You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 10, 2022

Thailand’s SEC to Update Definitions of Institutional and High-Net-Worth Investors

Subscribe to Updates

The Securities and Exchange Commission of Thailand (SEC) will refresh its definitions of institutional, high-net-worth (HNW), and ultra-high-net-worth (UHNW) investors according to its recently issued Notification No. Kor Jor 39/2564, effective on October 1, 2022. The key changes to these classifications are described below.

Institutional Investors

The SEC’s list of types of institutional investors will be expanded by the addition of the following four types:

  • Venture capital. This refers to juristic persons established under Thai or foreign law for the purpose of investing in a startup, whereby the investors must not be retail investors.
  • Private equity. This describes businesses established under Thai or foreign law for the purpose of investment by three or more nonretail investors who have appointed a person to manage the investment funds and accrued assets. The business must also have a policy to invest in other enterprises through arrangements that involve either stock investment agreements or other financial support giving rise to the right to acquire stock in the enterprise in the future. Under such arrangements, the private equity investor must demonstrate involvement in the enterprise’s business management (e.g., through planning, developmental, or other operational control).
  • Sophisticated/professional investors. This type of investor includes (1) fund managers or derivatives fund managers in accordance with the Capital Market Supervisory Board’s rules on capital market business personnel; (2) investment analysts authorized by the SEC; and (3) angel investors, defined as experienced and knowledgeable SEC-approved financial advisors or crowdfunding portal providers, or other individual or juristic investors, with net assets of at least THB 50 million, annual revenue of at least THB 4 million, or gross direct investment in securities and derivatives of at least THB 10 million (or THB 20 million if cash deposits are aggregated). Investments by angel investors are limited to securities offered by SMEs or startups, or securities offered through an SEC-approved crowdfunding portal.
  • Stakeholders of the issuer. Current and recent (i.e., in the past three months) directors, major shareholders, and subsidiaries or affiliates will be regarded as institutional investors only in relation to investment in securities issued by the company.

These changes reflect a more modernized approach to defining types of investors, such as by adopting internationally accepted terms like “angel investor.”

HNW and UHNW Investors

In general, the new notification lowers financial thresholds for the definitions of HNW and UHNW investors. This suggests that the SEC wants to expand the number of investors who can access high-risk securities and derivatives.

Under the new notification, HNW investors include individuals with net assets of at least THB 30 million, annual income of at least THB 3 million, or gross direct investment in securities and derivatives of at least THB 8 million (or THB 15 million if cash deposits are aggregated).

UHNW investors include individuals with net assets of at least THB 60 million, annual income of at least THB 6 million, or gross direct investment in securities and derivatives of at least THB 15 million (or THB 30 million if cash deposits are aggregated).

Next Steps

The new notification will come into effect on October 1, 2022. In the transition period before then, Thai and overseas securities companies, asset management companies, and other issuers and intermediaries, both in Thailand and in other countries, should update their offering documentation to ensure it is consistent with the new definitions.

For more information on these definitions, or on any aspect of Thai investment rules, please contact Kobkit Thienpreecha at [email protected] or +66 2056 5534, Nutavit Sirikan at [email protected] or +66 2056 5510, or Thammapas Chanpanich at [email protected] or +66 2056 5561.

Related Professionals

Practices

Banking and Finance

Capital Markets

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 5, 2026
Amid increasing financial globalization, Vietnam’s establishment of an International Financial Center (IFC) represents a strategic initiative to attract high-quality foreign investment and enhance the country’s position in the global financial system. In support of this objective, a Specialized Court was introduced under Resolution No. 222/2025/QH15 as a dedicated dispute resolution mechanism within the IFC framework. The Specialized Court at the IFC was subsequently operationalized by Law on the Specialized Court No. 150/2025/QH15, effective from January 1, 2026. Organizational Structure of the Specialized Court The Specialized Court at the IFC is a court within the system of the People’s Courts, organized and operating in accordance with the Law on the Specialized Court, and vested with jurisdiction to adjudicate and resolve cases at the IFC. The Specialized Court is located in Ho Chi Minh City and comprises (i) a Court of First Instance; (ii) a Court of Appeal, and (iii) a supporting apparatus. Jurisdiction of the Specialized Court The jurisdiction of the Specialized Court at the IFC is strictly defined based on both (i) the subject matter of the cases and (ii) the membership status of the parties involved. Specifically, the Specialized Court has jurisdiction over (except for cases involving public interests or the interests of the state) the following: Disputes arising from investment and business activities. Requests for recognition and enforcement in Vietnam of judgments and decisions of foreign courts and foreign arbitral awards. Requests related to dispute resolution by arbitration. Other disputes directly related to investment and business activities (to be specified by the Supreme People’s Court). Additionally, at least one party in the case must be a member of the IFC. The IFC’s membership status is established through registration, recognition as a member, or the grant of a license for establishment and operation within the IFC. In the
Read More
February 27, 2026
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has officially implemented a new regulatory framework supervising systemically important retail payment systems (SIRPS), effective February 21, 2026, with PromptPay being the first payment system designated as a SIRPS. Under this new set of regulations, the BOT may designate payment systems under the Payment Systems Act B.E. 2560 (2017) as SIRPSs based on quantitative and qualitative assessments. Once a system is designated as a SIRPS, the operator becomes subject to expanded supervisory obligations beyond the general requirements of the Payment Systems Act. Enhanced Supervisory Requirements SIRPS operators must comply with a heightened supervisory regime across three key areas, outlined below. 1. Governance SIRPS operators must maintain robust and transparent governance structures, including: Balanced board composition, with at least one-third of the board comprising independent directors who represent stakeholders in the system (such as payment service providers, consumers, and experts). Independent directors may serve for no more than two consecutive terms. Subcommittees to assist the board in overseeing compliance, policy implementation, and operational strategy. Clear separation between executives responsible for risk and information security and those overseeing day-to-day business operations. Risk Management and System SecuritySIRPS operators must implement comprehensive risk management frameworks, including: Clear service agreements between the SIRPS operator and its direct participants (payment service providers who connect directly to the SIRPS), defining roles and responsibilities among stakeholders. These agreements must include obligations for direct SIRPS participants to supervise any indirect participants they onboard to ensure compliance with service agreements and business rules. A business continuity plan covering both IT and non-IT aspects, with annual review. The SIRPS must target service availability comparable to international payment infrastructures, including the ability to recover operations within two hours of a disruption and to maintain scalable operational capacity. Tools and controls to monitor and manage material or
Read More
February 19, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has overhauled its approach to related-party transactions (RPTs) by issuing new rules that simplify approval processes while expanding oversight. Capital Market Supervisory Board Notification No. TorJor. 46/2568 will replace the longstanding Notification No. TorJor. 21/2551, which has governed RPT compliance for over a decade. The new regulation takes effect on July 1, 2026. Any RPT matters approved by a company’s board of directors or approved for shareholders’ approval before that date remain subject to Notification No. TorJor. 21/2551. The new RPT rules will introduce significant changes that market participants should carefully consider. Consolidated Definitions Under the previous framework, key definitions relevant to RPT compliance were dispersed across multiple sources, including SEC notifications, Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) regulations, and provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act (before amendments). The new regulation consolidates these definitions into a single notification. Concepts such as “related party” and “connected person,” as well as relevant transaction categories, are now more systematically organized and written in greater detail. The SET has yet to issue corresponding regulations, which should include more detailed related disclosure requirements. Unified Threshold and Mandatory Board Approval The most significant change under the new regulation is the elimination of the multitiered approval framework based on transaction type. Instead of various categories, transactions are now classified as either (1) financial assistance provided to related persons, or (2) other RPTs in order to determine the level of corporate approvals and disclosures for each transaction size in these categories, but the concept remains the same. Under the previous regulation, RPTs were divided into small, medium, and large transactions, with differing approval requirements. The new regulation effectively merges the small and medium categories. As a result, all RPTs must now be approved by the board of directors as a baseline
Read More
February 19, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a new regulation on material transactions (MTs) to govern asset acquisitions and disposals by listed companies and their subsidiaries. The new notification on MT criteria (No. TorJor. 45/2568) from the Capital Market Supervisory Board replaces the long-standing notification (No. TorJor. 20/2551) that has governed such matters. The SEC has also introduced parallel amendments to the country’s related-party transaction rules. The new regulation will take effect on July 1, 2026. Any MT matters approved by a company’s board of directors for shareholders’ approval before that date remain subject to Notification No. TorJor. 20/2551. Following that date, the new MT rules will introduce several significant changes that market participants should carefully consider. Expanded Scope of Material Transactions One of the key changes under the new regulation is the expansion of the definition of MTs, which now expressly covers financial assistance and certain lease and business lease arrangements that are not in the ordinary course of business of the listed company or its subsidiaries. For financial assistance, this includes lending, granting credit, providing guarantees, or entering into any arrangement that increases the company’s financial obligations, particularly where the recipient is facing liquidity issues or unable to repay debts. Other forms of financial support also fall within scope. However, whether the provision of collateral for others qualifies as an MT remains somewhat unclear, since no disposal of assets occurs for the provider of collateral. This issue remains to be carefully considered. For lease-related transactions, the MT rules now specifically include the lease or hire-purchase of all or part of a business or assets operated by or belonging to a listed company or its subsidiaries. New Exemptions The new regulation introduces clearer exemptions for transactions between a listed company and its subsidiaries or among subsidiaries, which
Read More