You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 30, 2025

Vietnam’s New Foreign Indirect Investment Regulations Explained

Subscribe to Updates

On April 29, 2025, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Circular No. 03/2025/TT-NHNN (Circular 03), which provides detailed guidance on the opening and use of Vietnamese dong (VND) accounts by non-resident foreign investors engaging in indirect investment activities in Vietnam. Circular 03, which took effect on June 16, 2025, amends Circular No. 06/2019/TT-NHNN of the SBV on the management of foreign exchange for foreign direct investment activities in Vietnam (Circular 06) and replaces Circular No. 05/2014/TT-NHNN of the SBV guiding the opening and use of indirect investment capital accounts for implementation of foreign indirect investment activities in Vietnam (Circular 05).

Below are some of the key points of Circular 03.

Change of Account Name

Circular 03 renames “indirect investment capital account” to “indirect investment account” (IIA). This change aligns with the terminology used in other legislation, ensuring consistency across Vietnam’s legal framework governing foreign exchange and investment activities. Additionally, by removing the word “capital,” the new term better encompasses the full range of transactions that may be conducted through these accounts, such as share transfer and other forms of indirect investment-related activities. This helps prevent misinterpretation and facilitates compliance for foreign investors operating in Vietnam.

Account Types

Circular 03 clearly delineates account types and investor residency status as follows:

  • For non-resident foreign investors: The opening and use of investment accounts in VND is for carrying out transactions related to indirect investment activities.
  • For resident foreign investors: Credit and debit transactions are made through payment accounts in VND in accordance with relevant laws.

Additional Permitted Uses of IIAs

In addition to the cash inflows and outflows authorized under Circular 05, Circular 03 introduces more cash transactions that can be conducted via IIAs. These include:

  • Receiving interest and other legal income when conducting stock purchase transactions that do not require sufficient funds when placing orders by foreign institutional investors under the securities law.
  • Receiving funds for deposits or collateral related to stock purchases, as well as refunds of such deposits.
  • Receiving transfers from previously opened IIAs at other licensed banks.
  • Payment of losses and other expenses incurred from purchasing securities that do not require sufficient funds when placing orders by foreign institutional investors.
  • Payment of fees, charges, taxes, administrative penalties, and other expenses associated with foreign indirect investment activities in Vietnam.

These changes aim to improve transparency for foreign investors by clearly defining the purposes of money transfer orders, as well as enable authorized banks to verify, document, and process transactions more effectively.

Fixing Mismatch

Circular 03 updates Circular 06 to align with the foreign ownership thresholds provided in the current Law on Investment. Specifically, it changes references from “51% or more” to “more than 50%,” and from “below 51%” to “equal to or below 50%,” fixing a mismatch in the classification of foreign ownership thresholds.

Additionally, Circular 03 introduces a 12-month transitional period from its effective date (i.e., by June 16, 2026), allowing companies previously exempt under Circular 06 time to open a Direct Investment Capital Account (DICA). During this period, foreign investors may continue using their existing IIAs to carry out capital contributions and share acquisition transactions until the new DICA is officially opened.

Simplified IIA Opening Procedures

Under the prevailing law, documents issued in foreign countries must be legalized for use in Vietnam. However, Circular 03 removes this legalization requirement for documents submitted by foreign investors to open IIAs for investment in the Vietnamese securities market, allowing them to submit notarized and certified documents under Vietnamese law or foreign law within 12 months of the submission date of the IIA opening application.

The translation of foreign-language documents into Vietnamese is also no longer required, but is subject to mutual agreement between licensed banks and foreign investors. However, licensed banks must ensure the accuracy and compliance with Circular 03 of foreign-language documents, and provide certified or notarized translations if requested by the competent authorities.

These reforms aim to streamline the administrative process and shorten the timeline for the document preparation of foreign investors to open IIAs.

Opening Multiple IIAs

Under Circular 05, foreign investors were only allowed to open one IIA for their indirect investment activities. This could cause difficulties for foreign investors (especially investment funds or organizations managed by many fund management companies) to separately manage their investment portfolios.

To address this issue, Circular 03 permits multiple IIAs to be opened by foreign investors corresponding to the different issued securities trading codes, subject to regulatory conditions and applicable to the following subjects:

  • Foreign securities companies;
  • Foreign investment funds;
  • Foreign organizations managed by many foreign fund management companies; and
  • Investment organizations under foreign governments, or financial or investment organizations under an international financial organization of which Vietnam is a member.

These amendments will facilitate foreign investors in monitoring and managing their investment portfolios on the Vietnamese stock market.

Other Changes

Circular 03 adds the following new principles:

  • Opening a joint IIA by two or more foreign holders is not
  • All money transfer orders related to foreign indirect investment in Vietnam must specify the purpose of the transfer. This requirement enables commercial banks to verify, compare, and retain relevant documentation, thereby ensuring proper execution of the transaction in accordance with regulatory guidelines.

Circular 03 also removes the list of indirect investment forms in Vietnam (e.g., capital contribution and acquisition, bonds or other securities trading, etc.) that was specified in Circular 05.

Outlook

Circular 03 aims to significantly modernize Vietnam’s foreign exchange management, address evolving challenges in foreign indirect investment, and promote the country’s appeal to foreign investors. This is expected to be a catalyst for further reforms in Vietnam’s financial and investment sectors.

Related Professionals

Practices

Banking and Finance

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 5, 2026
Amid increasing financial globalization, Vietnam’s establishment of an International Financial Center (IFC) represents a strategic initiative to attract high-quality foreign investment and enhance the country’s position in the global financial system. In support of this objective, a Specialized Court was introduced under Resolution No. 222/2025/QH15 as a dedicated dispute resolution mechanism within the IFC framework. The Specialized Court at the IFC was subsequently operationalized by Law on the Specialized Court No. 150/2025/QH15, effective from January 1, 2026. Organizational Structure of the Specialized Court The Specialized Court at the IFC is a court within the system of the People’s Courts, organized and operating in accordance with the Law on the Specialized Court, and vested with jurisdiction to adjudicate and resolve cases at the IFC. The Specialized Court is located in Ho Chi Minh City and comprises (i) a Court of First Instance; (ii) a Court of Appeal, and (iii) a supporting apparatus. Jurisdiction of the Specialized Court The jurisdiction of the Specialized Court at the IFC is strictly defined based on both (i) the subject matter of the cases and (ii) the membership status of the parties involved. Specifically, the Specialized Court has jurisdiction over (except for cases involving public interests or the interests of the state) the following: Disputes arising from investment and business activities. Requests for recognition and enforcement in Vietnam of judgments and decisions of foreign courts and foreign arbitral awards. Requests related to dispute resolution by arbitration. Other disputes directly related to investment and business activities (to be specified by the Supreme People’s Court). Additionally, at least one party in the case must be a member of the IFC. The IFC’s membership status is established through registration, recognition as a member, or the grant of a license for establishment and operation within the IFC. In the
Read More
February 27, 2026
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has officially implemented a new regulatory framework supervising systemically important retail payment systems (SIRPS), effective February 21, 2026, with PromptPay being the first payment system designated as a SIRPS. Under this new set of regulations, the BOT may designate payment systems under the Payment Systems Act B.E. 2560 (2017) as SIRPSs based on quantitative and qualitative assessments. Once a system is designated as a SIRPS, the operator becomes subject to expanded supervisory obligations beyond the general requirements of the Payment Systems Act. Enhanced Supervisory Requirements SIRPS operators must comply with a heightened supervisory regime across three key areas, outlined below. 1. Governance SIRPS operators must maintain robust and transparent governance structures, including: Balanced board composition, with at least one-third of the board comprising independent directors who represent stakeholders in the system (such as payment service providers, consumers, and experts). Independent directors may serve for no more than two consecutive terms. Subcommittees to assist the board in overseeing compliance, policy implementation, and operational strategy. Clear separation between executives responsible for risk and information security and those overseeing day-to-day business operations. Risk Management and System SecuritySIRPS operators must implement comprehensive risk management frameworks, including: Clear service agreements between the SIRPS operator and its direct participants (payment service providers who connect directly to the SIRPS), defining roles and responsibilities among stakeholders. These agreements must include obligations for direct SIRPS participants to supervise any indirect participants they onboard to ensure compliance with service agreements and business rules. A business continuity plan covering both IT and non-IT aspects, with annual review. The SIRPS must target service availability comparable to international payment infrastructures, including the ability to recover operations within two hours of a disruption and to maintain scalable operational capacity. Tools and controls to monitor and manage material or
Read More
February 25, 2026
Tilleke & Gibbins has updated the Vietnam chapter in the newly released Licensing 2026 guide, published by Lexology Panoramic. The comparative guide provides companies and other interested readers with information on licensing law and practice in various countries around the world. Licensing 2026 provides detailed information on the following topics: Restrictions, laws and licensing arrangements Intellectual property issues: Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, contesting the validity of licensor’s IP rights, invalidity and expiry of IP rights, security interests, proceedings against third parties, sublicensing, jointly owned IP, first to file, scope of patent protection, trade secrets, copyright Software licensing: Perpetual licensing, legal requirements, user restrictions Royalties and payments, currency conversion, and taxes: Relevant legislation, restrictions, taxation of foreign licensors Competition law issues: Restrictions on trade, legal restrictions, and IP-related court rulings Indemnification, disclaimers, and damages: Prevalence and enforceability of indemnity provisions and contractual waivers of damages Termination: Right to terminate, impact of termination Bankruptcy: Impact of licensee or licensor bankruptcy Dispute resolution: Governing law, arbitration, enforceability, injunctive relief, contractual waivers The Vietnam chapter is available below as a PDF. Readers can gain 30 days of complementary access to the full Licensing 2026 guide and the rest of Lexology Panoramic’s varied offerings through this link.
Read More
February 19, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has overhauled its approach to related-party transactions (RPTs) by issuing new rules that simplify approval processes while expanding oversight. Capital Market Supervisory Board Notification No. TorJor. 46/2568 will replace the longstanding Notification No. TorJor. 21/2551, which has governed RPT compliance for over a decade. The new regulation takes effect on July 1, 2026. Any RPT matters approved by a company’s board of directors or approved for shareholders’ approval before that date remain subject to Notification No. TorJor. 21/2551. The new RPT rules will introduce significant changes that market participants should carefully consider. Consolidated Definitions Under the previous framework, key definitions relevant to RPT compliance were dispersed across multiple sources, including SEC notifications, Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) regulations, and provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act (before amendments). The new regulation consolidates these definitions into a single notification. Concepts such as “related party” and “connected person,” as well as relevant transaction categories, are now more systematically organized and written in greater detail. The SET has yet to issue corresponding regulations, which should include more detailed related disclosure requirements. Unified Threshold and Mandatory Board Approval The most significant change under the new regulation is the elimination of the multitiered approval framework based on transaction type. Instead of various categories, transactions are now classified as either (1) financial assistance provided to related persons, or (2) other RPTs in order to determine the level of corporate approvals and disclosures for each transaction size in these categories, but the concept remains the same. Under the previous regulation, RPTs were divided into small, medium, and large transactions, with differing approval requirements. The new regulation effectively merges the small and medium categories. As a result, all RPTs must now be approved by the board of directors as a baseline
Read More