You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 28, 2015

Vietnam’s New Investment and Corporate Law: A Step Forward or More of the Same?

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

On November 26, 2014, the National Assembly of Vietnam passed amended versions of the Law on Investment (LOI) and the Law on Enterprises (LOE), replacing the 2005 versions of each law. The new laws will take effect on July 1, 2015. As these two laws form the principal legal framework for foreign companies doing business in Vietnam, the foreign investment community has been keen to discover whether the new LOI and LOE will improve on the existing law or merely reshuffle the pieces with the net result being essentially the same.

The problems faced by foreign investors under the current laws are the complexity and length of time it takes for investment registration and corporate formation. Foreign investors are not allowed to incorporate a company without proposing and obtaining approval for a detailed investment “project.” Accordingly, they are required to submit a business plan or feasibility study in conjunction with the submission of information and documentation necessary to incorporate.

In addition, the licensing authorities will review and comment on the legal scope of business activities of a company, the adequacy of capital contributions, and the proposed business plan or feasibility study of a company, and require the investor to provide considerable detail and justification. The licensing authorities often require multiple meetings with counsel and revisions to the application dossier, which further prolongs the process.

Although the new laws fall short of making sweeping changes, there are some indications that they may ease the burden on foreign investors. The changes are discussed in greater detail below. 

Investment Registration Structure

Under the 2005 LOI, all direct foreign investment activity must be licensed via  an Investment Certificate (IC) which acts as both a foreign investment registration certificate and an incorporation certificate. Under the new law, where required, foreign investors must first apply for an Investment Registration Certificate (IRC) and then an Enterprise Registration Certificate (ERC).

While it may seem that requiring two steps instead of one could lead to a more complex and lengthier approval process, this is not necessarily the case. The combined statutory time frames for the authorities to approve the IRC and ERC are approximately the same as the time frame allotted to issue an IC. Moreover, under the current law, the authorities routinely go beyond the legally prescribed time frames, with ICs normally taking two to six months from the date of filing to approval. We can expect more of the same under the new law unless the approval process is streamlined, and there appears to be a serious attempt to do so.

Investment Registration Approval Process

Under the 2005 LOI, any foreign direct investment project with invested capital of over VND 300 billion (approximately USD 1.4 million) or in a conditional sector is required       to go through the investment “evaluation” process, while all others must go through the investment “registration” process. Certain projects also need the Prime Minister’s approval. In practice, little distinction has been made between the two processes.

Most applications for ICs are processed by the Department of Planning and Investment (DPI) under the provincial-level People’s Committee. When investment activity falls within the jurisdiction of certain ministries, such as trade, communication, or health, the DPI normally contacts those ministries for their input and opinions. Sometimes multiple ministries may have to be consulted. These consultations are time-consuming processes involving the submission of formal requests from the DPI, along with the delivery of any necessary supporting documents.

Consultations are mandatory for foreign investment in certain conditional sectors, unless local legislation or an international treaty to which Vietnam is a party (e.g., its WTO Commitments) makes consultation unnecessary. Under these rules, more often than not, consultation is required and, in practice, the DPI has normally erred on the side of caution and sought consultation from any ministry that may have jurisdiction over the proposed investment activity. For example, the Ho Chi Minh City DPI has sent all product distribution-related applications to the trade ministry in Hanoi regardless of whether they had prior experience with the trade ministry’s policy on a particular product. Furthermore, unless the investment is in an industrial zone, an officer from the provincial-level People’s Committee signs off on the ICs, adding yet another layer of bureaucracy to the approval process.

Under the new LOI, the first step is to determine whether a decision on investment policy is needed and who has the authority to issue a decision on investment policy, which is ascertained as follows:

1. National Assembly – Projects which have a significant impact on the environment, e.g., nuclear power plants and projects involving the relocation of 20,000 or more people in mountainous areas or 50,000 or more in other areas.

2. Prime Minister – Projects which involve the relocation of 10,000 or more people in mountainous areas or 20,000 or more in other areas, airports, seaports, petroleum, casinos, golf courses, and telecommunications involving the building of network infrastructure.

3. People’s Committee – Projects in which the state allocates or leases land without auction, tender, or transfer; projects involving conversion of land-use purposes; and projects utilizing technology on the technology transfer restricted list. 

Once a favorable decision on investment policy is issued, the IRC is to be issued within 5 working days. If the project is not subject to a decision on investment policy, then the IRC is to be issued within 15 calendar days. At this point, until follow-on legislation is issued, it appears that consultation with the ministries would not be mandatory under the new LOI, nor would sign-off from the People’s Committee be necessary. If the automatic involvement of the ministries at the IRC stage can be avoided, the processing time for investment registration would be significantly reduced.

Clarity on What Constitutes a Local Company

The 2005 LOI did not clearly set out what constitutes a “domestic investor,” leading to a situation where even a minor foreign holding in a domestic company could trigger the requirement for an application for an IC. Under the new LOI, any Vietnamese enterprise in which foreign entities or individuals or foreign-controlled entities hold or will hold 51 percent or more of the equity in an enterprise must comply with procedures applicable to foreign investors; otherwise, the enterprise will only be subject to domestic investment registration requirements. If this distinction is applied consistently throughout Vietnamese corporate and commercial law, many foreign investors are likely to choose the joint venture model as a path of entry into areas restricted to foreign participation, such as the distribution of pharmaceutical products, books, and video media.

Under the 2005 LOI, only projects with an amount invested of less than VND 15 billion (approximately USD 700,000), which are not in conditional sectors, are exempt from registration. Under the new LOI, domestic companies do not need an IRC, but they can apply for one if it is desired. They do need a decision on investment policy where the nature of the project requires it.

Legal Representatives

Under the new LOE, an enterprise will be allowed to have multiple legal representatives, instead of just one as limited under the current law. This is a significant change because replacing legal representatives was a slow and cumbersome process that not only created unnecessary administrative burdens on investors, but had the potential of temporarily debilitating business activity should the former legal representative become uncooperative or unavailable during the transfer. Having multiple legal representatives will likely mitigate this problem.

Capital Contribution

Under Decree 102 guiding the 2005 LOE, the time limit for capital contribution of an LLC may not exceed 36 months from the date of issuance of an IC. Under the new LOE, the time limit is 90 days from the date of issuance of an ERC. The requirement to complete an injection of capital contribution within 90 days from the date of issuance of an ERC is likely to have a significant impact on foreign investors. Prior to this change, in most instances, investors were allowed to contribute their charter capital within two years, according to their business needs. Now, they have only 90 days from the date of incorporation regardless of whether there is a commercial need to do so.

Equity Purchase in a Vietnamese Company

Under the 2005 LOI, for limited liability companies, approval is required for any amount of equity purchase. For joint-stock companies, notice must be made to the investment authorities for a purchase of over 5 percent of equity, and registration is required if any founding shareholder is replaced. Under the new LOI, investment registration is only required if the combined foreign ownership after acquisition will be 51 percent or more or the target entity operates in a conditional field in respect of foreign investors. The new LOE would, however, require corporate registration of a new member to an LLC and, for a JSC, notice of a new foreign shareholder must be made to the investment registration body within ten days of the completion of the share purchase.

The 2005 LOE only allows enterprises of the same type (e.g., LLCs or JSCs) to be merged or consolidated. This provision has been abolished in the new law.

Conclusion

While the new laws have kept many of the same requirements of the old laws, they include some changes that could be beneficial to foreign investors. In particular, depending on how the laws are applied, there may be a significant improvement in investment registration times. It is yet to be seen whether the shortened time frame for capital contribution is a cause for concern.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 2, 2026
On July 24, 2026, a new 12.5% Section 301 tariff took effect on most imports from Thailand into the United States. The tariff was imposed by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, following a finding that Thailand had failed to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on imports of goods produced with forced labor. The new tariff replaced the temporary 10% Section 122 surcharge that had applied since February 24, 2026, following the US Supreme Court’s invalidation of the prior tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The 12.5% tariff is not the only potential source of additional US duties on Thai-origin goods. Thailand is also subject to a separate Section 301 investigation concerning structural excess manufacturing capacity, which could result in additional duties. Unlike the Section 122 surcharge, which was capped at 15% and limited to 150 days, Section 301 provides a more flexible framework for imposing and maintaining trade measures. Section 301 actions are generally subject to a four-year termination rule but may continue following a review if continuation is requested. The new tariff therefore represents a potentially longer-term change in the tariff treatment of Thai-origin goods entering the US market. This article explains the legal and policy developments that led to the new tariff, how the Section 301 tariff differs from the tariff regimes that preceded it, Thailand’s response and ongoing negotiations with the United States, and the practical implications for businesses that manufacture, export, import, or distribute goods between Thailand and the United States. From IEEPA to Section 122 to Section 301 IEEPA Era (April 2025–February 2026) Beginning in April 2025, the US administration imposed sweeping tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), invoking national emergencies relating to trade
Read More
September 28, 2026
Thailand has expanded the mandatory use of the Electronic Government Procurement (e-GP) system to cover submissions of procurement appeals to all government agencies subject to the Public Procurement and Supplies Administrative Act B.E. 2560 (2017) (Government Procurement Act). The expansion, which was set out in an official circular dated September 16, 2026, from the Public Procurement and Supplies Administrative Ruling Committee, takes effect on October 1, 2026. Notable Changes Under the expanded framework, bidders challenging an e-bidding or selective-method procurement result must file their appeal exclusively through e-GP within seven working days of the result being announced by the Comptroller General’s Department. While the system accepts filings around the clock during that window, submissions on the final day must be fully completed by 16:30 according to the e-GP system clock—merely starting a draft or uploading materials before the cutoff does not count as a confirmed submission. Government agencies that disagree with an appeal, in whole or in part, will also report their findings and supporting documents to the Appeals Committee through e-GP using the prescribed Appeal Opinion Report, also within seven working days of receipt. Withdrawals of appeals must likewise follow prescribed e-GP steps that vary depending on whether the matter is still under agency review, has been forwarded to the Appeals Committee, or has already been resolved. Excluded Categories Certain categories of procurement are not subject to the new guidelines on filing appeals electronically. These include: Procurement of supplies for confidential government use. Procurement conducted by government agencies operating overseas where the bidder is a foreign legal entity with no legal representative in Thailand, or where the bidder is a non-Thai national. Consulting service procurement under chapter 7 of the Government Procurement Act Design or construction supervision procurement under chapter 8 of the Government Procurement These exclusions apply
Read More
September 15, 2026
The Myanmar Investment Commission (MIC) has issued a notification that gives investors with projects in Myanmar clearer guidance for securing approval and for changing, expanding, or exiting an approved project. Issued on August 19, 2026, MIC Notification No. 5/2026 replaces MIC Notification No. 26/2021 and sets procedures for state or regional investment committees to review, approve, and supervise investment projects, including project amendments, investment increases, land-use rights applications, compliance inspections, and suspension or termination of approved businesses. Endorsement Application Timeline and Deemed Acceptance In Myanmar, prospective investors seeking approval under the Myanmar Investment Law generally do so through an MIC permit or an MIC endorsement, depending on the nature of the investment. While certain large-scale investment projects require an MIC permit, projects that are not required to obtain an MIC permit may instead apply for an MIC endorsement. Investors seeking MIC endorsement for their planned projects typically submit their applications to the relevant state or regional investment committee. These committees are established under the Myanmar Investment Law and are authorized to approve investments of less than USD 5 million, subject to the project’s nature and location. MIC Notification No. 5/2026 specifies that upon receiving an endorsement application, the relevant investment committee office will check it for completeness and determine whether it can be considered at the state or regional level or must be referred to the MIC; if it must be forwarded to the MIC, this will be done within 10 working days. If an application is within its purview, the committee may reject the endorsement application within 15 working days of receipt; otherwise, the application is deemed accepted. If approved, the endorsement certificate will be issued within 10 working days of the approval decision, subject to applicable procedures. Endorsement Certificate Amendment The notification clarifies which amendments a state
Read More
September 9, 2026
Certain securities, derivatives, and treasury activities in Thailand were opened to foreign investors when Thailand’s Ministry of Commerce published two new ministerial regulations in the Government Gazette on August 28, 2026. The regulations significantly broaden the service activities that foreign-owned businesses may conduct without a license or certificate under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542, as amended (FBA). Securities and Derivatives Business Exemptions Prior to the issuance of these ministerial regulations, the exemptions covered (1) securities brokerage and derivatives brokerage with their only underlying assets being agricultural commodities, financial instruments, and securities; and (2) dealers, advisers, and fund managers conducting derivatives business under Thailand’s derivatives laws. The ministerial regulations provide broader exemptions. In addition to derivatives under the laws on derivatives as before, the following two major categories are provided: Derivatives whose underlying assets or variables fall outside the scope of Thailand’s laws on derivatives. This addresses a gap in the previous framework, which did not comprehensively exempt derivatives tied to nonregulated underlying assets or variables, such as certain commodities. Foreign brokers, advisors, and fund managers can now facilitate a broader range of hedging and risk management instruments without triggering FBA licensing requirements. Derivatives traded outside a derivatives exchange, or over the counter (OTC), whose payments are calculated by reference to foreign exchange rates or interest rates. This removes an FBA licensing barrier for foreign providers of widely used OTC hedging products, broadening the solutions available to importers and exporters managing currency exposure and to borrowers seeking greater certainty over financing costs. The ministerial regulations also exempt brokers and agents handling transactions involving either of these two derivatives categories. For securities businesses, the ministerial regulations add exemptions for margin loans used to purchase securities and for securities repurchase transactions. These additions clarify whether such activities qualify as exempt brokerage
Read More