You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 8, 2012

Tricks of the Trade: A Guide for M&A in Vietnam

Asian-Mena Counsel

Fostering Growth

Since 2008, even before the outbreak of the global recession, the economy of Vietnam has faced difficulties, including extremely high inflation and interest rates, and the weakening of the Vietnamese dong. Foreign direct investment has witnessed a slowdown in parallel with the country’s gloomy economic conditions.

Yet despite the adverse economic situation, M&A transactions in Vietnam have strongly increased in both number and value over the same period. According to statistics established by KPMG, there were 93 successful M&A deals in Vietnam in 2008, with an increase to 112, 236, and 262 for the years 2009, 2010, and 2011, respectively. In 2012, through the end of April, approximately 60 deals had been successfully completed. The total value of the completed deals also continues to reach record highs year after year. In 2008, the total deal value accounted for US$0.9 billion. The deal value went on to reach successively higher records of US$1.2 billion for 2009, US$3.2 billion for 2010, and US$4.4 billion for 2011.

One of the primary drivers of M&A growth in Vietnam has been the low valuations of local companies, the result of a number of factors:

  • The economic downturn led to an increased number of distressed companies and assets. According to a report made by Stoxplus, 75 percent of the stocks trading on Vietnamese stock exchanges are trading below their book value, while 60 percent of those stocks are trading at a price below their par value of approximately US$0.50. Real estate prices in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City fell 40–50 percent in 2011 alone.
  • Foreign indirect investment via on-shore and off-shore funds was booming in 2006 and 2007, and now it is time for several of those funds to liquidate, leading to an increased supply of shares for sale.
  • State-owned enterprises were channeling money into investment and expansion from 2007 to 2010, but are now being directed by the government to divest their non-core businesses, crowding the market with even more shares and assets.

The decline in the share value of Vietnamese companies has made them more affordable and thus more attractive targets for foreign investors.

Other more typical reasons for M&A growth are apparent. Vietnam is a rather large (and growing) market with a population of about 90 million, presenting a great opportunity for foreign investors to expand their business geography and market size. Via M&A, they can pursue this expansion while leveraging target companies’ strengths, such as experienced local staff, existing distribution channels, and governmental permits. Many foreign investors are also treating Vietnam as a “China plus one” country—a secondary hub for production and outsourcing to mitigate the economic risks of having all foreign operations in China. Creating such hubs through M&As is an alternative to setting up the investors’ own subsidiary companies in Vietnam.

Practical Tips for a Successful M&A Deal

Experience has shown that if a foreign investor does not pay due attention to the local characteristics in Vietnam, its deal may be delayed or even come to a dead end. To avoid wasting time and resources, a foreign investor should become familiar with these characteristics before proceeding with an M&A deal. Below is a list of primary issues that foreign investors should be aware of before initiating an M&A deal in the country.

The nature of the deal

An M&A transaction in Vietnam for foreign investors is limited to the purchase of shares of local companies. Other forms of M&A transactions, such as mergers between a foreign entity and a local entity or purchases of assets (rather than shares) by a foreign entity, are not available to them. The legal system is not yet ready for such transactions to which a foreign investor is a party.

Lacking knowledge

Many M&A deals involve small or medium-size local companies. Owners of those companies often lack knowledge of international standards in business management. As a result, they do not understand how an M&A transaction should proceed. It may be necessary to provide ‘training’ to help them understand their roles and obligations during the M&A process, such as their cooperation in the due diligence process and obligations of confidentiality and performance of the contract.

Sky high

Owners of local companies often overvalue their companies and thus demand unreasonably high prices for their shares. Foreign investors should be prepared to present good reasons to the owners to explain what price is reasonable, as well as communicate the additional benefits that they could bring to the company following the transaction.

Misleading information?

The business environment in Vietnam is less transparent than in most developed countries, and the enforcement of law on local companies is rather loose. As a result, local companies are often involved in less-than-transparent transactions. Sometimes they maintain two different accounting books. In addition, company managers tend to hide adverse information about their companies such as tax, social insurance, and other debts and pending litigation cases. Thus, careful due diligence as to the legal and financial matters of the target company is absolutely essential.

Licensing Issues

The most time-consuming process for an M&A deal in Vietnam is, regrettably, not the negotiation over the price. Rather, it is the licensing process to record a foreign investor as a new shareholder of the target company. As a matter of practice, depending on the complexity of the deal, it normally takes from three to six months (or even longer) to complete such a process.

Below are some notes on the licensing process relating to restrictions on foreign ownership, the necessity of investment certificates, sophisticated and simplified sale and purchase agreements, evidence of completion, and purchase of shares in the form of private placement.

Restrictions on foreign ownership

A foreign investor should be well aware of any applicable restrictions on foreign ownership in the target company. The government of Vietnam restricts foreign ownership in certain business sectors, permitting foreign investors to purchase only a limited percentage of the target company’s charter capital. This foreign-ownership threshold is stated in international treaties to which Vietnam is a member, such as its World Trade Organization commitments and/or relevant bilateral agreements. If a foreign-ownership threshold is absent from an international treaty, it may be stated in domestic laws. If it is not given in domestic laws then it is subject to the discretion of the licensing authority on a case-by-case basis.

The foreign ownership threshold can be 30 percent of the target company’s charter capital (applicable to the banking sector, etc.), 49 percent (applicable to facilities-based telecommunications, entertainment and electronic game businesses, etc.), 51 percent (applicable to container stations and depots, storage and warehouses, freight transport agency services, etc.), 65 percent (applicable to non-facilities-based Internet access services, etc.), or up to 100 percent of the entire charter capital of the target company for unrestricted sectors.

It is worth noting that in the business registration process, a local company will often register a long list of business lines in which it may conduct business, even if it does not currently operate in all of them. Among those business lines, a foreign investor may be permitted to own up to 100 percent of the charter capital of the target company for some lines, but only 30 percent of the charter capital for others. In such cases, unless the foreign investor agrees to remove the restricted business line from the business license of the target company, the licensing authority will only allow the foreign investor to own up to the lowest threshold, that is, 30 percent of the charter capital of the target company.

Investment certificate

Legally speaking, in the purchase of shares of a local company, the law only requires the target company to apply for a change in its shareholders. However, in practice, the licensing authority further requires the company to apply for the issuance of an investment certificate in order to convert the company into a foreign-invested company. This is the most painstaking process and normally takes from three to six months to complete.

Sale and purchase agreement

An industry-standard sophisticated sale and purchase agreement is not always accepted by the licensing authority. One of the reasons is the capacity of the staff of that agency. Thus, in many cases where the parties agree upon sophisticated conditions precedent, representations, warranties, payment conditions, etc., they may have to prepare two separate agreements. The primary agreement is kept by the parties for performance. The second, simplified agreement will be submitted to the licensing authority for licensing purposes. Additionally, the licensing authority may require the parties to submit to Vietnamese laws and courts or arbitration as the governing law and jurisdiction.

Evidence of completion

In order to approve a share sale transaction, the licensing authority requires the party to submit proof that the transaction has been completed. The evidence of completion is the full payment by the purchaser to the seller for the shares sold. This requirement often runs counter to the intention of the parties for the payment conditions set out in the sale and purchase agreement. Fortunately, an acknowledgement by the seller and the purchaser of full payment of the sold shares, regardless of whether payment was actually transferred, is normally accepted by the licensing authority.

Private placement

The purchase of shares of an unlisted joint-stock company in the form of private placement is practically impossible in Vietnam at present. In theory, a foreign investor may purchase shares of an unlisted joint-stock company via this form of investment. However, the legislation issued in 2010 guiding this investment form was so rigid that it has never been put into practice. As a result, foreign investors have to overcome this impossibility by converting their form of investment to a direct purchase of shares from the existing shareholders of the target company. It should be noted that the purchase of shares from a limited liability company or its shareholders does not face the same difficulty as purchasing shares from an unlisted joint-stock company via the form of private placement.

(Author’s note: After this article was submitted for publication, the Vietnamese government issued a new piece of legislation which will take effect on September 15, 2012. Under the new legislation, it appears that many of the obstructions of the 2010 legislation have been removed.)

A Well-Prepared Sale and Purchase Agreement

As mentioned above, it is very common for the parties to an M&A deal to prepare two sale and purchase agreements: a comprehensive one for the parties to perform the contract, and a simple one to be submitted to the licensing authority for licensing purposes. The primary comprehensive sale agreement should be carefully prepared to protect the foreign purchaser, containing detailed conditions precedent for the payment, representations, warranties, covenants and indemnification of the seller, rights of the purchaser acting as a special shareholder in purchasing the shares, etc. In some cases, those rights of the purchaser should be incorporated into the charter (that is, articles of association) in order to make them become part of a constitutional document of the company rather than private agreements. A well-prepared agreement will help the parties define their rights, obligations, and duties during and after the transaction, thus minimizing the possibility of future disputes.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 23, 2026
Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) has significantly revised its post-approval compliance framework for projects that receive investment promotion incentives, replacing the previous semiannual reporting system for project progress with a new quarterly reporting regime. The initial report is due by July 30, 2026, covering the second-quarter reporting period of April to June 2026. The new requirements—implemented through BOI Announcement No. 8/2569 and Office of the BOI Notification No. Por. 8/2569, both of which became effective on March 30, 2026—apply both to newly promoted projects and to existing promoted projects that remain in the implementation stage. Background Under the previous reporting framework, BOI-promoted companies that had not yet commenced full operations were generally required to submit reports on project progress to the BOI twice a year (February and July) through the BOI’s e-Monitoring system. By adopting a quarterly reporting regime, the BOI seeks to strengthen monitoring and evaluation of investment progress and project implementation. Reporting Requirements Under the new regulations, BOI-promoted companies must submit project progress reports on a quarterly basis during the implementation phase of a promoted project. The reporting periods and submission deadlines are: Q1 (January–March): April 30 Q2 (April–June): July 30 Q3 (July–September): October 30 Q4 (October–December): January 30 of the following year The quarterly reporting obligation runs from the date the BOI promotion certificate is issued until the BOI grants approval for commencement of full operations. For newly promoted projects, no quarterly report is required for the quarter in which the BOI promotion certificate is issued—the first reporting obligation arises in the immediately following reporting period. All project progress reports must be submitted electronically through the BOI’s e-Monitoring system. The existing annual reporting requirement also remains in effect, requiring promoted companies to submit an annual operating results report through the e-Monitoring system by July 31 of
June 9, 2026
On April 28, 2026, the Central Bank of Myanmar (CBM) issued Notification No. 18/2026 introducing the new Foreign Remittance Business Regulations. The new regulations apply to companies intending to operate foreign remittance businesses in Myanmar that are not licensed banks, non-bank financial institutions, or other financial institutions. The regulations supersede and replace the previous regulatory framework governing foreign remittance businesses under CBM Notification No. 21/2019. While the overall structure remains familiar, the new regulations introduce more detailed requirements for licensing, operations, reporting, and compliance, with a stronger focus on transparency and regulatory oversight. Broader Licensing Requirements Under the new regulations, applicants must submit detailed business plans describing the use of information technology and mobile platforms, along with clear plans for handling remittances from workers abroad and resolving customer complaints. Financial Thresholds and Reporting Requirements The baseline financial thresholds remain unchanged. Licensees must maintain a security deposit of MMK 100 million in an escrow account, along with a separate revolving fund dedicated solely to remittance operations. The new regulations introduce more structured reporting obligations. Licensees are now required to submit daily remittance transaction data by the next business day before noon, in addition to monthly and periodic reporting requirements. Foreign bank account statements must also be submitted regularly, and licensees must provide updates on business operations every six months. Strengthened AML and CFT Framework The new regulations place a greater emphasis on anti-money laundering (AML) and counter financing of terrorism (CFT), with tighter controls over management changes. Any changes in shareholding, share transfers, or the appointment of key management personnel such as the managing director require prior approval from the CBM. Licensing Fees and Validity The new regulations increase licensing costs, while maintaining the same validity period of three years. The new regulations provide more detailed grounds for suspension and
June 4, 2026
On May 19, 2026, the Cabinet of the Royal Thai Government approved, in principle, revisions to Thailand’s visa exemption scheme and visa on arrival (VOA) program, as proposed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Tourism and Sports. The revisions represent a tightening of Thailand’s immigration framework and will affect a broad range of short-term visitors. Background On July 15, 2024, Thailand expanded its visa exemption scheme by increasing the permitted period of visa-exempt stay from 30 days to 60 days in order to promote tourism, support the country’s post-pandemic economic recovery, and facilitate international travel. Under this revised scheme, passport holders from 93 countries and territories (an increase from the previous 57 countries and territories) have been permitted to enter Thailand without a visa and remain in the country for up to 60 days per entry for purposes including tourism, business engagements, urgent work, and ad hoc assignments. In addition, eligible visitors may apply at the Thai Immigration Bureau for a further 30-day extension of stay. Key Changes The proposed revisions would revoke the current 60-day exemption and reinstate the previous stay period, thereby reducing the maximum permitted stay for eligible travelers to 30 days per entry. In addition, the number of countries and territories eligible under the 30-day visa-exemption scheme is expected to be reduced to 54. The scope of the VOA scheme would likewise be significantly narrowed, with the number of eligible countries reduced from 31 countries to just four (Azerbaijan, Belarus, Serbia, and India). Further, Thailand is expected to introduce a new 15-day visa exemption category for nationals of Seychelles, the Maldives, and Mauritius. The revised framework would also limit each country or territory to a single visa exemption privilege in order to simplify Thailand’s immigration framework and reduce overlapping immigration privileges.
May 25, 2026
After several years of policy discussion and continued efforts led by the Ministry of Commerce (MOC) to relax the list of reserved businesses under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA), the reform process has now reached a significant milestone. On May 12, 2026, the Thai cabinet approved in principle two draft subordinate legislative instruments aimed at delisting certain reserved business activities under the FBA and reducing licensing requirements for foreign business operators. These developments signal a renewed and concrete effort by the government to modernize Thailand’s business regulatory framework in order to attract foreign investment and boost Thailand’s competitiveness in the global market. Nine Businesses Set for FBA Delisting Below is a list of the nine businesses that are being targeted for delisting from the FBA’s restrictions. A draft ministerial regulation would delist the first eight reserved businesses, while a royal decree has been drafted to delist the ninth business: Telecommunications services (Type 1 license only, covering operators without their own telecommunications infrastructure), under the supervision of the Office of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission. Treasury center services subject to the Foreign Exchange Control Act B.E. 2485 and under the supervision of the Bank of Thailand. Securities-collateralized lending, pursuant to the laws governing securities and exchange and derivatives regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Agency, dealer, advisory, or fund management services relating to derivatives where the underlying assets fall outside the scope of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) Intra-group shared services, including administrative, human resources, and IT functions Intra-group domestic debt guarantee services Leasing of partial space for installation of financial service machines and automatic vending machines for employee use Petroleum drilling services Trading of agricultural product derivatives through a futures exchange, with physical delivery or receipt of agricultural products at a futures exchange–designated