You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 8, 2023

Thailand’s Competition Law and Regulations: Background and Outlook for 2023

Subscribe to Updates

Thailand has a robust legal framework for competition, with laws and regulations in place to prevent anticompetitive conduct and market concentration and to promote fair competition. However, as the business environment in the country continues to evolve, it is important for companies operating in Thailand to stay informed about the latest developments in competition laws and regulations.

Generally, Thailand’s competition regime is based on the Trade Competition Act B.E. 2560 (2017) (the TCA) and its implementing regulations, except for certain industries which are governed by sector-specific competition regulations. The TCA is designed to promote free and fair competition by suppressing anticompetitive behaviors.

In this article, we will examine what businesses can expect in the coming year, and what they need to be aware of in order to stay compliant.

A Maturing Regulatory Structure

The Trade Competition Commission of Thailand (TCCT) is the agency responsible for enforcing competition laws and regulations in Thailand. The TCCT has the authority to oversee the market structure, act to maintain competitiveness in various industries, investigate misconduct, and take action against companies that engage in anticompetitive practices, such as abuse of market dominance, cartels, and unfair trade practices. It also has discretionary power to consider applications for a merger of two or more businesses that may cause monopoly or market dominance.

While the TCA and the TCCT had limited success in the decades after the original TCA’s enactment in 1999, a new TCA in 2017 made several significant changes to the previous version of the law. The 2017 TCA guarantees the independence of the TCCT from political and business interventions. It also introduces administrative penalties for less-serious offenses, including non-hardcore cartels, unfair trade practices, and neglect of merger filing duties.

Since then, the TCCT has been more active in its issuance of subordinate regulations to optimize the functionality of TCA provisions. A number of business-specific guidelines adopted from time to time address competition concerns in certain business sectors, such as modern trade, franchises, and food delivery services. The TCCT has also issued rules that purchasers must follow when setting credit terms for SMEs (small and medium enterprises).

The level of enforcement has also escalated, evidenced by more than 60 cases determined and concluded during 2019–2021—mostly regarding merger filings and unfair trade practices. In recent years, the TCCT has had oversight of several high-profile mergers, issuing remedies and closely keeping track of the companies’ business conduct to ensure compliance with fair trade and competition requirements. The administrative office of the TCCT has also accomplished the first proactive investigation procedures involving unannounced inspections, commonly known in some jurisdictions as “dawn raids,” conducted at the accused’s premises to obtain useful evidence for cartel misconduct.

TCCT’s academic role has also been well recognized. The TCCT has conducted market studies of many emerging industries, such as e-commerce and marketplace platforms, to understand business practices and identify potential anticompetitive behaviors. The TCCT also acknowledges that the TCA should not stop evolving in today’s complex economy. In collaboration with the Thailand Development Research Institute, the TCCT studied whether and how to improve the TCA and its enforceability, resulting in the proposal of significant amendments to the TCA.

The regulatory structure of Thailand’s competition regime has matured a great deal in the past five years. This increased reliability is likely to continue in 2023 as the TCCT looks to deal with concerns about today’s market conditions.

TCCT and Emerging Issues

One of the key areas of focus for the TCCT in the coming year will be the digital economy. With the rapid growth of e-commerce and online platforms, the TCCT will be closely monitoring the growing market power of these operators to ensure that competition is fair and that consumers’ selection of goods and services is not manipulated. This is particularly important as the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the shift to what the Thai government has called the “platform economy.” Recognizing that some plaftform operators’ conduct and trade conditions could damage competitors and trade partners, or restrict consumers’ choices, the TCCT set out to develop a new set of regulations and strategies to address these competition concerns. In this regard, the TCCT may adopt new legislation modeled on the Digital Markets Act of the European Union to more efficiently tackle anticompetitive conduct by digital marketplaces and online gatekeepers.

One of the TCCT’s missions in the year ahead will be to revitalize its existing regulations. The TCCT is prepared to raise the threshold for determining whether a company is in a position of market dominance, in light of the country’s economic growth and heightened inflation. Another area of focus is amendments to enhance the clarity of merger control rules and to extend the scope of control to certain types of mergers such as a full-function joint ventures, which are not yet clearly regulated under the current rules.

In terms of enforcement mechanisms, the TCCT is studying the possibility of implementing a leniency program that would grant immunity to whistleblowers who expose collusive arrangements. This leniency program would be a highly useful instrument for the TCCT in detecting cartels, similar to the success of leniency policies in exposing collusion in the United States, the European Union, Japan, and other jurisdictions.

Conclusion

Overall, businesses operating in Thailand can expect the TCCT to continue its efforts to promote fair competition and to intensify the level of enforcement in the coming year, with a particular focus on the digital economy and merger control. Companies should stay informed about the latest developments in competition laws and regulations and seek legal advice when necessary to ensure compliance. While competition is just one of the many areas of compliance that businesses have to uphold, enlisting outside assistance in maintaining a healthy and resilient presence in the market can greatly ease the burden.

Related Professionals

Practices

Antitrust and Competition

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 25, 2025
In Thailand, in-court business rehabilitation is a legal proceeding that enhances a debtor’s chance to restructure business operations for corporate debtors who are unable to repay their debts. The purpose of this proceeding is to allow the debtor to continue operating the business and generate income to repay creditors. The amounts that creditors receive in the rehabilitation proceeding are greater than the amounts creditors would receive if the debtor went bankrupt. The law is not designed to allow debtors or creditors to use the business rehabilitation process in bad faith for their benefit or to defraud another party. Accordingly, the Business Rehabilitation Law, which is included in the Thai Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940), provides criminal liability for actions taken before or during the process. This article addresses the key points regarding criminal liability for safeguarding debtors and creditors in business rehabilitation proceedings from any parties who act in bad faith. Criminal Liability in Business Rehabilitation The following provisions establish the framework for criminal liability in business rehabilitation cases, ensuring that all parties act with integrity throughout the process. The Bankruptcy Act of Thailand B.E. 2483 (1940) provides the relevant provisions regarding the business rehabilitation process. Additionally, if a company debtor or its authorized directors are found to have committed fraud or malfeasance under the Bankruptcy Act, they can also be held criminally liable under the Penal Code or related criminal statutes. The rehabilitation process aims to help a business recover financially under the supervision of the court. When the court approves the rehabilitation plan, the court appoints a business rehabilitation plan administrator to manage and implement the process. However, if it is discovered that the debtor, its executives, or even the plan administrator engaged in illegal activities prior to or during the rehabilitation process—such as tax evasion, embezzlement,
Read More
June 17, 2025
On January 9, 2025, the Lao official gazette published the newly amended Decision on Trade Inspection Implementation No. 0019/MOIC, dated January 6, 2025. This decision aims to establish principles and rules for trade officers to inspect, fine, and take measures against violators of trade laws and their related regulations on business competition, business operations, and intellectual property rights to protect consumers and business operators in Laos. Changes in Trade Inspection Procedures Previously, trade inspection officers, operating independently under the central Ministry of Industry and Commerce (MOIC) or the provincial-level Department of Industry and Commerce (DOIC), were responsible for administrative raid actions focusing exclusively on intellectual property issues. However, following the enactment of Decision No. 0019/MOIC, trade inspection officers will now be grouped into the Trade Officers Unit, which will also include business competition officers and consumer protection officers. This unit will conduct and participate in raids, considering not only intellectual property laws but also competition and consumer protection laws when imposing penalties on infringers. Trade Inspection Authority Levels Trade inspection implementation is overseen by authorities at three levels: Central level: Department of Business Competition and Trade Inspection, MOIC. The MOIC handles trade inspection work covering all provinces in Laos. Provincial level: DOIC offices in provinces and Vientiane handle trade inspections covering two or more districts. District level: Office of the Industry and Commerce offices in districts. Violations Individuals, legal entities, and organizations violating the newly amended trade inspection decision, the Decree on Trade Inspection, or other related regulations will be educated about the issue, warned, disciplined (for government servants), fined, subject to compensation for damage incurred, or punished by the relevant laws, depending on the gravity of the violation. Trade Violations Violations of trade laws and regulations concerning business operations will result in fines and additional measures. Examples include:
Read More
June 6, 2025
As from July 1, 2025, as part of its ongoing efforts to digitalize and streamline the delivery of public services, the Vietnamese government will officially conduct administrative procedures, both online and offline, only via electronic identity (“e-ID”) accounts on the VNeID platform. In particular: Online administrative procedures carried out via the National Public Service Portal or via information systems for administrative procedures at the ministerial or provincial level are required to be implemented by using e-ID accounts only. When receiving dossiers, authorities will be required to check and verify the e-IDs of companies or individuals responsible for conducting administrative procedures. Further, it is worth noting that to complete the registration of an e-ID account for a company, the legal representative of the company must hold a level-2 e-ID account. Compliance Considerations Vietnam’s first regulation of e-ID accounts for individuals and organizations was issued in Decree No. 59/2022/ND-CP dated September 5, 2022, on electronic authentication and identification. This decree was subsequently replaced by Decree No. 69/2024/ND-CP dated June 25, 2024, which governs the same matters. Registration and operation of e-ID accounts are centralized through VNeID, a digital ID app developed by the National Population Data Center under the Ministry of Public Security of Vietnam. Although the registration of e-ID accounts for companies is not explicitly mandated by law, the absence of an e-ID account may hinder companies from completing administrative procedures, including licensing and reporting obligations. Such non-compliance could consequently result in administrative penalties. To mitigate unexpected non-compliance and administrative fines due to the lack of an e-ID account, companies should be well prepared for and implement the registration of a company e-ID account as soon as possible.
Read More
June 4, 2025
On April 2, 2024, the Cambodian Competition Commission (CCC) issued Decision No. 087 on Requirements and Procedures of Exemptions under the Law on Competition, outlining the requirements and procedures for requesting exemptions for agreements or activities that could prevent, restrict, or distort competition in Cambodia. Franchise agreements often include clauses such as price fixing, exclusive supply arrangements, or territorial restrictions, which could potentially raise concerns under the Law on Competition. Therefore, it is necessary for both franchisors and franchisees to understand how the law applies to their agreements and whether an exemption request may be required. Some arrangements under franchise agreements may fall within the scope of prohibited practices under the Law on Competition. These include horizontal and vertical agreements, abuse of dominant position, and anti-competitive business combination. If a business owner contemplates that their franchise agreement could be interpreted as anti-competitive, they must assess whether to apply for an exemption. Key Criteria for Exemption Under Decision No. 087, the CCC may grant an exemption if the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed agreement or activity meets all four of the following conditions: Significant and identifiable benefits: The agreement must provide clear technological, social, or economic benefits such as cost efficiencies, qualitative efficiencies, initiations of new technologies, or environmental and sustainable benefits. Necessity of the agreement/activities: These benefits must not be achievable without the proposed agreement or activity. The applicant must show that prevention, restriction, or distortion of competition are essential to realizing the benefits. Benefits outweigh harm: The positive impacts must significantly outweigh any adverse effects caused by the prevention, restriction, or distortion of competition, and the benefits should be likely to materialize within one year. No elimination of competition: The agreement must not eliminate competition in any substantial aspect of goods or services. Application and Supporting Documents
Read More