You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 25, 2025

Vietnam Addresses Land Law Implementation Challenges

Subscribe to Updates

On December 11, 2025, Vietnam’s National Assembly issued Resolution No. 254/2025/QH15 (Resolution No. 254) to address practical difficulties encountered in implementing the Law on Land 2024. The resolution provides specific mechanisms and policies to resolve issues related to land allocation, land leasing, and conversion of land-use purposes, while also addressing land valuation principles, timing of information collection, and land valuation methods. The resolution takes effect on January 1, 2026.

Key provisions affecting investors are discussed below.

Land Use Terms for Transferred Investment Projects

The National Assembly has addressed situations where the remaining term of a transferred investment project is insufficient for the transferee’s business or financial plans. Resolution No. 254, along with the Law on Investment 2025, introduces aligned regulatory solutions.

Under the Law on Investment 2025 (4th version submitted to the National Assembly for promulgation), if an investment project implemented prior to March 1, 2026, has been transferred and the transferor holds a Land Use Rights Certificate, has fulfilled all land-related financial obligations, and is not subject to termination, the competent authority may determine a new operating term if the remaining operating term does not meet the transferee investor’s financial or business plan. This adjustment occurs when approving or adjusting the investment policy or issuing or amending the investment registration certificate. The revised operating term is calculated from the date of the approval or issuance and must not exceed the statutory maximum of 70 years for projects in economic zones and 50 years for projects outside economic zones.

Resolution No. 254 also permits adjustment of the land use term for transferred investment projects involving land, provided that the transferee investor pays additional land rent in accordance with applicable law, thereby ensuring consistency with the Law on Investment 2025.

Land Rent Payment Options

Resolution No. 254 generally expands the right to choose the form of land lease beyond the three specific cases in the Law on Land 2024 that allow a one-time payment of land rent for the entire lease term. Land users may now opt for either a one-time payment of land rent for the entire lease term or an annual payment of land rent, except where (1) public service units allocated land by the state without land use fee collection seek to use part or all of the allocated land area for production, business, or service provision, or (2) investments use land managed by state organizations.

Additional Circumstances for State Land Recovery

The Law on Land 2024 provides for 31 cases in which the state may recover land for socioeconomic development in the national or public interest. However, practice has revealed additional circumstances where land recovery mechanisms for such purposes are necessary to expedite investment implementation. Accordingly, Resolution No. 254 provides three additional cases in which the state may recover land for socioeconomic development in the national or public interest:

  • Projects in free trade zones and international financial centers. The development of free trade zones and international financial centers is a key national priority, yet the Law on Land 2024 lacks provisions on land recovery for projects in these areas, creating practical implementation challenges. Accordingly, permitting land recovery for such projects is necessary to institutionalize state policies and provide a coherent legal basis for their effective implementation.
  • Land compensation and clearance. Where land is used for project implementation through agreements on land use rights transfers, if the deadline for reaching an agreement has expired and agreements have been reached for more than 75% of the total land area and more than 75% of the land users, the provincial-level People’s Council may consider and approve the recovery of the remaining land area for allocation or lease to an investor. In practice, projects are often stalled when investors have secured most, but not all, required land through agreements. Accordingly, Resolution No. 254 provides a mechanism to support site clearance and ensure timely project implementation when the majority of land users have consented.
  • Land funds for build-transfer contracts. Resolution No. 254 allows for the creation of land funds to pay for projects implemented under build-transfer contracts, and for leasing land to continue production and business activities in cases where organizations are using land that is recovered by the state. This provision is necessary to complete the legal framework and facilitate infrastructure development under public-private partnerships.

Application of Land Price Lists

Under the Law on Land 2024, the land price list is primarily used to determine land-related financial obligations of households and individuals, while specific land prices are applied to determine land-related financial obligations of enterprises implementing investment projects when the state allocates land with a land use fee or leases land with a one-time rental payment for the entire lease term. However, Resolution No. 254 provides for broader application of the land price list, making it the basis for determining land-related financial obligations of all entities (individuals and enterprises) when the state grants land use rights and in other cases where land-related financial obligations arise, except for some limited cases.

Applying the land price list in lieu of specific land prices enhances transparency, simplifies calculation, and addresses valuation bottlenecks where comparable data, planning clarity, or technical information is lacking.

Outlook

Resolution No. 254 introduces measures that aim to address difficulties and bottlenecks encountered by investors in the implementation of the Law on Land 2024, while creating momentum for national development and supporting the business activities of enterprises and individuals. Investors and private sector entities should proactively review their land acquisition strategies and ensure compliance with the updated regulatory framework to mitigate risks and capitalize on new avenues for project development.

Related Professionals

Practices

Real Estate

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 3, 2026
Thailand will keep its reduced government fees for property sale and mortgage registration in place for another year. Two Ministry of Interior notifications, issued following a cabinet resolution on June 30, 2026, and published in the Government Gazette on July 1, 2026, extend the previously reduced fee levels through June 30, 2027. The reduced registration fees apply to the sale and mortgage of the same property types covered in prior versions of the scheme: detached houses, semidetached houses, row houses, commercial buildings, land transferred together with such buildings, and condominium units. To be eligible for the reduced fees, the purchase price, the officially assessed value, and the mortgage amount must each not exceed THB 7 million, and the buyer must be a Thai individual. The reduced registration fees for eligible sales and mortgages are calculated as follows: Sale: 0.01% of the official assessed value (reduced from standard rate of 2%) Mortgage: 0.01% of the mortgage amount (reduced from standard rate of 1%) The reduced mortgage registration fee applies only if the mortgage is registered at the same time as the sale of the property.
Read More
April 30, 2026
Thailand’s Long-Term Resident (LTR) Visa regime offers an attractive immigration pathway for qualifying foreign nationals, providing a 10-year renewable permission to stay in Thailand. Following amendments under Board of Investment (BOI) Announcement No. Por. 3/2568 dated February 4, 2025, the regime now more explicitly accommodates property investment as a qualifying vehicle—a development of particular relevance to foreign nationals already considering real estate acquisitions in Thailand. The LTR Visa is available to several categories of applicants, including wealthy global citizens with global assets of at least USD 1 million, and wealthy pensioners aged 50 or older with an annual pension or fixed income of at least USD 40,000. Property as a Qualifying Investment For both categories, property investment is recognized as one of three eligible investment types alongside Thai government bonds (with at least five years remaining to maturity) and direct investments in Thai companies or approved venture capital or private equity vehicles. The minimum qualifying property investment is USD 500,000 for wealthy global citizens and USD 250,000 for wealthy pensioners. Eligible property types include freehold condominiums, buildings, or villas, as well as leasehold properties with a remaining lease term of at least 10 years. Health Coverage Requirement Beyond the investment threshold, applicants must demonstrate adequate health coverage. This requirement can be satisfied through a health insurance policy covering at least USD 50,000 in Thai medical expenses with at least 10 months of remaining coverage, evidence of social security benefits covering Thai medical costs, or a bank deposit of at least USD 100,000 retained for 12 months. Practical Considerations For foreign nationals already considering property acquisitions in prime residential markets—where investment values commonly meet or exceed the USD 500,000 threshold—the visa pathway effectively transforms a real estate purchase into a dual-purpose investment, combining asset ownership with long-term residence rights that
Read More
April 7, 2026
Real estate law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins provided the chapter on Vietnam for Practical Law’s Commercial Real Estate Global Guide 2026, a comparative jurisdictional guide in Q&A format giving a high-level overview of real estate investment structures, restrictions on foreign ownership, and other important issues of real estate law. The main topics include the following: Real estate investment Title to real estate Sale of real estate Real estate tax Real estate finance Real estate leases Planning and development controls To read the Vietnam chapter, please visit the Practical Law website and enroll in the free Practical Law trial to gain full access.
Read More
February 25, 2026
In December 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam enacted a new Law on Construction, replacing the 2014 Law on Construction as amended in 2020. The 2025 Law on Construction will, in principle, take effect on July 1, 2026, subject to certain exceptions. Among its notable reforms, one development has attracted particular attention from both legal practitioners and market participants: the introduction of a statutory framework governing predetermined damages, commonly referred to as “liquidated damages.” This marks the first time liquidated damages have been expressly recognized at the level of primary legislation in Vietnam. While liquidated damages clauses have long been a common feature of construction contracts in practice, their legal enforceability has historically been subject to uncertainty. Although the new provision appears to represent a positive step toward greater legal clarity, it remains an open question whether it is sufficient, on its own, to provide a solid legal basis for the enforceability of liquidated damages clauses in construction disputes in Vietnam. What’s New? Article 86.2 of the 2025 Law on Construction provides (emphasis added): “Compensation for damages shall be determined on the basis of actual damages [or] predetermined damages corresponding to obligations under the construction contracts that are breached [and] the extent of such breaches.” This provision is significant in that it expressly recognizes predetermined damages, or liquidated damages, as a lawful basis for determining compensation for damage. However, the new law does not define “predetermined damages.” The absence of a statutory definition creates potential ambiguity as to the scope and nature of this concept and may give rise to disputes over how—and whether—a particular contractual clause qualifies as predetermined damages for the purposes of Article 86.2. Further, Article 86.2 qualifies the application of predetermined damages by requiring that such damages correspond to the obligations not fulfilled and the
Read More