You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

July 27, 2016

Thailand’s Free Trade Agreements: Minimizing Costs for Businesses

Subscribe to Updates
Tilleke & Gibbins

Free trade agreements (FTAs) provide a range of benefits to businesses. FTAs, which are agreed upon between two or more countries, allow companies in those countries to trade in certain goods with reduced or eliminated tariff rates. They can greatly reduce costs for businesses, and in turn, this allows companies to allocate more resources to other business functions such as research and development, marketing, and so on.

This article provides an overview of Thailand’s FTAs and the types of goods they apply to. In particular, the article discusses how businesses should operate in countries with FTAs.

Thailand’s FTAs

Under the laws and regulations of the World Trade Organization, Thailand has six separate FTAs with Australia, Chile, China, Japan, New Zealand, and Peru. As an ASEAN member country, Thailand also belongs to various regional FTAs, including an FTA among ASEAN member countries, and separate FTAs between ASEAN member countries and Australia, China, India, Japan, Korea, New Zealand.

ASEAN member countries are currently negotiating several FTAs and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnerships to further reduce trading costs and encourage trade within ASEAN and between ASEAN and other countries.

FTAs between individual countries and FTAs that affect whole regions can overlap. If a company is operating in a country where multiple FTAs apply, and it is trading in certain goods designated in the FTAs, the company can select the most favorable tariff rate.

Requirements for the Application of FTA Tariff Rates

FTA tariff rates are applicable if goods which are traded between countries that belong to an FTA satisfy the following requirements:

The goods are covered by the FTA. FTA tariff rates can apply to any types of goods, as long as the goods are specifically included in an FTA. The goods are specified by a Harmonized System code—a widely recognized code to classify goods. Countries have discretion in classifying goods under Harmonized System codes, and therefore, it is common for the same good to have different classifications.

To determine whether an FTA applies to certain goods, a request for information can be made to Customs in the importing country or at the National Trade Repository of an ASEAN member country. The National Trade Repository has an informative database containing valuable regulatory information ranging from Harmonized System codes for goods to documents required when importing a product. Every ASEAN member country contributes to this database, which has increased transparency and improved the time it takes to search for laws and regulations. It can be accessed at the ASEAN Trade Repository website.

The goods originate from the exporting country. FTAs focus on the trade of goods that originate, or largely originate, from the exporting country. The specific goods mentioned in the FTA must be “Originating Goods,” a requirement which can be fulfilled in a number of ways.

To qualify as Originating Goods, a good can either be wholly obtained or produced from the exporting country, or produced exclusively from materials from the exporting country. In addition, a good can qualify if it is wholly or partially made of foreign materials, and it adheres to product-specific rules that are found in most FTAs, per any of the following:

  • The end product has a different Harmonized System code than the foreign materials it is made of. The agreement specifies what part of the code must be different.
  • The good has value added in the exporting country. FTAs normally have provisions on how to calculate this and what thresholds need to be met.
  • The good has gone through a specific process stipulated in the FTA.

These definitions can be quite technical, and they can vary depending on the FTA. If a company is operating in a country with multiple FTAs, it is important to examine these definitions closely to see how trading costs may be reduced.

FTAs in Practice

Using an FTA for a company’s benefit can be illustrated with a practical example. Take a car factory in Thailand. The factory assembles a number of parts to form a final product, a car. In considering where to obtain the individual parts, FTAs are factored into the equation. Cherry picking the most advantageous FTA for each individual part can almost completely eliminate tariff costs.

The company could import exhaust pipes from Cambodia, which are covered by a regional ASEAN FTA that completely eliminates import tariffs to Thailand. Wheels are not covered by any FTAs, and so the company could purchase these locally to avoid importing costs. Any car electronics could be imported from Peru, as there is a Thailand-Peru FTA that greatly reduces tariffs for electronics imported from Peru.

Once all of these parts are assembled into a car, they constitute a new product and consequently the Harmonization Code changes. The car would qualify as an Originating Good from Thailand, under the requirements mentioned above. An FTA applicable to cars can now be used to export the car with limited or eliminated tariff costs from Thailand.

Reducing Costs Through FTAs

Companies should strive to operate their business in the most cost-effective way. Deciding on which countries parts and final products will be manufactured in, how to procure parts and materials, and how to distribute final products can have a lot of influence on the costs incurred by businesses. FTAs can go a long way toward reducing costs and maintaining a competitive edge.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals
Atsuko Kudo
Email

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 20, 2026
Vietnam’s Law on Bankruptcy and Rehabilitation No. 142/2025/QH15, passed by the National Assembly on December 11, 2025, does something many regional counterparts do not yet attempt: it instructs parties and arbitral tribunals on exactly what happens to an arbitration once a debtor becomes insolvent. Together with the Law on Commercial Arbitration No. 54/2010/QH12, the new law improves upon what used to be an uncertain area of practice, now providing an explicit, mandatory sequence of procedures. Suspension and Termination of Arbitration Proceedings Under article 40(2) of the law, once a Vietnamese court accepts a bankruptcy petition, any arbitration that concerns the debtor’s financial obligations must be temporarily suspended as soon as the tribunal receives the court’s notification. If the court subsequently issues a decision commencing bankruptcy proceedings, article 59(2) takes a further step: the suspended arbitration is terminated outright, and the underlying case file is transferred to the court handling the insolvency for resolution. The two provisions work as a sequence: first suspension, then termination and transfer, rather than as independent triggers. Meanwhile, article 60(4) reinforces this effect by vesting the bankruptcy court with exclusive jurisdiction over all claims against the debtor from the date the petition is accepted. Notably, this mechanism operates automatically, without the need for the insolvency court to issue a separate anti-arbitration order. The tribunal simply suspends or terminates the proceeding by operation of law once notified; however, Vietnamese law currently provides no procedure by which a party can apply to the insolvency court for permission to continue the arbitration despite the statutory effect. Practitioners with a Vietnamese counterparty in arbitration should treat notification of a bankruptcy filing as something to flag to the tribunal immediately since continuing to arbitrate a claim that has become subject to article 40(2) or 59(2) risks producing an award vulnerable
Read More
August 20, 2026
Thai law contains no provision that speaks directly to what happens to an arbitration when one of the parties becomes insolvent. The interaction between arbitration and insolvency is derived instead from the general operation of two separately drafted laws: the Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940) and the Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002). Because Thai courts have had few opportunities to interpret how these two statutes apply together, the practical answer to many questions, such as who represents an insolvent party in arbitration, whether an award will be enforced, and what happens to a foreign proceeding, depends on inference from general principles of insolvency, arbitration, and procedural law rather than on settled rules. Liquidation and Restructuring The Bankruptcy Act governs both liquidation, which winds up a debtor’s affairs, and restructuring (rehabilitation), which aims to preserve a business. The consequences for arbitration differ accordingly. In liquidation, the debtor’s assets vest in the official receiver, who alone can conduct or continue any arbitration affecting the estate; the debtor loses the authority to act on its own behalf. In restructuring, the plan preparer or administrator takes over that role, but there is more room for the debtor to remain involved, since the objective of rehabilitation is to keep the business operational. Restructuring carries an automatic stay that takes effect once the Bankruptcy Court accepts the restructuring petition. This stay can halt an arbitration regardless of where it is seated. In contrast, liquidation does not work through a stay; instead, the debtor’s loss of authority over its own assets and disputes is what constrains the arbitration. Neither proceeding provides a party a formal route to apply for permission to continue arbitrating—the Bankruptcy Act contains no such mechanism—though in restructuring cases the Bankruptcy Court may allow proceedings to continue where doing so will not prejudice
Read More
August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.
Read More
August 18, 2026
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) is seeking public comment on proposed amendments that would significantly expand know-your-customer (KYC) and customer due diligence (CDD) requirements for cash-related transactions at financial institutions (FIs) and specialized financial institutions (SFIs). Released on August 5, 2026, the proposed regulation would supersede BOT Notification No. 16/2569, which focused primarily on cash withdrawal transactions. The public comment period is open through September 3, 2026. The amendments reflect concerns that FIs and SFIs may be used to facilitate the movement, concealment, and conversion of criminal proceeds, potentially damaging institutional operations and public confidence in the financial system. Expanded Scope of Covered Transactions The most significant change is the broadening of the definition of “cash-related transactions.” Previously, the regulation covered only cash withdrawals and uncrossed check withdrawals. The amended regulation extends coverage to include: Cash deposits, check deposits, or receipt of funds from the public not in the form of deposit accounts; Thai baht (THB) banknote exchange (different denominations); Receipt of cash for issuing checks and drafts; and Purchase, sale, or exchange of foreign banknotes. Mandatory Identity Verification and Risk Management For all cash-related transactions, FIs and SFIs must require customers, or authorized or delegated persons, to present identification or verify their identity before every transaction, including one-time (walk-in) transactions. Specific identification requirements vary by transaction type, customer nationality, and channel (branch vs. electronic). FIs and SFIs must also establish comprehensive risk management processes and procedures for cash-related transactions. These requirements include identifying customers or authorized representatives in accordance with transaction-specific verification standards, analyzing customer behavior, implementing risk-management measures proportionate to the customer’s risk profile, and recording abnormal behavior in relevant systems. The BOT also encourages institutions to proactively guide customers toward transaction channels that offer greater traceability than cash. For corporate customers in high-risk business sectors—including foreign
Read More