You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 30, 2025

Vietnam’s New Foreign Indirect Investment Regulations Explained

Subscribe to Updates

On April 29, 2025, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Circular No. 03/2025/TT-NHNN (Circular 03), which provides detailed guidance on the opening and use of Vietnamese dong (VND) accounts by non-resident foreign investors engaging in indirect investment activities in Vietnam. Circular 03, which took effect on June 16, 2025, amends Circular No. 06/2019/TT-NHNN of the SBV on the management of foreign exchange for foreign direct investment activities in Vietnam (Circular 06) and replaces Circular No. 05/2014/TT-NHNN of the SBV guiding the opening and use of indirect investment capital accounts for implementation of foreign indirect investment activities in Vietnam (Circular 05).

Below are some of the key points of Circular 03.

Change of Account Name

Circular 03 renames “indirect investment capital account” to “indirect investment account” (IIA). This change aligns with the terminology used in other legislation, ensuring consistency across Vietnam’s legal framework governing foreign exchange and investment activities. Additionally, by removing the word “capital,” the new term better encompasses the full range of transactions that may be conducted through these accounts, such as share transfer and other forms of indirect investment-related activities. This helps prevent misinterpretation and facilitates compliance for foreign investors operating in Vietnam.

Account Types

Circular 03 clearly delineates account types and investor residency status as follows:

  • For non-resident foreign investors: The opening and use of investment accounts in VND is for carrying out transactions related to indirect investment activities.
  • For resident foreign investors: Credit and debit transactions are made through payment accounts in VND in accordance with relevant laws.

Additional Permitted Uses of IIAs

In addition to the cash inflows and outflows authorized under Circular 05, Circular 03 introduces more cash transactions that can be conducted via IIAs. These include:

  • Receiving interest and other legal income when conducting stock purchase transactions that do not require sufficient funds when placing orders by foreign institutional investors under the securities law.
  • Receiving funds for deposits or collateral related to stock purchases, as well as refunds of such deposits.
  • Receiving transfers from previously opened IIAs at other licensed banks.
  • Payment of losses and other expenses incurred from purchasing securities that do not require sufficient funds when placing orders by foreign institutional investors.
  • Payment of fees, charges, taxes, administrative penalties, and other expenses associated with foreign indirect investment activities in Vietnam.

These changes aim to improve transparency for foreign investors by clearly defining the purposes of money transfer orders, as well as enable authorized banks to verify, document, and process transactions more effectively.

Fixing Mismatch

Circular 03 updates Circular 06 to align with the foreign ownership thresholds provided in the current Law on Investment. Specifically, it changes references from “51% or more” to “more than 50%,” and from “below 51%” to “equal to or below 50%,” fixing a mismatch in the classification of foreign ownership thresholds.

Additionally, Circular 03 introduces a 12-month transitional period from its effective date (i.e., by June 16, 2026), allowing companies previously exempt under Circular 06 time to open a Direct Investment Capital Account (DICA). During this period, foreign investors may continue using their existing IIAs to carry out capital contributions and share acquisition transactions until the new DICA is officially opened.

Simplified IIA Opening Procedures

Under the prevailing law, documents issued in foreign countries must be legalized for use in Vietnam. However, Circular 03 removes this legalization requirement for documents submitted by foreign investors to open IIAs for investment in the Vietnamese securities market, allowing them to submit notarized and certified documents under Vietnamese law or foreign law within 12 months of the submission date of the IIA opening application.

The translation of foreign-language documents into Vietnamese is also no longer required, but is subject to mutual agreement between licensed banks and foreign investors. However, licensed banks must ensure the accuracy and compliance with Circular 03 of foreign-language documents, and provide certified or notarized translations if requested by the competent authorities.

These reforms aim to streamline the administrative process and shorten the timeline for the document preparation of foreign investors to open IIAs.

Opening Multiple IIAs

Under Circular 05, foreign investors were only allowed to open one IIA for their indirect investment activities. This could cause difficulties for foreign investors (especially investment funds or organizations managed by many fund management companies) to separately manage their investment portfolios.

To address this issue, Circular 03 permits multiple IIAs to be opened by foreign investors corresponding to the different issued securities trading codes, subject to regulatory conditions and applicable to the following subjects:

  • Foreign securities companies;
  • Foreign investment funds;
  • Foreign organizations managed by many foreign fund management companies; and
  • Investment organizations under foreign governments, or financial or investment organizations under an international financial organization of which Vietnam is a member.

These amendments will facilitate foreign investors in monitoring and managing their investment portfolios on the Vietnamese stock market.

Other Changes

Circular 03 adds the following new principles:

  • Opening a joint IIA by two or more foreign holders is not
  • All money transfer orders related to foreign indirect investment in Vietnam must specify the purpose of the transfer. This requirement enables commercial banks to verify, compare, and retain relevant documentation, thereby ensuring proper execution of the transaction in accordance with regulatory guidelines.

Circular 03 also removes the list of indirect investment forms in Vietnam (e.g., capital contribution and acquisition, bonds or other securities trading, etc.) that was specified in Circular 05.

Outlook

Circular 03 aims to significantly modernize Vietnam’s foreign exchange management, address evolving challenges in foreign indirect investment, and promote the country’s appeal to foreign investors. This is expected to be a catalyst for further reforms in Vietnam’s financial and investment sectors.

Related Professionals

Practices

Banking and Finance

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 1, 2025
In September 2025, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused a company listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), including its current and former directors, of concealing material information in connection with its filing registration and draft prospectus. This recent enforcement action demonstrates the serious consequences of making false statements or appearing to conceal material information in IPO filings and ongoing disclosures. In addition to being subject to criminal penalties, such actions can impact the eligibility of directors and executives to serve and may cause lasting reputational damage. Key Legal Risks The Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (as amended) imposes strict liability for making false statements or concealing material information in IPO registration statements and draft prospectuses. In such cases, investors can claim for damages, and there are also criminal penalties, including imprisonment for up to five years and substantial fines, may apply to the company, its directors, and responsible officers. However, misstatements or omissions in IPO filings do not, by themselves, disqualify directors or executives from holding office, whether arising from an SEC accusation or even a final court judgment. In contrast, for ongoing disclosures after listing, such as financial statements, annual reports, and meeting notices, false or misleading statements or concealment of material information can result in not only criminal liability but also immediate disqualification of directors and executives. If the SEC accuses a listed company or its directors or executives of such misstatements or omissions, those directors or executives are immediately disqualified from their positions, even before a final court judgment. Director and Executive Qualifications Directors and executives must meet the SEC’s specified standards of trustworthiness, as set out in the relevant rules. The SEC clearly defines characteristics that are considered to demonstrate a lack of trustworthiness. For ongoing disclosures, being involved in
Read More
September 30, 2025
Vietnam’s higher education system is at a pivotal stage of reform, with the government taking decisive steps to strengthen its policy and regulatory framework. In response to obstacles encountered during the implementation of the Law on Higher Education, issued in 2012 and amended in 2018, the third draft of the amended Law on Higher Education (Draft Law) is scheduled for submission to the National Assembly in October 2025. The Draft Law reflects the state’s commitment to aligning the education sector with international standards while addressing persistent structural challenges. The Draft Law emphasizes clarifying institutional mandates, enhancing accountability, and modernizing governance models to enable higher education institutions to operate with greater autonomy and efficiency. Against this backdrop, we outline below several notable provisions of the third draft and their potential implications for higher education institutions (HEIs) in Vietnam. Applicable Entities In addition to HEIs as defined and covered under existing legislation, the Draft Law extends its scope of applicable entities. The current Law on Higher Education does not regulate training institutions under state agencies, the armed forces, or political and social organizations, nor does it provide specific provisions for institutions offering only postgraduate education. To address this, the Draft Law introduces the term “institutions with higher education activities,” expanding its scope to include: (a) academies and research institutes established by the prime minister, mandated to provide doctoral-level training; (b) educational institutions affiliated with state agencies, political organizations, socio-political organizations, and the people’s armed forces, authorized to offer higher education programs in their specialized fields; and (c) institutions established pursuant to international treaties or by decision of the prime minister, with authorization to deliver certain levels of higher education. The inclusion of “institutions with higher education activities” represents a significant development both legally and institutionally. In an increasingly diversified higher education
Read More
September 29, 2025
In September 2019, the government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 75/2019/ND-CP on Administrative Sanctions in the Field of Competition (Decree 75) to address the urgent need for clear sanctioning mechanisms following the implementation of the new Law on Competition in July 2019. However, after five years of enforcement, various gaps and inconsistencies have been exposed that hinder its application. These shortcomings have reduced the deterrent effect of the sanctioning regime, and created legal uncertainty for market participants. A recent case involving Duc Giang – Lao Cai Chemicals’ acquisition of another chemical company—one of the first cases of economic concentration violation to be sanctioned by the National Competition Commission (NCC) since the Law on Competition took effect—highlights the practical difficulties under Vietnam’s competition law enforcement regime. In this case, although the transaction exceeded the statutory notification thresholds of economic concentration set out in the law, the parties failed to submit the required notification. This violation resulted in the NCC imposing aggregate fines of VND 1,423,982,880 (approximately USD 54,770) on the companies in September 2024. On appeal, Duc Giang – Lao Cai Chemicals argued that the chairman of the NCC was legally entitled to issue a warning as the key punishment instead of a monetary penalty. However, the chairman rejected the appeal, citing Article 14 of Decree 75, under which the specific penalty and level for “failure to notify economic concentration” is a fine, not a warning. While the chairman of the NCC is generally empowered to impose penalties, a warning cannot be applied if the specific regulation for a particular violation does not provide for it as a sanction. This example shows the inadequacy and inconsistency of the regulations on penalties for violations of competition law, and underscores the need for an amendment of Decree 75 to resolve such conflicts
Read More
September 26, 2025
As Vietnam accelerates its digital transformation, data centers have emerged as critical infrastructure supporting the shift toward a digital government, digital economy, and digital society. For businesses targeting Vietnam’s rapidly growing data center market, a clear understanding of the evolving regulatory landscape, compliance obligations, and government incentives is key to successful market entry and operation. This article provides a strategic overview of investment opportunities and key compliance requirements in Vietnam’s dynamic data center sector. Investment Incentives to Boost Data Center Growth Since July 1, 2024, organizations and individuals across all economic sectors have been encouraged to invest in and contribute to the development of data centers. By law, there are no restrictions on shareholding ratios, capital contributions, or foreign investor participation in data center and cloud computing services under business cooperation contracts. Currently, investment in AI data centers is classified as a specially incentivized industry, qualifying for preferential treatments and incentives in terms of investment, taxation, land use, and other related areas. Large-scale data centers, together with AI and cloud computing, are currently considered as strategic technologies and products for which Vietnam offers significant fiscal, tax, and land incentives to promote investment. Additionally, these large-scale projects may receive direct financial support from local development budgets for facility construction, technical infrastructure, and equipment procurement, subject to state budget provisions and applicable laws. AI data center construction projects also enjoy preferential treatment under customs regulations. Regulatory Approvals for Providing Data Center Services The 2023 Telecom Law and its guiding documents marked a significant milestone by classifying data center services as value-added telecom services. Under the law, a data center service is defined as a telecom service that enables users to process, store, and retrieve information via a telecom network through the leasing of part or all of a data center. A
Read More