You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 6, 2018

Vietnam Issues Decree on Disclosure of Customer Financial Information

Informed Counsel

With Vietnam’s controversial new Law on Cybersecurity set to take effect on January 1, 2019, the protection of personal information has become a very hot topic for Vietnamese and foreign companies and organizations. In the banking sector, where customer information is particularly sensitive, confidentiality has always been a matter of crucial importance.   

In September, the government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 117/2018/ND-CP on confidentiality and  dis- closure of customer information of credit institutions and branches of foreign banks (Decree 117). Decree 117 took effect on November 1, 2018, replacing Decree No. 70/2000/ND-CP of 2000 on confidentiality, storage, and disclosure of information related to customer deposits (Decree 70). Below are some notable points of Decree 117.

Governing Scope    .

Decree 117 applies broadly to the confidentiality and disclosure of customer information of credit institutions and branches of foreign banks in Vietnam. However, some information is excluded from its purview, including customer information that is (i) classified as state secrets, (ii) provided to the State Bank of Vietnam, or (iii) used for anti-money laundering or anti-terrorism purposes.

Definition of Customer Information   

This is the first time that customer information of a credit institution or a branch of a foreign bank has been formally defined under Vietnamese legislation. Under Article 3 of Decree 117, such customer information is defined as information that is provided by the customer, or arises in the course of a customer requesting or a credit institution/bank providing banking products and services, comprising:

(1)    Personally identifiable information that contributes to identifying customers, whether individuals or organizations.

  • For individuals: Full name; specimen signature; electronic signature; date of birth; nationality; occupation; permanent residence, current residence, or place of residence abroad (for foreigners); telephone number; email address; ID card or passport number, date of issuance, and place of issuance; and other relevant information.
  • For organizations: Full name; abbreviated name; establishment license or decision; enterprise registration certificate or equivalent document; address of head office; telephone number; fax number; email address; personally identifiable information (as described above) of the legal representative of the organization; and other relevant information.

As in other Vietnamese data privacy regulations, “personally identifiable information” is defined very broadly, and the phrase “other relevant information” is problematic in that it seems to allow almost any information about the customer to be considered “personally identifiable information.”

(2)    Information on accounts, deposits, deposited assets, transactions, securing parties, and other relevant information. (Most of these terms are further defined/clarified in the same article.)

Requests from State Authorities

Competent state authorities—which have been expanded under Decree 117 to include state audit agencies, customs authorities, and tax authorities, among others— can request the disclosure of customer information from credit institutions and branches of foreign banks in order to perform their assigned functions and tasks, provided they comply with the following conditions:

  • Their request for customer information is in line with the purposes, contents, scope, and jurisdiction stipulated by law or as agreed by the customer, and they must bear responsibility for their requests.
  • They have supporting documents to prove the reasons for and objectives of such request, issued by the appropriate-level authority, and in conformity with relevant law, unless such request relates to a criminal proceeding or national security.
  • After obtaining the customer information, they must keep it confidential, use it in line with the purpose stated when requesting the information, and not disclose it to any third party without consent of the customer, except where permitted by law.

Although Decree 117 requires the authorities to maintain the confidentiality of the customer information they receive, enforcement will be a challenge in practice. By expanding the range of state authorities having the right to request customer information, without any corresponding requirements to improve oversight or secrecy, there is a greater risk of customer information being disclosed, intentionally or unintentionally.

Requests from Non-State Entities   

Under Article 11, credit institutions and branches of foreign banks may only disclose customer information to other non-state organizations or individuals in one of the following circumstances:

(1)    At the request of an entity specifically authorized to make such request in accordance with codes, laws, and resolutions issued by the National Assembly; or

(2)    Upon receiving the customer’s consent in writing or in another form as agreed with the customer.

In a notable change from Decree 70, Decree 117 does not allow credit institutions, without the prior consent of their customers, to share customer information with each other. Although this is in line with Vietnam’s general rules on data privacy, it may cause difficulties for credit institutions, as the exchange of customer information within the banking system is vital for evaluating and mitigating insolvency risks.

Other Provisions   

Decree 117 specifies the form for requesting disclosure of customer information, which applies to requests made by both state authorities and non-state entities, as well as the procedure and deadlines for financial institutions to carry out the information disclosure (10 working days for simple and readily available information, or 25 working days for complicated and not readily available information), except as otherwise regulated by the relevant laws.   

The new decree does not address whether financial institutions may provide access to, disclose, or transfer customer information to third parties located outside of Vietnam. These issues are covered by other legislation, such as the Law on Cybersecurity.

Outlook

Decree 117 aims to reduce the number of fraudulent transactions and mitigate the risk of outside parties appropriating the personal information and assets of banking customers. While these are worthy goals, the effectiveness and enforcement of Decree 117 remain to be seen.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 9, 2026
On April 28, 2026, the Central Bank of Myanmar (CBM) issued Notification No. 18/2026 introducing the new Foreign Remittance Business Regulations. The new regulations apply to companies intending to operate foreign remittance businesses in Myanmar that are not licensed banks, non-bank financial institutions, or other financial institutions. The regulations supersede and replace the previous regulatory framework governing foreign remittance businesses under CBM Notification No. 21/2019. While the overall structure remains familiar, the new regulations introduce more detailed requirements for licensing, operations, reporting, and compliance, with a stronger focus on transparency and regulatory oversight. Broader Licensing Requirements Under the new regulations, applicants must submit detailed business plans describing the use of information technology and mobile platforms, along with clear plans for handling remittances from workers abroad and resolving customer complaints. Financial Thresholds and Reporting Requirements The baseline financial thresholds remain unchanged. Licensees must maintain a security deposit of MMK 100 million in an escrow account, along with a separate revolving fund dedicated solely to remittance operations. The new regulations introduce more structured reporting obligations. Licensees are now required to submit daily remittance transaction data by the next business day before noon, in addition to monthly and periodic reporting requirements. Foreign bank account statements must also be submitted regularly, and licensees must provide updates on business operations every six months. Strengthened AML and CFT Framework The new regulations place a greater emphasis on anti-money laundering (AML) and counter financing of terrorism (CFT), with tighter controls over management changes. Any changes in shareholding, share transfers, or the appointment of key management personnel such as the managing director require prior approval from the CBM. Licensing Fees and Validity The new regulations increase licensing costs, while maintaining the same validity period of three years. The new regulations provide more detailed grounds for suspension and
May 25, 2026
After several years of policy discussion and continued efforts led by the Ministry of Commerce (MOC) to relax the list of reserved businesses under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA), the reform process has now reached a significant milestone. On May 12, 2026, the Thai cabinet approved in principle two draft subordinate legislative instruments aimed at delisting certain reserved business activities under the FBA and reducing licensing requirements for foreign business operators. These developments signal a renewed and concrete effort by the government to modernize Thailand’s business regulatory framework in order to attract foreign investment and boost Thailand’s competitiveness in the global market. Nine Businesses Set for FBA Delisting Below is a list of the nine businesses that are being targeted for delisting from the FBA’s restrictions. A draft ministerial regulation would delist the first eight reserved businesses, while a royal decree has been drafted to delist the ninth business: Telecommunications services (Type 1 license only, covering operators without their own telecommunications infrastructure), under the supervision of the Office of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission. Treasury center services subject to the Foreign Exchange Control Act B.E. 2485 and under the supervision of the Bank of Thailand. Securities-collateralized lending, pursuant to the laws governing securities and exchange and derivatives regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Agency, dealer, advisory, or fund management services relating to derivatives where the underlying assets fall outside the scope of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) Intra-group shared services, including administrative, human resources, and IT functions Intra-group domestic debt guarantee services Leasing of partial space for installation of financial service machines and automatic vending machines for employee use Petroleum drilling services Trading of agricultural product derivatives through a futures exchange, with physical delivery or receipt of agricultural products at a futures exchange–designated
March 5, 2026
Amid increasing financial globalization, Vietnam’s establishment of an International Financial Center (IFC) represents a strategic initiative to attract high-quality foreign investment and enhance the country’s position in the global financial system. In support of this objective, a Specialized Court was introduced under Resolution No. 222/2025/QH15 as a dedicated dispute resolution mechanism within the IFC framework. The Specialized Court at the IFC was subsequently operationalized by Law on the Specialized Court No. 150/2025/QH15, effective from January 1, 2026. Organizational Structure of the Specialized Court The Specialized Court at the IFC is a court within the system of the People’s Courts, organized and operating in accordance with the Law on the Specialized Court, and vested with jurisdiction to adjudicate and resolve cases at the IFC. The Specialized Court is located in Ho Chi Minh City and comprises (i) a Court of First Instance; (ii) a Court of Appeal, and (iii) a supporting apparatus. Jurisdiction of the Specialized Court The jurisdiction of the Specialized Court at the IFC is strictly defined based on both (i) the subject matter of the cases and (ii) the membership status of the parties involved. Specifically, the Specialized Court has jurisdiction over (except for cases involving public interests or the interests of the state) the following: Disputes arising from investment and business activities. Requests for recognition and enforcement in Vietnam of judgments and decisions of foreign courts and foreign arbitral awards. Requests related to dispute resolution by arbitration. Other disputes directly related to investment and business activities (to be specified by the Supreme People’s Court). Additionally, at least one party in the case must be a member of the IFC. The IFC’s membership status is established through registration, recognition as a member, or the grant of a license for establishment and operation within the IFC. In the
February 27, 2026
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has officially implemented a new regulatory framework supervising systemically important retail payment systems (SIRPS), effective February 21, 2026, with PromptPay being the first payment system designated as a SIRPS. Under this new set of regulations, the BOT may designate payment systems under the Payment Systems Act B.E. 2560 (2017) as SIRPSs based on quantitative and qualitative assessments. Once a system is designated as a SIRPS, the operator becomes subject to expanded supervisory obligations beyond the general requirements of the Payment Systems Act. Enhanced Supervisory Requirements SIRPS operators must comply with a heightened supervisory regime across three key areas, outlined below. 1. Governance SIRPS operators must maintain robust and transparent governance structures, including: Balanced board composition, with at least one-third of the board comprising independent directors who represent stakeholders in the system (such as payment service providers, consumers, and experts). Independent directors may serve for no more than two consecutive terms. Subcommittees to assist the board in overseeing compliance, policy implementation, and operational strategy. Clear separation between executives responsible for risk and information security and those overseeing day-to-day business operations. Risk Management and System SecuritySIRPS operators must implement comprehensive risk management frameworks, including: Clear service agreements between the SIRPS operator and its direct participants (payment service providers who connect directly to the SIRPS), defining roles and responsibilities among stakeholders. These agreements must include obligations for direct SIRPS participants to supervise any indirect participants they onboard to ensure compliance with service agreements and business rules. A business continuity plan covering both IT and non-IT aspects, with annual review. The SIRPS must target service availability comparable to international payment infrastructures, including the ability to recover operations within two hours of a disruption and to maintain scalable operational capacity. Tools and controls to monitor and manage material or