You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

July 27, 2016

Thailand’s Free Trade Agreements: Minimizing Costs for Businesses

Subscribe to Updates
Tilleke & Gibbins

Free trade agreements (FTAs) provide a range of benefits to businesses. FTAs, which are agreed upon between two or more countries, allow companies in those countries to trade in certain goods with reduced or eliminated tariff rates. They can greatly reduce costs for businesses, and in turn, this allows companies to allocate more resources to other business functions such as research and development, marketing, and so on.

This article provides an overview of Thailand’s FTAs and the types of goods they apply to. In particular, the article discusses how businesses should operate in countries with FTAs.

Thailand’s FTAs

Under the laws and regulations of the World Trade Organization, Thailand has six separate FTAs with Australia, Chile, China, Japan, New Zealand, and Peru. As an ASEAN member country, Thailand also belongs to various regional FTAs, including an FTA among ASEAN member countries, and separate FTAs between ASEAN member countries and Australia, China, India, Japan, Korea, New Zealand.

ASEAN member countries are currently negotiating several FTAs and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnerships to further reduce trading costs and encourage trade within ASEAN and between ASEAN and other countries.

FTAs between individual countries and FTAs that affect whole regions can overlap. If a company is operating in a country where multiple FTAs apply, and it is trading in certain goods designated in the FTAs, the company can select the most favorable tariff rate.

Requirements for the Application of FTA Tariff Rates

FTA tariff rates are applicable if goods which are traded between countries that belong to an FTA satisfy the following requirements:

The goods are covered by the FTA. FTA tariff rates can apply to any types of goods, as long as the goods are specifically included in an FTA. The goods are specified by a Harmonized System code—a widely recognized code to classify goods. Countries have discretion in classifying goods under Harmonized System codes, and therefore, it is common for the same good to have different classifications.

To determine whether an FTA applies to certain goods, a request for information can be made to Customs in the importing country or at the National Trade Repository of an ASEAN member country. The National Trade Repository has an informative database containing valuable regulatory information ranging from Harmonized System codes for goods to documents required when importing a product. Every ASEAN member country contributes to this database, which has increased transparency and improved the time it takes to search for laws and regulations. It can be accessed at the ASEAN Trade Repository website.

The goods originate from the exporting country. FTAs focus on the trade of goods that originate, or largely originate, from the exporting country. The specific goods mentioned in the FTA must be “Originating Goods,” a requirement which can be fulfilled in a number of ways.

To qualify as Originating Goods, a good can either be wholly obtained or produced from the exporting country, or produced exclusively from materials from the exporting country. In addition, a good can qualify if it is wholly or partially made of foreign materials, and it adheres to product-specific rules that are found in most FTAs, per any of the following:

  • The end product has a different Harmonized System code than the foreign materials it is made of. The agreement specifies what part of the code must be different.
  • The good has value added in the exporting country. FTAs normally have provisions on how to calculate this and what thresholds need to be met.
  • The good has gone through a specific process stipulated in the FTA.

These definitions can be quite technical, and they can vary depending on the FTA. If a company is operating in a country with multiple FTAs, it is important to examine these definitions closely to see how trading costs may be reduced.

FTAs in Practice

Using an FTA for a company’s benefit can be illustrated with a practical example. Take a car factory in Thailand. The factory assembles a number of parts to form a final product, a car. In considering where to obtain the individual parts, FTAs are factored into the equation. Cherry picking the most advantageous FTA for each individual part can almost completely eliminate tariff costs.

The company could import exhaust pipes from Cambodia, which are covered by a regional ASEAN FTA that completely eliminates import tariffs to Thailand. Wheels are not covered by any FTAs, and so the company could purchase these locally to avoid importing costs. Any car electronics could be imported from Peru, as there is a Thailand-Peru FTA that greatly reduces tariffs for electronics imported from Peru.

Once all of these parts are assembled into a car, they constitute a new product and consequently the Harmonization Code changes. The car would qualify as an Originating Good from Thailand, under the requirements mentioned above. An FTA applicable to cars can now be used to export the car with limited or eliminated tariff costs from Thailand.

Reducing Costs Through FTAs

Companies should strive to operate their business in the most cost-effective way. Deciding on which countries parts and final products will be manufactured in, how to procure parts and materials, and how to distribute final products can have a lot of influence on the costs incurred by businesses. FTAs can go a long way toward reducing costs and maintaining a competitive edge.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals
Atsuko Kudo
Email

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 9, 2026
On April 28, 2026, the Central Bank of Myanmar (CBM) issued Notification No. 18/2026 introducing the new Foreign Remittance Business Regulations. The new regulations apply to companies intending to operate foreign remittance businesses in Myanmar that are not licensed banks, non-bank financial institutions, or other financial institutions. The regulations supersede and replace the previous regulatory framework governing foreign remittance businesses under CBM Notification No. 21/2019. While the overall structure remains familiar, the new regulations introduce more detailed requirements for licensing, operations, reporting, and compliance, with a stronger focus on transparency and regulatory oversight. Broader Licensing Requirements Under the new regulations, applicants must submit detailed business plans describing the use of information technology and mobile platforms, along with clear plans for handling remittances from workers abroad and resolving customer complaints. Financial Thresholds and Reporting Requirements The baseline financial thresholds remain unchanged. Licensees must maintain a security deposit of MMK 100 million in an escrow account, along with a separate revolving fund dedicated solely to remittance operations. The new regulations introduce more structured reporting obligations. Licensees are now required to submit daily remittance transaction data by the next business day before noon, in addition to monthly and periodic reporting requirements. Foreign bank account statements must also be submitted regularly, and licensees must provide updates on business operations every six months. Strengthened AML and CFT Framework The new regulations place a greater emphasis on anti-money laundering (AML) and counter financing of terrorism (CFT), with tighter controls over management changes. Any changes in shareholding, share transfers, or the appointment of key management personnel such as the managing director require prior approval from the CBM. Licensing Fees and Validity The new regulations increase licensing costs, while maintaining the same validity period of three years. The new regulations provide more detailed grounds for suspension and
Read More
June 4, 2026
On May 19, 2026, the Cabinet of the Royal Thai Government approved, in principle, revisions to Thailand’s visa exemption scheme and visa on arrival (VOA) program, as proposed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Tourism and Sports. The revisions represent a tightening of Thailand’s immigration framework and will affect a broad range of short-term visitors. Background On July 15, 2024, Thailand expanded its visa exemption scheme by increasing the permitted period of visa-exempt stay from 30 days to 60 days in order to promote tourism, support the country’s post-pandemic economic recovery, and facilitate international travel. Under this revised scheme, passport holders from 93 countries and territories (an increase from the previous 57 countries and territories) have been permitted to enter Thailand without a visa and remain in the country for up to 60 days per entry for purposes including tourism, business engagements, urgent work, and ad hoc assignments. In addition, eligible visitors may apply at the Thai Immigration Bureau for a further 30-day extension of stay. Key Changes The proposed revisions would revoke the current 60-day exemption and reinstate the previous stay period, thereby reducing the maximum permitted stay for eligible travelers to 30 days per entry. In addition, the number of countries and territories eligible under the 30-day visa-exemption scheme is expected to be reduced to 54. The scope of the VOA scheme would likewise be significantly narrowed, with the number of eligible countries reduced from 31 countries to just four (Azerbaijan, Belarus, Serbia, and India). Further, Thailand is expected to introduce a new 15-day visa exemption category for nationals of Seychelles, the Maldives, and Mauritius. The revised framework would also limit each country or territory to a single visa exemption privilege in order to simplify Thailand’s immigration framework and reduce overlapping immigration privileges.
Read More
May 25, 2026
After several years of policy discussion and continued efforts led by the Ministry of Commerce (MOC) to relax the list of reserved businesses under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA), the reform process has now reached a significant milestone. On May 12, 2026, the Thai cabinet approved in principle two draft subordinate legislative instruments aimed at delisting certain reserved business activities under the FBA and reducing licensing requirements for foreign business operators. These developments signal a renewed and concrete effort by the government to modernize Thailand’s business regulatory framework in order to attract foreign investment and boost Thailand’s competitiveness in the global market. Nine Businesses Set for FBA Delisting Below is a list of the nine businesses that are being targeted for delisting from the FBA’s restrictions. A draft ministerial regulation would delist the first eight reserved businesses, while a royal decree has been drafted to delist the ninth business: Telecommunications services (Type 1 license only, covering operators without their own telecommunications infrastructure), under the supervision of the Office of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission. Treasury center services subject to the Foreign Exchange Control Act B.E. 2485 and under the supervision of the Bank of Thailand. Securities-collateralized lending, pursuant to the laws governing securities and exchange and derivatives regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Agency, dealer, advisory, or fund management services relating to derivatives where the underlying assets fall outside the scope of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) Intra-group shared services, including administrative, human resources, and IT functions Intra-group domestic debt guarantee services Leasing of partial space for installation of financial service machines and automatic vending machines for employee use Petroleum drilling services Trading of agricultural product derivatives through a futures exchange, with physical delivery or receipt of agricultural products at a futures exchange–designated
Read More
April 29, 2026
Vietnam’s education sector is entering a new regulatory era. On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly adopted a series of new and amended laws in the field of education, including the 2025 Law on Vocational Education, the 2025 Law on Higher Education, and the amended Law on Education No. 123/2025/QH15 (Amended Law on Education). These laws together took effect on January 1, 2026, marking a significant reform of Vietnam’s legal framework governing the education sector. The legislative package introduces a new lawmaking approach under which foundational and principle-based provisions are codified in the Amended Law on Education, while the Law on Higher Education and the Law on Vocational Education serve as specialized statutes providing supplementary, sector-specific regulatory detail tailored to their respective subsectors. The Amended Law on Education fundamentally restructures how educational institutions are established, governed, and licensed, with direct implications for private investors, foreign-invested entities, and education service providers operating in Vietnam. Below are several highlights of the key changes under the amended law, especially in the private sector, that stakeholders should understand: Change in the National Education System In addition to primary education, lower secondary (junior high school) education is now compulsory in Vietnam. Accordingly, diplomas are no longer awarded upon completion of lower secondary school but only for upper education levels. The national education system is also expanded through the introduction of vocational high school as a new level of vocational education. Such reform creates additional learning pathways that not only enable learners to pursue both further education and participate in the labor market, but also better align education and training with socioeconomic development needs. New Hurdle for Joint Investors: Mandatory Corporate Entity Requirement Where two or more investors jointly establish an education institution, the investors are no longer permitted to directly establish such an institution.
Read More