You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 24, 2024

Vietnam’s Data Revolution: Law on Data

Subscribe to Updates

On November 30, 2024, the Data Law was officially promulgated after an accelerated preparation process that began in February 2024. The Data Law is set to take effect on July 1, 2025. Having extraterritorial effect, the Data Law will impact both local and foreign individuals and enterprises.

As noted in our previous legal update, the Data Law governs digital data, the National Data Center, the National General Database, digital data products and services, digital data management, and the rights, obligations, and responsibilities of agencies, organizations, and individuals related to digital data activities.

This legal update provides an overview of the Data Law, with a deep focus on the key provisions likely to impact businesses operating or offering services in Vietnam.

New Data Definition and Classification

The Data Law broadly defines “digital data” as data about objects, phenomena, and events, which can include one or a combination of audio, images, numbers, text, or symbols represented in digital format (hereinafter referred to as “data”). This definition is very broad and potentially covers any information recorded or represented in digital forms, including personal and nonpersonal data (such as business data, transactional data, trade secrets, etc.). Data is further categorized into different types that can be used by public bodies. However, the rights and obligations associated with each type of data are not clearly addressed. The data classification criteria include:

  • The nature of data sharing (shared data, private data, open data);
  • The importance of data (core data, important data, and other data);
  • Any other criteria to meet the requirements of data administration, processing, and protection, as determined by the data owner.

While the Data Law requires private organizations to categorize data based on its level of importance, it still grants these organizations the right to categorize data based on other criteria.

Cross-Border Data Transfers and Processing

Under the Data Law, agencies, organizations, and individuals can freely transfer and process offshore data in Vietnam, with the state protecting their lawful rights and interests.

For core and important data, the law regulates cases deemed as cross-border data transfers, including the transfer of data to foreign organizations and individuals, which was not mentioned in the Personal Data Protection Decree or the publicized version of the draft Personal Data Protection Law. Currently, the Data Law imposes no specific restrictions on cross-border data transfers, but these activities must comply with national defense, security, public interests, and international treaties. Further guidance is expected in a future government decree, which enterprises will also need to keep an eye on.

Under the Data Law, “important data” refers to data that may impact national defense, security, foreign affairs, macroeconomics, social stability, health, and public safety, while “core data” means important data that directly affects national defense, security, foreign affairs, macroeconomics, social stability, health, and public safety. More detailed lists of important data and core data will be issued by the prime minister.

National Comprehensive Database

The government will establish and manage a National Comprehensive Database, consolidating open, shared, and private data, as well as other data from various sources, including state and party agencies. This database will include data from administrative procedures and public services, though it is unclear whether it will include data submitted by private organizations during administrative filing processes. Once the National Comprehensive Database is created, it is possible that various authorities may have easy access to the data, which will strongly facilitate their supervision and enforcement activities.

Organizations and individuals can voluntarily contribute data, and in certain cases, may be requested to do so, as further explained below.

Access Rights of Competent Agencies

The Data Law sets out the conditions under which state agencies can access data from organizations and individuals. These access rights have been limited and are more restricted than the typical access rights that the government tends to reserve for itself. Under the Data Law, the request to access can be made under four special cases: (1) in response to a state of emergency; (2) upon a threat to national security, but not to the extent of declaring a state of emergency; (3) upon disasters; or (4) for the prevention of riots or terrorism. Consent from relevant data subjects is not required for data sharing in this case. If the data is encrypted, the state agencies also have the right to decrypt data for their access and usage.

The Data Law also prescribes certain responsibilities for state agencies when receiving data, which is a welcome development. Further regulations on the authorities access rights and the data provision obligations of private organizations and individuals are expected to be encompassed in the decree guiding this Data Law.

These new developments and limitations to access powers were among the requests the business community made following the first draft Data Law (circulated in March 2024), aiming to safeguard the attractiveness of the Vietnamese market and protect proprietary data.

New Data-Related Products and Services

Recognizing new data-related products and services, the Data Law opens the market to new opportunities for local players. However, the Data Law has yet to provide any definition of “data-related products and services” in general, and these products and services could be broadly interpreted to encompass any services related to data processing.

The Data Law clearly indicates that its provisions apply to data intermediary products and services, data analysis and aggregation, and data platforms. Accordingly, depending on the specific nature of the products or services, they may be subject to registration or licensing requirements as stipulated under the Data Law and its forthcoming guiding decree.

Applicability of the Data Law

To address the risk of contradiction or conflict in the patchwork of regulations related to data, the Data Law stipulates that where other laws issued before its effective date (July 1, 2025) contain regulations on key data-related activities (such as building, developing, protecting, managing, processing, and using data) that do not contradict the principles of the Data Law, the provisions of those laws shall still apply. The Data Law is silent on the consequences if the provisions of existing laws contradict the Data Law.

Furthermore, the Data Law requires new laws issued after its effective date to clarify how they comply with or deviate from the Data Law, ensuring a clear understanding of implementation requirements.

Looking Ahead

The Data Law explicitly recognizes that data is a resource that state policies will mobilize and develop into assets. This has the potential to pave the way for many data-related businesses in the future and offers promising opportunities for tech companies with a strong focus on data.

The Data Law recognizes the importance of data in the digital age and highlights Vietnam’s commitment to fostering a secure and innovative data environment. However, the scope and applicability of the Data Law, especially those overlapping with other existing laws or regulations, are still ambiguous, as discussed above. Thus, it remains to be seen how legislators will address these issues in the future.

Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 23, 2026
On May 26, 2026, Thailand’s Department of Land Transport (DLT) published for public consultation a draft amendment to the Ministerial Regulation on Electronic Ride-Hailing Vehicles that would, for the first time, allow juristic persons (legal entities) to register vehicles as electronic ride-hailing cars—a right that currently belongs exclusively to natural persons, limited to one person per one vehicle. If finalized in its current form, the regulation would significantly expand the supply side of Thailand’s ride-hailing market by enabling corporate fleet operators to enter the space. The public comment period is open through June 24, 2026. Key Principles Under the Draft Regulation Under the proposed amendment, juristic persons that maintain a fleet of at least 50 vehicles will be permitted to register vehicles as electronic ride-hailing cars. This represents a fundamental shift from the current framework, which restricts registration to individual natural persons on a one-person-one-car basis. Vehicle Specifications Corporate-owned ride-hailing vehicles must meet the following requirements: Be brand new from the factory, or no more than two years old from first registration with no more than 20,000 km of use. Not be a vehicle that has been reconstructed or repaired after involvement in a serious accident affecting safety—a standard consistent with public transport vehicles (RorYor. 6). Be classified as small, medium, or large in accordance with ministerial or director-general specifications. The vehicles may be equipped with safety devices such as interior or exterior cameras (video/photo recording) and can retain the original factory color of the vehicle body (no mandatory color change is required). License Plates Corporate ride-hailing vehicles will use license plates of the same size, characteristics, and color as those for private passenger vehicles not exceeding seven seats (RorYor. 1), rather than public transport plates. Potential Impact The government has stated that the regulation is intended to: Promote
Read More
June 23, 2026
On May 14, 2026, Thailand published a ministerial regulation in the Government Gazette to prescribe measures for prevention and suppression of technology crimes. The regulation creates a comprehensive procedural framework for returning money and digital assets to victims of technology crimes. It will take effect 90 days after publication (in mid-August 2026), giving affected entities a limited window to prepare. Mandatory Reporting Obligations for Financial Institutions When a deposit account, e-money account, or digital asset wallet is frozen in connection with a technology crime, the relevant financial institution or business operator must report transaction data to the Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) via AMLO’s designated electronic system. Required data elements include account numbers (sender and receiver), names, identification or passport numbers, legal entity registration numbers, phone numbers, remaining balance, damage amount, transaction reference numbers, and the bank case ID. Institutions that already share data through the information-sharing system under the emergency decree are deemed to have satisfied this reporting obligation, creating an incentive for platform participation. When the Royal Thai Police or the Department of Special Investigation seize or freeze assets related to technology crimes, they must provide AMLO with investigation reports, complaint evidence, money-trail data, and account statements. Notification and Claims Process Once the AMLO secretary-general approves verified reports of a technology crime, the account information of persons connected to the crime will be published in the Government Gazette, triggering a 90-day window for victims to file claims and for related persons to file objections. Officers will also publish details on AMLO’s electronic media and send registered mail to identified victims, which will be deemed received after 7 days domestically or 15 days internationally. Victims have 90 days from the date the crime is published in the Government Gazette to file claims through AMLO’s electronic system. Claims must include
Read More
June 15, 2026
The surge in AI development has led to a desperate demand for large, high-quality training data. However, real-world data can be expensive to collect, difficult to access, and often subject to strict privacy and regulatory constraints. Synthetic data, which consists of artificially generated records that replicate the statistical properties of real-world data without reproducing specific individuals’ information, provides an appealing solution by generating artificial datasets at scale without relying on identifiable personal information. It combines speed, cost efficiency, and regulatory compliance, making it a sensible alternative for organizations seeking to reduce risks while maintaining data utility. When properly anonymized, synthetic datasets may fall outside the scope of laws such as the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA), reducing compliance burdens while still supporting high-quality model training. However, relying on synthetic data without rigorous legal due diligence could be a strategic mistake. It replaces one set of known risks (scraping, direct privacy liability) with a new set of complex liabilities. The narrative that synthetic data is a “silver bullet” for privacy and IP compliance is dangerous and could be misleading. While synthetic data addresses data scarcity, it also introduces new legal uncertainties. Legal counsel should anticipate downstream risks arising from compromised data sources. Models trained on unlawfully obtained data may need to be decommissioned, even if their outputs appear lawful. What is synthetic data? Synthetic data refers to artificially generated information created using AI techniques such as deep learning and generative models. Instead of copying real records, it reproduces the statistical patterns and relationships found in the original dataset. Synthetic data generally falls into three categories: Fully synthetic data – Entirely new data points generated from learned patterns. The model studies the structure of the original data and produces records that resemble real-world
Read More
June 11, 2026
Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) has released a revised draft Electronic Transactions Act (ETA) for public hearing from May 12, 2026, to June 15, 2026. This is not merely an amendment to certain provisions of the current ETA, but a comprehensive redrafting of the entire act. The revised draft ETA introduces several significant changes from the current framework, with practical implications for businesses operating in Thailand. Unified Coverage of Public and Private Sectors The current law segregates government transactions into a separate chapter with distinct rules. The draft ETA eliminates this division, defining “transaction” to encompass civil and commercial juristic acts as well as administrative procedures, administrative contracts, and other acts of government agencies. Enhanced E-Signature Definition The definition of “electronic signature” is broadened to expressly include biometric data and refocused on identifying the signatory and demonstrating intent regarding the content of the electronic data. Shift in Burden of Proof When a party challenges the reliability of electronic data created using a “trusted electronic method” or a method prescribed by the ETDA, the burden of proof and the cost of proving unreliability shifts to the challenger. Introduction of New Digital Method Concepts The draft ETA introduces several new digital method concepts that are not currently recognized under the existing ETA framework. These include: Electronic timestamping (e-timestamp) Electronic registered delivery Electronic company seals Electronic stamp duty compliance Electronic identity authentication and verification Electronic transferable records (electronic bills of lading, promissory notes, and similar negotiable instruments) Recognition of Automated Systems and Electronic Contracting The draft ETA expressly recognizes the legal validity and enforceability of contracts formed through automated systems, including contracts concluded entirely between automated systems or between an automated system and a person. A party may not deny the binding effect of such contracts solely because no human review
Read More