You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 3, 2016

Update on Myanmar’s IP Laws

Managing Intellectual Property

Myanmar’s general election, which took place on November 8, was the first nationwide vote since the military junta’s dissolution in 2011. It was also the first poll contested by opposition party the National League for Democracy (NLD) in 25 years. Rapid economic reforms since 2011 have resulted in enormous growth opportunities. With the NLD winning a sweeping majority in both houses of parliament, the country now enters a transitional phase with the quasi-civilian government gradually transferring power to the NLD.

It is unclear how the NLD’s win will shape Myanmar’s economic agenda, but Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the country has seen steady growth, providing some measure of stability and predictability. Aung San Suu Kyi has taken steps to ensure the handover is smooth, and she has taken a cooperative approach with the military administration. Investors and IP owners are certainly being cautious, however, allowing themselves time to assess and observe the political reform process.

In July, the Thein Sein government issued draft laws for industrial designs, patents, trademarks, and copyright, inviting public opinion and consultations. These IP laws will have a significant impact on business, and they should make Myanmar a more attractive country for investment. This is because IP owners will be better able to protect and preserve their IP rights in the country.

Draft Industrial Design Law

According to the draft law, to be eligible for protection, industrial designs must be original and genuine and not published, used, displayed, or declared to the public abroad or domestically before making an application. The term of a registered industrial design is five years from the application date, and it can be renewed for two additional terms of five years each. The duration of a registered industrial design is 15 years.

Importantly, this law empowers the Union Supreme Court to establish an IP office and IP courts to hear IP cases. In addition, it will repeal The Burma Patents and Designs (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1946.

Draft Patent Law

Chapter 5 of the draft patent law holds that a patent must be genuine, have an inventive step, and be utilized in industry. The term of a patent is 20 years from the date of the patent application, and annuity fees are to be paid to the registrar for the prescribed periods to maintain the patent registration. Any court proceedings relating to patents will follow the provisions that are enacted for IP courts under the law on industrial designs.

Draft Trademark Law

The term of a registered trademark is ten years from the filing date, and it can be renewed for additional ten-year terms. Furthermore, both domestic and foreign owners of marks can apply under this law. Again, court proceedings will be under the jurisdiction of the IP courts.

Importantly, trademark owners who have registered a declaration of trademark ownership with the Office of the Registry of Deeds and Assurances under the Registration Act before this law comes into force must apply for a new registration under the new law, and there will be no transitional period. International trademark owners have a priority claim to register their international trademarks.

Draft Copyright Law

Currently, protection of original literary, artistic, musical, and dramatic works exists under the 1914 Copyright Act. The existing law does not accord protection to foreign copyright—Myanmar is not a signatory to the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, nor is it a signatory to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. It has, however, signed the TRIPS agreement under the WTO and is therefore obligated to implement adequate intellectual property legislation.

Under the draft copyright law, protection will cover works created by nationals of other state members that adhere to treaties or conventions that relate to copyright. The protection will principally last for the lifetime of the creator and an additional 50 years after his or her death. The infringement of copyright is considered both a criminal and civil offense.

There is a lot to be said for Myanmar’s draft IP laws. The country’s industrial design law is separate from its patent law, unlike many jurisdictions, offering greater protection for industrial designs. Furthermore, the copyright law will recognize foreign copyright, meaning that foreign copyright holders’ works would be protected in Myanmar.

It is expected that Myanmar’s new government and parliament will be set up in March or April 2016. The draft laws will be open to public opinion and further revisions after they are published in a local newspaper.

As the government has shown a commitment to protecting intellectual property, refining investment laws, and acclimating Myanmar to the international community, investors can feel confident that future iterations of the draft laws will support foreign business.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.
August 13, 2026
Modern agricultural machinery is no longer purely mechanical but instead technology dependent. Modern tractors, harvesters, and other farm equipment increasingly incorporate embedded software, electronic control units, sensors, and digital diagnostic systems. While such technologies enhance efficiency, productivity, and precision farming, they also affect the manner of equipment repair and maintenance. As a result, farmers and independent repair providers may have little practical choice but to rely on authorized dealers, even for routine maintenance and repairs. Section 36 of Thailand’s Patent Act reflects the principle that the authorized sale of a patented invention usually exhausts the exclusive right of the patent owner over the specific product. This means that upon legal sale of the patented product, it can typically be used or resold without further authorization from the patent holder. This principle is relatively straightforward when applied to traditional mechanical equipment. Ownership of a machine ordinarily carries with it the practical ability to diagnose faults, replace worn parts, and restore the equipment to working order. Modern agricultural machinery, however, increasingly depends on embedded software, proprietary diagnostic systems, firmware updates, and other digital resources that may remain under the control of the manufacturer or patent holder. This tension lies within the “right to repair” debate. In the United States, on July 8, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission and five states announced a settlement with Deere & Company resolving allegations that Deere had unlawfully restricted farmers’ and independent repair providers’ ability to repair their equipment. Under the terms of the settlement, for the next ten years, Deere must provide repair resources, including software capabilities, on terms equivalent to those provided to authorized dealers. The Deere settlement highlights that the nature of ownership is changing, but legal concepts have not kept pace. Traditional patent-law concepts, including patent exhaustion, were developed with physical products
August 10, 2026
Thailand has finalized its social media KYC (“know your customer”) rules under Notification of the Electronic Transactions Commission on Measures to Prevent Technological Crimes for Social Media Service Providers (No. 2), which was published in the Government Gazette on May 5, 2026, and will take effect on November 1, 2026. While an early draft of the notification proposed requiring social media platforms to arrange identification of every user account, the final notification is significantly more targeted, focusing on paid online advertising and advertiser identity verification. Though the regulatory initiative primarily aims to combat online fraud and technology-related crimes, it also has important consequences for intellectual property enforcement, because the verified platform records that will be generated under the new requirements can help IP rights holders to identify anonymous online infringers. Key Regulatory Mandates The notification requires social media service providers to verify the identity of advertisers before their paid advertisements are published and disseminated in Thailand through social media, regardless of whether the advertising fees come from the advertisers or third parties. Verification of an advertiser is valid for one year, after which verification would have to be performed again before the platform could publish additional paid advertisements from the advertiser. Permitted verification methods are specified under the notification. A platform may verify an advertiser by checking identity evidence and confirming the connection between the advertiser and that identity evidence, with the notification giving facial comparison against certain government-issued identity documents as an example. Alternatively, platforms may verify advertisers through a digital identity verification and authentication system with an identity-proofing assurance level not lower than the level prescribed by Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Commission. The notification further requires platforms to retain only the advertiser’s information necessary to identify the advertiser, beginning from the start of the advertising activity and for
August 6, 2026
Introduction: A Trademark Paradox in Sustainable Packaging Walk into any Thai supermarket, and the label-free water bottle is no longer a novelty. Thailand’s packaging market, valued at approximately USD 15.68 billion in 2025, is shifting toward minimalist, plastic-light designs as ESG pressures reshape how brands present their products. The country generated roughly 5.68 million tons of plastic waste in 2021, with a recycling rate of only 19 percent, and regulators are now considering rules that would allow label-free bottled water relying on embossing, laser printing, or QR codes instead of wrap-around labels. As packaging itself becomes the brand identifier, a paradox emerges: designs built to say the least often struggle hardest for protection under Thai intellectual property law. The Trademark Barrier: When Shape Is Not Enough Section 7, paragraph 2(10) of the Thai Trademark Act deems a shape distinctive only if it is not the natural form of the goods, is not necessary to achieve a technical result, and does not add value to the goods. The Department of Intellectual Property’s 2022 examination guidelines apply this test conservatively, as the following examples illustrate. A plain water bottle relying on subtle contours to signal its brand is typically read as just another bottle, not a source identifier. Acquired distinctiveness offers a theoretical escape route, but it demands extensive evidence of sales, advertising, and consumer recognition—an especially heavy burden for new entrants whose minimalist packaging has not yet achieved market prominence. The result is a structural bias against precisely the design innovation that sustainability goals are meant to encourage. Design Patents: A Partial, Imperfect Substitute Design patent protection, covering a product’s shape, configuration, or ornamentation, appears to offer an alternative route. In practice, it is constrained by the same forces driving the minimalist trend. Because many brands converge on similar solutions—clear