You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 2, 2021

Thailand’s New Electronic Meeting Laws and Security Measures

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a significant increase in the popularity of electronic meetings among businesses across the world, as physical meetings became unfeasible due to government lockdowns and regulations limiting gatherings to limit the risk of further spreading the disease. In Thailand, this turn of events has resulted in the promulgation of a new electronic meeting law to modernize rules that facilitate the convening of corporate entities’ statutory meetings as required under Thai law.

Electronic meetings in Thailand have been permitted to some degree since June 27, 2014, when the Announcement of the National Council for Peace and Order No. 74/2557 on Teleconferences through Electronic Means B.E. 2557 (2014) first allowed the practice, subject to various restrictions. However, many companies considered two strict requirements under this announcement to be impractical: at least one-third of the quorum for the electronic meeting had to physically attend the meeting at the designated meeting venue, which implies that no more than two-thirds of the quorum could choose to attend the meeting via electronic means; and all participants of the electronic meeting (whether attending electronically or in person) had to be physically present in Thailand at the time of the meeting, which effectively prohibited overseas participation.

New Rules for Electronic Meetings

The new electronic meeting law, the Royal Decree on Teleconferences through Electronic Means B.E. 2563 (2020), came into effect on April 19, 2020, replacing the 2014 order and relaxing its most onerous limitations in order to facilitate meetings of directors and shareholders via electronic means during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The key relaxations codified by the royal decree include allowing all attendees to attend meetings via electronic means, such as by phone or videoconferencing, from anywhere in the world. Furthermore, there is no longer a physical attendance requirement, and notices (and enclosures) calling a meeting can be distributed to participants via electronic mail, replacing the standard postal requirement of the 2014 announcement.

The new royal decree also needed to introduce certain statutory protocols in order to safeguard the integrity of the new meeting procedures. First, the meeting organizer must keep records of the meeting notice that is sent out electronically, and must verify the identities of the participants before the meeting starts. There must also be an audio or audiovisual record of the entire meeting (except for secret meetings), and the electronic traffic data of all attendees (i.e., the log file of usernames and login/logout dates and times) must be kept as evidence. Minutes of the meetings must also be documented, whether in an electronic or physical format.

Similar to the previous law, the new royal decree applies to board meetings and shareholders meetings of both private and public companies in Thailand, as well as to meetings of partnerships, trade associations, and chambers of commerce. Companies may choose to hold electronic meetings regardless of whether their articles of association have any provision specially permitting this. In addition, the standard rules and conditions for physical meetings still apply to electronic meetings, for instance, appointment of a proxy is allowed at a shareholders meeting but not at board meetings.

Security Measures for E-Meetings

To supplement the new royal decree, the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society (MDES) issued a new set of mandatory security standards for electronic meetings in its Notification Re: Standards for Maintaining Security of Meetings via Electronic Means B.E. 2563 (2020). The notification, which came into effect on May 26, 2020, outlines various mandatory security measures and procedures for electronic meetings. It also regulates the role and functions of the “conference control system” and the “system controller.” While the new royal decree already addressed security measures to some degree through its statutory protocols, the MDES notification added the following key requirements:

  • Method of identity check. The meeting organizer may adopt any secured method of identity verification, such as username and password or one-time password.
  • Two-way communication. The meeting must have sufficient bandwidth to provide a clear and continuous communication channel—whether via interactive audio or video communication—to allow participants to interact and express opinions to one another without interruption throughout the meeting.
  • Conference control system. The chair of the meeting (or the system controller) must have technological access to control or restrict, whether permanently or temporarily, the participation of attendees during the meeting in case of necessity or emergency.
  • Access to documents and data. Attendees must be able to access documents and data presented during the meeting.
  • Voting mechanism. The meeting must grant access to the technological tools to facilitate voting by the attendees, whether in the form of a general vote or a secret vote;
  • Storage of records. The meeting must keep records and data in connection with the meeting, including method of identity check, method and results of votes, audio or audiovisual recording (except for secret meetings), attendees’ electronic traffic data, and occurrence of disruptions during the meeting (if any).
  • Troubleshooting. Attendees must be able to report disruptions and errors that occur during the meeting, and the organizer must arrange for proper solutions and preventive measures.
  • IT security standards. The meeting must meet minimum IT security in terms of confidentiality, integrity, accessibility, privacy and protection of personal data, and other IT security measures.

It has become a general and convenient practice for electronic meetings to be conducted via free or paid conference applications or platforms, such as MS Teams, Zoom, Google Meet, and so on. The Electronic Transaction Development Agency (ETDA) is empowered to verify and certify whether the conference control systems have the technical capabilities or functions to comply with the security measures set out by the MDES notification on e-meeting security. To date, several conference control systems have voluntarily completed the ETDA’s self-assessment, but only a few have opted to apply with ETDA for its official certification. Both groups are published on the ETDA website at https://www.etda.or.th.

Meeting organizers from all Thai companies should familiarize themselves with these new laws and rules on electronic meetings and carefully choose a conference control system that both complies with the regulations and is compatible with their needs. Regardless of the platform chosen, the royal decree and the associated MDES notification have taken a much-needed, modernizing step that significantly eases the process of corporate operations in Thailand. These developments are an encouraging indication of Thailand’s intent to facilitate international business in the country, and a welcome innovation for shareholders and board members.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 28, 2023
On March 28, 2023, Cambodia’s Ministry of Economy and Finance and Ministry of Commerce issued Inter-Ministerial Prakas No. 168 on Penalties for Persons Violating the Law on Competition. This release was in line with the country’s recent establishment of a framework and thresholds for merger filings. The penalties for violating the Law on Competition center on the following three offenses: 1.  Entering into vertical agreements. This can be done by: requiring buyers to resell goods or services in limited geographic locations; requiring buyers to resell goods or services to specific customers or specific types of customers; requiring buyers to purchase goods or services from one seller only; preventing sellers from selling goods or service to other buyers; or requiring buyers to buy additional goods or services that are not related to the goods or services being sold. 2. Abusing a dominant market position. This can be done by: requiring or persuading suppliers or customers to not do business with competitors; refusing to supply goods or services to competitors; selling goods or services subject to commercial terms that require buyers to buy other goods or services separately that are not related to the purpose of the transaction; selling goods or services below production cost; or refusing to give competitors access to the necessary means of selling their goods and services. 3.  Undertaking a business combination that actually or potentially restricts or distorts market competition. Each of these violations is punishable by a fine of 3% to 10% of the infringer’s total turnover during the period of violation, limited to three years. Next Steps The first half of 2023 has seen three new regulations strengthening Cambodia’s competition law framework, as noted above. Although certain unclear terms do remain, regulators are expected to issue additional decisions in 2023. For more details on
Read More
April 20, 2023
In 2018, following enactment of the Myanmar Companies Law (MCL), the Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA) launched Myanmar Companies Online (MyCO), an official online platform for corporate registration. The MCL required companies to re-register in MyCO, but some companies did not complete this step within the date provided by the law. In addition, the MCL introduced a requirement for companies to file an annual return through MyCO. Some companies have also failed to do this, which can eventually lead to DICA automatically striking the company’s name from the register. If a company has not re-registered, it must follow specific administrative procedures to “activate” the company in MyCO. There are also administrative procedures allowing for restoration of companies that have been struck from the DICA register. This article considers the ramifications of each of these scenarios and outlines potential next steps for companies facing these challenges. Activating a Company Not Yet Re-registered Prior to enactment of the MCL, all companies were formed under the Myanmar Companies Act 1914, which was the primary law governing registration and operation of companies in the country. Once the MCL was passed, companies were required to re-register online via MyCO by January 31, 2019. For companies that did not re-register on MyCO, the company’s name, old registration number, and registration date under the Myanmar Companies Act 1914 was recorded in MyCO, and the status of the company was set as “Not Yet Re-registered.” Companies assigned this status should not assume that it means the company was struck off the DICA register. Rather, the DICA states that if a company is listed as not re-registered on MyCO, it can still re-register by fulfilling the requirements specified in the MCL. In order to re-register under the MCL, the company must obtain a court order to
Read More
April 10, 2023
On April 1, 2023, Myanmar’s Directorate of Investment and Companies Administration (DICA) announced additional reporting requirements for newly registered companies. According to the announcement, newly established companies must submit the required information to DICA by email within two months of their registration and before submitting their first annual return (AR) to DICA through the Myanmar Companies Online (MyCO) system as required under the Myanmar Companies Law 2017 (MCL). The reporting requirements include: Proof that the bank account established in the company’s name has been credited with the paid-up capital shown in the MyCO system. Verification of individuals listed as directors of the company. For directors who are Myanmar citizens, this consists of confirmation from the relevant township police office that the director actually resides at the address stated in the national registration card and the application for company registration (Form A). For directors who are foreign nationals, the required verification is proof of compliance with the Registration of Foreigners Rules 1948 (such as Immigration Form C). Confirmation from the relevant township police office that the registered address of the company matches an actual location and that the company is planning to open an office. Verification of individuals and entities listed as members of the company. For individual registered members, the requirements are the same as for individual directors (see above). For legal entities that are registered members, the entity’s certificate of incorporation must be provided. Once a newly registered company submits this information by email, the registrar will review it manually. Companies that fail to submit the required information will not be able to submit their first AR documentation. If this happens, the DICA registrar will issue a notice, and the company will have 28 days to submit its AR and pay all outstanding fees and penalties, or face automatic
Read More
March 29, 2023
On March 14, 2023, the Competition Commission of Cambodia (CCC) set out its merger filing thresholds in Decision No. 095 on Thresholds for Prior Notification of Business Mergers. This was a follow-up to the recent issuance of a regulation outlining the requirements and procedures for merger and acquisition filings. Decision No. 095 applies to all business combinations subject to premerger notification requirements under this prior regulation. The thresholds for when the CCC must be notified of a merger are laid out in the table below. In current practice, the term “turnover” typically refers to a company’s total sales revenue, while “input purchase turnover” denotes the value of materials or equipment acquired for production purposes. Although this reflects the initial interpretation of these terms, it is advisable to seek confirmation or clarification from the CCC before the filing to ensure accuracy and alignment with their current definitions, as it is conceivable that the interpretation may change. Decision No. 095 leaves room for the Ministry of Commerce to amend these thresholds as deemed necessary. Outlook In the last two years, Cambodia has steadily issued regulations to strengthen its legal framework for competition. Although gaps remain, especially with regard to enforcement of fines and certain unclear terms, more regulations are likely in 2025 and 2026.
Read More