You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 26, 2014

Vietnam’s New Land Law: The Impact on Foreign Developers

Informed Counsel

The latest incarnation of Vietnam’s Land Law was ratified by the country’s National Assembly on November 29, 2013, and came into force on July 1, 2014 (the 2014 Land Law). This new law replaced the previous Land Law of 2003 (the 2003 Land Law). Following the 2014 Land Law, the Vietnam Government issued Decrees Nos. 43, 44, and 47, all of which came into force on the same date as the 2014 Land Law. The new Land Law has, however, brought with it mixed feelings for foreign developers in Vietnam.

Equal Footing for Domestic and Foreign Investors

Under the 2003 Land Law, the most common form of land acquisition by foreign investors was direct lease through the government. Foreign investors paid rent either on an annual or an upfront basis. On the other hand, local investors were allowed to acquire land via land allocation (i.e., through a land grant obtained from the government for agricultural, commercial, and residential land), under which they paid a land use fee (the legal term for payment of the land allocation by the local investors to the government) on a definite- or indefinite-term basis. In addition, local investors were also able to lease the land from the government and pay rent on a yearly basis.

The 2014 Land Law removes all of the aforementioned differences between local and foreign investors. Now, either may lease land from the government and pay rent on an annual basis or as a lump-sum payment. Both may also acquire land via land allocation. However, land allocation is now only available for residential land.

More Conditions for Land Acquisition

The 2014 Land Law sets out new harsh requirements for developers (both local and foreign), who want to lease or obtain land allocation from the government. These new requirements include the following:

  • The lease (or allocation) of the land must have been provided for in the annual land use plan (the plan for using each specific piece of land such as for commercial or residential purposes within the district) issued by the district-level People’s Committee. In other words, foreign developers must ensure that the land they intend to acquire has been specified in the annual land use plan.
  • The developers must meet a minimum level of statutory equity capital (i.e., pocket money). For example, for a project that has a land area of less than 20 hectares, the developer’s equity capital must be at least 20% of the total estimated investment capital of the project. For a project of 20 hectares or more, the equity capital must be at least 15%.
  • The developers must pay deposits to the government to ensure that they will pay the land rent (or land use fees) and develop the projects in a timely manner.

Uncertainty Over Land Prices

Under the 2003 Land Law, the land price (i.e., the land rent or land use fees) for a specific piece of land could be calculated based on the table of land prices annually published by the provincial People’s Committee. The 2014 Land Law, however, requires the land price to be determined on a case-by-case basis by the provincial People’s Committee. The government may hire land valuation firms to determine and advise on the land price. This new land price determination method leaves much uncertainty about the land price and also the timing issue of the local government in determining the land prices.

More Restrictions on Land Withdrawal

Under the 2003 Land Law, the grounds for land withdrawal (akin to eminent domain) by the government for the development of a commercial or residential project were very broad. Developers were able to ask the government for land withdrawal from individual land users for their development of a three-star hotel or any residential project. This is no longer permissible under the 2014 Land Law. Land withdrawal for a commercial or residential project must satisfy two conditions: (i) it may only be for significant projects, such as construction of a new township; and (ii) it must have prior approval for land withdrawal from the provincial People’s Council.

More Options for Residential Projects

For the first time, the 2014 Land Law allows a residential project developer to transfer part of its project (i.e., by dividing the land and transferring the divided plots of land and the assets constructed on them, if any) to another developer. The conditions for such a transfer are fairly simple: (i) the land price must be fully paid by the selling developer; and (ii) the land must have been issued a land use right certificate (akin to the title deed). Regrettably, thus far, it is still unclear as to the procedures and documentation for the transfer of part of a residential project.

Also, for the first time, the 2014 Land Law allows a residential project developer to transfer individual plots of land in a project (without any houses constructed on them). Previously, this form of transfer was strictly prohibited, for fear that if the developer failed to construct the houses in its project in a timely manner and did not follow an approved design, then the entire city would look unsightly. In response to the recent downturn of the real estate market in Vietnam, however, the 2014 Land Law allows a developer to transfer bare land to buyers, so long as the following conditions are met:

  • The developer must have fully paid the land price for the project land;
  • The developer has constructed the infrastructure of the project;
  • The project is not located in the central districts of the city or province; and
  • The provincial People’s Committee where the project land is situated agrees to the transfer.

Future Outlook

There are signals showing that the real estate market in Vietnam is warming up. Nevertheless, it is too early to judge whether the new Land Law may further defrost the market through its liberal provisions on land transfer or whether it will worsen the situation with its new harsh criteria for land acquisition and pricing. The market has its own voice.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 3, 2026
Thailand will keep its reduced government fees for property sale and mortgage registration in place for another year. Two Ministry of Interior notifications, issued following a cabinet resolution on June 30, 2026, and published in the Government Gazette on July 1, 2026, extend the previously reduced fee levels through June 30, 2027. The reduced registration fees apply to the sale and mortgage of the same property types covered in prior versions of the scheme: detached houses, semidetached houses, row houses, commercial buildings, land transferred together with such buildings, and condominium units. To be eligible for the reduced fees, the purchase price, the officially assessed value, and the mortgage amount must each not exceed THB 7 million, and the buyer must be a Thai individual. The reduced registration fees for eligible sales and mortgages are calculated as follows: Sale: 0.01% of the official assessed value (reduced from standard rate of 2%) Mortgage: 0.01% of the mortgage amount (reduced from standard rate of 1%) The reduced mortgage registration fee applies only if the mortgage is registered at the same time as the sale of the property.
April 30, 2026
Thailand’s Long-Term Resident (LTR) Visa regime offers an attractive immigration pathway for qualifying foreign nationals, providing a 10-year renewable permission to stay in Thailand. Following amendments under Board of Investment (BOI) Announcement No. Por. 3/2568 dated February 4, 2025, the regime now more explicitly accommodates property investment as a qualifying vehicle—a development of particular relevance to foreign nationals already considering real estate acquisitions in Thailand. The LTR Visa is available to several categories of applicants, including wealthy global citizens with global assets of at least USD 1 million, and wealthy pensioners aged 50 or older with an annual pension or fixed income of at least USD 40,000. Property as a Qualifying Investment For both categories, property investment is recognized as one of three eligible investment types alongside Thai government bonds (with at least five years remaining to maturity) and direct investments in Thai companies or approved venture capital or private equity vehicles. The minimum qualifying property investment is USD 500,000 for wealthy global citizens and USD 250,000 for wealthy pensioners. Eligible property types include freehold condominiums, buildings, or villas, as well as leasehold properties with a remaining lease term of at least 10 years. Health Coverage Requirement Beyond the investment threshold, applicants must demonstrate adequate health coverage. This requirement can be satisfied through a health insurance policy covering at least USD 50,000 in Thai medical expenses with at least 10 months of remaining coverage, evidence of social security benefits covering Thai medical costs, or a bank deposit of at least USD 100,000 retained for 12 months. Practical Considerations For foreign nationals already considering property acquisitions in prime residential markets—where investment values commonly meet or exceed the USD 500,000 threshold—the visa pathway effectively transforms a real estate purchase into a dual-purpose investment, combining asset ownership with long-term residence rights that
April 7, 2026
Real estate law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins provided the chapter on Vietnam for Practical Law’s Commercial Real Estate Global Guide 2026, a comparative jurisdictional guide in Q&A format giving a high-level overview of real estate investment structures, restrictions on foreign ownership, and other important issues of real estate law. The main topics include the following: Real estate investment Title to real estate Sale of real estate Real estate tax Real estate finance Real estate leases Planning and development controls To read the Vietnam chapter, please visit the Practical Law website and enroll in the free Practical Law trial to gain full access.
February 25, 2026
In December 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam enacted a new Law on Construction, replacing the 2014 Law on Construction as amended in 2020. The 2025 Law on Construction will, in principle, take effect on July 1, 2026, subject to certain exceptions. Among its notable reforms, one development has attracted particular attention from both legal practitioners and market participants: the introduction of a statutory framework governing predetermined damages, commonly referred to as “liquidated damages.” This marks the first time liquidated damages have been expressly recognized at the level of primary legislation in Vietnam. While liquidated damages clauses have long been a common feature of construction contracts in practice, their legal enforceability has historically been subject to uncertainty. Although the new provision appears to represent a positive step toward greater legal clarity, it remains an open question whether it is sufficient, on its own, to provide a solid legal basis for the enforceability of liquidated damages clauses in construction disputes in Vietnam. What’s New? Article 86.2 of the 2025 Law on Construction provides (emphasis added): “Compensation for damages shall be determined on the basis of actual damages [or] predetermined damages corresponding to obligations under the construction contracts that are breached [and] the extent of such breaches.” This provision is significant in that it expressly recognizes predetermined damages, or liquidated damages, as a lawful basis for determining compensation for damage. However, the new law does not define “predetermined damages.” The absence of a statutory definition creates potential ambiguity as to the scope and nature of this concept and may give rise to disputes over how—and whether—a particular contractual clause qualifies as predetermined damages for the purposes of Article 86.2. Further, Article 86.2 qualifies the application of predetermined damages by requiring that such damages correspond to the obligations not fulfilled and the