You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 12, 2024

Vietnam Amends Law on Pharmacy

Subscribe to Updates

On November 21, 2024, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted a law amending and supplementing the 2016 Law on Pharmacy (“Amended Law on Pharmacy”). The Amended Law on Pharmacy simplifies some procedures for the pharmaceutical field, and will take effect on July 1, 2025, except for regulations on drug registration and rights and responsibilities of certain types of pharmaceutical business.

Some outstanding points in the Amended Law on Pharmacy are presented below.

E-commerce Distribution

The Amended Law on Pharmacy allows trading in pharmaceutical products by the e-commerce channel, including e-commerce trading floors, e-commerce sales applications, and e-commerce sales websites with online ordering functions. Accordingly, e-commerce retail of non-prescription drugs is permitted if the drugs are neither specially controlled drugs nor drugs included in the list of drugs restricted for retail sale, and e-commerce wholesale of drugs and drug materials is permitted, as long as they are not specially controlled drugs.

New Rights for Import FIEs

The amendment provides some additional rights to foreign-invested enterprises (“FIEs”) that import drugs, including the rights to:

  • Repurchase drugs and drug materials manufactured through the technology transfer of the FIE itself in Vietnam, and sell such products to wholesalers;
  • Import drug materials to supply to drug manufacturers in Vietnam that are hired by or receive technology transfer from the FIE itself under a processing contract or technology transfer contract;
  • Deliver and transport drugs and drug materials the FIE has imported, outsourced for processing, or transferred technology for in Vietnam, from the FIE’s warehouse to its wholesalers;
  • Deliver and transport drugs used in aid, sponsorship, humanitarian, and disease prevention and control programs to medical facilities receiving funding; and
  • Transport drug materials imported by the FIE from its warehouse to drug manufacturers that are hired by or receive technology transfer from the FIE itself under a processing contract or technology transfer contract, and transport drugs imported by the FIE and used in clinical trials sponsored by the FIE itself to the facility that conducts the clinical trial.

Drug Registration

The amendment mentions that when drug registration uses the reference results of a registration dossier appraised by other authorities (including Stringent Regulatory Authorities and authorities recognized by the Ministry of Health (MOH) based on the WHO’s classification), the appraisal period will be 9 months, while it is 12 months for a normal dossier.

Also, the renewal dossiers for drugs and drug materials are simplified; in particular, only three documents will be required for renewal: (1) application form; (2) valid certificate of pharmaceutical product (CPP) for imported drugs; and (3) report on the safety and effectiveness of the drug during circulation.

Further, drugs that were granted a five-year marketing authorization (MA) but were not actually marketed within that period would not be subject to MA renewal.

Finally, if the MA of a drug or drug material has expired but the MOH has received a dossier for MA renewal, the MA can continue to be used until its renewal dossier is approved or until the MOH issues a written notice not to renew, or to temporarily suspend the use of the MA due to a discovery that the drug poses a risk of being unsafe for users or is suspected of having fake legal documents.

Drug Importation

The Amended Law on Pharmacy permits drugs without an MA used for clinical trials (except specially controlled drugs) to be imported into Vietnam without an import license, with the quantity and type in accordance with information published on the MOH portal, based on the clinical trial protocol approved by the MOH.

Price Management

Drug importers/manufacturers are required to announce or reannounce to the MOH the proposed wholesale prices of their prescription drugs before the first batch is put on the Vietnam market, or whenever there are any changes to the proposed wholesale prices, so that the MOH can publish the prices on its portal.

Pharmaceutical business establishments (including importers, wholesalers, manufacturers, and retailers) are also required to declare the prices of drugs included in the list of essential drugs (wholesale or retail price) to the authorities to serve the synthesis, analysis, and forecast of market prices.

Transitional Provisions

Pending new, renewal, and variation dossiers for drugs and drug materials submitted before July 1, 2025, will be processed in accordance with the provisions of the 2016 Law on Pharmacy, unless the applicants request application of the provisions of the Amended Law on Pharmacy instead.

Drug prices declared or redeclared in accordance with the 2016 Law on Pharmacy will continue to be used and considered as announced or re-announced wholesale prices according to the provisions of the Amended Law on Pharmacy.

Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 9, 2026
On August 5, 2026, the Consumer Case Division of Thailand’s Civil Court rendered a judgment in a case involving a beauty clinic that advertised acne scar treatments using claims that the clinic was operated by a specialist physician and that the treatment, allegedly involving stem cell technology, could permanently remove acne scars. The plaintiff brought a claim against both the physician-owner and the clinic company, alleging that the advertisements were false and induced her to purchase the treatment. The court found that the clinic was liable for the false representations and that the physician-owner, as both the authorized director of the company and the medical practitioner who provided treatment, was jointly responsible. Although the plaintiff could not fully prove all damages claimed, the court awarded compensation of THB 20,000, together with interest. While the judgment arose from a consumer protection dispute, it serves as a valuable reminder that medical facility advertisements in Thailand are regulated and may expose clinics and healthcare providers not only to regulatory enforcement but also to civil liability from patients who rely on misleading promotional claims. Regulatory Framework Governing Medical Facility Advertisements Medical facility advertising in Thailand is governed by the Medical Facility Act B.E. 2541 (1998), as amended by the Medical Facility Act (No. 4) B.E. 2559 (2016). The principal secondary legislation is the Department of Health Service Support (DoHSS) Notification Re: Rules, Procedures, Conditions, and Fees for an Advertisement or Publication Concerning a Medical Facility, which came into force on November 25, 2019. Under this notification, “advertising” includes any act, by any means, that causes members of the public to see, hear, or otherwise become aware of a message, sound, or image for the commercial benefit of a medical facility. This broad definition covers not only traditional media but also clinic websites, social
Read More
September 9, 2026
On June 30, 2026, Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 on Food Packaging, which expands the list of approved food-contact substances and recognizes a broader range of permissible functions for those substances. The new regulation, which revokes BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, reflects developments in packaging technology and materials science. Although the new regulation provides more advantages to business actors by adding more food contact substances to the approved list for use in food packaging, there are more stringent rules and restrictions for testing. One of the most significant changes is a comprehensive migration-testing framework that sets out requirements for packaging materials, testing conditions, food simulants, and specific migration limits. Overall and Specific Migration Under BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, migration requirements were primarily set out within the lists of approved food-contact substances and packaging materials. BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 instead expressly requires packaging materials that come into direct contact with food to meet both overall and specific migration limits. These are defined as follows: Overall migration: The total quantity of all substances that migrate from the packaging, regardless of whether the substances are hazardous or nonhazardous to health. Specific migration: The quantity of a particular identified substance known to be hazardous to health that migrates from the packaging. Stricter Limits on Heavy Metals The overall migration limit for plastic packaging remains unchanged under both regulations at 60 mg/kg or 10 mg/dm². However, the new regulation introduces significant changes to the regulation of heavy metals. Under the 2019 regulation, four heavy metals—lead, cadmium, chromium VI, and mercury—were subject to a single combined limit of 1 mg/kg. The 2026 regulation, however, requires each heavy metal to meet its own individual specific migration limit, adds arsenic as
Read More
September 7, 2026
Indonesia’s Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi) has reinstated a key provision limiting pharmaceutical patent protection, signaling a renewed commitment to balancing patent rights with public access to medicines. In its ruling to Case No. 255/PUU-XXIII/2025, the court partially granted a petition for judicial review of Law No. 65 of 2024, which had amended the country’s Patent Law, and ordered the restoration of a provision that had excluded certain pharmaceutical inventions from patentability. The decision took effect immediately upon its pronouncement at the court’s plenary session on August 28, 2026. Background The petition challenged the removal of article 4(f) from Law No. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents (Patent Law), as amended by Law No. 65 of 2024. Article 4(f) had excluded from patentability certain inventions relating to new uses of known substances. The petitioners argued that removing this provision would open the door to patent protection for second medical use inventions and facilitate patent evergreening—practices that can extend exclusivity periods, delay generic market entry, and reduce public access to affordable medicines. The petitioners included several patient advocacy and public-interest organizations: the Indonesian Dialysis Patients Community Association, the Indonesian Association of Drug Abuse Victims (PKNI), the Indonesian Pulmonary Hypertension Foundation (YHPI), the Rekat Peduli Indonesia Foundation, and the Indonesian Positive Women’s Association (IPPI), along with the Indonesia for Global Justice Association and four individual petitioners. The petitioners also challenged the constitutionality of the phrase “interested party” in article 70(1) of the Patent Law, arguing that it should be construed expressly to clarify who has standing to appeal a decision to grant a patent before the Board of Patent Appeal, and to allow a broader range of parties—such as patent holders, licensees, consumer organizations, prosecutors, aggrieved third parties, and others who may suffer direct or indirect harm from the grant of a patent—to
Read More
September 4, 2026
Blind boxes and collectibles have become increasingly popular, driven by the excitement of not knowing which character or design will be revealed until the package is opened. While most visible in the art toy market, the same concept is also used in the food industry. Confectionery, snacks, and other food products are sometimes sold with toys, character figures, cards, or other collectibles. A package might, for example, contain one of ten possible characters, with consumers knowing that an item is included but not which one they will receive. Some collections may also feature rare or “secret” items. For food businesses, however, adding a randomized toy or collectible involves more than a marketing decision. The food, the nonfood item, and the randomized mechanism may each raise different regulatory considerations in Thailand. Thai FDA Requirements for Nonfood Objects Packaged with Food The main food regulatory consideration is Ministry of Public Health Notification No. 310 B.E. 2551 (2008), which regulates food packaged together with things or objects that are not food. Under Notification No. 310, certain nonfood objects may be packaged together with food where they fall within specified exceptions, including objects that serve the following purposes: Maintaining the quality or standard of the food, such as a desiccant or oxygen absorber; Serving as a seasoning or as part of food preparation, such as chili powder sachets or seasoning sachets contained in instant noodle packages; or Functioning as an eating or food-preparation utensil, such as a spoon or fork included with instant noodles. Other nonfood objects that do not fall within these categories generally should not be placed inside the food container together with the food. Where a toy, collectible, or other nonfood object is intended to be sold together with a food product, businesses should therefore carefully consider the nature of
Read More