You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 26, 2014

Vietnam’s New Land Law: The Impact on Foreign Developers

Informed Counsel

The latest incarnation of Vietnam’s Land Law was ratified by the country’s National Assembly on November 29, 2013, and came into force on July 1, 2014 (the 2014 Land Law). This new law replaced the previous Land Law of 2003 (the 2003 Land Law). Following the 2014 Land Law, the Vietnam Government issued Decrees Nos. 43, 44, and 47, all of which came into force on the same date as the 2014 Land Law. The new Land Law has, however, brought with it mixed feelings for foreign developers in Vietnam.

Equal Footing for Domestic and Foreign Investors

Under the 2003 Land Law, the most common form of land acquisition by foreign investors was direct lease through the government. Foreign investors paid rent either on an annual or an upfront basis. On the other hand, local investors were allowed to acquire land via land allocation (i.e., through a land grant obtained from the government for agricultural, commercial, and residential land), under which they paid a land use fee (the legal term for payment of the land allocation by the local investors to the government) on a definite- or indefinite-term basis. In addition, local investors were also able to lease the land from the government and pay rent on a yearly basis.

The 2014 Land Law removes all of the aforementioned differences between local and foreign investors. Now, either may lease land from the government and pay rent on an annual basis or as a lump-sum payment. Both may also acquire land via land allocation. However, land allocation is now only available for residential land.

More Conditions for Land Acquisition

The 2014 Land Law sets out new harsh requirements for developers (both local and foreign), who want to lease or obtain land allocation from the government. These new requirements include the following:

  • The lease (or allocation) of the land must have been provided for in the annual land use plan (the plan for using each specific piece of land such as for commercial or residential purposes within the district) issued by the district-level People’s Committee. In other words, foreign developers must ensure that the land they intend to acquire has been specified in the annual land use plan.
  • The developers must meet a minimum level of statutory equity capital (i.e., pocket money). For example, for a project that has a land area of less than 20 hectares, the developer’s equity capital must be at least 20% of the total estimated investment capital of the project. For a project of 20 hectares or more, the equity capital must be at least 15%.
  • The developers must pay deposits to the government to ensure that they will pay the land rent (or land use fees) and develop the projects in a timely manner.

Uncertainty Over Land Prices

Under the 2003 Land Law, the land price (i.e., the land rent or land use fees) for a specific piece of land could be calculated based on the table of land prices annually published by the provincial People’s Committee. The 2014 Land Law, however, requires the land price to be determined on a case-by-case basis by the provincial People’s Committee. The government may hire land valuation firms to determine and advise on the land price. This new land price determination method leaves much uncertainty about the land price and also the timing issue of the local government in determining the land prices.

More Restrictions on Land Withdrawal

Under the 2003 Land Law, the grounds for land withdrawal (akin to eminent domain) by the government for the development of a commercial or residential project were very broad. Developers were able to ask the government for land withdrawal from individual land users for their development of a three-star hotel or any residential project. This is no longer permissible under the 2014 Land Law. Land withdrawal for a commercial or residential project must satisfy two conditions: (i) it may only be for significant projects, such as construction of a new township; and (ii) it must have prior approval for land withdrawal from the provincial People’s Council.

More Options for Residential Projects

For the first time, the 2014 Land Law allows a residential project developer to transfer part of its project (i.e., by dividing the land and transferring the divided plots of land and the assets constructed on them, if any) to another developer. The conditions for such a transfer are fairly simple: (i) the land price must be fully paid by the selling developer; and (ii) the land must have been issued a land use right certificate (akin to the title deed). Regrettably, thus far, it is still unclear as to the procedures and documentation for the transfer of part of a residential project.

Also, for the first time, the 2014 Land Law allows a residential project developer to transfer individual plots of land in a project (without any houses constructed on them). Previously, this form of transfer was strictly prohibited, for fear that if the developer failed to construct the houses in its project in a timely manner and did not follow an approved design, then the entire city would look unsightly. In response to the recent downturn of the real estate market in Vietnam, however, the 2014 Land Law allows a developer to transfer bare land to buyers, so long as the following conditions are met:

  • The developer must have fully paid the land price for the project land;
  • The developer has constructed the infrastructure of the project;
  • The project is not located in the central districts of the city or province; and
  • The provincial People’s Committee where the project land is situated agrees to the transfer.

Future Outlook

There are signals showing that the real estate market in Vietnam is warming up. Nevertheless, it is too early to judge whether the new Land Law may further defrost the market through its liberal provisions on land transfer or whether it will worsen the situation with its new harsh criteria for land acquisition and pricing. The market has its own voice.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 20, 2026
Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) has imposed new restrictions on foreign-majority shareholding and land ownership for companies in certain promoted activities. The changes took effect on September 1, 2025, but were not published in the Government Gazette until December 30, 2025, under Notification of the Board of Investment No. Sor. 7/2568 on the Amendment to List of Activities Eligible for Investment Promotion under Notification of the Board of Investment No. 9/2565, dated July 22, 2025. Foreign Land Ownership Restrictions Generally, foreign land ownership is one of the privileges granted to BOI-promoted companies, allowing them to own land to engage in the promoted activities. However, with these new restrictions, the BOI will no longer grant land-ownership privileges to foreign-majority-owned companies that conduct business activities in the following categories: Rolling, drawing, casting, or forging of nonferrous metals (category 5.4.9) Manufacturing of ferrous metal products or ferrous metal parts (category 5.4.11.2) Manufacturing of nonferrous metal products and/or nonferrous metal parts for industrial use (category 5.4.11.4) Manufacturing of other metal products, including other metal parts for industrial use (category 5.4.11.5) Manufacture of chemical products for industry (category 6.2) Manufacture of plastic products for industrial goods and parts (category 6.4.1) These restrictions do not apply to existing BOI-promoted companies that have at least three projects granted promotion under the same juristic person during the past 15 years (2011–2025) with total investment of at least THB 5 billion, excluding the cost of land and working capital. Foreign Shareholding Restrictions For companies to be eligible for BOI promotion in three other categories of business activities, at least 51% of the company’s registered capital must be held by Thai individual shareholders, unless the BOI-promoted activity is located within a special border economic zone as designated by the BOI. These three categories are: Manufacture of bags made of
January 8, 2026
Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) has tightened criteria for BOI-promoted companies to own land for residential use and introduced new procedures for land ownership applications under a new notification. Officially titled Notification of the Office of the Board of Investment No. Por. 9/2568 Re: Amended Criteria and Conditions for Permitting Foreign Juristic Persons Receiving Investment Promotion to Own Land for Office and Residence for Operational-Level Workers to Operate Business Granted Investment Promotion, dated July 18, 2025, the new notification was published in the Government Gazette on January 6, 2026, and is applicable to all applications submitted since the date of the notification (July 18, 2025). The new notification introduces an online application process for BOI-promoted companies seeking to own land for office use or residential purposes via the e-Land system, the BOI’s electronic system for land rights and benefits. Applications are reviewed virtually, and any requested amendments or additional documents must be submitted within seven business days. Failure to amend the application or submit any additional requested documents within this period will result in automatic rejection and removal of the application from the system. The new notification builds on the requirements specified in the previous notification on land ownership allowances for foreign companies, issued in 2024, by introducing additional qualification requirements for residences for operational-level workers (i.e., unskilled laborers). In this regard, such a residence must not be: Part of a land development project (housing estate), A condominium unit, or Classified as a house or commercial building.
December 25, 2025
On December 11, 2025, Vietnam’s National Assembly issued Resolution No. 254/2025/QH15 (Resolution No. 254) to address practical difficulties encountered in implementing the Law on Land 2024. The resolution provides specific mechanisms and policies to resolve issues related to land allocation, land leasing, and conversion of land-use purposes, while also addressing land valuation principles, timing of information collection, and land valuation methods. The resolution takes effect on January 1, 2026. Key provisions affecting investors are discussed below. Land Use Terms for Transferred Investment Projects The National Assembly has addressed situations where the remaining term of a transferred investment project is insufficient for the transferee’s business or financial plans. Resolution No. 254, along with the Law on Investment 2025, introduces aligned regulatory solutions. Under the Law on Investment 2025 (4th version submitted to the National Assembly for promulgation), if an investment project implemented prior to March 1, 2026, has been transferred and the transferor holds a Land Use Rights Certificate, has fulfilled all land-related financial obligations, and is not subject to termination, the competent authority may determine a new operating term if the remaining operating term does not meet the transferee investor’s financial or business plan. This adjustment occurs when approving or adjusting the investment policy or issuing or amending the investment registration certificate. The revised operating term is calculated from the date of the approval or issuance and must not exceed the statutory maximum of 70 years for projects in economic zones and 50 years for projects outside economic zones. Resolution No. 254 also permits adjustment of the land use term for transferred investment projects involving land, provided that the transferee investor pays additional land rent in accordance with applicable law, thereby ensuring consistency with the Law on Investment 2025. Land Rent Payment Options Resolution No. 254 generally expands the
December 16, 2025
Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed the Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to Infrastructure and Construction in Southeast Asia, a comparative guide developed by Drew Network Asia (DNA). The publication brings together insights from leading ASEAN law firms to address common legal and practical issues faced by participants in the construction and engineering sector across the region. Covering nine major Southeast Asian jurisdictions, the guide provides concise answers to frequently encountered questions relating to infrastructure and construction projects. Topics addressed include the regulatory environment, procurement practices, project structuring, risk allocation, contracting terms, dispute resolution mechanisms, and the enforcement of arbitral awards. Each jurisdictional chapter follows a consistent question-and-answer format, enabling readers to compare legal approaches and market practices across countries. This structure highlights both areas of convergence and key differences between jurisdictions, supporting more informed decision-making in cross-border projects and investments. While the guide offers a practical regional overview, it also underscores that legal frameworks and market practices vary significantly between jurisdictions and may be shaped by local principles and industry norms. Readers seeking jurisdiction-specific advice are encouraged to contact the practitioners listed at the end of each chapter. The full guide is available for download through the button below or directly from the DNA website.