain a security deposit of MMK 100 million in an escrow account, along with a separate revolving fund dedicated solely to remittance operations. The new regulations introduce more structured reporting obligations. Licensees are now required to submit daily remittance transaction data by the next business day before noon, in addition to monthly and periodic reporting requirements. Foreign bank account statements must also be submitted regularly, and licensees must provide updates on business operations every six months. Strengthened AML and CFT Framework The new regulations place a greater emphasis on anti-money laundering (AML) and counter financing of terrorism (CFT), with tighter controls over management changes. Any changes in shareholding, share transfers, or the appointment of key management personnel such as the managing director require prior approval from the CBM. Licensing Fees and Validity The new regulations increase licensing costs, while maintaining the same validity period of three years. The new regulations provide more detailed grounds for suspension and
Read More
May 25, 2026
After several years of policy discussion and continued efforts led by the Ministry of Commerce (MOC) to relax the list of reserved businesses under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA), the reform process has now reached a significant milestone. On May 12, 2026, the Thai cabinet approved in principle two draft subordinate legislative instruments aimed at delisting certain reserved business activities under the FBA and reducing licensing requirements for foreign business operators. These developments signal a renewed and concrete effort by the government to modernize Thailand’s business regulatory framework in order to attract foreign investment and boost Thailand’s competitiveness in the global market. Nine Businesses Set for FBA Delisting Below is a list of the nine businesses that are being targeted for delisting from the FBA’s restrictions. A draft ministerial regulation would delist the first eight reserved businesses, while a royal decree has been drafted to delist the ninth business: Telecommunications services (Type 1 license only, covering operators without their own telecommunications infrastructure), under the supervision of the Office of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission. Treasury center services subject to the Foreign Exchange Control Act B.E. 2485 and under the supervision of the Bank of Thailand. Securities-collateralized lending, pursuant to the laws governing securities and exchange and derivatives regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Agency, dealer, advisory, or fund management services relating to derivatives where the underlying assets fall outside the scope of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) Intra-group shared services, including administrative, human resources, and IT functions Intra-group domestic debt guarantee services Leasing of partial space for installation of financial service machines and automatic vending machines for employee use Petroleum drilling services Trading of agricultural product derivatives through a futures exchange, with physical delivery or receipt of agricultural products at a futures exchange–designated
Read More
March 5, 2026
Amid increasing financial globalization, Vietnam’s establishment of an International Financial Center (IFC) represents a strategic initiative to attract high-quality foreign investment and enhance the country’s position in the global financial system. In support of this objective, a Specialized Court was introduced under Resolution No. 222/2025/QH15 as a dedicated dispute resolution mechanism within the IFC framework. The Specialized Court at the IFC was subsequently operationalized by Law on the Specialized Court No. 150/2025/QH15, effective from January 1, 2026. Organizational Structure of the Specialized Court The Specialized Court at the IFC is a court within the system of the People’s Courts, organized and operating in accordance with the Law on the Specialized Court, and vested with jurisdiction to adjudicate and resolve cases at the IFC. The Specialized Court is located in Ho Chi Minh City and comprises (i) a Court of First Instance; (ii) a Court of Appeal, and (iii) a supporting apparatus. Jurisdiction of the Specialized Court The jurisdiction of the Specialized Court at the IFC is strictly defined based on both (i) the subject matter of the cases and (ii) the membership status of the parties involved. Specifically, the Specialized Court has jurisdiction over (except for cases involving public interests or the interests of the state) the following: Disputes arising from investment and business activities. Requests for recognition and enforcement in Vietnam of judgments and decisions of foreign courts and foreign arbitral awards. Requests related to dispute resolution by arbitration. Other disputes directly related to investment and business activities (to be specified by the Supreme People’s Court). Additionally, at least one party in the case must be a member of the IFC. The IFC’s membership status is established through registration, recognition as a member, or the grant of a license for establishment and operation within the IFC. In the
Read More
February 27, 2026
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has officially implemented a new regulatory framework supervising systemically important retail payment systems (SIRPS), effective February 21, 2026, with PromptPay being the first payment system designated as a SIRPS. Under this new set of regulations, the BOT may designate payment systems under the Payment Systems Act B.E. 2560 (2017) as SIRPSs based on quantitative and qualitative assessments. Once a system is designated as a SIRPS, the operator becomes subject to expanded supervisory obligations beyond the general requirements of the Payment Systems Act. Enhanced Supervisory Requirements SIRPS operators must comply with a heightened supervisory regime across three key areas, outlined below. 1. Governance SIRPS operators must maintain robust and transparent governance structures, including: Balanced board composition, with at least one-third of the board comprising independent directors who represent stakeholders in the system (such as payment service providers, consumers, and experts). Independent directors may serve for no more than two consecutive terms. Subcommittees to assist the board in overseeing compliance, policy implementation, and operational strategy. Clear separation between executives responsible for risk and information security and those overseeing day-to-day business operations. Risk Management and System SecuritySIRPS operators must implement comprehensive risk management frameworks, including: Clear service agreements between the SIRPS operator and its direct participants (payment service providers who connect directly to the SIRPS), defining roles and responsibilities among stakeholders. These agreements must include obligations for direct SIRPS participants to supervise any indirect participants they onboard to ensure compliance with service agreements and business rules. A business continuity plan covering both IT and non-IT aspects, with annual review. The SIRPS must target service availability comparable to international payment infrastructures, including the ability to recover operations within two hours of a disruption and to maintain scalable operational capacity. Tools and controls to monitor and manage material or
Read More