You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 24, 2019

Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Act – Requirements for Employers

Subscribe to Updates
Taylor Vinters – International Employment Law Update

If an employer collects employees’ personal information, the employer must comply with the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA).

Thailand’s PDPA, which was enacted earlier this year, contains significant new requirements for employers that collect employees’ (called “data subjects” in the PDPA) personal information. Most sections of the PDPA will become effective on May 27, 2020, so employers should be aware of their duties and liabilities.

Important PDPA requirements that relate to employers include the following:

  • Employees’ personal information can be collected only to the limited extent necessary for the employer’s lawful purpose.
  • Employers cannot collect employees’ personal information from any source apart from the employees themselves.
  • Employers must prevent employees’ personal information from being disclosed, lost, or altered.
  • Employers must delete employees’ personal information after a certain time period.
  • Employers must receive consent from employees to collect, use, or disclose the employees’ personal information.
  • Employers must inform a special government-run Personal Data Committee if an employees’ personal information is leaked.

Employers who violate the PDPA could face civil or criminal liability, as well as administrative fines, depending on the claim and breach.

Civil Liability

If an offender is found to be civilly liable (e.g. an employee sues the employer for damages arising from a breach of the PDPA), the court can order the offender to pay punitive damages capped at twice the actual damages.

Criminal Liability

The PDPA also contains criminal liability for certain offences. Penalties are set at a maximum of six months’ imprisonment, a fine of up to THB 1 million (approximately EUR 30,000), or both. If the offender is a corporate entity, and the offence is committed because of an order or act by a director, manager, or any associated persons responsible for the act, those individuals would face criminal liability and be subject to the above penalties. Moreover, a person who has a duty to order or perform any act but fails to carry out his or her duty, resulting in the company committing an offence, is also criminally liable and subject to the above penalties.

Administrative liability

Companies can also face administrative fines for violation of the PDPA, which range from THB 500,000 to THB 5 million (approximately EUR 15,000 to EUR 150,000).

Comment

If an employer collects, uses, or discloses employees’ personal information, then the employer should be aware of the PDPA’s requirements. Otherwise, the employer can face criminal, civil, or administrative penalties.

Related Professionals

Practices

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 7, 2020
Amendments to Thailand’s Labour Protection Act (LPA) on May 5, 2019, ushered in significant changes to a variety of labour laws, resulting in increased statutory severance pay, increased maternity leave benefits, implementation of paid necessary business leave, changes in wage payments during temporary suspension of business, interest payments for non-payment of wages in certain situations, and new workplace relocation procedures. These changes to the LPA also enhanced employee protections by setting out key amendments to the law governing transfer of employment.
Read More
September 17, 2020
After the COVID-19 outbreak, a number of business operators were forced to react to the situation by reducing the number of workers or staff they employed. For the labour courts and labour officers, one important point related to such reductions is whether employers have paid the correct amount of severance, remuneration in lieu of advance notice, and overtime payments to their employees.
Read More
September 15, 2020
With many employees in Thailand working outside their company’s normal IT security fence, their increased use of their own computers and devices instead of those in their offices with standard or enhanced security mechanisms has made it more challenging for employers to control access to key business information. In the rush to set up a fully or partially remote workforce, most companies have had little time to establish work-from-home guidelines on protection of their valuable intangible assets like trade secrets and confidential business information.
Read More