You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

October 17, 2014

Understanding the Asean Collective Investment Scheme

Subscribe to Updates
Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

In the latest step towards the integration of Asean capital markets, Thailand-based fund managers can now offer retail funds directly to investors in Malaysia and Singapore —and vice versa — through a streamlined process. This change follows the launch on Aug 25 of the Asean Collective Investment Scheme (CIS) Framework by Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission, Malaysia’s Securities Commission and the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Initially, the Asean CIS will offer retail investors in all three countries a wide range of innovative cross-border funds. In the future, more Asean members will take part. Fund managers will also benefit in that they will have a direct and efficient route through which to offer their funds to retail investors throughout the region.

Fund managers using the framework must abide by a set of common standards designed to ensure they have the necessary experience and track record. A handbook provides guidance to fund managers on the operational aspects.

Qualifying as an Asean CIS is a two-step process — an application must be made to the regulator in the fund’s home jurisdiction, followed by an application to the host jurisdiction where the fund manager intends to offer the CIS.

In assessing whether a CIS is suitable to be an Asean CIS, the home regulator will consider among other things the following:

  • the qualifications of the CIS operator and the trustee/fund supervisor;
  • the custody arrangements for the CIS assets; and
  • compliance with certain product restrictions specified in the Standards of Qualifying CIS.

The CIS operator, for example, must be licensed or registered by its home regulator and maintain shareholders’ equity of at least US$1 million. In addition, the chief executive must have at least 10 years’ experience in financial and capital markets, and all board members must have a minimum five years’ experience.

Also, the underlying investments of the qualifying CIS may consist only of the following assets: transferable securities, money market instruments, deposits, units in other CIS vehicles or financial derivatives. To eliminate any doubt, a qualifying CIS must not engage in non-permissible activities such as securities lending, repurchase transactions and direct lending of monies.

Once approval is obtained from the home regulator, the following documents must be submitted to the host regulator together with the Asean CIS application form:

  • a letter issued by the home regulator stating the CIS has been approved for public offering in the home jurisdiction and that there is no objection to the CIS being deemed an Asean CIS;
  • offering documents, which must be in compliance with the host jurisdiction’s laws and regulations;
  • an undertaking to submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the host jurisdiction’s courts; and
  • other documents that may be required by the host regulator including other application forms used in the host jurisdiction.

All documents submitted to the host regulator must be written in English and may also need to be translated into the official language of the host jurisdiction. Thailand, for example, requires submission of a fact sheet for the Asean CIS prepared by a local intermediary in Thai. The time frame for this review is subject to the host regulator’s discretion.

A host regulator also retains the right to decline a qualifying CIS operator’s application if, for example, it deems the application contains any false or misleading information or it is not satisfied the host jurisdiction’s laws are being complied with.

Post-approval obligations: Upon approval, a qualifying CIS may be offered to the general public in a host jurisdiction, provided the operator meets the following obligations:

  • The offer in a host jurisdiction may be made only through locally licensed or regulated intermediaries in that host jurisdiction;
  • A qualifying CIS operator is required to appoint an independent auditor to conduct an annual audit of the qualifying CIS operator covering, at a minimum, the compliance with the
  • standards of a qualifying CIS; and
  • A qualifying CIS operator is required to inform both the home and host regulators of significant changes to the qualifying CIS operator or the Asean CIS.

In addition, host regulators may require the qualifying CIS operator similarly to notify investors in the Asean CIS.

More products and improved efficiency: The Asean CIS Framework promises to increase the range of products and provide fund managers with a direct and efficient route to offer funds to retail investors in other Asean members. This is a welcome step towards achieving the vision of an integrated Asean Economic Community under the Asean Capital Markets Forum Implementation Plan.

 

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Banking and Finance

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 2, 2026
On July 24, 2026, a new 12.5% Section 301 tariff took effect on most imports from Thailand into the United States. The tariff was imposed by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, following a finding that Thailand had failed to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on imports of goods produced with forced labor. The new tariff replaced the temporary 10% Section 122 surcharge that had applied since February 24, 2026, following the US Supreme Court’s invalidation of the prior tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The 12.5% tariff is not the only potential source of additional US duties on Thai-origin goods. Thailand is also subject to a separate Section 301 investigation concerning structural excess manufacturing capacity, which could result in additional duties. Unlike the Section 122 surcharge, which was capped at 15% and limited to 150 days, Section 301 provides a more flexible framework for imposing and maintaining trade measures. Section 301 actions are generally subject to a four-year termination rule but may continue following a review if continuation is requested. The new tariff therefore represents a potentially longer-term change in the tariff treatment of Thai-origin goods entering the US market. This article explains the legal and policy developments that led to the new tariff, how the Section 301 tariff differs from the tariff regimes that preceded it, Thailand’s response and ongoing negotiations with the United States, and the practical implications for businesses that manufacture, export, import, or distribute goods between Thailand and the United States. From IEEPA to Section 122 to Section 301 IEEPA Era (April 2025–February 2026) Beginning in April 2025, the US administration imposed sweeping tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), invoking national emergencies relating to trade
Read More
September 30, 2026
On September 15, 2026, Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance (MOF) released for public consultation a draft circular on reporting and information disclosure in the pilot crypto asset market. The draft implements Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP on the Pilot Implementation of the Crypto Asset Market in Vietnam and provides further detail on how licensed crypto asset service providers (“CASPs”) will be supervised once the market becomes operational. The draft indicates a data-intensive supervisory model, with licensed CASPs serving as the first line of market oversight. Public Disclosure Requirements The draft imposes detailed public disclosure requirements on CASPs, aimed primarily at market transparency. CASPs and crypto asset issuers must make disclosures in both Vietnamese and English, retain reported and disclosed information for at least 10 years, and keep information published on their websites accessible for at least five years. For CASPs, disclosure obligations arise both periodically and when specific events occur. A CASP must announce any crypto asset to be admitted to trading on its website at least seven days before trading begins and publish periodic financial statements. Certain extraordinary events and information requested by the MOF must generally be disclosed within 24 hours. CASPs must also provide ongoing market information. During trading hours, they must publish key trading data, including prices and volumes, daily highs and lows, average prices, the three best bid and offer levels, and transactions by foreign investors. By 9:00 a.m. each trading day, they must publish specified information on the previous day’s trading activity. Regulatory Reporting Requirements Separate from public disclosure, the draft requires CASPs to provide regulators with detailed information enabling ongoing supervision of their operations and the market. For market activity, CASPs must report decisions to admit or remove a crypto asset from trading within 24 hours, submit previous-day trading data to the State Securities Commission
Read More
September 28, 2026
Thailand has expanded the mandatory use of the Electronic Government Procurement (e-GP) system to cover submissions of procurement appeals to all government agencies subject to the Public Procurement and Supplies Administrative Act B.E. 2560 (2017) (Government Procurement Act). The expansion, which was set out in an official circular dated September 16, 2026, from the Public Procurement and Supplies Administrative Ruling Committee, takes effect on October 1, 2026. Notable Changes Under the expanded framework, bidders challenging an e-bidding or selective-method procurement result must file their appeal exclusively through e-GP within seven working days of the result being announced by the Comptroller General’s Department. While the system accepts filings around the clock during that window, submissions on the final day must be fully completed by 16:30 according to the e-GP system clock—merely starting a draft or uploading materials before the cutoff does not count as a confirmed submission. Government agencies that disagree with an appeal, in whole or in part, will also report their findings and supporting documents to the Appeals Committee through e-GP using the prescribed Appeal Opinion Report, also within seven working days of receipt. Withdrawals of appeals must likewise follow prescribed e-GP steps that vary depending on whether the matter is still under agency review, has been forwarded to the Appeals Committee, or has already been resolved. Excluded Categories Certain categories of procurement are not subject to the new guidelines on filing appeals electronically. These include: Procurement of supplies for confidential government use. Procurement conducted by government agencies operating overseas where the bidder is a foreign legal entity with no legal representative in Thailand, or where the bidder is a non-Thai national. Consulting service procurement under chapter 7 of the Government Procurement Act Design or construction supervision procurement under chapter 8 of the Government Procurement These exclusions apply
Read More
September 15, 2026
The Myanmar Investment Commission (MIC) has issued a notification that gives investors with projects in Myanmar clearer guidance for securing approval and for changing, expanding, or exiting an approved project. Issued on August 19, 2026, MIC Notification No. 5/2026 replaces MIC Notification No. 26/2021 and sets procedures for state or regional investment committees to review, approve, and supervise investment projects, including project amendments, investment increases, land-use rights applications, compliance inspections, and suspension or termination of approved businesses. Endorsement Application Timeline and Deemed Acceptance In Myanmar, prospective investors seeking approval under the Myanmar Investment Law generally do so through an MIC permit or an MIC endorsement, depending on the nature of the investment. While certain large-scale investment projects require an MIC permit, projects that are not required to obtain an MIC permit may instead apply for an MIC endorsement. Investors seeking MIC endorsement for their planned projects typically submit their applications to the relevant state or regional investment committee. These committees are established under the Myanmar Investment Law and are authorized to approve investments of less than USD 5 million, subject to the project’s nature and location. MIC Notification No. 5/2026 specifies that upon receiving an endorsement application, the relevant investment committee office will check it for completeness and determine whether it can be considered at the state or regional level or must be referred to the MIC; if it must be forwarded to the MIC, this will be done within 10 working days. If an application is within its purview, the committee may reject the endorsement application within 15 working days of receipt; otherwise, the application is deemed accepted. If approved, the endorsement certificate will be issued within 10 working days of the approval decision, subject to applicable procedures. Endorsement Certificate Amendment The notification clarifies which amendments a state
Read More