You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 24, 2023

Thailand Tightens Rules for Consumer Loan Agreements

Subscribe to Updates

The Contract Committee of Thailand’s Consumer Protection Board has issued new requirements and prohibitions for consumer loan agreements. The Notification of the Contract Committee Re: Stipulation of Loan Business for Consumers as a Contract-Controlled Business B.E. 2565 (2022) was published in the Government Gazette on December 13, 2022, and will take effect after 90 days (i.e., on March 13, 2023).

The notification repeals and replaces the Contract Committee’s previous notifications regarding the same subject matter, which were issued in 2001 (Nos. 1–2), 2002 (No. 3), and 2015 (No. 4). The notification enhances protection for consumers by extending the scope of application and stringently regulating the content of agreements for loans to individual consumers.

Key Definitions

The scope of the notification is largely indicated by its definitions of a few key terms:

  • “Loan business for consumers” refers to a business in which the operator enters into an agreement to grant a loan to a consumer (i.e., not a juristic person) or to allow the consumer to borrow money from the business operator, whereby the consumer will spend money for a purpose other than their occupation or business to earn income. This includes granting loans to consumers through an electronic channel. The notification can also apply to personal loan businesses, digital loan businesses, and peer-to-peer lending businesses regulated by the Bank of Thailand.
  • “Business operators” include financial institutions under the law relating to financial institutions; banks established under specific laws; individuals who carry out a loan business in their ordinary course of business; and juristic persons that engage in loan business, securitization business, or asset management of rights to monetary claim. Certain types of businesses and organizations—such as cooperatives—are excluded from the scope of this notification.
  • “Interest” means legal interest in accordance with the Civil and Commercial Code, and it includes compensation, profits, and other benefits with the same characteristics as legal interest, regardless of name.

Required Loan Agreement Content

The notification requires that the loan agreement be clearly legible in Thai language, and it must be executed in two copies for both the lender and the borrower. The font size must not be smaller than two millimeters, with no more than 11 characters within one inch. The details that must be stipulated in the agreement include:

  • Interest rate and other expenses together with calculation formula;
  • Details about collection fees and expenses;
  • Conditions on default—in bold, italic or underlined text, or otherwise made more clearly visible than other terms and conditions;
  • Conditions for assignment of rights to claim repayment;
  • Conditions for payment in installments;
  • Notification duties and address to receive notifications by post or email;
  • Data protection rules, especially in case of disclosure of personal data to a third party; and
  • Conditions on guarantee by person.

If the loan agreement gives the lender the right to adjust the interest rate, the lender must notify all borrowers concerned in writing by registered post or email regarding any interest rate adjustment, depending on circumstances as stipulated in the Contract Committee’s notification.

Prohibited Loan Agreement Content

The Contract Committee’s notification prohibits the loan agreement from including certain clauses that provide excessive benefits to the lender, including:

  • Restriction or exemption of liabilities of the lender in case of its default.
  • Allowing the lender to claim for outstanding debt or call for repayment before the due date of the repayment period when the borrower is not in default.
  • Allowing the lender to terminate the agreement without written notification.
  • Allowing the lender to adjust the interest rate, fees, or expenses unless otherwise permitted under this notification.
  • Requiring the borrower to apply for insurance, except for a housing loan or loan with collateral.
  • Granting the lender the right to charge a penalty or fees before the due date for receiving payment has passed in accordance with the period specified in the agreement, except in certain circumstances prescribed in this notification.

Online, electronic, and digital loan businesses must also comply with this notification and ensure that the content of loan agreements complies with the specified requirements and prohibitions. Operators of platforms that act as an intermediary, such as peer-to-peer lending, must facilitate the distribution of loan agreements to the concerned parties (particularly the borrower).

Grandfather Clause

The provisions under this notification do not apply to loan agreements executed before the new notification’s effective date (i.e., March 13, 2023), which would have to be in accordance with the Contract Committee’s previous notification on consumer loans.

As the new notification has an extensive scope of application and notable requirements and prohibitions, business operators—particularly nonfinancial institutions—should prepare for these more rigid provisions and review their draft loan agreements to ensure full compliance.

For more information or advice on the notification’s requirements, review of draft loan agreements, or any other aspect of consumer lending in Thailand, please contact Nutavit Sirikan at [email protected].

Related Professionals

Practices

Banking and Finance

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 9, 2026
When unauthorized credit card transactions occur, who bears responsibility—the cardholder or the issuing bank? In Thailand, a landmark 2025 ruling by the country’s Supreme Court has clarified this question, establishing a stricter standard for banks in fraud disputes and significantly strengthening consumer protections. The case centered on disputed charges where a customer claimed their credit card had been used without authorization. The bank sued to recover the amount, and both the court of first instance and the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of the bank. However, the Supreme Court overruled their judgments and decided that the customer did not need to pay for the unauthorized transactions, placing liability squarely on the bank. This ruling was based on three key findings, which are outlined below. Finding 1: Insufficient Expert Testimony In this case, the bank bore the burden of proving matters related to the credit card system’s manufacture, design, security, and operation, as required under the Consumer Case Procedure Act B.E. 2551 (2008). To meet this requirement, the bank presented testimony from two employees in its credit card department regarding ’security measures and issuance procedures. However, the Supreme Court found these witnesses unqualified as experts, as they did not present technical or academic evidence and did not possess specialized expertise in credit card technology. As a result, their testimony failed to establish that the bank’s credit card technology was sufficiently secure against fraudulent misuse. Finding 2: Contradictory Terms and Conditions The bank’s own credit card terms and conditions included a provision acknowledging that despite the card’s EMV security standards, cardholders must still exercise caution to prevent unauthorized access. The Supreme Court interpreted this clause as an explicit admission that credit card systems remain vulnerable to hacking and fraud, even with high-level security measures in place. This acknowledgment undermined the
Read More
February 4, 2026
On November 18, 2025, Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance released for public consultation a draft decree on administrative sanctions in the field of crypto assets and crypto asset markets (the “Draft Decree”), intended to implement Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP dated September 9, 2025, on the pilot crypto asset market in Vietnam (“Resolution 05”). While Resolution 05 sets out who may participate and under what conditions, the Draft Decree addresses a more practical question for market participants, i.e., what happens if those conditions are not met. In doing so, the Draft Decree offers important insight into how Vietnamese regulators intend to supervise, discipline, and ultimately shape the crypto market during the pilot phase. Regulatory Scope and Overall Sanctions Architecture The Draft Decree applies to both domestic and foreign organizations and individuals engaging in crypto-related activities in Vietnam’s market. Covered entities include: (i) crypto asset issuers; (ii) crypto asset service providers, including trading platforms and market operators; (iii) Vietnamese and foreign investors participating in the pilot market; and (iv) other organizations involved in the offering, issuance, or provision of crypto-related services in Vietnam. The breadth of this scope is deliberate. It appears to reflect a regulatory view that cross-border structures, offshore platforms, and indirect participation may not necessarily insulate market actors from compliance obligations once they operate within the pilot framework. For the crypto industry, this may mark a shift from regulatory ambiguity toward a more explicit articulation of jurisdictional reach. At first glance, the Draft Decree’s monetary penalties appear restrained. The maximum fine per administrative violation is capped at VND 200 million (approx. USD 7,700) for organizations and VND 100 million (approx. USD 3,800) for individuals. However, focusing solely on fine levels risks missing the point. The Draft Decree also places great regulatory weight on supplementary sanctions and corrective measures, including: (i)
Read More
January 23, 2026
On December 31, 2025, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Circular No. 72/2025/TT-NHNN (Circular 72), establishing a streamlined foreign exchange framework for Vietnam’s International Financial Center (IFC). Circular 72, which took effect on the same day, implements core provisions of Decree No. 329/2025/ND-CP and marks a fundamental shift from ex ante licensing to ex post supervision for IFC member enterprises and foreign investors. These changes are designed to accelerate capital flows, reduce compliance costs, and position Vietnam as a competitive regional financial hub by granting IFC members substantially greater autonomy in currency transactions, borrowing, lending, and investment activities. Key provisions for IFC members to note are discussed below. Use of Foreign Currency and Payments within the IFC Vietnam generally requires the use of Vietnamese dong for transactions within the country, with limited exceptions. This can be burdensome for foreign investors, who may be unfamiliar with all the foreign exchange rules they must comply with. Under the new regulation, IFC member enterprises and foreign investors gain the ability to transact, list prices, and settle obligations in foreign currency when dealing with other IFC members or offshore counterparties, avoiding currency risk and conversion friction. With respect to individuals and organizations located within Vietnam who are not IFC members, the use of foreign currency must continue to comply with general restrictions on foreign exchange usage within Vietnam. Dual-Track Account System for IFC Members The new regulation introduces a two-tier account structure that differentiates transactions by purpose and counterparty. IFC member enterprises must use a designated foreign currency capital account at an IFC member bank for four specified activities: Borrowing from offshore individuals and organizations Lending to offshore entities and domestic borrowers Outbound investing from the IFC Investing elsewhere in Vietnam from the IFC All other foreign exchange transactions—including operational receipts, vendor
Read More
January 22, 2026
On January 20, 2026, Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance (MOF) issued Decision No. 96/QD-BTC to formally launch pilot administrative procedures for licensing crypto asset trading market services in Vietnam. The decision took immediate effect and implements the government’s pilot crypto asset market program under Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP. Notably, competent authorities have now begun accepting license applications, marking the first time Vietnam has operationalized a licensing pathway for crypto trading market operators. Administrative Procedures and Applications The decision stipulates procedures for (i) granting, (ii) adjusting, and (iii) revoking licenses to provide services for organizing crypto asset trading markets. It provides detailed, step-by-step guidance for each procedure, including dossier composition, internal review stages, coordination mechanisms, and statutory timelines. These procedures apply specifically to entities seeking to organize and operate crypto asset trading markets within Vietnam’s pilot regulatory framework. The MOF is the authority responsible for reviewing and deciding on the above procedures, with the State Securities Commission acting as the receiving, coordinating, and procedural focal point. For licensing applications, the MOF will coordinate with multiple authorities, including the State Bank of Vietnam and the Ministry of Public Security, particularly in relation to anti-money laundering, cybersecurity, system safety, and risk control requirements. Applications may be submitted in person, by post, or electronically via the National Public Service Portal or the administrative procedure information system, in line with applicable regulations. Statutory processing timelines vary depending on the specific procedure and stage involved. For applications to obtain a license to organize a crypto asset trading market, the process is conducted in multiple phases: The MOF will issue an initial written response within 20 working days from receipt of a complete and valid initial dossier, following which, upon submission of the full set of required documents, the MOF will complete substantive review and issue the license
Read More