You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 30, 2025

Vietnam’s New Foreign Indirect Investment Regulations Explained

Subscribe to Updates

On April 29, 2025, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Circular No. 03/2025/TT-NHNN (Circular 03), which provides detailed guidance on the opening and use of Vietnamese dong (VND) accounts by non-resident foreign investors engaging in indirect investment activities in Vietnam. Circular 03, which took effect on June 16, 2025, amends Circular No. 06/2019/TT-NHNN of the SBV on the management of foreign exchange for foreign direct investment activities in Vietnam (Circular 06) and replaces Circular No. 05/2014/TT-NHNN of the SBV guiding the opening and use of indirect investment capital accounts for implementation of foreign indirect investment activities in Vietnam (Circular 05).

Below are some of the key points of Circular 03.

Change of Account Name

Circular 03 renames “indirect investment capital account” to “indirect investment account” (IIA). This change aligns with the terminology used in other legislation, ensuring consistency across Vietnam’s legal framework governing foreign exchange and investment activities. Additionally, by removing the word “capital,” the new term better encompasses the full range of transactions that may be conducted through these accounts, such as share transfer and other forms of indirect investment-related activities. This helps prevent misinterpretation and facilitates compliance for foreign investors operating in Vietnam.

Account Types

Circular 03 clearly delineates account types and investor residency status as follows:

  • For non-resident foreign investors: The opening and use of investment accounts in VND is for carrying out transactions related to indirect investment activities.
  • For resident foreign investors: Credit and debit transactions are made through payment accounts in VND in accordance with relevant laws.

Additional Permitted Uses of IIAs

In addition to the cash inflows and outflows authorized under Circular 05, Circular 03 introduces more cash transactions that can be conducted via IIAs. These include:

  • Receiving interest and other legal income when conducting stock purchase transactions that do not require sufficient funds when placing orders by foreign institutional investors under the securities law.
  • Receiving funds for deposits or collateral related to stock purchases, as well as refunds of such deposits.
  • Receiving transfers from previously opened IIAs at other licensed banks.
  • Payment of losses and other expenses incurred from purchasing securities that do not require sufficient funds when placing orders by foreign institutional investors.
  • Payment of fees, charges, taxes, administrative penalties, and other expenses associated with foreign indirect investment activities in Vietnam.

These changes aim to improve transparency for foreign investors by clearly defining the purposes of money transfer orders, as well as enable authorized banks to verify, document, and process transactions more effectively.

Fixing Mismatch

Circular 03 updates Circular 06 to align with the foreign ownership thresholds provided in the current Law on Investment. Specifically, it changes references from “51% or more” to “more than 50%,” and from “below 51%” to “equal to or below 50%,” fixing a mismatch in the classification of foreign ownership thresholds.

Additionally, Circular 03 introduces a 12-month transitional period from its effective date (i.e., by June 16, 2026), allowing companies previously exempt under Circular 06 time to open a Direct Investment Capital Account (DICA). During this period, foreign investors may continue using their existing IIAs to carry out capital contributions and share acquisition transactions until the new DICA is officially opened.

Simplified IIA Opening Procedures

Under the prevailing law, documents issued in foreign countries must be legalized for use in Vietnam. However, Circular 03 removes this legalization requirement for documents submitted by foreign investors to open IIAs for investment in the Vietnamese securities market, allowing them to submit notarized and certified documents under Vietnamese law or foreign law within 12 months of the submission date of the IIA opening application.

The translation of foreign-language documents into Vietnamese is also no longer required, but is subject to mutual agreement between licensed banks and foreign investors. However, licensed banks must ensure the accuracy and compliance with Circular 03 of foreign-language documents, and provide certified or notarized translations if requested by the competent authorities.

These reforms aim to streamline the administrative process and shorten the timeline for the document preparation of foreign investors to open IIAs.

Opening Multiple IIAs

Under Circular 05, foreign investors were only allowed to open one IIA for their indirect investment activities. This could cause difficulties for foreign investors (especially investment funds or organizations managed by many fund management companies) to separately manage their investment portfolios.

To address this issue, Circular 03 permits multiple IIAs to be opened by foreign investors corresponding to the different issued securities trading codes, subject to regulatory conditions and applicable to the following subjects:

  • Foreign securities companies;
  • Foreign investment funds;
  • Foreign organizations managed by many foreign fund management companies; and
  • Investment organizations under foreign governments, or financial or investment organizations under an international financial organization of which Vietnam is a member.

These amendments will facilitate foreign investors in monitoring and managing their investment portfolios on the Vietnamese stock market.

Other Changes

Circular 03 adds the following new principles:

  • Opening a joint IIA by two or more foreign holders is not
  • All money transfer orders related to foreign indirect investment in Vietnam must specify the purpose of the transfer. This requirement enables commercial banks to verify, compare, and retain relevant documentation, thereby ensuring proper execution of the transaction in accordance with regulatory guidelines.

Circular 03 also removes the list of indirect investment forms in Vietnam (e.g., capital contribution and acquisition, bonds or other securities trading, etc.) that was specified in Circular 05.

Outlook

Circular 03 aims to significantly modernize Vietnam’s foreign exchange management, address evolving challenges in foreign indirect investment, and promote the country’s appeal to foreign investors. This is expected to be a catalyst for further reforms in Vietnam’s financial and investment sectors.

Related Professionals

Practices

Banking and Finance

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 19, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a new regulation on material transactions (MTs) to govern asset acquisitions and disposals by listed companies and their subsidiaries. The new notification on MT criteria (No. TorJor. 45/2568) from the Capital Market Supervisory Board replaces the long-standing notification (No. TorJor. 20/2551) that has governed such matters. The SEC has also introduced parallel amendments to the country’s related-party transaction rules. The new regulation will take effect on July 1, 2026. Any MT matters approved by a company’s board of directors for shareholders’ approval before that date remain subject to Notification No. TorJor. 20/2551. Following that date, the new MT rules will introduce several significant changes that market participants should carefully consider. Expanded Scope of Material Transactions One of the key changes under the new regulation is the expansion of the definition of MTs, which now expressly covers financial assistance and certain lease and business lease arrangements that are not in the ordinary course of business of the listed company or its subsidiaries. For financial assistance, this includes lending, granting credit, providing guarantees, or entering into any arrangement that increases the company’s financial obligations, particularly where the recipient is facing liquidity issues or unable to repay debts. Other forms of financial support also fall within scope. However, whether the provision of collateral for others qualifies as an MT remains somewhat unclear, since no disposal of assets occurs for the provider of collateral. This issue remains to be carefully considered. For lease-related transactions, the MT rules now specifically include the lease or hire-purchase of all or part of a business or assets operated by or belonging to a listed company or its subsidiaries. New Exemptions The new regulation introduces clearer exemptions for transactions between a listed company and its subsidiaries or among subsidiaries, which
Read More
February 10, 2026
Data center and cloud investments are forming a major focus of private-sector investment in Thailand, with tech giants like Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and TikTok, as well as numerous telecom and data center companies, committing significant outlays to data center and cloud development. The country’s Board of Investment (BOI) approved projects worth THB 1.87 trillion in 2025, and THB 746 billion of this was from planned data center investments—by far the largest amount from any single industry. Thailand’s swift rise as a regional data center hub is fueled by surging demand for cloud, AI, and digital services, as well as large-scale investments from global tech firms. The country’s strategic location, competitive power costs, robust fiber infrastructure, expanding IT talent, and supportive government policies—including BOI incentives and streamlined approvals—have made it an attractive destination for scalable and sustainable digital infrastructure investments. The BOI’s proactive approach in updating promoted categories and providing both tax and non-tax incentives further ensures Thailand’s continued growth in this sector. 2025 BOI Changes for Data Centers In the middle of 2025, the BOI responded to the remarkable trend by updating investment‑promotion categories across various sectors (e.g., machinery and electrical equipment, public utilities, digital and innovative industries) to accommodate growing investment in data‑center projects. Before the change, which was detailed in a notification that has applied to investment promotion applications submitted from July 1, 2025, onward, data‑center projects under BOI promotion were granted a single A1 incentive (an eight‑year corporate income‑tax exemption) and subject to one uniform set of conditions. The July 2025 notification restructured promotion for data centers into two categories based on power‑usage efficiency: high‑efficiency data centers and other data centers. Under these rules, qualified high‑efficiency data centers are eligible for an eight‑year corporate income tax (CIT) exemption, while for other data centers this exemption is
Read More
February 9, 2026
When unauthorized credit card transactions occur, who bears responsibility—the cardholder or the issuing bank? In Thailand, a landmark 2025 ruling by the country’s Supreme Court has clarified this question, establishing a stricter standard for banks in fraud disputes and significantly strengthening consumer protections. The case centered on disputed charges where a customer claimed their credit card had been used without authorization. The bank sued to recover the amount, and both the court of first instance and the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of the bank. However, the Supreme Court overruled their judgments and decided that the customer did not need to pay for the unauthorized transactions, placing liability squarely on the bank. This ruling was based on three key findings, which are outlined below. Finding 1: Insufficient Expert Testimony In this case, the bank bore the burden of proving matters related to the credit card system’s manufacture, design, security, and operation, as required under the Consumer Case Procedure Act B.E. 2551 (2008). To meet this requirement, the bank presented testimony from two employees in its credit card department regarding ’security measures and issuance procedures. However, the Supreme Court found these witnesses unqualified as experts, as they did not present technical or academic evidence and did not possess specialized expertise in credit card technology. As a result, their testimony failed to establish that the bank’s credit card technology was sufficiently secure against fraudulent misuse. Finding 2: Contradictory Terms and Conditions The bank’s own credit card terms and conditions included a provision acknowledging that despite the card’s EMV security standards, cardholders must still exercise caution to prevent unauthorized access. The Supreme Court interpreted this clause as an explicit admission that credit card systems remain vulnerable to hacking and fraud, even with high-level security measures in place. This acknowledgment undermined the
Read More
February 4, 2026
On November 18, 2025, Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance released for public consultation a draft decree on administrative sanctions in the field of crypto assets and crypto asset markets (the “Draft Decree”), intended to implement Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP dated September 9, 2025, on the pilot crypto asset market in Vietnam (“Resolution 05”). While Resolution 05 sets out who may participate and under what conditions, the Draft Decree addresses a more practical question for market participants, i.e., what happens if those conditions are not met. In doing so, the Draft Decree offers important insight into how Vietnamese regulators intend to supervise, discipline, and ultimately shape the crypto market during the pilot phase. Regulatory Scope and Overall Sanctions Architecture The Draft Decree applies to both domestic and foreign organizations and individuals engaging in crypto-related activities in Vietnam’s market. Covered entities include: (i) crypto asset issuers; (ii) crypto asset service providers, including trading platforms and market operators; (iii) Vietnamese and foreign investors participating in the pilot market; and (iv) other organizations involved in the offering, issuance, or provision of crypto-related services in Vietnam. The breadth of this scope is deliberate. It appears to reflect a regulatory view that cross-border structures, offshore platforms, and indirect participation may not necessarily insulate market actors from compliance obligations once they operate within the pilot framework. For the crypto industry, this may mark a shift from regulatory ambiguity toward a more explicit articulation of jurisdictional reach. At first glance, the Draft Decree’s monetary penalties appear restrained. The maximum fine per administrative violation is capped at VND 200 million (approx. USD 7,700) for organizations and VND 100 million (approx. USD 3,800) for individuals. However, focusing solely on fine levels risks missing the point. The Draft Decree also places great regulatory weight on supplementary sanctions and corrective measures, including: (i)
Read More