You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 30, 2025

Vietnam’s New Foreign Indirect Investment Regulations Explained

On April 29, 2025, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Circular No. 03/2025/TT-NHNN (Circular 03), which provides detailed guidance on the opening and use of Vietnamese dong (VND) accounts by non-resident foreign investors engaging in indirect investment activities in Vietnam. Circular 03, which took effect on June 16, 2025, amends Circular No. 06/2019/TT-NHNN of the SBV on the management of foreign exchange for foreign direct investment activities in Vietnam (Circular 06) and replaces Circular No. 05/2014/TT-NHNN of the SBV guiding the opening and use of indirect investment capital accounts for implementation of foreign indirect investment activities in Vietnam (Circular 05).

Below are some of the key points of Circular 03.

Change of Account Name

Circular 03 renames “indirect investment capital account” to “indirect investment account” (IIA). This change aligns with the terminology used in other legislation, ensuring consistency across Vietnam’s legal framework governing foreign exchange and investment activities. Additionally, by removing the word “capital,” the new term better encompasses the full range of transactions that may be conducted through these accounts, such as share transfer and other forms of indirect investment-related activities. This helps prevent misinterpretation and facilitates compliance for foreign investors operating in Vietnam.

Account Types

Circular 03 clearly delineates account types and investor residency status as follows:

  • For non-resident foreign investors: The opening and use of investment accounts in VND is for carrying out transactions related to indirect investment activities.
  • For resident foreign investors: Credit and debit transactions are made through payment accounts in VND in accordance with relevant laws.

Additional Permitted Uses of IIAs

In addition to the cash inflows and outflows authorized under Circular 05, Circular 03 introduces more cash transactions that can be conducted via IIAs. These include:

  • Receiving interest and other legal income when conducting stock purchase transactions that do not require sufficient funds when placing orders by foreign institutional investors under the securities law.
  • Receiving funds for deposits or collateral related to stock purchases, as well as refunds of such deposits.
  • Receiving transfers from previously opened IIAs at other licensed banks.
  • Payment of losses and other expenses incurred from purchasing securities that do not require sufficient funds when placing orders by foreign institutional investors.
  • Payment of fees, charges, taxes, administrative penalties, and other expenses associated with foreign indirect investment activities in Vietnam.

These changes aim to improve transparency for foreign investors by clearly defining the purposes of money transfer orders, as well as enable authorized banks to verify, document, and process transactions more effectively.

Fixing Mismatch

Circular 03 updates Circular 06 to align with the foreign ownership thresholds provided in the current Law on Investment. Specifically, it changes references from “51% or more” to “more than 50%,” and from “below 51%” to “equal to or below 50%,” fixing a mismatch in the classification of foreign ownership thresholds.

Additionally, Circular 03 introduces a 12-month transitional period from its effective date (i.e., by June 16, 2026), allowing companies previously exempt under Circular 06 time to open a Direct Investment Capital Account (DICA). During this period, foreign investors may continue using their existing IIAs to carry out capital contributions and share acquisition transactions until the new DICA is officially opened.

Simplified IIA Opening Procedures

Under the prevailing law, documents issued in foreign countries must be legalized for use in Vietnam. However, Circular 03 removes this legalization requirement for documents submitted by foreign investors to open IIAs for investment in the Vietnamese securities market, allowing them to submit notarized and certified documents under Vietnamese law or foreign law within 12 months of the submission date of the IIA opening application.

The translation of foreign-language documents into Vietnamese is also no longer required, but is subject to mutual agreement between licensed banks and foreign investors. However, licensed banks must ensure the accuracy and compliance with Circular 03 of foreign-language documents, and provide certified or notarized translations if requested by the competent authorities.

These reforms aim to streamline the administrative process and shorten the timeline for the document preparation of foreign investors to open IIAs.

Opening Multiple IIAs

Under Circular 05, foreign investors were only allowed to open one IIA for their indirect investment activities. This could cause difficulties for foreign investors (especially investment funds or organizations managed by many fund management companies) to separately manage their investment portfolios.

To address this issue, Circular 03 permits multiple IIAs to be opened by foreign investors corresponding to the different issued securities trading codes, subject to regulatory conditions and applicable to the following subjects:

  • Foreign securities companies;
  • Foreign investment funds;
  • Foreign organizations managed by many foreign fund management companies; and
  • Investment organizations under foreign governments, or financial or investment organizations under an international financial organization of which Vietnam is a member.

These amendments will facilitate foreign investors in monitoring and managing their investment portfolios on the Vietnamese stock market.

Other Changes

Circular 03 adds the following new principles:

  • Opening a joint IIA by two or more foreign holders is not
  • All money transfer orders related to foreign indirect investment in Vietnam must specify the purpose of the transfer. This requirement enables commercial banks to verify, compare, and retain relevant documentation, thereby ensuring proper execution of the transaction in accordance with regulatory guidelines.

Circular 03 also removes the list of indirect investment forms in Vietnam (e.g., capital contribution and acquisition, bonds or other securities trading, etc.) that was specified in Circular 05.

Outlook

Circular 03 aims to significantly modernize Vietnam’s foreign exchange management, address evolving challenges in foreign indirect investment, and promote the country’s appeal to foreign investors. This is expected to be a catalyst for further reforms in Vietnam’s financial and investment sectors.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

November 7, 2025
Thailand and the United States signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) titled “Cooperation to Diversify Global Critical Minerals Supply Chains and Promote Investments” on October 26, 2025, signaling a new strategic alignment aimed at developing Thailand’s mineral sector, particularly in rare earth elements (REEs). The MOU has implications for investments in technology, manufacturing, and other related sectors. This update outlines the key provisions of the MOU and the potential opportunities and legal navigating points for businesses. Objectives The primary driver of this agreement is the US initiative to diversify global supply chains for critical minerals and reduce reliance on current market leaders, particularly China. For Thailand, it represents a major opportunity to attract high-tech investment and develop its downstream processing industries. The cooperation is set to focus on five main areas: Technical knowledge: Exchange of technical expertise and international best practices to strengthen Thailand’s mining and processing sector. Joint cooperation: Establishing workshops, seminars, and scientific collaboration to boost innovation. Regulatory practice: Promoting good governance and streamlining regulatory and licensing procedures. Information sharing: Sharing data on potential projects and global market prices. Full-value chain: The MOU covers the entire mineral lifecycle, from exploration and extraction to processing, refining, and recycling. “First Opportunity to Invest” Clause The most debated provision within the MOU states that “participants expect to have the first opportunity to invest . . . in critical minerals assets that may be sold in Thailand.” Business implications: This clause is widely interpreted as granting US companies a first look or preferential access to investment opportunities in Thailand’s critical minerals sector. This could be a significant advantage for US-based or affiliated companies in mining, technology, and energy seeking to secure a foothold in a developing REE supply chain. Thai government position: Thai officials, including the prime minister, have publicly clarified
October 31, 2025
On September 29, 2025, Thailand’s Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC Office) published its Regulations on the Review and Certification of Binding Corporate Rules B.E. 2568 (2025) (the Regulations). The Regulations provide clarity on the PDPC Office’s approach to reviewing and certifying binding corporate rules (BCRs) under Section 29 of the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA), and aim to facilitate international data transfers within a group of undertakings or enterprises (a “corporate group”). In conjunction with this development, the PDPC Office also approved BCRs for two companies operating in Thailand on September 30, 2025. This milestone represents the first concrete progress since the PDPC’s Notification on Criteria for the Protection of Personal Data Sent or Transferred to a Foreign Country pursuant to Section 29 of the PDPA B.E. 2566 (2023) came into effect in March 2024. Some key features of the Regulations are set out below. Categorization of BCRs BCRs are classified into two types: (1) BCRs for Controllers (BCR-C) and (2) BCRs for Processors (BCR-P). The category must be clearly specified when submitting the BCRs to the PDPC Office. Documentation Requirement The applicant must prepare and submit the application (a standard template may be provided by the PDPC Office in the future) along with supporting documents for review and certification in the Thai language. If the supporting documents are in a foreign language, a certified Thai translation should be provided. The translation must be notarized by a notary public or qualified person. Supporting documents may include, among others, a binding instrument such as an intra-group agreement, or a list of entities subject to the BCRs. Expedited Process Requirement Organizations with existing BCR approvals under the EU or UK GDPR, or from countries announced by the PDPC under Section 28, may apply through an
October 30, 2025
Recent events at a Thai listed company, where a proposal to remove the director was not successful, amid claims that a competitor was attempting to gain control of the company, illustrate how disputes over corporate control can unfold differently at the board level and shareholder level. At the board level, removing directors of a listed company mid-term to gain corporate control is not an easy task under Thai law, as it requires a higher threshold than appointing a new director, which typically only requires a simple majority vote in a listed company. At the shareholder level, Thailand’s tender offer and competition regimes add complexity where different shareholder groups act in concert to remove opposing board representatives or otherwise influence control. In this article, we will explore why the attempted removal of a director may fail, and how the tender offer regime may apply. Key Issues at a Glance Shareholder groups may seek to convene meetings to propose changes to board composition or company authority. Such proposals can be delayed or complicated by regulatory requirements and the need for additional disclosures. Regulatory authorities and minority shareholders may raise concerns when major shareholders coordinate to influence board control, especially if such actions could trigger tender offer or merger control obligations. Companies often respond by seeking further information on shareholder relationships and potential conflicts before proceeding. Why the Director Removal Failed Under Section 76 of the Public Limited Companies Act B.E. 2535 (as amended), the early removal of a director requires two conditions to be satisfied at the same meeting of shareholders: Headcount test: At least 75% of shareholders attending and entitled to vote must vote in favor. If multiple shareholders appoint the same person as proxy, each proxy is counted as a separate head for the purpose of the headcount test,
October 24, 2025
On October 22, 2025, the Thai government posted a directive not to grant gambling licenses for gambling involving poker nationwide to crack down on illegal gambling activities. The directive was issued by Thailand’s Ministry of Interior to align with government policies to prevent the legalization of all types of gambling businesses, including poker as a sporting activity. This will result in the revocation of poker activities as sport and institute a strict ban on such activities nationwide. Businesses should note the new government’s strict approach toward gambling activities as the legal situation regarding gambling in the country continues to draw close attention.